📰 Reason · 90
United StatesVance on the clock with Iran deal under fire
Vice President Kamala Harris is now officially on the clock to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran, following a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that failed to extract significant concessions from Tehran. Harris defended President Trump's preliminary deal during a White House briefing, stating that the 60-day clock for further talks would begin today. She attempted to downplay controversial provisions of the MOU, including the immediate lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil exports and the eventual creation of a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran. Harris was scheduled to travel to Geneva,
US Details, Defends 14-Point Iran Plan It Has Yet to Publish
Senior U.S. officials have described and defended the key elements of a proposed 14-point agreement with Iran aimed at initiating broader peace negotiations. The agreement was electronically signed by both sides on Sunday but has not yet been officially published by the U.S. government. A U.S. official, speaking anonymously, provided details of the agreement, while another indicated that Iran might release the memorandum of understanding shortly.
U.S. and Iran peace talks postponed and U.K. PM Keir Starmer braces for leadership battle: Morning Rundown
Peace talks between the U.S. and Iran have been postponed following Vice President JD Vance's cancellation of a planned trip to Switzerland. This decision comes amid intensified Israeli strikes in Lebanon, which have raised concerns about the future of efforts to end the ongoing conflict. The talks were meant to begin a 60-day negotiation period aimed at resolving key long-term issues and achieving a permanent cessation of hostilities. Switzerland's foreign ministry confirmed that the meeting at the Bürgenstock resort will not proceed, though no specific reason for the postponement has been给出.
Juneteenth becomes America's quiet holiday as DEI goes underground
Juneteenth continues to be observed as a federal holiday despite the decline in corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives following 2020. While some cities have scaled back or canceled events due to reduced sponsorships and funding, the holiday remains in place and cannot be unilaterally revoked by the president. Former President Donald Trump has taken symbolic steps to reduce its prominence, such as removing it from the National Park Service's free-entry calendar and declining to issue a Juneteenth proclamation in 2025.
Guns, Aliens, Indians, Registration Numbers, and John Jay
The article discusses a legal case involving Isaac Craghtten, a Canadian-born American Indian who attempted to purchase a firearm in Idaho but was denied due to lacking an alien registration or admission number required by the federal Firearm Transaction Record Form 4473. The Ninth Circuit upheld the requirement, stating it does not violate the Second Amendment.
The law that Citizenship Clause litigation forgot: the 1872 Oregon Territory citizenship statute
The article discusses an overlooked piece of legislation—the 1872 Oregon Territory citizenship statute—that could be relevant to current legal debates surrounding the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment. It references a guest post by Elliott Wainwright, who notes that this statute was not considered in past major cases like United States v. Wong Kim Ark or Elk v. Wilkins. The article highlights how the statute might inform ongoing discussions about the citizenship status of individuals born outside tribal lands but within U.S. territories.
Did California's Gubernatorial Race Reveal the Limits of 'Abundance' Politics on the Left?
The article discusses the 2022 California gubernatorial race, highlighting the lack of prominent candidates and the impact of the top-two primary system. It notes the unexpected performance of Matt Mahan, a reform-minded candidate from San Jose, and mentions his alignment with the 'abundance' agenda, a policy approach that emphasizes market-driven solutions. The author, a self-described free-market classical liberal, acknowledges the potential value of this agenda within Democratic circles.
Graham Platner - Yes, Collins usually votes with Trump, as Platner said. But she broke with him at key moments.
Senator Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, typically votes in alignment with former President Donald Trump, supporting his positions approximately 95% of the time in 2025, according to CQ Roll Call. This figure was slightly lower during Trump's first term, at around 90%. Despite this alignment, Collins has occasionally opposed Trump on significant issues. Her campaign emphasizes bipartisan values, reflected by the frequent use of the term 'bipartisan' on her official website. However, her Democratic opponent, Graham Platner, criticized her for being a 'rubber stamp' for Trump, questioning
Slate Crossword: Head of Greens That Outlasted the Head of the Tories (15 Letters)
The article text provided does not contain any substantive content related to the headline 'Slate Crossword: Head of Greens That Outlasted the Head of the Tories (15 Letters).' The visible text appears to be a message requesting users to disable their ad blockers or subscribe to support Slate's journalism.
Survey: More Americans Are Carrying Concealed Guns
A survey by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, found that the percentage of Americans carrying concealed guns has increased since 2024. According to the survey, 13.2% of respondents carry guns all or most of the time, while an additional 16.6% carry them sometimes or rarely. This brings the total percentage of individuals carrying concealed weapons to 29.8%, up from 24.3% previously. The report notes that obtaining a concealed-carry permit appears to influence the frequency of carrying.
Alleged mastermind behind foiled UFC terror plot is an Obama-era 'Dreamer' in U.S. illegally
The Department of Homeland Security announced that Abraham Alvarez, an undocumented Mexican national who benefited from the Obama-era DACA program, was the alleged mastermind behind a foiled terror plot targeting the UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House. Alvarez entered the U.S. in 2001 on a tourist visa, which expired, but he remained in the country. He was granted deferred action under DACA in 2014. Prosecutors allege Alvarez planned to attack President Trump and other high-profile individuals using explosive drones and snipers. Four other suspects were also charged in connection with a
Review: The Short Life of a Formerly Enslaved Poet
The article reviews historian David Waldstreicher's book about Phillis Wheatley, an enslaved African girl brought to America at age 7 who became a prominent poet and advocate for freedom. It highlights her agency, her interactions with historical figures like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, and contrasts her portrayal with the traditional narrative of her being a passive genius under the control of her enslavers.
Supreme Court’s narrow gun decision kindles divisions, more questions
The Supreme Court issued a unanimous but narrow ruling on gun rights, finding that the government cannot criminalize firearm possession based solely on marijuana use. While the decision was technically unanimous, internal divisions among the justices were evident. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito and liberal Justice Elena Kagan both expressed concerns that the court's opinion extended too far. Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor signaled potential challenges to the conservative framework for evaluating gun rights. Justice Clarence Thomas suggested a desire to invalidate
AI Agents and the CFAA: Amazon.Com Services v. Perplexity AI
The article discusses a legal case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), focusing on whether using AI agents to assist with purchases on Amazon constitutes a federal hacking crime. The case, Amazon.com Services v. Perplexity AI, is currently at the preliminary injunction stage. The article outlines the core legal question and provides links to both parties' briefs and oral arguments. It also references previous commentary by the author on interpreting the CFAA, suggesting an 'agency test' for determining authorization in shared password scenarios.
Headlines for June 10, 2026
The provided text appears to be a donation appeal from Democracy Now!, an independent news organization based in the United States. The content includes a call for financial support from listeners and readers, emphasizing the non-commercial nature of the outlet and its commitment to covering important issues such as war, climate change, and inequality without influence from corporate sponsors.
Who Speaks For The Majority In Hunter v. United States?
The article discusses the Supreme Court case Hunter v. United States, highlighting the split among justices in their opinions. Justice Kagan delivered the majority opinion, while Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett issued separate concurrences. Gorsuch's concurrence criticized plea bargaining, while Kavanaugh's challenged Gorsuch's stance. Kagan avoided referencing the concurrences, maintaining the majority position.
Chief Judge Pryor's Non-Order in the Eleanor Ross Judicial Misconduct Proceedings: Why It Is So Problematic and What Might Be Done About It
The article discusses concerns regarding Chief Judge Pryor's handling of judicial misconduct proceedings against Federal District Judge Eleanor Ross. It raises questions about Pryor's authority in deciding not to pursue further investigation after Judge Ross made a private reprimand public. The author highlights procedural issues and suggests that these actions may undermine the Judicial Council's agreement with Judge Ross.
UK unveils sweeping social media ban for users under 16
The U.K. government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, plans to implement a ban on social media use for individuals under 16 years old. This measure applies to major platforms such as Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X. Messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal will remain unaffected. Additionally, AI-based 'romantic companion' chatbots will be restricted to users aged 18 and older. The U.K. claims this regulation will be more extensive than any previously enacted by other nations. Other countries, including Australia, Canada, France, and Denmark, are also exploring similar
Disclosing One's HIV+ Status Isn't Criminal Harassment of Ex
A court in Arizona ruled that a father's disclosure of his HIV-positive status on social media cannot be considered criminal harassment. The case involved a dispute between a mother and father who previously dated and had a child together. The mother had posted about HIV-negative patches online, prompting the father to reveal his HIV status and his past relationship with the mother. The court determined that the father's post was protected free speech and overturned the protective order against him.
A New Bipartisan Bill Promises Innovation and Choice. It Will Deliver Neither.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers has reintroduced the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which aims to regulate 'systemically important platforms' such as Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft. The article argues that AICOA would hinder innovation and competition rather than promote it, by restricting common business practices like self-preferencing and product bundling. Critics argue the bill undermines existing antitrust frameworks and could make it harder for platforms to compete.
Plaintiff Can't Litigate Claim That "Security Clearance Process" Was Used "as a Pretextual Weapon to Execute an Ideological Purge"
A federal court in the Middle District of Florida ruled in Reilly v. U.S. Attorney General that a plaintiff cannot litigate claims alleging that the security clearance process was used as a 'pretextual weapon' to carry out an ideological purge. The court emphasized the tension between individual rights under the First and Fifth Amendments and the executive branch's authority over national security matters. It cited precedent, including Department of Navy v. Egan (1988), which limits judicial review of security clearance determinations.
Trump's fight with Anthropic is now a fight over cybersecurity
The Trump administration's restrictions on Anthropic's AI models have raised concerns among cybersecurity experts about potential negative impacts on U.S. cyber defenses. Prominent security leaders, including former Facebook security chief Alex Stamos, have criticized the administration's actions, warning that they could discourage American AI companies from developing tools that help identify and fix vulnerabilities. An open letter signed by nearly 150 security professionals called for the reversal of these restrictions. The dispute arose following Anthropic's release of its first Mythos-5 AI
ICE Says It's Moved Detainees Out of 'Alligator Alcatraz' For Hurricane Season
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirmed that detainees have been moved out of the 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center in the Florida Everglades ahead of hurricane season. The move follows reports by Florida news outlet WINK News that all detainees had been relocated. A DHS spokesperson provided the same statement to Reason, but did not answer follow-up questions regarding whether the facility is now empty or if it will reopen after the hurricane season. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis stated that the camp was intended as a temporary measure to assist with increased immigration-enfо
Trump Has Used Taxpayer Money To Purchase Stakes in Dozens of Companies. Congress Is About to Make It Easier.
The article discusses how former President Donald Trump used taxpayer money to acquire stakes in numerous companies and highlights a proposed provision in the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act that would establish a slush fund allowing the Department of Defense to invest up to $500 million in private firms involved in critical industries such as battery production. The provision permits various forms of investment including equity stakes, warrants, and revenue-sharing agreements.
Trump's shadow AI policy
The Trump administration initially advocated for minimal government involvement in the AI industry, opposing regulations that could hinder innovation. However, rather than implementing a clear regulatory framework, the administration has resorted to a series of ad hoc interventions, voluntary guidelines, and executive actions. This approach has created a 'shadow AI policy' that influences the industry without formal rules. While Congress has attempted to address AI governance, legislative progress remains stalled due to upcoming midterm elections, allowing the administration to take the lead.
A Slow Thursday At The Court
The author recounts their experience attending the Supreme Court on a day when a large number of people sought bar admissions. They describe the unusual crowd, the limited seating, and the announcement of Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion in Hemani. Gorsuch's comments on the government's argument and historical references to John Adams and James Madison are noted. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion in Hunter v. Un.
Colorado Gun Owners Sue Over New Law Allowing Warrantless Access to Dealer Records
A group of Colorado gun owners and firearms associations have sued the state over a new law requiring firearms dealers to allow warrantless inspections of their sales records by 'duly authorized peace officers.' The law, signed by Governor Jared Polis, mandates detailed record-keeping for all firearm transactions and imposes penalties for non-compliance. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the Fourth Amendment by allowing unrestricted access without warrants or probable cause.
The Most Interesting Supreme Court Opinion Line-Up You Will See This Year
The Supreme Court ruled in T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp., deciding on the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents federal district courts from reviewing state court decisions. The Court ruled 5-4 in favor of upholding the dismissal of the case, with Justice Sotomayor writing the majority opinion. The decision highlights the ideological alignment of the justices, with Sotomayor joined by Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Jackson.
Americans Still Believe in the Founding—and Want Schools To Teach Capitalism
A new survey by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) found that 82% of Americans support teaching the benefits of free markets in high schools. The study highlights strong bipartisan support for teaching the principles of the Founding Fathers, with 92% of Republicans and 77% of Democrats agreeing it is 'more important than ever' to teach students about the founding history. However, there is a generational gap, with baby boomers showing stronger approval of the Founding compared to Gen Z. The article mentions a controversial A.P. U.S. History curriculum in Florida that presents the Founding
Feds Nab Nearly A Dozen Illegal Aliens Tied To Massive Fraud Scheme
Federal authorities arrested 11 undocumented immigrants in Massachusetts linked to a benefit fraud scheme exceeding $1 million. The Justice Department charged a total of 15 individuals, including the 11 undocumented immigrants, with fraud. Some defendants are referred to as 'John Does' due to stolen identities. Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald stated that investigators are still determining the true identities of the unnamed suspects, emphasizing that they are not U.S. citizens and used false identities to access taxpayer-funded benefits. McDonald noted that legitimate American公民s,
Who Can't Afford Food?
The article critiques the current discourse around affordability in the United States, pointing out that media outlets such as NPR, Fortune, and Axios have highlighted concerns over rising costs of living and the emergence of policies described as 'sewer socialism.' The author explains that 'sewer socialism' is an older term being used to describe a shift toward universal welfare-style policies rather than means-tested support. The piece argues that these discussions often conflate different issues related to cost of living and quality of life, particularly in urban areas.
Two New Large Libel Models Lawsuits, Though Alleging Mischaracterization Rather Than Outright Hallucination
The article discusses two new lawsuits involving large language models accused of libel, focusing on claims of mischaracterization rather than outright fabrication. These cases are described as the eighth and ninth of their kind in U.S. courts. Unlike prior cases that involved alleged hallucinations or document merges, these lawsuits argue that AI outputs have overstated allegations found in source documents, a common issue in traditional libel cases against media outlets. The article also references a separate case where the SEC charged Sergii Grybniak with securities violations, resulting in
The War on Economic Growth Is a War on the Poor
The article discusses the Global Justice Report by the World Inequality Lab, which advocates for capping economic growth in wealthy nations, implementing high-income tax rates, and establishing a global fund to redistribute wealth to poorer countries. It argues that economic growth is essential for reducing poverty, citing historical data showing that all countries that have lifted their populations out of poverty have done so through economic growth. The article critiques the report's stance as a radical expression of a widely held view among some development economists.
Libel by "Buddy Comedy"
A playwright has filed a libel lawsuit against theater critic Zachary Stewart and TheaterMania, alleging that Stewart's review mischaracterized their serious historical drama as a 'buddy comedy.' The plaintiff argues that this description was false and malicious, driven by Stewart's alleged anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian biases. The play addresses heavy themes including the Holocaust, the founding of Israel, the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, and racial injustice.
Supreme Court will decide whether criminal cases must have 12 jurors in Florida case
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether states can use six-person juries in criminal cases instead of the traditional 12. The case involves Hamed Kian, a Florida chiropractor convicted of continuing to practice despite having a suspended license. Kian's legal team argues that a six-person jury violates the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a trial by an impartial jury. Florida and five other states currently use six-person juries for certain criminal cases.
Trump Says 'Russia Should Make a Deal', His Focus on Ukraine Now Iran Deal Done, at G7 Summit
At the G7 summit in Evian, France, former U.S. President Donald Trump stated that the Iran issue is now behind him and emphasized the need for Russia to make a deal to end the Ukraine War. He highlighted the heavy casualties in the conflict, noting that both Russia and Ukraine have suffered significant losses. Trump met separately with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and discussed potential future bilateral meetings. During a separate session with the Emir of Qatar, Trump focused on the Iran situation but reiterated his stance on seeking a resolution in Ukraine.
1776 All-Stars: Why a Pseudonymous Anti-Federalist Is My Favorite Founder
The article discusses 'A Farmer,' a pseudonymous Anti-Federalist writer from 1788 who opposed the proposed U.S. Constitution due to concerns over centralized federal power. The author highlights 'A Farmer's' advocacy for a decentralized democracy inspired by Swiss cantons, his calls for a bill of rights, and his skepticism toward standing armies. While acknowledging some of 'A Farmer's' controversial views—such as support for sumptuary laws and property-based voting—the article recognizes his contributions to early American political discourse.
In Lawsuit Over Construction Raids, DHS Official Testifies ICE Agents Can't Trust REAL IDs
In a federal court hearing in Mobile, Alabama, Philip Lavoie, an acting assistant special agent with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), testified that REAL IDs 'can be unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship.' This testimony was part of a civil rights lawsuit filed by Leo Garcia Venegas, an Alabama construction worker and U.S. citizen, who has been detained multiple times by immigration officers despite his citizenship status. The case centers on whether immigration agents can ignore government-issued IDs when detaining individuals suspected of being undocumented immigrants.
The Best Way To Keep Data Centers From Driving Up Electricity Costs
The article discusses public opposition to data centers due to concerns about rising electricity costs and resource usage. It references a poll showing widespread disapproval of building new data centers near residential areas. While acknowledging that data centers do not consume significant amounts of drinking water, the article notes ongoing debate about their impact on electricity prices. It cites research indicating a slight, statistically insignificant correlation between data centers and rising electricity prices, while also noting instances where new data centers coincide with lower电价.
Steven Spielberg's Disclosure Day Has Some Strange Assumptions About the Media
The article discusses Steven Spielberg's film 'Disclosure Day,' comparing it to internet memes and the 'ancient aliens' theory popularized by the History Channel. It notes that while the film's plot involves aliens existing since the 1940s and a government cover-up, these elements are revealed early in the movie. The focus is on the narrative structure and how it aligns with familiar tropes.
"The President is Legally Barred from Waiving Iranian Sanctions as Pledged in the Iran [Memorandum of Understanding]"
An article discusses whether the U.S. president has the legal authority to waive Iranian sanctions as pledged in the Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). It references Professor Jack Goldsmith of Harvard, who argues that the president is legally barred from issuing such waivers under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA) of 2015. The article notes that while the executive branch may have counterarguments, compliance with INARA is uncertain.
New York City Has a History of Public Bathroom Failures. Will This New Plan Flush Away More Tax Dollars?
New York City has faced ongoing challenges with public bathrooms, including high costs and poor maintenance. Recently, the city awarded a $4 million contract to Throne Labs Inc. to install and maintain 17 new bathrooms. This comes after previous projects, such as a $4.7 million restroom in Ferry Point Park, which took 12 years to complete and was often inaccessible during winter. Former officials have criticized the inefficiencies and delays in these projects.
Over 100,000 Kids Have Died Due to Greenpeace Blocking Genetically Enhanced Rice, New Calculation Shows
The article discusses the impact of Greenpeace's opposition to Golden Rice, a genetically modified crop designed to combat vitamin A deficiency. According to research by Abi Olvera, this opposition has led to an estimated 106,000 child deaths and between 210,000 to 425,000 cases of blindness. The analysis focuses on 11 countries where rice is a major dietary component. The World Health Organization estimates that 250,000–500,000 children with vitamin A deficiency become blind annually, with half dying within a year of losing their sight.
Louisiana Cops Threatened To Arrest a Man for Handing Out Religious Leaflets. They Got Qualified Immunity.
Richard Hershey was threatened with arrest by Louisiana police for handing out religious leaflets in a public park. The officers claimed he needed to stop, despite his assertion that he was exercising his First Amendment rights. A court ruled that the officers were protected by qualified immunity, preventing Hershey from suing them. He now seeks Supreme Court intervention to challenge this ruling.
How Worried Should We Be About a Socialist Mayor in D.C.?
The article discusses the potential victory of D.C. Councilmember Janeese Lewis George, a self-described socialist, in the Democratic mayoral primary. Initial results show her leading with 52% of the vote, with former Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie trailing at 36%. The article notes that progressive candidates have also performed well in down-ballot races. It highlights Lewis George's left-wing policy proposals, including universal childcare, social housing, business tax increases, and a more activist City Hall. The author expresses mixed feelings about the implications of these developments.
England Fans Warned Not To Chant 'Keir Starmer's a Wanker' at World Cup
England fans traveling to the World Cup in Dallas are being cautioned against chanting politically charged slogans, such as 'Keir Starmer's a Wanker,' due to FIFA regulations prohibiting political, offensive, or discriminatory expressions within stadiums. While FIFA enforces these rules inside venues, fans are free to express such sentiments outside of matches.
Adam Schiff Wants Federal Tax Credits for Movie and TV Production
The article discusses Senator Adam Schiff's proposal for a federal film production tax credit aimed at helping the American movie and television industry compete with other regions offering financial incentives. It notes that Hollywood has not fully recovered from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and that many productions have moved overseas due to higher costs in Los Angeles. The piece references comments from Gene Maddaus of Variety, who highlights the challenges faced by Hollywood, including high labor costs and competition from other locations.
Pennsylvania S. Ct. Finds Pattern of "Lack of Candor" in Philadelphia D.A. Krasner's Filings Urging Reversal of Murder Convictions
A Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling in Commonwealth v. Brown found a pattern of 'lack of candor' in filings by District Attorney Larry Krasner, who sought reversals of murder convictions. The court emphasized that prosecutors should not unilaterally concede relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), as this undermines the adversarial process and risks erroneous grants of relief. The opinion, authored by Justice Kevin Dougherty, highlights concerns over the potential for misrepresentation and lack of opposing advocacy when prosecutors support defendants.
Tulsi Gabbard's Not-So-Shocking Revelation of U.S.-Funded Veterinary Biolabs in Ukraine
The article discusses claims made by Russian officials and some American right-wing figures, including former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, regarding the existence of U.S.-funded biolaboratories in Ukraine. These claims were used to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The article notes that such allegations have been repeated by individuals like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon, while also pointing out that Russia itself has obstructed investigations into the origin of the COVID-19 virus.
How the FDA Created a Peptide Black Market
The article discusses the growing popularity of peptides, which are claimed to offer various health benefits such as increased energy, improved metabolism, clearer skin, slowed aging, enhanced muscle growth, and injury recovery. However, most peptides are banned by the FDA due to concerns over safety and efficacy. Anita Gupta, an anesthesiologist and pharmacist involved in the FDA's decision-making process, highlights the lack of regulation and verification of peptide products, leading to uncertainty about their actual contents. The article notes that the FDA's restrictions have driven the U.S
Brickbat: Keeping a List
The text provided is primarily promotional content from Reason, a US-based publication known for libertarian perspectives. It includes multiple calls-to-action encouraging donations to support 'free minds and free markets,' emphasizing the importance of fact-based reporting and challenging 'socialist ideas.' The content does not present a specific news event or story but rather serves as fundraising material.
Anti-G7 protest turns violent as demonstrators torch Tesla and smash UN office windows
Anti-G7 protesters in Geneva turned violent during a demonstration against an upcoming G7 summit in France. Protesters set a Tesla vehicle on fire and smashed windows at a United Nations agency. The protest began peacefully but escalated when demonstrators threw bricks at police, leading to the deployment of tear gas. Demonstrators targeted symbols of capitalism and multilateralism, including the Tesla and the UN building. This follows Elon Musk becoming the world's first trillionaire.
Texas Landowners Face a Difficult Decision: Allow Border Wall or Lose Right to Property
Texas landowners along the U.S.-Mexico border are being pressured by federal authorities to allow access to their property for potential border wall construction. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued Right of Entry for Construction (ROE-C) letters offering financial incentives in exchange for access to private land. Refusal could lead to legal action or eminent domain proceedings. Some landowners feel compelled to accept the offer due to limited resources to contest such actions.
What 1976 Got Right About America
This article discusses a conversation between Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie reflecting on the 1976 bicentennial celebrations and their relevance today. Topics include the unexpected success of the bicentennial due to local efforts, the cultural impact of 'Roots' and 'The Bad News Bears,' the 1976 Montreal Olympics, Cold War dynamics, and discussions on American identity and patriotism.
Carded Before Sexting?
The U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has proposed that technology companies implement device controls to prevent minors from sending and receiving sexually explicit images. The article argues that this proposal poses significant risks to adult privacy and highlights the lack of straightforward solutions for tech companies to comply without invasive measures such as heavy monitoring of messages and potential breaches of encryption.
Turn to Europe
The article discusses speculation about former U.S. President Donald Trump potentially shifting focus to Russia's conflict in Ukraine, referencing his past actions in regions like the Caribbean and Iran. It mentions Trump's comments at the G7 summit regarding Ukraine and his interactions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
KBJ Just Blasted Amy Coney Barrett’s “Contempt” for Congress
The article discusses a recent Supreme Court decision where the Republican-appointed justices weakened a statute protecting investors by preventing them from suing when certain funds break the law. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion dismissed the idea that Congress intended to allow injured parties to sue under the statute, despite clear legislative intent. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a dissenting opinion criticizing the majority for showing 'contempt' for Congress and undermining democracy.
Can Employer Fire You for Self-Defense on the Job?
The article discusses a legal case in Colorado where a 72-year-old employee, Mary Ann Moreno, was fired after using self-defense against an armed robber during her shift. The Colorado Supreme Court is considering whether this action constitutes a violation of public policy, potentially creating an exception to the at-will employment doctrine. The court references previous cases and evaluates whether the right to self-defense, as outlined in state statutes and the constitution, qualifies as a protected right under existing legal standards.
Bipartisan JAWBONE Act Targets Government Censorship Threats
The article discusses the bipartisan JAWBONE Act, aimed at addressing concerns about government 'jawboning,' where officials exert undue influence on private entities. It highlights the efforts of Senators Ted Cruz and Ron Wyden to increase transparency around government communications with private parties and hold officials accountable if they cross ethical boundaries. The piece argues that reducing government power and increasing oversight are key solutions to prevent coercion.
Columbia Anti-Israel Activist Ordered Deported
A federal immigration judge ordered the deportation of Mohsen Mahdawi, an anti-Israel activist and Columbia University graduate, following the abandonment of his asylum claim. Mahdawi, originally from the Judea and Samaria area, had been arrested by ICE during a citizenship interview in March 2025. His deportation case was initially dismissed in February 2026, but the federal government appealed, leading to the reinstatement of removal proceedings. Mahdawi co-founded the Palestinian Student Union at Columbia University with another activist facing similar legal action.
Mississippi 1-year-old killed after police shoot at car during alleged shoplifting call
A 1-year-old boy named Kohen Wiley was killed when police shot at a vehicle during a shoplifting incident at a Walmart in Senatobia, Mississippi. The child was in the car with his mother and a family friend, who was critically injured. Civil rights attorney Ben Crump stated that the mother had informed the officers about the presence of a baby in the car but was not charged with any crime. The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation reported that police encountered individuals fleeing from the store and attempted to stop the vehicle, which then drove toward them before being shot at. The driver, a
The Coroner "Kept Several Skulls as Trophies from the Deceased He Examined"
The article discusses a legal case involving Wesley Hyland, the former coroner of Boone County, Illinois, who retained several skulls, including that of Louise Betts, as trophies. The Betts family later sued the county under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the county is not liable under Monell v. Department of Social Services because state law mandates that coroners return bodily remains to families, and Hyland's actions did not establish an 'official policy.'
Robocalls Are Annoying. Eroding Privacy Is Not the Right Way To Stop Them.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is proposing a new rule requiring phone service providers to collect additional personal information from customers, including names, addresses, government-issued ID numbers, and alternate phone numbers. The goal is to combat robocalls by making it harder for individuals to use burner phones anonymously. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has emphasized stopping robocalls as a top consumer protection priority.
Sports Fans Don't Complain Their Championship-Winning Team Employs Too Many Immigrants
The article discusses how immigrants contribute to sports teams' success, using examples from the NBA Finals and the World Cup. It highlights OG Anunoby's crucial play in the Knicks' victory and Folarin Balogun's impact on the U.S. national team, noting that birthright citizenship allows players like Balogun to represent the U.S. despite being born abroad.
Pick Your YIMBY
The article discusses the Washington, D.C. mayoral race, focusing on the competition between Democratic candidates Janeese Lewis George and Kenyan McDuffie. Both candidates emphasize support for increasing housing supply, but the article highlights potential contradictions in their positions. It also covers other related topics such as zoning issues affecting homeless shelters, challenges to affordable housing initiatives in Phoenix, and a proposed federal bill to relax 'Buy America' requirements for federally funded housing.
"Needless Cost Increases" from "Both Counsels' Choices to Follow the Path of Most Resistance"
In the case Doe v. Thomas, Judge April Perry of the Northern District of Illinois denied the plaintiff's motion for a protective order, citing duplication with an existing motion before the Magistrate Judge. The court instructed that any confidential materials would be marked 'attorneys' eyes only' and provided to defense counsel, who must treat them as confidential until the Magistrate Judge rules on the protective order motion. Additionally, the defendant's 'emergency' motion to strike and for sanctions was denied, as the court found the situation did not constitute an emergency.
Court Rejects Sealing of Summary-Judgment-Related Filings in Trump Media Libel Suit Against Washington Post
A court has rejected a request by Trump Media & Tech. Group Corp. to seal summary-judgment-related filings in its defamation lawsuit against the Washington Post. The case stems from an article published by the Post that detailed a proposed merger between TMTG and Digital World Acquisition Corp. (DWAC), including details about financial arrangements involving entities linked to the adult film industry.
Disbarred Lawyer Can't Pseudonymously Challenge Her Disbarment
A disbarred lawyer attempted to file a lawsuit under the pseudonym Jane Roe but was denied by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court ruled that federal rules require the use of real names in legal complaints, emphasizing that lawsuits are public events and plaintiffs must accept public scrutiny. The case involves the lawyer's challenge to her disbarment and allegations of discrimination in the process.
The Trump Administration Wants More Tariffs To Combat 'Structural Excess Capacity.' Here's What That Means.
The article discusses the U.S. production of commercial aircraft, noting that American manufacturers like Boeing produce more planes than the domestic market can absorb. These surplus planes are exported to international buyers, benefiting both U.S. workers and foreign airlines. The article explains that this 'structural excess capacity' is not inherently negative and highlights the economic advantages it provides.
Lawyers' Bar Journal Article Discussing Their AI-Hallucination Errors Doesn't Entirely Satisfy Judge, but …
In the case Doe v. Univ. of N.C. Sys., decided by Chief Judge Martin Reidlinger, the court ordered Plaintiff's counsel to explain why they should not face sanctions for numerous errors in their submitted documents. These errors included fabricated citations, incorrect quotations, mischaracterizations of legal holdings, irrelevant case citations, and lack of proper citations. During a hearing, the Plaintiff's counsel acknowledged the mistakes, attributing them largely to improper use of AI tools and failure to verify AI-generated content, despite having certified that all statements and cites核实
A Colorado Town Will Pay $675,000 To Settle a Lawsuit After a Police Officer Shot a Family's Dog
The city of Loveland, Colorado, has agreed to pay $675,000 to settle a lawsuit involving a police officer who shot a family's dog in 2019. The lawsuit, filed in 2021, accused officer Mat Grashorn of violating the family's constitutional rights by recklessly killing their dog, Herkimer. As part of the settlement, Loveland will implement new training requirements for officers regarding handling dogs. The attorney for the family stated that the settlement amount is the highest ever paid by a police department in Colorado for a dog-shooting case.
'Unmasking, Naming, and Shaming': This Academic Freedom Group Is Pushing for Campus Censorship
The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) established the Center for the Defense of Academic Freedom (CDAF) in February 2024 with the stated goal of promoting academic freedom. However, according to reports by City Journal, the CDAF appears to be targeting civics centers on campuses that aim to introduce viewpoint diversity. In a March 2025 meeting disclosed via public records, CDAF director Isaac Kamola discussed strategies such as 'unmasking, naming, and shaming' to increase political costs and reduce the legitimacy of these centers. The article suggests that despite its focus
Even an AI-Sparked Economic Miracle Will Not Save the Federal Budget
The article discusses Silicon Valley's argument that artificial intelligence could resolve U.S. federal budget issues by increasing productivity, generating tax revenue, reducing government service costs, and controlling healthcare spending. Industry leaders such as Elon Musk suggest AI and robotics are the solution to the national debt. However, the article argues that relying on AI to achieve these outcomes is improbable, similar to previous 'easy solutions' proposed for addressing budget deficits.
Trump Sees World Cup Visitors as a Threat, But America Sees a Chance for Hospitality
The article discusses various intersections of sports and politics, including Pride Night controversies involving the San Francisco Giants, Brendan Sorsby's move from the NCAA to the NFL, Republican concerns over the cost of NFL Sunday Ticket, potential developments in LIV Golf, and Democratic attorneys general urging Formula 1 to ban nicotine pouch sponsorships.
Judge Blocks Trump’s Attempt To Rein In H-1B Visa Program
A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visa applications, ruling it unconstitutional and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The judge found that the policy exceeded the executive branch's authority to set fees and encroached on Congress's power to tax. The decision came after legal action from 20 Democrat-led states. The Trump administration plans to appeal the ruling. The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to hire skilled foreign workers temporarily, with tech and finance industries relying heavily on such
Trump's Ceasefire Definition Sounds Wrong. History Sadly Suggests Otherwise.
President Donald Trump was questioned about his understanding of the term 'ceasefire' during a press briefing regarding ongoing tensions involving the U.S., Israel, Iran, and Lebanon. Trump defined a ceasefire as a situation where parties are 'shooting in a more moderate manner,' which drew criticism from commentators who argued that his interpretation was incorrect. However, the article suggests that Trump's view might align with findings from the Ceasefire Project, a research initiative that analyzed global ceasefire data and found that only 21% of conflicts experience ceasefires, and these
Birthright Citizenship, the Common Law, and the 39th Congress
The article discusses a new academic paper analyzing the original meaning of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, focusing on its English common law origins and the debates in the 39th Congress. It references historical materials indicating that the native birth rule was inherited from English common law and was intended to repudiate the Dred Scott decision by enshrining the rule in the Constitution.
Trump, Scalia, and the Unitary Executive
The article discusses a pending U.S. Supreme Court case, Trump v. Slaughter, which examines the president's authority to fire independent federal agency heads 'at will' rather than 'for cause,' as required by current federal law. The case involves President Donald Trump's alleged removal of Rebecca Slaughter, a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner, based on political grounds rather than inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. The article suggests that if Trump prevails, a 1988 dissenting opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia could support the argument that the statutory 'ca
1776 All-Stars: Why George Mason Is Extremely Underrated
The article discusses George Mason, one of the Founding Fathers, highlighting his role in drafting the 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights, which influenced the U.S. Bill of Rights. It notes that Mason did not sign the U.S. Constitution and opposed its ratification due to concerns about individual rights. The piece acknowledges that while Mason was not the most influential Founder, his contributions are often overlooked.
Guterres welcomes US-Iran peace deal as ‘critical step’ toward ending conflict
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres praised a newly announced peace deal between the United States and Iran, describing it as a 'critical step' toward ending the ongoing conflict. The agreement includes provisions for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and a framework for future negotiations. Guterres acknowledged the contributions of several regional countries, including Pakistan, Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye, in facilitating the talks. He emphasized the importance of continuing efforts toward a lasting resolution and noted UN
Thune says Senate will move FISA bill without SAVE America Act, rebuffing Trump
Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the Senate will attempt to pass an extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)'s Section 702 surveillance provisions as a standalone bill, without attaching the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act, despite pressure from President Trump to combine the two measures. Thune emphasized concerns about national security risks if Section 702 expires and noted that passing the SAVE America Act separately would be 'unrealistic.' He also mentioned that the confirmation of Jay Clayton as director of national intelligence,
Trump Celebrates Achieving Absolutely Nothing in Iran
The article discusses the Trump administration's claims of concluding its conflict with Iran, despite failing to achieve any of the original goals set by President Donald Trump. It highlights that the proposed deal would restore the pre-war status quo, with the Strait of Hormuz reopened but no nuclear agreement in place. The article notes that the U.S. has not significantly weakened Iran's military or political structure, and Trump suggested a potential U.S.-led economic arrangement for Middle Eastern countries.
Colorado Becomes Second State To Create Right to an Attorney When Police Seize Your Property
Colorado has enacted new legislation to tighten its civil asset forfeiture laws, requiring courts to pause such cases until a related criminal conviction occurs and granting property owners the right to court-appointed legal counsel if they cannot afford an attorney. The law was signed by Democratic Governor Jared Polis and passed with bipartisan support.
SCOTUS To Newman: Drop Dead
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Newman v. Moore, allowing the case to proceed without intervention. The article references the ongoing conflict between Chief Judge Moore and Judge Pauline Newman, noting that Moore has been waiting for Newman's retirement or death. The author draws a parallel to the historical 'Ford to City: Drop Dead' headline.
New in Civitas: "Our American Legal Tradition Is Not the Warren Court's Tradition"
The article discusses the Supreme Court's approach to originalism, focusing on the three-part method involving the plain text of the Constitution, historical context before ratification, and post-ratification tradition. It critiques the influence of the Warren and Burger Courts in shaping legal traditions related to issues like the separation of church and state and abortion rights.
FDA approves first new sunscreen ingredient in more than 20 years
The FDA approved bemotrizinol as a new sunscreen ingredient, marking the first addition to the list of permitted active ingredients since the late 1990s. The ingredient offers protection against both UV A and B rays and has low skin absorption. The FDA deems it safe and effective for use in sunscreens by adults and children aged six months and older. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated the approval advances innovation in the sunscreen market. The decision aligns with a September report from the Trump administration’s Make America Health Again Commission, which recommended promoting FDA-
Second Amendment Roundup: Arms and Accoutrements
The article discusses the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in United States v. DeBorba, where the court ruled that certain firearm accessories like silencers, gun slings, and scopes are not protected under the Second Amendment as they are considered 'accoutrements' rather than 'arms.' The ruling builds upon the court's earlier decision in Duncan v. Becerra, which established a test for determining what constitutes a necessary component of a firearm. The article critiques the logic behind these rulings and speculates on potential legislative actions in California.
Justice Barrett v. Justice Jackson On Textualism
The article discusses the ongoing debate over the use of legislative history in legal interpretation, focusing on the differing approaches of Justices Barrett and Jackson. It references Justice Scalia's opposition to legislative history and notes Justice Jackson's efforts to revive its use. The article mentions the case FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., highlighting the disagreement between Justice Barrett's majority opinion and Justice Jackson's dissent. It also references Professor Victoria Nourse's perspective on the issue.
Gordon Wood, RIP
Gordon Wood, a prominent historian specializing in the American Revolution and the Founding Era, has died at the age of 92. He authored influential works such as 'The Creation of the American Republic' and 'The Radicalism of the American Revolution.' His scholarship emphasized the Enlightenment liberal ideals of the Founding, offering a counterpoint to both right-wing ethno-nationalism and far-left interpretations that focus on slavery and white supremacy. The article includes a tribute and an excerpt from one of his recent speeches.
"American Diabetes Association Ejects Researchers from Conference for Sharing Editorial from Its Own Journal"
Researchers were removed from an American Diabetes Association (ADA) conference after distributing a printed editorial from the association's own journal, which criticized Trump administration policies on biomedical research. The researchers included the journal's editor, who co-authored the piece. They were escorted out by security at the request of the event organizers. The article raises concerns about the ADA's response to the distribution of its own publication and questions whether the organization's actions align with its stated commitment to open dialogue and diverse perspectives.