ON
← Back to feed
IrelandTechnology2 days ago

Tribunal hears of 2nd wording error in Aer Lingus report

A senior Aer Lingus manager testified before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) regarding two instances of incorrect word usage in a disciplinary investigation report. The manager explained that these errors led to misinterpretations of his intended meaning, particularly concerning a pilot's claim about the company's safety manual. The tribunal heard that the first error involved the word 'believe,' which the manager claimed should have been 'belie.' A second instance involved the word 'belies,' which had a different intended meaning.

A tribunal has upheld the sacking of a senior Aer Lingus flight attendant said by his colleagues to have refused to let a passenger use the on-board bathroom until he was reduced to tears.

The airline decided the actions of Alan O’Neill, a senior cabin crew member, amounted to gross misconduct and terminated him with notice after 12 years’ service with an otherwise clean disciplinary record, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has been told.

It rejected O’Neill’s complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against the airline in a decision just published.

A stand-off developed between O’Neill and a passenger after the senior flight attendant told him he could not use the bathroom while the plane was being refuelled on the tarmac in Marseilles on 9 April, 2024 for a flight to Dublin, the tribunal heard earlier this year.

Another flight attendant said passengers had been left to wait for the inbound jet in a part of the terminal with “apparently no bathrooms” available.

When O’Neill refused the passenger use of the toilet on safety grounds, the flight attendant, Clair Durkan, said she heard the passenger saying “under his breath” the words “oh for f**k’s sake”. She said he didn’t say it “directly” to O’Neill.

After take-off, when the “fasten seat belt” sign was still on, O’Neill had another interaction with the passenger when he got up and tried to go to the forward bathroom, the tribunal heard.

O’Neill was accused of refusing to let the passenger, a man in his thirties, to use the bathroom on the delayed flight for up to 45 minutes after take-off.

The length of time the customer had to wait is strongly disputed by O’Neill’s legal team, who say he was following standard operating procedures while the pilots had the “fasten seat belt” lit.

He told his bosses he was under strain in his personal life and that the man “triggered” him by swearing when he was first refused, the WRC was told earlier this year.

The passenger was also subject to a temporary flight ban after O’Neill wrote him up under the airline’s “disruptive passenger” procedure and read him a formal warning – a ban which was later “rescinded”, the airline’s legal team said.

Will a Middle East peace deal make any difference to inflation?

Listen |

32:03

That was after a different passenger wrote a complaint to the airline on 29 April 2024 about what happened during the flight and an investigation began, the tribunal heard.

The complaint writer reported that they boarded directly after the passenger and heard him ask O’Neill: “Any chance of using the toilet?”

The senior flight attendant’s reply, telling the customer no on safety grounds, was in an “angry, extremely unprofessional, hostile and snarly tone”, the complaint writer added.

The customer replied: “Oh for feck’s sake, we have been held here for an hour delay on the ground and badly need to use the toilet,” the complaint added.

O’Neill then “literally seemed to snap, and devoured the passenger in front of all passengers”, the complaint continued.

“Don’t you swear at me; do not swear at me, or I will have you removed from this aircraft,” O’Neill was quoted as saying.

The passenger “tried to respond politely”, but O’Neill “seemed to view the passenger as dirt and treated him that way”, the writer added.

“It was a clear case of someone abusing their power,” the customer added. “He used threatening body language and words against the passenger ... [he] escalated the situation at every moment, and fellow passengers were shocked,” the complaining passenger wrote.

It was put to company witnesses by counsel for the complainant, Jason Murray, that O’Neill’s position was that the passenger told him: “F**k you, I need to use the toilet.”

A statement later taken from O’Neill in a company probe stated that the passenger “tried to push past me on boarding to use the toilet during fuelling” and that he told the man he could use the bathroom when fuelling was finished.

“He started swearing. I informed him the bathroom was not available while fuelling ... He continued swearing. I informed him if he continued we would offload him,” the statement said.

He told his bosses he was “fearful” and felt “triggered” by the customer, the manager assigned to conduct a disciplinary process, Mary McHugh, told the tribunal.

Another flight attendant, Clair Durkan, said in evidence that when the passenger later refused to hand over his boarding pass when O’Neill was preparing to issue the formal warning, her senior colleague said: “He won’t be allowed to go to the toilet unless he gives the boarding pass,” she said.

Durkan added that O’Neill went to the passenger and told him: “You can’t go to the toilet. I’ll tell you whenever you can go to the toilet.”

McHugh said: “Okay, [the passenger] didn’t provide his boarding pass; but apart form that, he became upset, and was just complying and embarrassed.”

The second most senior flight attendant aboard, Joan O’Gorman, told the tribunal she saw the passenger “crying” coming d


Read the full article at The Irish Times →
Source document: Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)

4 reports

RTÉ NewsState / PublicCenter2 days ago
Aer Lingus flight attendant loses dismissal claim at WRC

A tribunal has ruled in favor of Aer Lingus, upholding the dismissal of senior flight attendant Alan O'Neill. The case involved an incident where O'Neill allegedly refused a passenger access to the onboard bathroom during refueling in Marseilles. The tribunal found that O'Neill's actions constituted gross misconduct, leading to his termination despite a previously clean disciplinary record. The dispute arose over safety concerns related to using the bathroom during refueling.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of the tribunal ruling without apparent ideological framing. It reports on the outcome of a labor dispute based on legal proceedings and does not exhibit clear bias toward either the employee or employer. The language remains neutral, focusing on the facts of O

Official sources cited

  • government Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)
The Irish TimesIndependent🔒Center2 days ago
Aer Lingus flight attendant involved in passenger bathroom access row loses dismissal claim

A tribunal has ruled in favor of Aer Lingus after upholding the termination of a senior flight attendant, Alan O'Neill, who was accused of refusing a passenger bathroom access during a flight delay in Marseilles. The incident occurred while the plane was being refueled, and O'Neill cited safety concerns. A fellow flight attendant reported hearing the passenger mutter expletives but not directly at O'Neill. The tribunal found the airline's action justified under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a workplace dispute without overt ideological framing. It reports on the tribunal's decision and includes details from both the employee and employer perspectives without apparent bias.

Official sources cited

  • government Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)
The Irish TimesIndependent🔒Center3 days ago
Tribunal hears of second wording error in Aer Lingus pilot disciplinary report

A senior Aer Lingus manager, Conor Barrett, testified before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) that a second passage in a disciplinary investigation report appeared to support a pilot who was later demoted due to a typographical error. Barrett explained that he intended to use the word 'belie' but mistakenly wrote 'believe.' He also clarified that when he used the word 'belies' elsewhere in the report, it had a different meaning. The tribunal is examining the case as part of a whistleblower penalty claim.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal proceeding involving a workplace dispute and typographical errors in a disciplinary report. It presents facts without apparent ideological framing or biased language. The content focuses on procedural details of the tribunal and does not take a stance on broader policy

Official sources cited

RTÉ NewsState / PublicCenter3 days ago
Tribunal hears of 2nd wording error in Aer Lingus report

A senior Aer Lingus manager testified before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) regarding two instances of incorrect word usage in a disciplinary investigation report. The manager explained that these errors led to misinterpretations of his intended meaning, particularly concerning a pilot's claim about the company's safety manual. The tribunal heard that the first error involved the word 'believe,' which the manager claimed should have been 'belie.' A second instance involved the word 'belies,' which had a different intended meaning.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without apparent ideological framing. It focuses on a legal proceeding involving a corporate disciplinary report and does not take a stance on broader political issues. The content is neutral in tone and centered on the details of the case being presented inćș­

Official sources cited

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.