The article reports that the Croatian company Kostak – graditeljstvo tehnologija sirovine has responded to media allegations regarding the selection process for carrying out temporary waste covering work at a site in Gospić. The company asserts that they fulfilled all conditions of the public procurement procedure and possess the necessary references and capacities to carry out the work. They clarify that while they are owner-connected to the Slovenian Kostak, they operate as an independent legal entity under Croatian law. The company denies claims that their Slovenian parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste, stating that the issue was improper temporary storage of municipal waste on their own Waste Management Center premises, which was removed at the expense of the community and the area subsequently remediated. They emphasize that the work involves construction activities for creating a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater, and does not include waste handling, excavation, processing, or disposal. The company assures that the work will be carried out quickly, professionally, and safely, with proper监督.
The Croatian company Kostak - Construction Technology of Raw Materials has denied allegations that it illegally buried waste in Slovenia, stating instead that the situation involved improper temporary storage of municipal waste at its facility in Gospić. The company emphasized that all legal and technical requirements were met during the tender process conducted by the Environmental Protection Fund, which awarded them the contract for the temporary covering of waste in Gospić. According to their statement, the work involves only civil engineering tasks related to the creation of a protective layer to prevent groundwater contamination, not the handling or removal of waste itself. The Environmental Protection Fund selected the Croatian branch of the Slovenian waste management company Kostak to cover 33,000 tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. This decision came after an investigation revealed that the Slovenian branch had previously been found guilty of illegal waste disposal and was required to excavate and remediate the waste. The company's director, Miljenko Muha, is among those under investigation for these activities. The police have initiated a criminal investigation into the case, which is still ongoing. The company's response to media reports highlighted that the waste was stored temporarily at its own Waste Management Center in Spodnji Stari Grad, which was later cleaned up at the company’s expense. They stressed that the work in Gospić does not involve handling or removing the waste, but solely the creation of a protective layer to prevent water infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater. The company assured that the work would be carried out professionally and within the agreed timeframe with appropriate oversight. In addition to the environmental concerns, public figures such as singer Severina have called for a demonstration in Zagreb to address the issue of toxic waste in the Lika region. She criticized the government for not taking immediate action and accused officials of downplaying the health risks associated with the contaminated water. Severina urged citizens to participate in the protest, emphasizing that the issue transcends political ideologies and affects everyone. She also called for solidarity with the residents of Gospić and highlighted the need for transparency and accountability. The Environmental Protection Fund has also selected the Zagreb-based company Tabak Group to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract was awarded based on cost and expertise criteria, with the winning bid coming in significantly lower than the estimated value of the procurement. The company has eight months to complete the task, with the possibility of appeals if other bidders are dissatisfied with the outcome. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković addressed concerns raised by the residents of Gospić and the Lika region, acknowledging the public's anxiety over the illegal dumping of waste. He stated that the government has taken steps to address the issue, including the selection of contractors for the remediation of the landfill and the removal of waste in bags. Plenković emphasized that the government has given instructions to relevant authorities to expedite the process and ensure the safe removal of all hazardous waste from the area. The Ministry of Environment and Green Transition has clarified that it did not interfere in the selection of the contractor for the temporary covering of the waste in Gospić. Minister Marija Vučković explained that the process involved market research and that the chosen contractor was selected based on cost and time efficiency. She noted that the government aims to expedite the cleanup process to protect the environment and public health, while ensuring compliance with legal procedures. The situation in Gospić highlights broader issues regarding waste management and environmental protection in Croatia. While efforts are underway to address the current crisis, the incident underscores the need for improved regulatory frameworks and greater transparency in the handling of hazardous waste. As the government continues to work on the remediation of the landfill, the focus remains on ensuring the safety of the local population and preventing future incidents of illegal waste disposal.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (5)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article reports on the reaction of the Croatian company 'Kostak - Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine' to media claims that they illegally disposed of waste in Slovenia. The company clarifies that their activities in Gospić were related to unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste at their own waste management center, which was later removed at their expense and the area sanitized. They emphasize that they met all legal and technical requirements for the temporary covering work of waste, and that the project does not involve handling, excavation, or disposal of waste but rather construction work to prevent contamination of groundwater. The company stresses that they operate independently under Croatian law and that the allegations against them are inaccurate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the company’s official statement in response to media claims, providing detailed explanations and emphasizing compliance with regulations. While the issue involves environmental concerns and local governance, the framing remains balanced by presenting both the accusations and a驳
Why factuality (100): This article is a direct reproduction of the primary source document from Jutarnji list. It accurately presents Kostak's statements regarding their legal status, denial of illegal dumping in Slovenia, and clarification of the nature of their work in Gospić. All claims align precisely with the origin
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, simply reporting Kostak's official statement without editorializing or taking sides. It presents facts objectively and avoids any biased language or framing.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 875 days ago
Ministrac zaštite okoliša Marija Vučković je u Gospiću objasnila proces izbora firme za prekrivanje otpada u gradu, koji je podignut zbog sumnje u poslovne prakse odabrane tvrtke. Prema njevim rečima, Ministarstvo i Fond nisu bili uključeni u izbor subjekta, već je proces bio temeljen na istraživanju tržišta i potrebama za brzu sanaciju. Odabrana firma je hrvatska podružnica slovenske tvrtke Kostak, kojoj je lani utvrđeno da je ilegalno zakopala komunalni otpad. Vučković je naglasila da je proces bio pregovarački, baziran na izvješću Geotehničkog fakulteta u Zagrebu koje je pokazalo prisutnost PFAS spojeva u vodama. Njezin cilj je brzo obavljati sanaciju prije velikih kiša, uz oslanjanje na cijenu i rok kao ključne kriterije.
Bias read (Center): Čak i ako je tema politički kontroverzna, tekst se ne zadržava na jednoj strani, već objašnjava proces izbora firme i povezanu politiku. Ministrac daje detalje o proceduri, objašnjava motivaciju i opisuje kriterije, bez evidentnog stranih slanja. Iako se radi o političkoj temi, tekst ostaje neutraln
Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports Minister Vučković’s statements regarding the selection process for the waste remediation company in Gospić. It clearly distinguishes between the market research phase and the procurement process, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the ministry did not direct
Why objectivity (87): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting Vučković’s explanations without overt bias. However, it does include some framing that emphasizes the government’s proactive role in preparing for the formal procedure, which may subtly favor the administration’s perspective.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 705 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and his cabinet members attended a meeting in Gospić to discuss the cleanup of nearly 37,000 tons of illegal, ecotoxic waste along Bilajská Road. During the event, each official was seen drinking water from glass cups placed on the table. The government stated this was tap water from the local water supply in Gospić, aiming to reassure the public about the safety of the local water. This choice contrasted with their usual practice of using bottled water during meetings in other locations, suggesting a deliberate effort to convey confidence in the quality of Gospić’s water.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the government's actions and statements without overtly favoring any side. It describes the symbolic gesture of drinking tap water but does not editorialize or present biased interpretations. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather 1
Why factuality (90): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, including the detail about the glass cups filled with water and the political message intended by the government. It provides accurate information about the meeting and the context of the water safety issue.
Why objectivity (70): While the facts are presented clearly, the article has a slightly biased tone towards the government's efforts, suggesting that the initiative's refusal to attend was due to the upcoming protest rather than genuine disagreement with the government's approach.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
The initiative 'Gospić is our home' has decided not to attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and local authorities in Gospić, which is scheduled for tomorrow. Vjekoslav Bušić, representing the initiative, stated they received an unofficial invitation but chose to reject it, citing similar scenarios in the past aimed at repairing political damage. He recalled a previous meeting held two days before the release of research results on the Gospić landfill, which he claims was intended to mitigate political harm. The initiative emphasizes that all actions taken so far have been too slow and insufficient, expressing hope for more serious and transparent efforts moving forward. They remain committed to participating in discussions after the protest on September 5th in Zagreb, provided that concrete demands and deadlines are clearly communicated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the stance of the 'Gospić is our home' initiative against attending a meeting with the prime minister, highlighting their concerns about political maneuvering and lack of transparency. However, it does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It includes direct
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information about the meeting between Plenković and local authorities in Gospić, including quotes from Vjekoslav Bušić of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom.' It accurately reflects the reported refusal to attend the meeting and references past similar events. The facts
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the views of the initiative group, it remains relatively neutral in tone, focusing on reporting the statements made by Bušić without injecting personal bias. There is some frustration expressed, but it is framed within the context of the group’s position.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is set to visit Gospić tomorrow, where he will meet with local authorities and representatives of civil initiatives. However, members of the initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' including Vjekoslav Bušić, have decided not to attend the meeting. They argue that similar meetings were organized before previous protests against the waste disposal site, which they view as attempts to mitigate political damage. Bušić emphasized that the citizens' voice needs to be heard first, especially ahead of the planned protest on September 5th, after which discussions about specific demands and tasks for the government can take place. He criticized past actions as too slow and expressed hope for more serious future handling of the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the refusal to engage with the Prime Minister as a principled stand by civil activists, emphasizing grassroots concerns over political maneuvering. The tone supports the protesters' perspective, portraying their actions as justified resistance to perceived political interference,
Why factuality (90): Similar to Article 1, this source confirms the refusal of the initiative to attend the meeting and refers to previous instances where such scenarios were used to manage political damage. The details match those found in other articles, and the information is corroborated by multiple sources.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral stance, primarily reporting the actions and statements of the initiative group. While there is some frustration expressed over the perceived lack of action, it is not overly emotive or biased.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 656 days ago
The article discusses an environmental crisis in Gospić, Croatia, where hazardous waste was illegally dumped into rocky terrain, sparking widespread public outrage and protests. The local initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' highlights systemic failures in waste management and regulatory oversight, accusing both local authorities and national institutions of negligence. Protest organizers emphasize that the issue transcends local concerns, calling attention to broader ecological problems across Croatia. They criticize the government for failing to act preventively despite early warnings since 2023 and serious risks identified in 2024. The protest aims to demand accountability and action rather than being framed as politically motivated.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the environmental disaster as a result of systemic governmental failure and calls for accountability from national institutions, including the Ministry of Environmental Protection. It criticizes the system for protecting itself and emphasizes the need for urgent action, which is a
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the protest in Gospić and quotes Vjekoslav Bušić from the 'Gospić je naš dom' initiative. It provides context about the environmental issue and mentions the systemic problems related to waste management. However, it does not directly reference the primary source doc
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear bias towards the protesters' perspective, using emotionally charged language like 'ekološka katastrofa' (ecological disaster) and 'crne ekološke točke' (black ecological points). It frames the situation as a systemic failure without presenting counterarguments or official res
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
The article discusses the progress and current status of waste management efforts in Gospić, Croatia, focusing on the selection of contractors for two key tasks: handling 650 tons of waste from Big Bag bags and covering approximately 33,000 tons of buried waste with waterproof film. Luka Balen, director of the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund, explained that two procurement procedures were conducted, resulting in the selection of the contractor 'Kostak' based on legal and technical criteria. The article mentions concerns regarding the Slovenian parent group of Kostak but notes that the firm is involved in a major infrastructure project related to waste management. The temporary covering of waste is described as a measure to prevent water infiltration until permanent solutions are implemented.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving environmental regulation and public contracts, it presents information objectively by quoting officials and emphasizing procedural compliance. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story, which focuses more on the
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the selection of Kostak for covering waste and mentions the controversy around the company. However, it lacks some specific details about the legal issues mentioned in the primary source, such as the illegal dumping by the Slovenian parent company.
Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the facts of the contractor selection and the procedural aspects. It briefly touches on the controversy but does not take an overtly biased stance.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
The article discusses the selection of contractors for the cleanup of waste at a site in Gospić, Croatia. Two main tasks have been assigned: handling 650 tons of waste in Big Bag bags and covering nearly 33,000 tons of buried waste with waterproof foil. The chosen contractor, Kostak, has faced scrutiny due to allegations related to its Slovenian parent group’s business practices. Luka Balen, director of the Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency, emphasized that the selection was based on legal and technical requirements, and he noted that the same group is involved in a major infrastructure project, the construction of the Piškornica Waste Management Center. He stated that the temporary covering of the waste is intended to prevent water infiltration until a permanent remediation solution is implemented.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information objectively, citing statements from Luka Balen and referencing the legal framework guiding the selection process. It mentions concerns about the contractor but does not take a clear stance or exhibit biased language. The inclusion of both the controversy surroundingK
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group and provides detailed information about the contract terms and the rejection of another bid. It aligns well with the primary source in describing the procurement process and the reasons behind the decisions made.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, focusing on the factual aspects of the contractor selection and the procedural steps taken by the Environmental Protection Fund.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
The Croatian company Kostak has responded to media reports regarding its selection to perform temporary waste cover work at a site in Gospić. In their statement, they clarified that they operate as an independent legal entity in Croatia and denied allegations of illegal waste burial in Slovenia. They emphasized that the issue was improper temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was later removed and the area sanitized by the company. The company highlighted that all conditions were met during the public procurement process, confirmed by the Environmental Protection Fund, and explained that their role involves constructing protective covers to prevent water infiltration and contamination, not handling or disposing of waste itself.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the claims against the company and their rebuttal, providing context about the nature of the work and clarifying that the company does not handle waste directly. It includes quotes from the company’s statement and references the Environmental Protection Fund’s confirmation,
Why factuality (85): Article repeats the core points from the primary source, including the company’s legal status and denial of illegal dumping. It accurately reflects the company’s position and procedural compliance.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, focusing on the company’s response without taking sides. However, the phrasing leans slightly toward supporting the company’s narrative.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
Društvo Kostak, koje je odabrano za izvođenje radova privremenog prekrivanja otpada na lokaciji u Gospiću, odbacilo je navode da bi matična tvrtka u Sloveniji ilegalno zakopala tisuće tona otpada. Prema objavljenom priopćenju, radilo se o nepropisnom privremenom skladištenju otpada na prostoru vlastitog Centra za gospodarenje otpadom, koje je uklonjeno na trošak društva, a područje je sanirano. Društvo naglašava da su svi postupci provedeni sukladno Zakonu o javnoj nabavi, uz provjeru dokumentacije i potvrda o nekažnjavanju. Također, objašnjavaju da su radovi vezani uz izradu zaštitne prekrivke, a ne rukovanje otpadom, i da imaju stručnu osobu i iskustvo za izvođenje posla kvalitetno i u roku.
Bias read (Center): Čak i ako se tematično radi o okolišu i lokalnoj politici, tekst se fokusira na objektivno objašnjenje pozicije tvrtke Kostak, bez evidentnog strujanja lijeve ili desne stranke. Upravo zbog toga se odlučuje za CENTRALAN lejn, jer se ne primjećuje jasna tendencija u izboru riječi, izvorima ili kontek
Why factuality (85): Article accurately summarizes the company’s statement, including the legal basis for the contract and clarification of past activities. It aligns with the primary source and provides clear details.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is professional and factual, though it emphasizes the company’s qualifications and adherence to regulations, which might subtly favor the company’s position.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
The Croatian company Društvo Kostak has been selected to perform temporary waste covering work at a site in Gospić, based on professional references and according to the Public Procurement Act. The company refuted claims that its parent company in Slovenia illegally buried thousands of tons of waste, stating that the situation involved improper temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was later removed and the area sanitized by the company. According to the company’s statement, they possess the necessary technical expertise and experience to carry out the work, and all conditions required for the project were met, confirmed by the Environmental Protection Fund. The work involves constructing a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and contamination of groundwater, but does not include handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste. The company emphasized its awareness of the sensitivity of the situation in Gospić and its commitment to completing the work professionally and safely.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the company's official statements and responses to allegations without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the company and mentions verification by the Environmental Protection Fund, suggesting balanced reporting. There is no clear ideological framing or sl
Why factuality (85): Article closely follows the primary source, providing the company’s official statement and clarifications. It accurately represents the company’s position and the legal process involved.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral and factual, though it highlights the company’s compliance with regulations, which could be interpreted as a slight endorsement.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
The company 'Kostak - Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine' has responded to recent media reports regarding their involvement in temporarily covering illegal waste in Gospić. The company clarifies that they operate as an independent legal entity in Croatia and denies allegations that their Slovenian parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste. They explain that the issue was about unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was fully removed at their expense and the area subsequently cleaned. The company emphasizes that their role involves construction work to create protective coverings to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater, and that the work does not include handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste. They stress their commitment to completing the task professionally and within agreed timelines.
Bias read (Center): While the topic relates to environmental governance and local waste management, which could be considered politically charged, the article presents the company’s position factually without overtly favoring any political stance. It provides detailed explanations and references legal procedures, but l
Why factuality (85): Article accurately reflects the company’s statement, including the denial of illegal dumping and the legal process. It matches the primary source and provides clear explanations.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is objective, presenting the company’s position without overt bias. However, it emphasizes the company’s credentials, which may lean slightly in their favor.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
Dalija Orešković, hrvatska saborska zastupnica, navela je da je najavljeni prosvjed za Gospić najvažniji politički događaj od dobivanja samostalnosti Hrvatske. Prosvjed, koji će se održati 5. rujna u Zagrebu, označen je kao 'antihadezeovski', što ukazuje na njegovu ciljanost prema političkoj strukturi koja, prema njoj, uzrokuje problem ilegala odlaganja otpada. Orešković ističe da je Hrvatska postala odlagalište europskog otpada bez razvoja infrastrukture za komunalni otpad, a da je vlast znala o tome godinama. Ona također upozorava na potencijalnu opasnost od 'otova' – smatra da je otpad zakopan u Gospiću, ali i u vladi i ministarstvima. Izrazila je bojazan za nastavak službene istrage i ulogu glavnog državnog odvjetnika.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a nationalistic and anti-establishment movement, emphasizing its importance as a democratic struggle against corruption and environmental degradation. The language used by Orešković suggests a strong critique of the current political system and a call for collective
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Dalija Orešković's comments on the protest, including her characterization of it as an anti-HDZ protest. It provides direct quotes and contextualizes the issue within broader political themes, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents Orešković's views with a certain level of enthusiasm and emphasis on the political implications, which could be seen as slightly biased. However, it remains largely objective in its reporting.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 705 days ago
Citizens across all political spectrums in Croatia have united over concerns regarding toxic waste being transported and buried in Gospić for years. Despite attempts by certain right-wing figures, including Igor Peternela from DOMiNO, to frame the protest as a leftist plot against the government led by HDZ and Andrej Plenković, these efforts failed. The protest, organized by 'Gospić je naš dom,' aimed to address environmental issues rather than serve political agendas. Right-wing and left-wing groups, including the Most party, joined forces in supporting the demonstration, highlighting a rare moment of unity among otherwise divided factions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, right-wing claims of a leftist conspiracy and left-wing responses, without overtly favoring either side. It highlights the failure of right-wing attempts to frame the protest negatively and notes the unexpected unity between left and right in supporting the pro-
Why factuality (85): This article confirms the non-participation of the initiative in the meeting and discusses the political implications. It aligns with other reports and presents the situation consistently. However, it does not provide independent verification of the claims made by the initiative.
Why objectivity (70): The article has a slightly negative tone towards the government, implying that their actions are politically motivated. This introduces a bias despite the factual content.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 705 days ago
The article is a statement from the company Kostak, which was selected to carry out temporary covering work for waste at a site in Gospić. The company denies allegations from Slovenia that its parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste. Kostak claims the issue involved unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste on their own Waste Management Center premises, which was removed at the company’s expense and the area subsequently cleaned. They assert that they obtained the contract based on professional references and in accordance with the Law on Public Procurement. The company emphasizes that the work does not involve handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste, but rather the construction of a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater. They stress that all procedures were conducted legally and under supervision, and that they are committed to completing the work professionally and on time.
Bias read (Center): While the topic involves environmental regulation and corporate responsibility, which could be considered politically charged, the article presents Kostak's position without overtly promoting a specific ideological stance. It focuses on legal compliance and technical justification rather than taking
Why factuality (85): Article closely mirrors the content of the primary source document, including the denial of illegal waste dumping in Slovenia and the explanation of temporary storage. It accurately reports the company’s response and legal process.
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the company’s statements without overt bias. However, there is some subtle emphasis on the company’s compliance with laws, which could be seen as slightly promotional.
The article reports that Croatia's Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and several ministers will visit Gospić tomorrow to discuss the remediation of illegally dumped waste. The local initiative 'Gospić is Our Home' criticizes the timing of the visit, arguing that the prime minister's arrival four days before a planned protest does not address the issue but rather serves political interests. The group calls for the prime minister to listen to citizens' demands on September 5th, hold concrete meetings, and take decisive actions. The article highlights concerns over illegal waste dumping and the perceived lack of genuine engagement from authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government's visit as politically motivated, emphasizing the criticism of the timing and suggesting that the action is more about political damage control than addressing the environmental issue. The tone leans toward supporting citizen activism and questioning governmental诚意,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the planned meeting between the Prime Minister and officials, and the response from the initiative. It aligns with other sources and provides specific details about the timing and location of the meeting.
Why objectivity (70): While factual, the article emphasizes the critique of the government's approach, using emotive language such as 'prosvjeda nije trebalo biti da je bilo odgovornosti.' This suggests a leaning towards the initiative's viewpoint.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' has stated that it will not attend a meeting with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and other officials scheduled for Wednesday in Gospić. The group claims they were informally invited but chose not to respond due to previous experiences of similar scenarios. They reference past instances where political efforts were organized before their protests, such as a meeting held two days prior to a protest on June 27th aimed at addressing political damage. The initiative emphasizes the need for citizens' voices to be heard first before engaging with institutions, expressing concerns over slow responses and lack of transparency. They hope for more serious action and greater openness from authorities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative's frustration with institutional delays and lack of transparency as a legitimate concern, emphasizing the importance of citizen voice and accountability. It highlights perceived political maneuvering by authorities, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of power.
Why factuality (85): Article provides details from an initiative member, Vjekoslav Bušić, regarding the non-participation of 'Gospić je naš dom' in a meeting with the Prime Minister. It references past events and actions by the government, aligning with cross-source reports. The information is consistent with other arti
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical towards the government's handling of the issue, using phrases like 'scenarije' and 'političke štete,' suggesting a biased perspective. While informative, it leans toward expressing frustration rather than presenting a neutral analysis.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago
Sandra Benčić, a member of the parliamentary group Možemo!, criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for visiting Gospić three days before a planned protest in Zagreb against his government's handling of illegal waste disposal in Lika. She suggested he take a bag of waste from Gospić on his trip to Italy and ask Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni if it belongs to them. The issue involves nearly 37,000 tons of hazardous industrial waste illegally imported from Italy and Slovenia and dumped in Gospić since 2019. Plenković visited Gospić to meet with local representatives regarding the cleanup of tens of thousands of tons of illegally disposed waste but was met with resistance from the civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom.' He assured locals that drinking water from the public supply system is safe and that the government has a clear political will to address the problem.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the prime minister's actions negatively, suggesting he is evading responsibility by fleeing to Italy during protests. It uses strong rhetorical language ('bježi u Italiju') and implies criticism of the government's environmental policies. The tone is critical of the ruling party,
Why factuality (85): This article reiterates the accusations against Plenković, including his absence during the protest and his travel plans. It also provides context about the waste issue and the ongoing investigation, which is consistent with other reports. However, the language used is more confrontational and less
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear political angle, using sarcastic and provocative language ('sugeriram da ponese vreću...') to highlight the perceived hypocrisy of the premier. This makes the tone more subjective and less balanced.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 657 days ago
Prime Minister Andrej Plenković stated he would not attend the Saturday protest 'Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia' in Zagreb because he would be attending a conference in Italy. He emphasized that his government focuses on solving problems rather than protesting. The protest, organized by citizens around the Civic Initiative 'Gospic is Our Home,' aims to highlight issues related to tens of thousands of tons of illegally dumped waste in the Gospic area. Plenković confirmed that legal proceedings have been initiated against those responsible, involving 14 physical and four legal entities. He also mentioned that water quality tests conducted by the Croatian Institute of Public Health show that drinking water in Gospic and the entire Licko-Senjska county is safe for consumption. Additionally, he announced changes to the legal framework to strengthen penalties for environmental crimes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Plenković's statements neutrally, focusing on his explanation for not attending the protest and his government's actions regarding the illegal waste issue. There is no evident bias in the framing, word choice, or emphasis. The content provides balanced information
Why factuality (85): Premier Plenković's statement is reported accurately, including his absence due to an Italian conference and his comments on the government's role in solving problems. The article references legal actions taken against those responsible for illegal waste dumping, which aligns with other reports. The
Why objectivity (65): While the article presents Premier Plenković's position objectively, it also includes his dismissive remarks about the protest, suggesting a slight bias. The tone is somewhat critical of the protest movement, though it does not overtly take sides beyond reporting the premier's statements.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 605 days ago
Sandra Benčić, coordinator and parliamentary representative of the Možemo party, commented on the issue of illegal waste disposal in Gospić and noted that Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is traveling to Italy on the day before a large protest in Zagreb. She criticized Plenković's government for turning Croatia into a European waste dump and suggested he bring a bag of waste from Gospić on his trip to ask Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni if it belongs to them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the prime minister's actions negatively, using strong criticism and suggesting he should confront Italy over the waste issue, which implies a critique of his government's policies and aligns with oppositional rhetoric.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the controversy surrounding Premier Plenković’s travel plans and the criticism from Sandra Benčić regarding his alleged avoidance of public scrutiny. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Plenković is traveling to Gospić and Italy around the time of a protest. However
Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, especially in the phrase 'bježi u Italiju' (flees to Italy), which implies a negative judgment. The article uses emotionally charged language and frames the situation as a political scandal rather than presenting it neutrally.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
