ON
← Back to feed
EGEconomy9 days ago

Smartphones arrived just before the US fertility rate plunged. One study says it’s a direct cause

The US fertility rate has declined over several decades, prompting research into potential causes. A new study suggests that the introduction of smartphones, particularly the iPhone in 2007, may be a significant contributing factor. Researchers note that the decline coincided with the Great Recession and a 'baby-less recovery.' Some experts remain skeptical about whether smartphones alone could account for such a long-term trend.

The US fertility rate has been trending down for decades, leaving researchers and policymakers searching for causes that may help pinpoint solutions. There have been all kinds of theories, including soaring costs of childcare, the rise of birth control and even the role of car seat regulations .

A new paper offers a provocative culprit in a succinct package: the smartphone. But some other researchers are skeptical that this single factor could play such an outsized role in a much longer-term trend.

2007 marked a particularly significant “inflection point” in the US fertility rate, said Caitlin Myers, an economist with Middlebury College and the National Bureau of Economic Research, who is the lead author on the new paper.

The Great Recession started at the end of the year, just a few months after Apple started rolling out the iPhone in the US – the first modern smartphone.

“We initially all just assumed it was the global recession. Births have long been known to be pro-cyclical, and so the conventional wisdom was they’ll come back up,” she said. “Then we had a baby-less recovery.”

In the years since, Myers said, she would often raise the topic of “iGen” — a name for the first generation to grow up entirely in a world with smartphones — around the dinner table and wonder about the drop in so-called risky behaviors in this group, who tend to have less sex and use fewer substances.

Her stepson, Ezekiel Hooper, also noticed that his younger siblings had very different relationships than he did, with much more social interaction happening though screens than in person — interactions that physically created “no chance of having a kid,” he said.

Hooper started looking into this connection between smartphones and the fertility rate for his senior thesis while studying at Middlebury a couple years ago, and he co-authored the working paper that was published last week.

In it, he and Myers tracked the spread of AT&T mobile broadband – which was at first the only network the iPhone was available on — and compared the change in fertility rate between 2007 and 2011 with the share of the population living with access to the network.

They found that in counties where more than 90% of residents had early smartphone access, the fertility rate fell significantly more than it did in counties where less than 10% of residents had network coverage.

The difference was sharpest among teens; The birth rate among 15- to 19-year-olds fell about 26% between 2007 and 2011 in counties with broad smartphone access, compared with a 14% drop in counties with limited smartphone access.

For women in their 20s, the birth rate fell 15% in counties with broad access, compared with 10% in those with limited access. And for women in their 30s, the birth rate fell slightly in counties with broad access, while it rose in other counties.

Overall, the researchers estimate that early diffusion of the iPhone caused between a third and a half of the decline in the general US fertility rate between 2007 and 2011.

The new study can’t explain exactly why smartphones would drive fertility rates down, but the researchers theorize that it may be related to ways the technology has shifted our time and attention — particularly in ways that would make it less likely to have sex and lead to a pregnancy.

Drops in unintended births to young people are a key factor in the broader decline in fertility rate in the US, the researchers say. And, in some ways, the smartphone has interrupted ways that can lead to an unintended pregnancy.

The smartphone may have become a “substitute” for physical contact and in-person human interaction, Hooper said.

“Instead of looking to somebody else for that interaction, they might be looking to online pornography,” he said. “Maybe instead of going out and just having those physical interactions with their friends and their peers, they’re having those interactions through their phone instead.”

Some other experts, who are focused less on the economics of fertility and more on the social and health aspects, agree that smartphones have played a role in changing relationship patterns that can lead to lower fertility rates — but they say the broader context matters.

“It’s true that people are marrying later, partnering later, and spending less of adulthood in stable relationships, and smartphones may contribute to those trends. But they are occurring alongside major changes in housing costs, education, labor markets, gender norms, and social life,” Dr. Alison Gemmill, ​an associate professor of epidemiology at the UCLA School of Public Health whose research focuses on US fertility patterns and other reproductive health topics, said in an email. “Untangling those factors is challenging.”

The 2007 inflection point looks less significant when zooming out to a broader timeframe, some experts say. The general trend of declining fertility in the US started decades before the introduction of the iPhone. This is especially true whe…

Read the full article at Egypt Independent
Source document: Caitlin Myers, economist, Middlebury College and National Bureau of Economic Research

1 reports

Egypt IndependentIndependentCenter9 days ago
Smartphones arrived just before the US fertility rate plunged. One study says it’s a direct cause

The US fertility rate has declined over several decades, prompting research into potential causes. A new study suggests that the introduction of smartphones, particularly the iPhone in 2007, may be a significant contributing factor. Researchers note that the decline coincided with the Great Recession and a 'baby-less recovery.' Some experts remain skeptical about whether smartphones alone could account for such a long-term trend.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the claim made by the study and the skepticism from other researchers without taking a stance. It reports facts and quotes multiple perspectives without using biased language or emphasizing one side over the other.

Official sources cited

  • study Caitlin Myers, economist, Middlebury College and National Bureau of Economic Research

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • studyCaitlin Myers, economist, Middlebury College and National Bureau of Economic Research