Skip to content
Close
The latest in politics and policy.
Direct to your inbox.
Sign up for the Morning Report newsletter
In today’s issue:
60-day Iran clock begins
Pulte steps into DNI role
DC poised to get DSA mayor
Obama opens presidential center
Vice President Vance is now officially on the clock to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran, as he takes political fire from all sides for his leading role in a memorandum of understanding that failed to extract significant concessions from Tehran.
The vice president’s role as the public face of Iran negotiations was further cemented yesterday as he stepped into the White House briefing room to defend President Trump’s preliminary deal with Iran, which creates a 60-day window for further talks.
“ We’re going to start the 60-day clock today,” Vance said at the briefing.
Vance sought to downplay the more controversial aspects of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) — including provisions that immediately lift sanctions on Iranian oil exports and eventually creates a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran.
The vice president was slated to travel to Switzerland this weekend to start talks, but the White House said Thursday night the trip was being postponed.
From the podium, the vice president repudiated his former Senate Republican colleagues who have increasingly called into question the advice that Trump is getting on Iran. He urged critics to “have a little faith” in Trump, saying much of “what I’ve read or heard that people believe about this is fundamentally untrue.”
“The idea that he is going to strike a deal that’s been bad for the American people, it’s preposterous,” Vance said of the president. “He is the person who has had the courage to fundamentally transform our relationship with Iran and with a lot of other countries over the last year and a half.”
Vance warned members of the Israeli Cabinet against personal attacks on the president.
“If I was in the Cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world,” Vance said.
The vice president was asked to respond to some of the specific criticisms of the deal, including that waiving oil sanctions provides Iran was a crucial economic lifeline and gives up leverage that could have secured more favorable nuclear concessions.
“We didn’t see that as a major concession to the Iranians, frankly,” he said, arguing the sanctions were inneffective anyway.
The administration argues that most of the other controversial pieces of the deal, such as the $300 billion reconstruction fund, are tied to Iran agreeing to hand over its enriched uranium and ending its nuclear enrichment program.
Still, the list of GOP critics of the deal is steadily growing: Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chair of the Armed Services Committee, and Deb Fischer (Neb.), the second-ranking Republican on the committee, expressed concerns about the deal on Thursday.
“President Trump has pursued peace through strength. I hope the intermediaries working on this deal are no undermining that objective,” Wicker said in a statement.
Vance’s central role in the Iran talks have cut a sharp contrast to Secretary of State Marco Rubio , who has kept a relatively low profile as Washington and Tehran have sealed the controversial deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
That’s fueled chatter about how the Iran war could influence their jockeying ahead of the 2028 presidential race. It’s also caused many to ask if Vance could become Trump’s fall guy if talks for a more substantive nuclear deal fall apart.
Trump joked about that possibility in remarks at the Group of Seven (G7) summit Wednesday in France.
“If it works out, I’m going to take the credit. If it doesn’t work out, I’m blaming JD. You better be careful, JD,” Trump said.
Vance said Thursday he’s “not at all” concerned with being blamed for the deal.
“I think the president was joking as he often does,” Vance added.
Not everyone understood Trump’s remark the same way. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who’s been critical of the MOU, told NOTUS of Trump’s quip , “It wasn’t a joke.”
▪ The Hill : Key GOP senator opposes Iran deal.
▪ The Hill : Vance worried about possible leaked audio tapes.
SMART TAKE with NewsNation’s BLAKE BURMAN
Vice President JD Vance took to the White House briefing room Thursday to continue his sales pitch on the Iran deal. Domestically, the Trump administration is also trying to sell its economic policies ahead of the November midterms. With Americans routinely saying they are worried about higher prices, I asked Republican National Committee Chairman Joe Gruters if Republicans on the ballot should embrace tariffs.
“I think if you want to win, you have to embrace the president’s policies because it’s delivering. Listen, he’s brought record setting votes out, three consecutive elections. He’s the only one that knows…
Read the full article at The Hill →📄Source document: Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)→43 reports
The HillIndependentLeft2 days agoThe article discusses a new agreement between Iran and former U.S. President Donald Trump, highlighting that Iran's commitment to forgoing nuclear weapons is similar to what was stated in the 2015 nuclear deal under the Obama administration. The article notes that Iran received significant economic benefits in exchange for this commitment.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Trump's agreement with Iran as a 'big fat flop,' implying criticism of Trump's foreign policy achievements. It emphasizes that Iran's commitments were not new and highlights the economic concessions made to Iran, which could be seen as downplaying the significance of the deal from
The HillIndependentCenter2 days ago Vance on the clock with Iran deal under fireVice President Kamala Harris is now officially on the clock to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran, following a memorandum of understanding (MOU) that failed to extract significant concessions from Tehran. Harris defended President Trump's preliminary deal during a White House briefing, stating that the 60-day clock for further talks would begin today. She attempted to downplay controversial provisions of the MOU, including the immediate lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil exports and the eventual creation of a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran. Harris was scheduled to travel to Geneva,
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly favoring one side, providing details about the situation without clear ideological framing or biased language.
The HillIndependentRight2 days ago Five key issues in US-Iran nuclear talks as 60-day clock beginsThe article discusses five key issues in ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations, noting that a 60-day period has begun following the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MOU). The MOU was signed by President Trump and aims to finalize an agreement to address Iran's nuclear program and related concerns.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the negotiations through the lens of 'ending Tehran’s nuclear weapons ambitions,' which implies a focus on Iran's potential threat rather than diplomatic engagement. It also references 'President Trump’s signature' without critical examination of the policy implications or broader
Official sources cited
- government Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight2 days agoA national survey by Quantus found that a strong majority of U.S. voters approve of Trump's Iran deal, which was signed as a memorandum of understanding (MOU). The MOU includes a 60-day ceasefire, an agreement to lift the naval blockade of Iran, plans for Iran's reconstruction, and the termination of sanctions. Iran committed to reopening the Strait of Hormuz and not developing nuclear weapons.
Bias read (Right): The article presents the Trump administration's Iran deal in a favorable light, emphasizing approval ratings and positive terms of the agreement without significant counterpoints or critical perspectives. It uses language that highlights the benefits of the deal to the U.S., such as lifting the navy
Official sources cited
- press release Quantus Survey
The HillIndependentLeft2 days ago Pelosi on Trump's Iran deal: A 'gift to the Iranians'Rep. Nancy Pelosi criticized former President Donald Trump's Iran policy, calling his military actions a mistake and the resulting U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding a 'gift to the Iranians.' She stated that Americans paid the price for these decisions.
Bias read (Left): The article presents Rep. Nancy Pelosi's criticism of former President Trump's Iran policy, using strong negative language such as 'mistake' and 'gift to the Iranians,' which frames Trump's actions negatively and aligns with a left-leaning perspective.
Official sources cited
- statement Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) statement
The HillIndependentCenter3 days ago Trump signs Iran deal amid criticismPresident Trump signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the U.S. and Iran aimed at ending hostilities between the two nations. However, the move has drawn significant criticism, with concerns over granting Iran substantial concessions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the event factually without overtly favoring one side. It mentions both the action taken by Trump and the criticism it received, suggesting a balanced approach.
The HillIndependentCenter3 days ago MOU opens Hormuz, lifts sanctions on Iran's oilA 60-day ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran was announced, with key details revealed. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) includes provisions allowing Iran to export oil through the Strait of Hormuz and lifting certain sanctions on Iran's oil trade. Vice President Vance is expected to formally sign the agreement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of an agreement without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the terms of the MOU and mentions the involvement of Vice President Vance but does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing.
Official sources cited
- government Vice President Vance
The HillIndependentRight3 days ago Trump defends Iran deal amid criticism: 5 takeawaysPresident Trump defended a memorandum of understanding (MOU) released that ends the war with Iran, despite suggesting it may not be 'permanent.' He stated that other G7 members supported ending the war.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Trump's defense of the MOU as a positive action, emphasizing his argument that other G7 members support ending the war. This framing aligns with conservative narratives that favor U.S. foreign policy actions and downplay potential criticisms of such agreements.
Official sources cited
- government Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
NBC NewsIndependentCenter4 days agoAn Israeli government official stated that Israel was not shown the memorandum of understanding (MOU) drafted to end the war with Iran, indicating growing tensions between the U.S. and Israel. President Donald Trump claimed he provided a copy of the MOU to Israel, but Israel reportedly has not received it. The Israeli government's exclusion from the negotiations has created challenges for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of upcoming elections. Trump has publicly criticized Netanyahu, including at the G7 summit, where he called Netanyahu 'crazy' and expressed frustration with Netanyahu's
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the lack of communication between Israel and the U.S. regarding the MOU without taking a stance on either side. It presents statements from both Israeli officials and Trump without apparent bias.
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight4 days ago Trump Tells G7 and Ukraine’s Zelensky: ‘I’m the Boss’President Donald Trump made a lighthearted remark during the G7 summit in Evian, France, stating, 'I'm the boss,' while addressing reporters and world leaders. He also humorously invited journalists to remain for the closed-door session, though they were eventually asked to leave. The White House shared footage of the event online. The G7 issued a joint statement supporting Trump's Iran peace deal, emphasizing the importance of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and ensuring freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Trump's remarks in a positive light, highlighting his influence and the G7's endorsement of his Iran deal. The tone emphasizes Trump's leadership and the international support for his policies, using favorable language such as 'strong leadership' and 'historic opportunity.' There
ReasonIndependentCenter4 days agoThe article discusses criticisms of President Donald Trump's memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the war in the Middle East. Some Democrats, including Senators Cory Booker and Chris Murphy, argue that the agreement involves paying Iran billions of dollars. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused Trump of attempting to fund the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to develop weapons of mass destruction and terrorize the world. The article notes that similar criticisms were previously directed at Democratic efforts to engage with Iran, such as unfreezing Iranian bank accounts.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from both Democratic senators and Trump's former secretary of state, providing a balanced view of the controversy surrounding the memorandum of understanding.
Official sources cited
- government Memorandum of Understanding
- press release Bloomberg
- press release CNN
The HillIndependentCenter4 days ago Vance: 'Kind of ironic' GOP critics of Iran deal don't want war 'stopped'Vice President Vance commented on Tuesday that it is 'kind of ironic' that Republican critics of the Iran deal do not want the war 'stopped,' as lawmakers from both parties question the details of a recently signed memorandum of understanding (MOU).
Bias read (Center): The article presents Vice President Vance's statement without overtly favoring one side. It quotes his remarks directly and does not include additional commentary or sourcing that would indicate a clear ideological slant.
The Washington TimesIndependentCenter4 days agoNATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte praised President Trump's tentative agreement with Iran, calling it a 'massive step forward' and stating it could help prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. He emphasized the importance of restoring vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz and noted European allies are increasing their contributions to NATO following the U.S. reduction of military assets.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte supporting Trump's Iran deal without overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It reports on official statements and does not favor one side over another in the discussion of the deal's implications.
Official sources cited
- government NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's Press Conference Statements
The Daily WireIndependentRight4 days agoThe article argues that President Trump's Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Iran represents a missed opportunity to maintain leverage gained through recent military and economic actions against Iran. It highlights U.S. and Israeli efforts over the past three years that have weakened Iran, suggesting that negotiating away this advantage before major talks begin could be detrimental. The piece contrasts the Trump approach with the Obama-era JCPOA, which it claims allowed Iran to advance its nuclear program.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Iran as a threat that has been significantly weakened by U.S. and Israeli actions, implying that the Trump administration is making a strategic mistake by offering concessions. It uses strong language such as 'bestial massacre' and criticizes the Obama administration's approach, v
AxiosIndependentCenter4 days agoThe article discusses growing tensions within President Trump's base over his Iran policy, particularly regarding a new agreement with Iran. Hawkish Republicans, including prominent figures like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene, have criticized Trump for what they perceive as a departure from 'America First' principles. These Republicans are now pushing back against the deal, demanding transparency around the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. and Iran. There is confusion over when the document will be released, with conflicting statements from the White House. Israeli
Bias read (Center): The article presents information without overtly favoring one side, focusing on the internal divisions within Trump's base and the demand for transparency regarding the Iran deal. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context.
Responsible StatecraftIndependentLeft4 days agoThe article discusses former President Donald Trump's reported memorandum of understanding with Iran to end hostilities, including opening the Strait of Hormuz and continuing dialogue. It highlights the frustration among Trump allies such as Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro, who criticize the deal and demand transparency.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Trump's actions as aligning with neoconservative policies he previously opposed, suggesting a shift in his stance. It portrays Trump's allies as being upset by the deal, using terms like 'suicide pact' and emphasizing their demands for transparency, which implies criticism of theU
The HillIndependentCenter4 days ago The Memo: Clouds darken over Trump’s Iran dealThe article discusses growing concerns surrounding President Trump's agreement with Iran, which is set to be formally signed in Switzerland. The memorandum of understanding has already been signed electronically by high-level officials in both Tehran and Washington, including Trump himself. However, no official text of the agreement has been released yet.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the development of an agreement between the U.S. and Iran without using biased language or selectively presenting information.
The HillIndependentCenter4 days ago 5 reasons Trump allies don't like his Iran dealThe article discusses concerns among some of President Trump's allies regarding his proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Iran. These allies, including conservative pundits and hawkish Iran experts, are reportedly worried that the MOU could weaken U.S. leverage against Iran or provide the country with greater access to resources.
Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from both Trump's allies and critics without overtly favoring one side. It highlights concerns raised by conservative figures but does not explicitly endorse or criticize the MOU itself, maintaining a balanced tone.
Bloomberg NewsParty-aligned🔒Center4 days agoKey lawmakers, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, have not yet received details about a 14-point memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, which is expected to extend a two-month ceasefire and initiate negotiations on Iran's nuclear program. The agreement is set to be signed in Geneva on Friday. Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan discussed the situation on Balance of Power.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the lack of transparency regarding the memorandum of understanding and mentions bipartisan involvement without using biased language or selective sourcing.
ReasonIndependentCenter5 days ago Did Everyone Lose?A digital preliminary memorandum of understanding (MOU) has been signed between the U.S. and Iran, leading to the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and a 60-day pause in hostilities while final details are negotiated. Senior U.S. officials confirmed that both President Trump, Vice President Vance, and the Iranian parliamentary speaker have signed the agreement. The deal includes provisions for the immediate opening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Iran. Further details of the agreement are expected to be released within 24–48 hours.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the signing of a preliminary MOU between the U.S. and Iran without overtly biased language or framing. It references official statements and does not appear to favor one side over the other.
Official sources cited
- government Senior U.S. Official Statement
- press release Reuters Report
United States