ON
← Back to feed
United KingdomEconomy3 days ago

Single, childless workers fare worst at work-life balance

Research from the University of St. Andrews suggests that current flexible-working policies fail to address the challenges of maintaining work-life balance, particularly as hybrid and remote work become more prevalent. The study highlights that the effectiveness of such policies depends not just on their existence but on how they function in practice. It introduces 'border theory' to explain how individuals manage transitions between work and personal life, identifying three mechanisms—prompting employees to stop, enabling them to do so, and legitimizing time away—that often do not align in现实中

A cross-domain perspective on the varied roles of boundary-keepers in shaping work–nonwork boundaries. Credit: Human Resource Management (2026). DOI: 10.1002/hrm.70081

New research from the University of St. Andrews is calling on employers to rethink flexible-working policies, warning that current approaches fail to reflect increasingly blurred boundaries between work and personal life.

As hybrid and remote working become more common and household structures evolve, simply offering flexibility is not enough. The study finds that whether employees can truly "switch off" depends less on the existence of formal policies and more on how those policies function in practice.

Led by Dr. Giulia Giunti of the University of St. Andrews Business School and published in Human Resource Management , the research draws on "border theory"—the idea that work and nonwork are distinct domains that individuals navigate daily. The study identifies three key mechanisms that shape whether people can disengage from work: prompting employees to stop, enabling them to do so, and legitimizing time away.

However, these mechanisms rarely align. A policy may encourage staff to take leave, while heavy workloads prevent it. Others may support caregiving but overlook leisure, social or personal needs. When these mechanisms are misaligned, support appears robust on paper but fails in reality.

The findings are based on interviews with 45 U.K. academics, evenly split among three groups: partnered with children, partnered without children and single without children. Participants were also asked to photograph their work-life boundaries, revealing the extent to which work seeps into personal life.

The study shows how offering time without the conditions to use it—or addressing one demand while ignoring others—quietly undermines work-life balance. Parents reported particular strain in juggling professional and caregiving responsibilities.

However, the research highlights that other groups face equally significant, and often overlooked, challenges. Employees without children, particularly those who are single, reported being disproportionately assigned unsociable hours, having less control over their schedules and feeling that their lives outside work are treated as less legitimate because of the absence of caregiving responsibilities.

This is despite the fact that these groups represent a substantial and growing share of the population. In 2025, there were 8.3 million U.K. households comprising couples without children (42% of all family units) and 8.6 million single-person households (30% of all households), trends mirrored across the EU.

As workforces become more diverse in terms of family and relationship status, the researchers urge organizations to critically assess whether their policies genuinely support employees' ability to disconnect, and whether that support is equitable.

Giunti said, "Flexibility is not freedom. At present, a work-life balance is not available to everyone."

The study also identifies a subtler gendered impact. Because caregiving remains the most socially accepted reason to step away from work—and women continue to shoulder most care responsibilities—family-focused policies may unintentionally reinforce traditional roles. This risks limiting women's opportunities for rest, career development, social life and broader personal fulfillment.

Giunti said, "If organizations are serious about their Equality, Diversity and Inclusion commitments, they must look beyond whether policies exist and instead examine which mechanisms those policies activate—and for whom. Otherwise, EDI remains rhetoric."

More information

Giulia Giunti et al, Prompting, Facilitating, and Legitimizing: How Work‐Life Flexibility Policies and Relational Others Shape Boundary Management, Human Resource Management (2026). DOI: 10.1002/hrm.70081

Who's behind this story?

Gaby Clark

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news.

Full profile →

Andrew Zinin

Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success.

Full profile →

Citation :

Single, childless workers fare worst at work-life balance (2026, June 17)

retrieved 17 June 2026

from https://phys.org/news/2026-06-childless-workers-fare-worst-life.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no

part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Read the full article at Phys.org
Source document: A cross-domain perspective on the varied roles of boundary-keepers in shaping work–nonwork boundaries

1 reports

Phys.orgIndependentCenter3 days ago
Single, childless workers fare worst at work-life balance

Research from the University of St. Andrews suggests that current flexible-working policies fail to address the challenges of maintaining work-life balance, particularly as hybrid and remote work become more prevalent. The study highlights that the effectiveness of such policies depends not just on their existence but on how they function in practice. It introduces 'border theory' to explain how individuals manage transitions between work and personal life, identifying three mechanisms—prompting employees to stop, enabling them to do so, and legitimizing time away—that often do not align in现实中

Bias read (Center): The article presents academic research on work-life balance without taking a political stance. It discusses workplace policies and employee well-being in a neutral manner, focusing on theoretical frameworks and practical implications rather than ideological arguments.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.