Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 98Objective 658 days agoPop singer Severina called for participation in the 'March for Lika' protest in Zagreb, organized by the initiative 'Gospic is our home.' She emphasized that the protest is against pollution, illness, and corruption, stating these issues affect everyone regardless of ideology. Severina criticized authorities for suppressing dissent, referencing incidents in Serbia where students and citizens were beaten for demanding accountability. She accused opponents of the march of being either aligned with criminals who dumped waste in Gospic or with the government itself. Severina also urged athletes, religious groups, and pro-life activists to join the march, arguing that Croatia needs prayer and collective action to protect its environment and sovereignty.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a moral and environmental cause, criticizing government actions and aligning with anti-corruption and environmental protection narratives. The emphasis on grassroots activism, religious groups, and opposition to corporate interests suggests a progressive/leftist slp
Why factuality (98): This article provides an accurate summary of Severina's speech and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, making it highly factual.
Why objectivity (65): While more neutral than article 0, this article still contains subjective elements like 'žestoko pozivala' and emphasizes Severina’s support for the protest over opposing views, indicating some bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 658 days agoPop歌星Severina通过其Instagram账号呼吁民众参与抗议活动，反对在Lici非法倾倒危险废弃物的行为。她批评了腐败、污染和对公民的压迫，并将矛头指向塞尔维亚政府，指责其镇压寻求问责的市民。她强调需要勇敢和正直的人来拯救国家，并号召体育界人士和社会各界支持抗议行动，以保护环境和国家利益。她还提到历史人物和政治背景，暗示某些政客试图掩盖过去的关联。
Bias read (Progressive): 文章使用强烈的情感语言和道德谴责，指责腐败和压迫，并呼吁社会正义。文中提及政治人物的历史背景，暗示某些政客试图掩盖过去与体制的关系，带有明显的左翼意识形态倾向。同时，文章鼓励公众行动并强调社会责任，符合左翼价值观。
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports Severina's statements and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, making it very factual.
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone but still leans in favor of the protest by emphasizing the importance of the cause and the need for action, showing mild bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 96Objective 858 days ago HDZ responded to the alleged instructions to the membership about the protest: "Amateur subversion"The article reports that a screenshot of a message allegedly sent within a WhatsApp group of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has circulated on social media. The message appears to instruct members on how to respond to the 'Hodaj za Liku' protest, organized for September 5th in Zagreb against illegal and toxic waste in Gospić. The message suggests attacking groups and individuals associated with the protest using specific labels such as 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and 'Yugoslavs.' It also encourages continued attacks with different epithets if responses are received. In response, HDZ called the content 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, claiming it reflects growing frustration with radical leftist movements and attempts to misrepresent the protest as being orchestrated by HDZ. The party denied any involvement in organizing the protest and criticized past leftist-led protests as failures.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the alleged instructions as a form of 'amateurish sabotage' by activists, implying that the opposition (leftist groups) are attempting to manipulate public perception through disinformation. The language used by HDZ emphasizes the threat posed by radical leftist movements and the
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 96Objective 858 days agoThe ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has issued a strongly worded statement criticizing what they describe as amateurish disinformation spread by radical left activists online. The HDZ claims these activists are attempting to shift blame onto them for issues related to waste management in Lika, suggesting that the growing awareness among citizens of the radical left’s alleged parasitic behavior is being falsely attributed to HDZ actions. In their post, the HDZ shared screenshots of what they claim are fabricated messages circulating on social media, which allegedly suggest that supporters of protests should be labeled as extremists, Yugoslavs, anti-Croatians, or haters of all things Croatian. The HDZ emphasized that it does not oppose any legal protest and reiterated that the upcoming protest in Lika is scheduled for September 5th. They further argue that the left has faced setbacks with previous protests like 'Rijeka Nepravda' and the Balkan March, and now seeks to deflect attention from its failure to address local issues such as waste management in Gospić by creating false narratives.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the HDZ's perspective using strong language such as 'amateurs,' 'parasitic behavior,' and 'fabricated messages.' It frames the radical left as spreading disinformation and accuses them of shifting blame onto the HDZ while ignoring local issues. The tone is critical of the left,
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and focuses on the content of HDZ's response.
Večernji listIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 807 days agoThe article reports that the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has denied being behind a controversial message circulating online, which urges supporters to attack groups and individuals associated with the radical left during an upcoming protest against waste management issues in Lika. The message, attributed to the HDZ's 'media team,' instructs followers to engage in aggressive rhetoric against 'extreme leftists, anti-Heratians, Yugoslavs, and haters of everything that is Croatian.' HDZ claims this is an attempt by activists to shift blame onto them, arguing that the left wing is increasingly seen as trying to exploit the protest for political gain. The article states that the left has faced setbacks, including failed protests like the Rijeka Nepravda demonstration and the Balkan March, and now seeks to co-opt civil initiatives like the Gospić initiative. HDZ asserts that these fabricated messages aim to distract the public from the true issue, waste management, and highlight the lack of concern for citizens’ well-being.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy around the alleged involvement of HDZ in inciting anti-left rhetoric, portraying the left as irresponsible and politically motivated. It emphasizes the perceived failure of leftist movements and suggests that their attempts to co-opt civil initiatives are disingenu
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports HDZ's response to the alleged fake message circulating online. It includes direct quotes from HDZ's official statement and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents HDZ's perspective neutrally, avoiding emotional language and providing both sides of the argument. It remains objective in its reporting of the incident.
Telegram.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 757 days agoA fake message attributed to the HDZ (Croatian conservative party) has been circulating online, instructing supporters on how to respond to an upcoming protest in Gospić related to waste management. The message urges participants to attack 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and others who oppose Croatian national interests. The HDZ has denied responsibility, calling the message 'amateurish sabotage' and accusing the left of trying to co-opt the protest for their own political gain. They argue that the left failed previous protests and now seeks to undermine the current initiative by falsely associating it with HDZ. The protest, titled 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku,' is scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest as a legitimate civic initiative being undermined by the left, which the HDZ accuses of attempting to co-opt it for political purposes. The language used to describe the left ('extreme leftists,' 'parasitic workers') carries a negative tone, aligning with right-wing or
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the HDZ's response to the circulated message, including the content of the message and the claim that it was fabricated. It cites the source of the message (ZADAR News) and includes direct quotes from HDZ's statement. This aligns well with the primary source document
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone but does present the HDZ's position as the authoritative one, potentially giving more weight to their narrative than others. There is some subtle bias in the interpretation of the situation.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 705 days agoThe article discusses the selection of the company Kostak for the cleanup of an illegal waste dump in Gospić, Croatia. Kostak, based in Zagreb and linked to a Slovenian firm, was chosen for this task despite having previously competed for a major environmental project, the cleanup of the Sovjak pit near Rijeka. In that case, Kostak did not win the contract, which went to a consortium including GK Group, Ekoma, and Ivicom Consulting. This decision later became part of an investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which found evidence of corruption involving Miroslav Šaravanja, owner of Sokol Vinkovci, and Robert Gotić, a prominent member of the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and former mayor of Varazdin. Šaravanja admitted to paying approximately €130,000 in bribes to Gotić between December 2020 and February 2022 to influence decisions related to the Sovjak project and other business matters. Gotić denied any wrongdoing. While Kostak was not directly implicated in criminal charges, they were mentioned in the indictment as one of the competitors in the Sovjak tender process.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights allegations of corruption involving a prominent HDZ member and a businessperson, suggesting systemic issues within the political establishment. The framing emphasizes the involvement of HDZ figures in corrupt practices, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of conservative
Why factuality (80): The article discusses an environmental case involving an HDZ-linked company and legal actions taken by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). It cites specific names, amounts, and legal outcomes. While there is no primary source, the information appears consistent with public records and le
Why objectivity (70): The article has a slightly biased tone, particularly when discussing the involvement of HDZ officials and the alleged misuse of connections. Phrases like 'illegal dumping' and 'using connections' imply judgment, though not overtly partisan. The focus on the legal consequences suggests a critical per
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 706 days ago Kovačević: At one point, the play of the HDZ-Sopran concept of the circular economy beganThe article mentions Božo Kovačević, a former ambassador to Russia and former minister of environment, who participated in a program on 'Novo Dnevno' where he discussed various topics including Serbia, the death of Ratko Mladić, and waste management issues in Gospić. The headline suggests a critique of the HDZ (Croatian Democratic Union)-led interpretation of a circular economy, implying a political stance against certain policies. However, the content of the article does not provide detailed information on the discussion or the specific arguments related to the circular economy.
Bias read (Progressive): The headline implies criticism of the HDZ's approach to the circular economy, which could suggest a left-leaning perspective. While the article does not explicitly state this, the framing of the discussion around environmental policies and potential critiques of conservative economic approaches may傾
Why factuality (80): This article accurately reports the claim by HDZ that the messages circulating online are an amateur attempt by radical left-wing groups. It provides direct quotes from HDZ’s official response and details the content of the alleged message. It aligns closely with the primary source document regardin
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the HDZ's stance clearly, it frames the issue as a conflict between HDZ and radical leftist groups, which could be seen as slightly biased. However, it remains relatively neutral in its reporting.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 78Objective 656 days agoThe article discusses a protest in Zagreb against illegal waste dumping, organized by the initiative 'Gospić is our home.' Protesters argue that such issues are not limited to Gospić but affect many locations across Croatia. The movement has sparked debate online, where some users claim that supporters of the protests are labeled as extremists, anti-Heretics, and Yugoslavs. The HDZ party has denied these claims, calling them amateurish attempts to discredit the protest. Meanwhile, prominent figures like former football player Igor Štimac have labeled protesters as anti-Heretic, while others like Severina have called for unity and participation in the demonstration. The article highlights the polarized reactions to the protest, with some fearing ideological manipulation and others emphasizing the need for collective action.
Bias read (Center): While the article covers a politically sensitive issue involving accusations of ideological labeling, it presents multiple perspectives without clear editorial bias. It includes voices from both the HDZ party and activists, as well as public opinion, suggesting a balanced approach rather than a slan
Why factuality (78): The article reports on a protest organized by 'Gospić je naš dom' and mentions concerns about illegal waste dumping. It cites statements from Daria Došen and local residents, as well as reactions from HDZ and media. While there is no primary source, the information aligns with the cross-source conse
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards supporting the protesters and criticizing the opposition, particularly mentioning the HDZ's alleged smear campaign. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'ekološke aktiviste' and frames the protest as a necessary action, showing bias toward the organizers.
Index.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 658 days ago HDZ on the alleged message to party members: This is an amateur subversion of the radical leftThe Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), Croatia's ruling party, has denounced a WhatsApp message circulating on social media, claiming it was fabricated and part of an amateur effort by the radical left to undermine a planned protest. The message allegedly instructed members to attack individuals supporting the 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' (Walk for Love, Walk for Croatia) demonstration using fake profiles. The message, which claimed to come from the top of the HDZ, urged supporters to engage in online harassment against those they deemed 'extreme leftists,' 'anti-Heretics,' and others. The message was shared by journalist Hrvoje Bajlo of ZADAR News, who called it malicious and illiterate. HDZ claims the message is a fabrication meant to divert attention from their alleged failure to address issues like waste management in Gospić. They accuse the radical left of trying to co-opt the protest for political gain. The protest, organized by a citizens' initiative, aims to highlight environmental concerns in Gospić and is scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest and the alleged fake message as efforts by the radical left to destabilize civic action, implying that the left is politically motivated and manipulative. The language used to describe the left as 'radical' and 'trying to hijack' a legitimate civic movement carries a右翼
Why factuality (75): The article discusses the potential impact of the waste issue on HDZ, citing expert opinions and providing background on the environmental concerns. It references the growing support for the protest and the seriousness of the issue, which aligns with the primary source document. However, it lacks de
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards emphasizing the significance of the issue and the potential threat to HDZ, which may suggest a slight political bias. The article frames the protest as having national importance, possibly influencing reader perception.
Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 606 days ago The waste affair could be unlike any that HDZ has ever survived.The article discusses a growing civil protest against illegal and hazardous waste dumping in Gospić, Croatia, which has been occurring for decades. The waste, primarily toxic, has been illegally transported into the area and dumped in nature reserves, raising concerns over environmental contamination of land and water. The protest, organized by the citizens' initiative 'Gospić je naš dom,' is gaining support daily. Four political analysts agree that this issue could be more significant than previous scandals involving the ruling HDZ party. They highlight the symbolic weight of environmental protection in Croatia and warn that if this becomes part of a broader pattern, it could lead to serious consequences for the ruling party. Analysts suggest that the ruling party may attempt to deflect blame and divide responsibility, but they acknowledge the potential for increased public pressure and mobilization against them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the waste scandal as a significant threat to the ruling party, emphasizing the potential for widespread public mobilization and environmental symbolism. It highlights the role of citizen initiatives and criticizes the ruling party's attempts to deflect blame, suggesting a leftward
Why factuality (70): The article discusses the waste issue and the upcoming protest, quoting political analysts and referencing the environmental impact. It provides general information about the issue and the expected turnout, though it doesn't cite specific data or sources for the analysts' comments.
Why objectivity (60): The article has a somewhat promotional tone, especially when discussing the potential impact of the protest. It emphasizes the national importance of the issue, which could be interpreted as a form of editorializing.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 555 days ago Macan about anti-Croats' at the protest: 'It is anti-Croatian to dump garbage in Gospić like this'Communications expert Krešimir Macan comments on the politicization of protests in Croatia, particularly regarding claims that participants are 'anti-Heritage' or 'anti-Croatian.' He discusses the challenges of organizing large demonstrations in Zagreb, noting logistical difficulties and skepticism about turnout. Macan criticizes the HDZ for allegedly spreading messages labeling protesters as anti-Heritage and Yugoslav supporters, while acknowledging similar tactics from other right-wing groups. He compares these actions to the influence of Serbian leaders like Vučić, who gained popularity through effective communication. The discussion highlights divisions within political parties and the lack of consensus on environmental issues, such as waste disposal in Gospić. Macan argues that the protest against pollution is not inherently anti-Croatian but rather a reaction to poor waste management practices across the country.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the labeling of protesters as 'anti-Heritage' by right-wing figures, suggesting this is a politically motivated tactic to undermine the movement. It critiques the HDZ and other conservative groups for using divisive rhetoric, while praising more articulate,左
Why factuality (65): Article discusses a political commentary on the protest against illegal waste dumping in Gospić, referencing a communication strategy by Krešimir Macan. It references the involvement of public figures and mentions the HDZ's denial of a directive. While it aligns with the primary source document rega
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat biased towards criticizing the HDZ and suggesting political manipulation. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'antihrvatsko' and implies political polarization, showing a clear leaning toward one perspective.
Klauški: A new patriotism was seen at the protest.The article reports on a live studio discussion featuring Tomislav Klauški, a columnist from Expressa 24, who commented on the recent 'Hodaj za Liku' protest held in Zagreb. The protest appears to have been organized by individuals expressing nationalist sentiments, which the article notes was not labeled as 'anti-Heritage' by the HDZ party. The piece includes interactive elements such as viewer comments and social media engagement prompts but does not provide detailed information on the protest’s specific demands, participants, or broader political implications.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a discussion on a political protest without overtly endorsing or criticizing the event. It mentions the HDZ party's failure to label the movement as 'anti-Heritage,' suggesting some level of controversy, but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral,撮
Klauški: A new patriotism was seen at the protest.Tomislav Klauški, guest on N1's live show 'Studija', discussed the Saturday protest 'Hodaj za Liku' held in Zagreb. He described the event as showing a new form of patriotism that had not been seen before, which even the HDZ could not label as anti-Croatian. The protest was marked by a large presence of black-clad individuals and right-wing activists, creating an impression that much of Croatia was wrapped in black. Klauški noted that while organizers did not want the protest to be explicitly political, it still conveyed a message against the ruling HDZ and Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. He argued that the situation in certain regions has made citizens more dependent on the HDZ, as they hold the keys to solving problems. He criticized institutional corruption and suggested that the HDZ has created a 'black cloud' over the country. Regarding the absence of athletes at the protest, he sarcastically remarked that they would likely have attended if rapper Thompson had been present, implying that Thompson was under HDZ patronage. He also commented on the Catholic Church's reluctance to oppose the HDZ, noting that Bishop Mate Uzunić recognized this new form of patriotism but others in
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a new form of patriotism that challenges the HDZ, criticizes institutional corruption linked to the HDZ, and highlights the HDZ's dominance over Croatian institutions. The tone is critical of the ruling party and emphasizes the need for change, suggesting a leftward
Croatia
