By a single vote, the Senate shot down a proposal on Tuesday that would have reined in President Donald Trump’s ability to use military force against Iran without Congress’s approval.
The vote fell just one vote short of advancing with 48-47. Republican Senators Susan Collins, Bill Cassidy, Lisa Murkowski, and Rand Paul voted with the Democrats. On the flip side, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) crossed the aisle to vote alongside the Republican majority against the bill.
Introduced by Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), the resolution sought to require congressional approval for continued U.S. military action involving Iran. Warnock had urged Republicans to vote for it, arguing that Congress shouldn’t just sit back and let the president make all the decisions on foreign wars.
The vote occurred as lawmakers pressed the White House for details about an agreement Trump announced Sunday between Washington and Tehran that he has promoted as a path toward ending months of fighting.
“The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!” Trump declared on Truth Social.
Members of Congress are still completely in the dark about the agreement, leading to a push on the administration for transparency. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said lawmakers are demanding more details on how the arrangement actually works. Under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, agreements related to Iran’s nuclear program must be submitted to Congress for review before sanctions relief can take effect.
Although the measure did not advance, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats are continuing discussions surrounding a separate proposal sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) and are attempting to secure additional Republican support before bringing it up again.
Meanwhile, the House recently approved its own legislation seeking to halt unauthorized military operations against Iran. That measure has yet to receive consideration in the Senate. Administration officials have maintained that key portions of the War Powers Resolution are unconstitutional. They also contend that an April ceasefire altered the timeline governing congressional authorization requirements.
Read the full article at Breitbart News →📄Source document: Senate proceedings
4 reports
The HillIndependentCenter4 days agoThe Senate is facing turmoil as President Trump's decision to cancel a hearing for his nominee to director of national intelligence (DNI) raises questions about leadership within the intelligence community and the renewal of expired surveillance authorities. The Senate is debating whether to proceed with hearings for the nominee.
Bias read (Center): The article presents events without overtly favoring any political side. It describes the situation objectively, focusing on procedural issues and congressional reactions without using biased language or selective sourcing.
Official sources cited
- government Senate proceedings
Bloomberg NewsParty-aligned🔒Center4 days agoLeaders in the US House and Senate announced a deal on a sweeping housing bill, ending a months-long standoff between the chambers over competing versions of the measure.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legislative agreement without apparent ideological framing, focusing on the resolution of a bipartisan standoff rather than taking a stance on the policy itself.
Official sources cited
- government US House and Senate leaders
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight4 days agoThe Senate rejected a resolution aimed at limiting President Trump's authority to conduct military actions against Iran without congressional approval. The vote was 48-47, falling one vote short of passage. Several Republican senators, including Susan Collins and Rand Paul, supported the measure, while some Democratic senators opposed it. The resolution, introduced by Senator Raphael Warnock, sought to ensure congressional oversight of military engagements with Iran. The vote took place amid calls for greater transparency regarding a new agreement between the U.S. and Iran announced by Trump.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the rejection of the resolution as a victory for executive power, emphasizing the failure of the resolution to pass and highlighting support from conservative senators like Rand Paul. It also presents Trump's announcement of the Iran deal favorably, using direct quotes from him, a
The Washington TimesIndependentCenter5 days agoSenate Democrats attempted to pass a war powers resolution to end U.S. military actions against Iran but fell short of the required majority. The vote ended in a 47-48 defeat, with four Republicans joining most Democrats in supporting the measure. Senator John Fetterman was the only Democrat opposing the resolution. Critics argue that the Trump administration's peace deal with Iran lacks transparency and may not effectively address concerns regarding Iran's nuclear program.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the failed vote and includes quotes from both Democratic and Republican senators, providing balanced perspectives on the issue.
United States