A tribunal has upheld the sacking of a senior Aer Lingus flight attendant said by his colleagues to have refused to let a passenger use the on-board bathroom until he was reduced to tears.
The airline decided the actions of Alan OâNeill, a senior cabin crew member, amounted to gross misconduct and terminated him with notice after 12 yearsâ service with an otherwise clean disciplinary record, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has been told.
It rejected OâNeillâs complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against the airline in a decision just published.
A stand-off developed between OâNeill and a passenger after the senior flight attendant told him he could not use the bathroom while the plane was being refuelled on the tarmac in Marseilles on 9 April, 2024 for a flight to Dublin, the tribunal heard earlier this year.
Another flight attendant said passengers had been left to wait for the inbound jet in a part of the terminal with âapparently no bathroomsâ available.
When OâNeill refused the passenger use of the toilet on safety grounds, the flight attendant, Clair Durkan, said she heard the passenger saying âunder his breathâ the words âoh for f**kâs sakeâ. She said he didnât say it âdirectlyâ to OâNeill.
After take-off, when the âfasten seat beltâ sign was still on, OâNeill had another interaction with the passenger when he got up and tried to go to the forward bathroom, the tribunal heard.
OâNeill was accused of refusing to let the passenger, a man in his thirties, to use the bathroom on the delayed flight for up to 45 minutes after take-off.
The length of time the customer had to wait is strongly disputed by OâNeillâs legal team, who say he was following standard operating procedures while the pilots had the âfasten seat beltâ lit.
He told his bosses he was under strain in his personal life and that the man âtriggeredâ him by swearing when he was first refused, the WRC was told earlier this year.
The passenger was also subject to a temporary flight ban after OâNeill wrote him up under the airlineâs âdisruptive passengerâ procedure and read him a formal warning â a ban which was later ârescindedâ, the airlineâs legal team said.
Will a Middle East peace deal make any difference to inflation?
Listen |
32:03
That was after a different passenger wrote a complaint to the airline on 29 April 2024 about what happened during the flight and an investigation began, the tribunal heard.
The complaint writer reported that they boarded directly after the passenger and heard him ask OâNeill: âAny chance of using the toilet?â
The senior flight attendantâs reply, telling the customer no on safety grounds, was in an âangry, extremely unprofessional, hostile and snarly toneâ, the complaint writer added.
The customer replied: âOh for feckâs sake, we have been held here for an hour delay on the ground and badly need to use the toilet,â the complaint added.
OâNeill then âliterally seemed to snap, and devoured the passenger in front of all passengersâ, the complaint continued.
âDonât you swear at me; do not swear at me, or I will have you removed from this aircraft,â OâNeill was quoted as saying.
The passenger âtried to respond politelyâ, but OâNeill âseemed to view the passenger as dirt and treated him that wayâ, the writer added.
âIt was a clear case of someone abusing their power,â the customer added. âHe used threatening body language and words against the passenger ... [he] escalated the situation at every moment, and fellow passengers were shocked,â the complaining passenger wrote.
It was put to company witnesses by counsel for the complainant, Jason Murray, that OâNeillâs position was that the passenger told him: âF**k you, I need to use the toilet.â
A statement later taken from OâNeill in a company probe stated that the passenger âtried to push past me on boarding to use the toilet during fuellingâ and that he told the man he could use the bathroom when fuelling was finished.
âHe started swearing. I informed him the bathroom was not available while fuelling ... He continued swearing. I informed him if he continued we would offload him,â the statement said.
He told his bosses he was âfearfulâ and felt âtriggeredâ by the customer, the manager assigned to conduct a disciplinary process, Mary McHugh, told the tribunal.
Another flight attendant, Clair Durkan, said in evidence that when the passenger later refused to hand over his boarding pass when OâNeill was preparing to issue the formal warning, her senior colleague said: âHe wonât be allowed to go to the toilet unless he gives the boarding pass,â she said.
Durkan added that OâNeill went to the passenger and told him: âYou canât go to the toilet. Iâll tell you whenever you can go to the toilet.â
McHugh said: âOkay, [the passenger] didnât provide his boarding pass; but apart form that, he became upset, and was just complying and embarrassed.â
The second most senior flight attendant aboard, Joan OâGorman, told the tribunal she saw the passenger âcryingâ coming dâŠ
Read the full article at The Irish Times â