Frederic J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images
This is great news: A ballot measure that will hit California billionaires with a one-time tax of five percent on all of their assets has just qualified to appear on the November 3 ballot, the New York Times reported.
Yes, voters, most of whom are not billionaires, will decide the issue.
This is glorious, and all decent people should hope this unbelievably destructive measure passes and begets further measures with similar destructive powers.
Just the threat of this legal theft will chase billionaires out of California. Sure, this time, it might not pass. This time, failed Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom might be able to convince the billâs sponsors, the SEIU-UHW (Service Employees International Union â United Healthcare Workers West), to hold off placing it on the ballot by cutting some sort of a deal.
That doesnât matter.
Even if it doesnât pass this time, the very idea behind the measure, not to mention the fact it got so close to becoming reality, will hang like a threat over everyoneâs head. This threat (which is quite real) ensures more and more billionaires will flee to free states like Florida and Texas.
Governor Gavin Newsom (D) speaks about his state budget proposal Thursday, May 14, 2026, in Sacramento, California. (Jeff Chiu/AP)
And it wonât only be the billionaires who will feel threatened. Everyone knows how the left operates. As quick as the left went from Gays just want to get married  â to â Youâre bigots if you donât let us trans your kids , this billionaire tax will become a millionaire tax and then a tax on anyone dumb enough to hold any kind of asset, like a car or home.
âThe initiative would place a one-time, 5 percent tax on the assets of California residents with at least $1.1 billion and would dedicate most of the revenue to health care,â reports the far-left New York Times . âThose with between $1 billion and $1.1 billion would pay a lesser percentage.â
âIf the measure does move forward, there almost certainly will be an expensive election fight in California,â adds the report. âIt would pit the economic anxieties of working-class Californians against some of the stateâs richest residents and business leaders, who say that such a tax would threaten Californiaâs longstanding dominance in tech innovation.â
Some Democrats oppose it but only because â get this â âit would dedicate the overwhelming share of revenue to health care instead of education or social services.â
Sounds to me like we need another round of ballot measures to ensure California billionaires pay their fair share for âeducation and social services.â
The sooner California implodes, the sooner there can maybe-perhaps-possibly be a return to sanity in the former Golden State. Iâm skeptical that anything, even bottoming out into a fentanyl-fueled pooptopia, can save the state, but thatâs the only chance it has. Regardless, there will certainly be no reforming, no sanity, and no redemption as it stands now.
Besides, for us Normal People, watching Californians get what they vote for is all kinds of fun. People should get what they vote for. Why shouldnât we all be happy for them and enjoy the results?
Read the full article at Breitbart News âđSource document: California Secretary of State Shirley Weber
5 reports
The New York Times (US)IndependentđCenter2 days ago Union Behind California Billionaire Tax Offers to Reduce the RateA health care workers' union, which had proposed a 5 percent tax on billionaires' wealth, has agreed to reduce the rate to 2 percent if it is included in Governor Gavin Newsom's budget.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on a negotiation between a labor union and state officials regarding a proposed tax policy. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the agreement reached without taking a stance on theçš
Bloomberg NewsParty-alignedđCenter2 days ago California Billionaire Tax Backers Float Lower Rate in Push for DealA group advocating for a 5% wealth tax in California has proposed a lower rate of 2% as part of an effort to reach a deal with Governor Gavin Newsom.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of a proposal without taking a stance or using biased language. It reports on a policy discussion without emphasizing any particular perspective.
The HillIndependentCenter2 days ago Billionaire tax secures spot on California ballotA one-time wealth tax on billionaires living in California has qualified to be on the ballot in November. California Secretary of State Shirley Weber confirmed the measure's qualification.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on the qualification of a tax proposal for the ballot without taking a stance on the policy itself.
Official sources cited
- government California Secretary of State Shirley Weber
Breitbart NewsIndependentRight2 days ago Nolte: California Billionaire Tax Qualifies for November BallotA ballot initiative proposing a one-time 5% tax on California billionaires' assets has qualified for the November 3 ballot, according to the New York Times. The article discusses the potential impact of the measure, suggesting it could drive billionaires out of the state and create a lasting threat to economic stability.
Bias read (Right): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'unbelievably destructive measure,' 'legal theft,' and frames the tax as a threat to both billionaires and the broader economy. It also implies negative consequences for California while portraying the policy as harmful without providing balanced
The New York Times (US)IndependentđCenter4 days ago Unlikely Coalition Begins Campaign Against Billionaire Tax in CaliforniaA coalition of left-leaning interest groups is working to oppose a proposed wealth tax initiative in California ahead of the November ballot. Governor Gavin Newsom is involved in ongoing negotiations regarding the issue.
Bias read (Center): The summary presents the situation factually without apparent ideological framing. It mentions the involvement of left-leaning groups but does not imply approval or criticism of their actions. The focus is on the existence of the coalition and the role of the governor, with no clear slant toward one