See more This is Money on Google - save us as a Preferred Source
By ADAM LUCK
Updated: 11:30 BST, 21 June 2026
Apple tried to conceal documents showing it deliberately degraded the performance of old iPhones, a tribunal starting this week will hear, in a move that, if successful, could leave millions of consumers in the UK in line for compensation.
On Friday, the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal will hear lawyers for a class action argue the tech giant is trying to avoid releasing information that they say shows it chose to use software updates to ‘throttle’ older iPhones to conceal problems with their batteries.
They argue Apple is trying to hide this from UK consumers by claiming commercial sensitivity.
But Apple insists that it is legally entitled to keep confidential information out of the public domain.
The tech giant, led by Tim Cook has repeatedly tried and failed to have the case thrown out since it was launched in 2022, with a hearing taking place next year.
Lawyers believe that the claim could cost Apple as much as £956million if it is successful and leave 21million people who used iPhones 6s, 6s Plus, SE, 7 and 7 Plus in line for a payout. It is estimated each person could receive £40 in compensation.
Join the discussion
Should big tech companies face huge payouts if they're found to mislead customers about their products?
What's your view?
Hitting back: Apple has hit back, saying it is entitled to keep commercially sensitive information out of the public domain on legal grounds
It follows a similar case in the US which was settled by Apple in 2020 with a compensation fund of about $500 million, although it did not admit any liability.
Consumer campaigner Justin Gutmann, who is leading the UK class action, told The Mail on Sunday: ‘My claim alleges, on behalf of millions of iPhone users, that Apple abused its dominant position. An important aspect of that abuse was it was not transparent with customers.
‘It is hard to understand why, years later, Apple is still trying to keep evidence out of the public domain.
‘If Apple has good reasons for its conduct, it should make those arguments openly in court as any other defendant is required to do.’
An Apple spokesman said: ‘We have never – and would never – do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades.
‘Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.’
DIY INVESTING PLATFORMS
AJ Bell
AJ Bell
Easy investing and ready-made portfolios
Hargreaves Lansdown
Hargreaves Lansdown
Free fund dealing and investment ideas
interactive investor
interactive investor
Flat-fee investing from £4.99 per month
Freetrade
Freetrade
Investing Isa now free on basic plan
Trading 212
Trading 212
Free share dealing and no account fee
Affiliate links: If you take out a product This is Money may earn a commission. These deals are chosen by our editorial team, as we think they are worth highlighting. This does not affect our editorial independence.
Compare the best investing account for you
Read the full article at Daily Mail →
United Kingdom