Trade unions support the people of Lika and the protest Walk for Lika and for Croatia

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

A company from Zaprešić called Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, and the company has eight months to complete the work. This decision was made by the Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency, which evaluated bids based on cost and expertise. Another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković, emphasized the importance of removing illegal waste and minimizing environmental risks during a meeting on Wednesday.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a government-funded environmental cleanup project, including the selection of a contractor, the amount of funding, and the rejection of another bid. It includes quotes from the Prime Minister but does not exhibit clear ideological framing or biased word

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group as the contractor for removing 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from Gospić, including the contract value of 357,500 euros and the rejection of the second bid. It aligns closely with the primary source document, though it does not mention th

Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on facts such as the selection process, contract details, and the timeline for completion. There is no evident bias or emotionally charged language.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to handle approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The company will receive €357,500 (excluding VAT) for this task. The decision was based on the highest score according to price and professional expertise criteria, signed off by the Fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for €578,500 was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of €400,000. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to remove illegal waste in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to prevent water contamination and the removal of waste contained in bags.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize particular political narratives. While the issue involves public帑

Why factuality (95): This article provides an accurate summary of the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, including the financial aspects and the rejection of another bid. However, like the first article, it does not include the clarification from Kostak about the nature of their i

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without any apparent bias or subjective commentary.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, based on the highest score according to price and professional experience criteria. The decision was signed by the fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to address illegal waste removal in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to eliminate even the smallest trace and possibility of water contamination, along with transporting part of the waste contained in the bags.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It includes quotes from the prime minister regarding environmental concerns but does not take a clear ideological stance.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, along with the financial terms and the rejection of the higher-priced bid. It lacks the clarification from Kostak regarding the scope of their work but otherwise matches the primary source d

Why objectivity (95): The article remains objective, delivering the information in a straightforward manner without showing favoritism or using emotive language.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

The Croatian company Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The decision by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund was announced on Wednesday, stating that Tabak Grupa’s bid received the highest score based on cost and professional experience. The winning bid amounts to 357,500 euros excluding VAT, while another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS worth 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and dissatisfied bidders may file a complaint within ten days to the State Commission for Public Procurement Control. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković emphasized during a meeting on Wednesday that the fund’s decision aims to cover the landfill and eliminate any water runoff risks.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a public procurement decision made by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund. It includes quotes from the fund director and mentions the prime minister's comments but does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, including the contract amount and the rejection of the second bid. It does not include the clarification from Kostak about the nature of their involvement being strictly construction-related

Why objectivity (95): The article is presented in a neutral and factual manner, avoiding any biased language or opinionated statements.

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

Premijer Andrej Plenković, tokom sastanka u Gospiću, reagirao je na zabrinutost stanovnika vezanu uz nezakonito odlaganje otpada. Naglasio je da je Fond za zaštitu okoliša donio odluke o odabiru izvođača za prekrivanje odlagališta i odnošenje otpada u vrećama. Ocjenu je dao da je situacija s rasutim otpadom ozbiljna, s procjenom oko 4.500 tona, dok je zakopani otpad procjenjen na 33 tone i 33.000 tona. Plenković je istaknuo da su nalozi nadležnim tijelima dati, da će se uklanjati otpad u najskorijem roku, i da je voda iz javne vodoopskrbe zdravstveno ispravna. Također je naglasio da se brzo vrši kazneni postupak protiv osoba odgovornih za odlaganje otpada, a Vlada je preuzeo proces sanacije odlagališta.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's actions and responses to public concerns regarding waste management, without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It includes statements from the Prime Minister acknowledging public worries and outlining steps taken by the government, while also提及

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Prime Minister Plenković's address regarding the illegal waste disposal in Gospić and the selection of the contractor. It includes relevant details about the process and the expected actions.

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, reporting on the government's response and the steps being taken without showing bias or personal opinion.

Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 905 days ago

The article reports that a Croatian branch of a Slovenian waste management company, Kostak, has been selected by the Environmental Protection Fund to cover 33,000 tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. The same company was previously found to have illegally buried municipal waste last year, which required excavation and remediation. The project was estimated at €400,000 before tax, but Kostak offered to complete it for €268,740. The company is led by Miljenko Muha, who was previously accused alongside three others and an environmental inspector for illegal waste burial. Slovenian media reported that Kostak handled all the waste this year. Police have initiated a criminal report and investigation into the case, which is ongoing. Investigators suspect the company gained €8.7 million in profits through illegal waste burial.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a legal and ethical violation by the company, highlighting potential corruption and financial gain through illegal activities. It emphasizes the involvement of local authorities and the ongoing investigation, suggesting systemic issues rather than just individual罪

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and references the prior legal issues with the company. It provides precise details about the cost estimates, the involvement of Miljenko Muha, and the ongoing police investigation, aligning closely with the primar

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone, presenting facts without editorializing or showing bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on delivering the information clearly and concisely.

Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 905 days ago

The environmental protection fund has selected the company Kostak-Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine d.o.o. from Zagreb to cover hazardous buried waste in Gospić, with the task estimated at 400,000 euros excluding VAT, and the company offered to perform the work for 268,740 euros. The chosen company, a subsidiary of Slovenian municipal enterprise Kostak, was previously found to have illegally disposed of communal waste last year, requiring excavation and remediation. The company operates the Kostak Waste Management Center in Spodnji Stari Grad.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the selection of the company as a consequence of its previous illegal waste disposal, implying regulatory oversight and accountability. While the company is presented as having been sanctioned, the emphasis on its past violations suggests a critical stance toward corporate conduct

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and references the prior legal issues with the company. It provides precise details about the cost estimates, the involvement of Miljenko Muha, and the ongoing police investigation, aligning closely with the primar

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone, presenting facts without editorializing or showing bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on delivering the information clearly and concisely.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 905 days ago

The article reports that cities and municipalities surrounding the city of Split have stopped transporting their waste to Karepovac starting Wednesday. This decision follows previous meetings between Split’s mayor Tomislav Šuta and representatives from nearby areas such as Brela, Baška Voda, Podgore, Tučepa, Kaštela, as well as the Fund for Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition. Šuta confirmed that Omiš and other municipalities associated with the Omiška Komunalna Poduzetnica (Peovici) will no longer send waste to Karepovac. He noted that while some areas like Kaštela have resolved part of their waste issue, others, including the Croatian region, still need solutions. Šuta emphasized the goal of stopping waste transportation from the Croatian side through peaceful dialogue and normal communication, expecting a resolution soon. He also highlighted his efforts to protect Split residents by reducing waste volume, unpleasant smells, and disruptions to daily life for those in the Kamen, Šin, Mejaša area and related regions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on municipal waste management decisions without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on administrative actions and discussions among local authorities without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. The tone remains neutral, focusing on

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the closure of Karepovac to surrounding municipalities and includes details about the meeting between mayors and officials. While it doesn't mention the specific issue in Gospić, it provides factual information about the waste management situation in the Split-Dalma

Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the practical implications of the closure and the efforts by local authorities to find solutions. It avoids taking sides but uses some descriptive language that could be seen as slightly favoring the affected communities.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 856 days ago

Unions in Croatia have expressed full support for citizens of Lika and their protest 'Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia,' which is scheduled to take place in Zagreb on Saturday, September 5th. The unions, Savez samostalnih sindikata Hrvatske (SSSH), Nezavisni hrvatski sindikati (NHS), and Matica hrvatskih sindikata (MHS), are calling on the Croatian government and relevant authorities to urgently address health risks, assign responsibility for institutional failures, and establish systems to prevent such incidents from recurring. They emphasize that citizens of Lika have a right to demand protection of health, safety, environment, and property, especially when there are serious suspicions of illegal waste management and inadequate responses from institutions. The unions argue that this issue is not limited to Lika but affects the entire country, highlighting the fundamental right to a clean environment and safe living conditions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests as legitimate demands for environmental and institutional accountability, emphasizing the rights of citizens and criticizing government inaction. It uses strong language supporting the protesters' cause and criticizes attempts to discredit their actions as politically

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the support given by trade unions to the citizens of Lika and the planned protest. It provides context about the demands being made and the concerns raised by the unions. The content aligns closely with the information presented in the primary source documents.

Why objectivity (85): The article takes a clear stance in support of the protesters and emphasizes the need for institutional accountability. While it presents factual information, it also includes strong language that reflects the unions' position rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago

The waste disposal site at Karepovac near Split will close to surrounding cities and municipalities starting tomorrow, forcing them to find alternative locations for waste management. Most towns and municipalities in the Split-Dalmatia county were allowed to dispose of household waste there until now, but they were supposed to secure alternatives. However, some have yet to find solutions, including Podgora, Tučepi, Baška Voda, and Brela. All contacted waste sites in Croatia have refused to accept their waste, creating a significant challenge during the tourist season, which increases waste volume by up to ten times. The affected municipalities have hired lawyers and are preparing lawsuits against the City of Split, citing an existing agreement that allowed waste disposal at Karepovac until a new regional center in Lećevica is completed. Local officials expressed concerns about finding temporary solutions before the new facility opens.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the challenges faced by local governments and the legal actions being taken, without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from multiple officials expressing concern and seeking resolution, indicating balanced coverage.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the situation around Karepovac and the challenges faced by municipalities in finding alternative waste disposal sites. It provides relevant background about the legal agreements and the current status of the regional waste center.

Why objectivity (85): While the article is mostly factual, it contains some subjective language such as 'velik problem' (big problem) and 'normalno odlažemo otpad' (normally dispose of waste), which could imply a value judgment about the current situation.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 826 days ago

Premijer Andrej Plenković, uz pet ministara, planira da dođe u Gospić u Srijedu na sastanak o problemu nelegalnog otpada na tom području. Informacija je potvrđena ličko-senjskim županom Ernestom Petry. Sastanak će uključivati lokalne vlasti, Državni inspektorat, Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo i Fudn za zaštitu okoliša. Prosvjed pod nazivom 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' najavljen je za subotu u Zagrebu.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government meeting regarding illegal waste disposal, which is a politically sensitive issue. The framing remains neutral, presenting both the government action and the planned protest without overtly favoring either side. The focus is on the event itself rather than taking a

Why factuality (92): The article closely follows the primary source, providing exact times, locations, and participants. It includes quotes from local officials and contextualizes the meeting within the broader issue of illegal waste disposal. The information is comprehensive and aligned with the primary source.

Why objectivity (82): The tone remains largely neutral, although there is a brief quote from the premier that suggests a stance against protests, which may introduce a subtle bias. However, this is presented as a direct quote rather than an opinionated statement.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

The Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marije Vučković, stated that the government aims to quickly remediate waste in Gospić. The chosen company for covering the waste has been linked to illegal dumping in Slovenia, raising concerns. Vučković clarified that the selection process was market research, not a procurement process, and that neither the ministry nor the Fund had influenced the choice of the contractor. She emphasized the need for speed and efficiency, aiming to complete the cleanup before heavy rains. The situation highlights broader issues with thousands of illegal landfills across Croatia, ranging from construction to hazardous waste.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the minister’s statements and clarifications regarding the selection of a contractor for environmental remediation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects and the ap

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and mentions the prior legal issues involving the company. It aligns closely with the primary source regarding the cost estimates and the involvement of Miljenko Muha. However, it lacks some contextual details from

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, quoting the minister directly and avoiding overt bias. It explains the process of market research and procurement without taking sides or using emotive language.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

Croatia's Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marija Vučković, stated during a visit to Gospić that the government aims to quickly address waste management issues there. When asked about concerns regarding the selection of a contractor with questionable business practices for covering waste, she clarified that neither her ministry nor the relevant fund had intervened in the proposal process. Vučković emphasized that the process involved researching the market by contacting multiple domestic and international companies, aiming to prepare a comprehensive plan and expedite environmental cleanup while protecting the state budget. She noted that the chosen contractor was selected based on cost and time efficiency, with a three-month deadline set to avoid delays caused by heavy rain. The situation differs from past controversies like those involving Sovjak, where contracts were terminated due to similar issues.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the minister's statements and does not exhibit clear bias toward any political side. It includes direct quotes from Vučković and provides context about the selection process and previous controversies, without overtly favoring one perspective over another.

Why factuality (90): This article mirrors the content of article 1, accurately reporting the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and referencing the prior legal issues with the company. It provides similar details about the cost estimates and the role of Miljenko Muha, aligning well with the primary sourc

Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral, quoting the minister and explaining the procurement process without showing favoritism or using emotionally charged language. It focuses on the procedural aspects rather than taking a stance on the issue.

Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 858 days ago

The Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency has allocated an additional three million euros to support the cleanup of wild landfills across Croatia. This funding enables local governments, municipalities, and protected area institutions to apply for financial assistance for sanitation projects, with grants ranging up to 200,000 euros per site. The fund provides between 50% and 80% of the costs depending on the applicant. Over the past few years, approximately 24 million euros have been invested in such cleanups, with the fund contributing 16 million euros. The initiative aims not only to remove existing waste but also to prevent future illegal dumping by encouraging proper waste disposal practices and community engagement. The program remains open until the end of the year, with ongoing collaboration between the Ministry of Environment and Green Transition and local authorities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about environmental funding initiatives without overtly promoting any specific political ideology. It focuses on factual reporting regarding the allocation of funds, eligibility criteria, and the goals of the program. While the issue of environmental protection is a

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the funding allocated by the Environmental Fund for the cleanup of wild landfills. It provides specific figures and details about the financial support available to municipalities. However, it doesn't directly address the Gospić case mentioned in the primary source.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone while discussing the fund's activities. It focuses on the financial aspects and the goals of the program without showing overt bias toward any particular viewpoint.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 756 days ago

Predsjednik vlade Andrija Plenković i ministri posjetit će Gospić u srijedu kako bi razgovarali o rješavanju problema ilegala odloženog otpada. Sastanak će uključivati predstavnike lokalnih institucija, zajednice i građanskih inicijativa. U Zagrebu se priprema veliki prosvjed „Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku!“, koji je podržao zbog odlaganja opasnog otpada u Lici. Dijelovi desnih političkih krugova tvrde da prosvjed ima jugoslavensku lijevu okus, dok inicijativa „Gospić je naš dom“ odbacuje ovu tezu kao spin.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government meeting regarding illegal waste disposal and mentions a protest, but does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both perspectives, right-wing claims about the protest being influenced by leftist ideas and the counterclaim by a local initiative, that the '

Why factuality (88): This article provides accurate details about the meeting, including the timing, participants, and the context of the protest. It references the primary source document and includes additional context about political tensions surrounding the protest, which is supported by external reporting.

Why objectivity (75): The article has a more critical tone toward right-wing actors who have claimed the protest is influenced by 'Yugoslav leftism.' This introduces a slight bias, even if it is framed as reporting others' views rather than expressing them directly.

tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

The Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund has selected two contractors for waste remediation work at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The Zagreb-based Zaprešić Tabak Group was chosen to remove and manage approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags, while the Croatian branch of Slovenia’s Kostak company was selected to cover the illegally buried waste. The Kostak subsidiary had previously been linked to illegal waste disposal practices in Slovenia, where inspectors found that around 2,900 square meters of mixed municipal waste were unlawfully buried at their facility in Spodnji Stari Grad. Slovenian authorities have launched an ongoing investigation into these activities, suspecting financial gains of up to €8.7 million through illegal dumping. Despite this, the fund proceeded with selecting the Croatian branch of Kostak for the covering task, citing no legal barriers.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights concerns over environmental mismanagement and potential corruption by linking the selected contractor to prior illegal waste disposal activities. It emphasizes the ongoing police investigation and suggests possible conflicts of interest, which frames the situation as a matter

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the selection of contractors by the Environmental Protection Fund and provides specific details about the work involved. It references the legal framework and procurement process, aligning closely with the primary source document.

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual information about the selected contractors and the procedures followed. It avoids taking sides and presents the situation objectively without editorializing.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 786 days ago

The article reports that President of the Government, Andrej Plenković, along with ministers, will attend a meeting in Gospić focused on addressing illegal waste disposal. The meeting, held in the premises of the Lika-Senj County Council, will involve representatives of environmental protection institutions, the Croatian Institute of Public Health, and the State Inspectorate. Plenković will meet with local authorities and citizen initiatives working on cleaning up illegally dumped waste in Gospić. The meeting takes place ahead of a large protest 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' planned for September 5th in Zagreb.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a government meeting regarding environmental issues without overtly favoring any political stance. It provides balanced information about the participants and the purpose of the meeting without emphasizing ideological positions or taking sides in the debate.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the location, time, and participants of the meeting as per the primary source. It adds information about additional attendees like representatives from environmental protection organizations, which is not explicitly mentioned in the primary source but aligns with commo

Why objectivity (78): The tone remains neutral, though there is some emphasis on the significance of the meeting in relation to the upcoming protest. The article does not take sides but presents the context around the protest, which could be seen as slightly leaning towards highlighting the importance of civic engagement

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 605 days ago

The article discusses public discontent over toxic waste in Gospić, focusing on a protest organized by environmental activists calling for 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' (Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia). Citizens surveyed on the street expressed concerns about the removal of toxic waste from Gospić and the broader country, fearing the impact of illegal landfills on the environment and public health. The article highlights the growing frustration with government inaction and the lack of trust in institutions. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, despite previous claims of institutional control over the cleanup of the Šince landfill, has decided to visit Gospić with his ministers due to public pressure. The article suggests that this decision reflects a shift in political dynamics, where public sentiment, though often dismissed by authorities, is gaining traction. It emphasizes the importance of citizen voices, even if individual actions seem insignificant, as collective action can lead to meaningful change.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames public dissatisfaction with government handling of environmental issues as a legitimate concern, emphasizing grassroots activism and the need for accountability. While it does not overtly criticize specific policies, it portrays the government’s previous assurances as disingenuous

Why factuality (85): Article presents a narrative about Premier Plenković’s visit to Gospić and public sentiment around waste management issues. It includes quotes from citizens and references to a protest in Zagreb. While not citing specific primary sources, it aligns with the cross-source consensus that there is publi

Why objectivity (60): The tone is emotionally charged, using phrases like 'strah', 'plaha sredovječna gospođa', and 'nema to smisla'. The article frames the situation through the lens of citizen frustration and highlights personal anecdotes, which introduces bias. It also lacks balance by focusing more on criticism of th

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 754 days ago

A site containing illegal hazardous waste in Croatia needs to be covered by a waterproof layer by October 12th or 13th, potentially earlier. The Environmental Protection Fund explains that a 6-millimeter thick waterproof film will be placed over the entire area, including the sides, to prevent rainwater from penetrating the waste. Water will be directed into surrounding channels and collection wells, with additional protection provided by clay soil. However, this is not considered a final cleanup. The work is being carried out by the Croatian branch of the Slovenian waste management company Kostak from Krsk. In Slovenia, the company has been under suspicion of illegally burying municipal waste, but they deny these claims, stating that any improper storage was later remediated. They clarify their role is limited to creating the protective cover, not handling the waste itself. The company is already active in Croatia, working on building a waste management center in Piškornica.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information objectively, quoting the Environmental Protection Fund and the involved company. It includes both the planned measures and the company’s denial of wrongdoing, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. There is no strong ideological framing or

Why factuality (80): Article provides detailed information about the proposed covering method and references the primary source regarding Kostak’s involvement. It accurately describes the nature of the work and the company’s stance.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is informative and objective, though it includes a video interview which may introduce a slight subjective element through the speaker’s perspective.

Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 756 days ago

Three Croatian trade union federations, Savez samostalnih sindikata Hrvatske (SSSH), Nezavisni hrvatski sindikati (NHS) i Matica hrvatskih sindikata (MHS), have fully supported the citizens of Lika in their protest 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku!' which will take place in Zagreb on September 5th. The unions call for urgent action from the Croatian government and relevant authorities to remove health risks, determine institutional failures, and establish systems to prevent such incidents. They emphasize that trust in institutions is built through action, not by diminishing citizens' justified concerns. The protests highlight serious concerns over illegal waste management practices and lack of timely responses from institutions. The unions stress that the right to clean environment, safe water, healthy soil, and life without fear of pollution is a fundamental human right and a matter of public interest for all of Croatia. They warn against attempts to discredit legitimate citizen demands with labels like 'politicization,' 'undermining authority,' or 'anti-Heritage.' The leaders of the unions urge solidarity with Lika and participation in the protest, emphasizing that the fight for a

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced stance by highlighting the concerns of citizens and the role of trade unions in advocating for institutional accountability. While the issue of environmental protection and institutional failure is politically sensitive, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the诉求（

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the selection of contractors by the Environmental Protection Fund and mentions the legal background of Kostak. It includes specific details about the contract values and the procurement process, aligning closely with the primary source.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but highlights the ongoing police investigation into Kostak, which could imply a critical stance toward the chosen contractor without explicit bias.