ON
🔍
← Back to feed
United StatesScienceOverlooked from the left6 days ago

SCOTUS To Newman: Drop Dead

The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Newman v. Moore, allowing the case to proceed without intervention. The article references the ongoing conflict between Chief Judge Moore and Judge Pauline Newman, noting that Moore has been waiting for Newman's retirement or death. The author draws a parallel to the historical 'Ford to City: Drop Dead' headline.

This morning, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in  Newman v. Moore . For years, I've thought that Chief Judge Moore is simply waiting for Judge Pauline Newman to die. There is no reason why each suspension has to last a year. The Bush appointee is waiting for the Reagan appointee's life tenure to conclude. She even removed Newman from the ridiculous AI video.

Now, alas, the Supreme Court has declined to intervene. Not a single member noted a dissent. They will just wait for this brilliant and capable jurist to expire.

My immediate thought was the famous Daily News headline. Ford to City: Drop Dead .

SCOTUS to Newman: Drop Dead.

What's left? There is a flag for this situation.

Read the full article at Reason →
Source document: supremecourt.gov

1 reports

ReasonIndependentRight6 days ago
SCOTUS To Newman: Drop Dead

The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Newman v. Moore, allowing the case to proceed without intervention. The article references the ongoing conflict between Chief Judge Moore and Judge Pauline Newman, noting that Moore has been waiting for Newman's retirement or death. The author draws a parallel to the historical 'Ford to City: Drop Dead' headline.

Bias read (Right): The article uses strong, provocative language ('Drop Dead') and frames the situation with clear bias toward Judge Newman, implying that her continued service is an obstacle. It also criticizes the Supreme Court's decision without balanced counterpoints or neutral analysis.