Skip to content
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP
President Vladimir Putin’s Russian Federation is taking on water. Like the Titanic, it has struck an immovable object — in this case Ukraine — and it is sinking fast.
The last couple of weeks have been pretty bad for the Russian dictator, his generals at the Kremlin and his soldiers, trying to evade the onslaught of Ukrainian drones on the battlefield.
At the current daily rate of casualties , Russia will surpass 1.4 million in less than two weeks. And if that’s not bad enough, Ukraine has also nearly isolated the Crimean Peninsula in a modern-day version of siege warfare reminiscent of George Washington’s decisive victory at Yorktown in 1781.
In fact, as retired U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus recently posted, “Ukraine might actually be able to isolate the front lines as well as Crimea … Hugely impressive.”
But the real humiliation came when Ukrainian drones found their targets in Putin’s own city — not once, but twice. They struck the Saint Petersburg oil terminal and the Kronstadt naval base during the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum of 2026.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky followed the drone strikes with an open letter to Putin on June 4 proposing an immediate ceasefire along the current frontline and a face-to-face bilateral meeting in a third country to end the war. Putin rejected the offer.
Zelensky’s letter was very direct , detailing Putin’s failures in Ukraine. It concluded by reminding Putin of the cost of prolonging a war that he cannot win: “When Russia grows tired, change comes.”
On Tuesday, Ukrainian drones once again successfully penetrated Russian airspace, despite Putin’s assurances that he was strengthening Russia’s air defense system. This time, they found their target in Moscow — the Gazprom Neft-operated oil refinery. Zelensky called the attack a “just response to Russian strikes and prolonging the war by the Kremlin.”
Specifically, he was referring to the Kremlin missile and drone attack on Kyiv that hit multiple cultural sites, including the Pechersk Lavra monastery , a nearly 1,000-year-old UNESCO World Heritage site.
Zelensky would later post on X that “The Moscow region felt the reach of Ukraine’s long-range capabilities.” Suddenly, residents of St. Petersburg and Moscow are witnessing the war, and its effects, firsthand.
And that’s not just happening in Russia. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko must have also read Zelensky’s open letter and seen the success of Ukraine’s drone strikes. That was likely enough to get the Belarusian dictator to begin hedging his bets.
Lukashenko owes his political existence to Putin. He has said his country’s military and defense cooperation with Russia remains intact, and that Minsk is prepared to “defend Moscow, if necessary” — just not in Ukraine or against NATO. Still, his decision to let Russia launch its invasion of Ukraine from Belarus is something Zelensky will not likely forget.
According to Lukashenko, “So they’re striking targets . They’re not hitting the front. The Ukrainians are striking civilians, historical and cultural monuments, oil refineries, and factories. They’re striking all over Russia, all the way to the Urals, with drones. That’s the kind of war we have now.”
But Lukashenko may be wondering how he can defend Minsk if Putin cannot even defend Saint Petersburg or Moscow. Indeed, this is further complicated by Putin’s track record of not coming to the assistance of his allies — in Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and Iran. For Putin, loyalty travels one way — upward, toward himself.
That likely explains comments made by Lukashenko two weeks ago, when he ruled out sending troops to fight in Ukraine. His soldiers, he said, would not become “cannon fodder for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war” and that he “did not want to” fight Poland, Lithuania or Ukraine.
Yesterday, Lukashenko acknowledged that “Belarus is very vulnerable militarily, because Belarus is exposed to the Ukrainian military like we are in the open palm of their hand. We fully understand that our key life-support facilities — industrial and logistical — would come under attack.”
He does not want any of that. Perhaps that is why he even apologized for remarks he had made about Zelensky in the past that may have been offensive. “Perhaps I overdid it here and there,” he said.
So even Lukashenko perceives that his keeper is in trouble.
Putin’s only recourse to battlefield failures and his intelligence services’ unsuccessful attempts to interfere in elections, is nuclear saber-rattling and the launch of ballistic missiles, glide bombs, and drones against civilian targets, which include residential neighborhoods, hospitals, schools, markets, bomb shelters, churches and cultural centers — all war crimes or even forms of genocide .
Putin can no longer def…
Read the full article at The Hill →📄Source document: General David H. Petraeus→5 reports
The HillIndependentLeft3 days ago Putin's reign begins to crumbleThe article discusses the challenges faced by Russian forces under President Vladimir Putin following their invasion of Ukraine, highlighting significant military setbacks such as high casualty rates and the isolation of the Crimean Peninsula. It references General David H. Petraeus' comments on Ukraine's strategic achievements and mentions recent drone attacks on key locations in Saint Petersburg, including an open letter from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Putin.
Bias read (Left): The article presents a critical perspective on Putin's leadership and Russia's military actions in Ukraine, using strong negative language ('crumbling', 'dictator', 'humiliation') and emphasizing Ukrainian successes. It frames the situation as a failure of Putin's regime without providing balanced,
Official sources cited
- statement General David H. Petraeus
- statement Open Letter from Volodymyr Zelensky to Putin
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight4 days ago Trump to Breitbart News at G7: Had ‘Very Good Talks’ with Zelensky, PutinPresident Donald Trump stated during the G7 summit that he had held 'very good talks' with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, expressing hope for ending the war in Ukraine. The remarks were made during a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and were prompted by a question from Breitbart News correspondent Nick Gilbertson. Trump also mentioned that he believed the Ukraine conflict could have been resolved more easily if the parties involved were more willing to engage.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump's statements in a favorable light, emphasizing his positive interactions with both Zelensky and Putin, and highlights his confidence in resolving conflicts. The framing suggests support for Trump's diplomatic approach without critical examination of potential biases or the
ReasonIndependentCenter4 days ago Is Europe Finally Taking Responsibility for Its Own Defense?The article discusses the dynamics between the United States and Europe during the G7 summit, focusing on President Donald Trump's fluctuating stance on the war in Ukraine and the tensions it has caused with European allies. It highlights European concerns regarding America's role in NATO and the reluctance of European nations to fully commit to defense efforts independently.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual overview of events without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on Trump's actions and European reactions neutrally, without using loaded language or emphasizing one perspective over another.
The New York Times (World)Independent🔒Center5 days ago Trump Says U.S. Has ‘Nothing to Do’ with Ukraine War at G7 SummitPresident Trump stated during the G7 summit that the U.S. has 'nothing to do' with the Ukraine war, highlighting a shift in perceived security dynamics for European allies.
Bias read (Center): The summary presents Trump's statement without evaluative language or emphasis on any particular perspective. It does not include framing that suggests approval or criticism of his remarks, maintaining neutrality.
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight5 days ago Trump Says 'Russia Should Make a Deal', His Focus on Ukraine Now Iran Deal Done, at G7 SummitAt the G7 summit in Evian, France, former U.S. President Donald Trump stated that the Iran issue is now behind him and emphasized the need for Russia to make a deal to end the Ukraine War. He highlighted the heavy casualties in the conflict, noting that both Russia and Ukraine have suffered significant losses. Trump met separately with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and discussed potential future bilateral meetings. During a separate session with the Emir of Qatar, Trump focused on the Iran situation but reiterated his stance on seeking a resolution in Ukraine.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Trump's comments without overtly critical or supportive language, but the framing emphasizes Trump's emphasis on Russia making a deal and his focus on ending the Ukraine War, which aligns with conservative rhetoric often seen in Breitbart News. The tone does not explicitly favor