ON
← Back to feed
QatarCulture2 days ago

Indian court rejects appeal over ban on Telegram app

An Indian court has rejected an appeal by the messaging app Telegram against a temporary ban imposed by the Indian government. The ban was implemented due to allegations that Telegram channels were involved in selling leaked questions for undergraduate medical entrance exams. The New Delhi High Court ruled following a closed-door hearing between Telegram and Indian officials. The Indian Ministry of Information Technology stated that the platform was being used to distribute both real and fake exam questions, which could mislead students. This case has drawn significant attention as a major法律争端

The ruling comes after India said channels on the app were selling leaked questions for undergraduate medical entrance ​exams.

An Indian court has rejected an appeal by the Telegram social media app against a temporary ban.

The New Delhi High Court issued the ruling on Friday after a closed-door hearing between Telegram and Indian officials, court records show. India blocked the app over allegations that it was being used to sell leaked exam questions.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 items list 1 of 4 India blocks Telegram until Monday due to student exam fraud concerns

list 2 of 4 Telegram challenges India app ban, calls move unconstitutional

list 3 of 4 Why was India’s Cockroach Janta Party founder attacked?

list 4 of 4 ‘Don’t meddle’: Lula calls on Trump to stay out of Brazil’s elections

end of list The ban took Telegram offline and removed it from app stores earlier this week, according to app tracking data.

India’s Ministry of Information Technology said on Sunday that channels on the platform were selling undergraduate medical entrance exam questions. The ministry added that even fake questions could mislead candidates.

A month ago, India cancelled the results of the test after allegations that the questions had been leaked in advance.

The case has become one of the most closely watched legal clashes between a global tech company and the Indian government this year.

‘One-sided and inaccurate’

Delhi High Court judge Tejas Karia said the government orders banning the app were reasoned and had strictly followed legal procedure.

India is Telegram’s largest market, with more than 150 million users. Founder Pavel Durov publicly criticised the ban, saying it penalised the platform’s users, even though the exam leaks had already been disseminated elsewhere.

The ban followed days of private arguments, according to court filings. Indian officials told Telegram it had not acted fast enough to remove the accounts selling exam papers.

Telegram rejected the Indian government’s account of the meetings in court filings, calling it “one-sided and inaccurate” and “intentionally” omitting details of the company’s proactive processes.

Telegram said it took down more than 900 links involving unlawful exam-related content.

India joins a growing list of countries cracking down on Telegram. China and Iran have maintained long-term bans since 2015 and 2018, respectively.

Telegram also faces mounting regulatory pressure elsewhere, including a French investigation into Durov over alleged failures to curb criminal content on the platform, as well as scrutiny from authorities in Malaysia and Australia.

Read the full article at Al Jazeera English
Source document: New Delhi High Court

1 reports

Al Jazeera EnglishState / PublicCenter2 days ago
Indian court rejects appeal over ban on Telegram app

An Indian court has rejected an appeal by the messaging app Telegram against a temporary ban imposed by the Indian government. The ban was implemented due to allegations that Telegram channels were involved in selling leaked questions for undergraduate medical entrance exams. The New Delhi High Court ruled following a closed-door hearing between Telegram and Indian officials. The Indian Ministry of Information Technology stated that the platform was being used to distribute both real and fake exam questions, which could mislead students. This case has drawn significant attention as a major法律争端

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on the court's decision, the reasons behind the ban, and the involvement of both Telegram and the Indian government without taking a stance or emphasizing one side over the other.

Official sources cited

  • government New Delhi High Court
  • government India’s Ministry of Information Technology

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • governmentNew Delhi High Court
  • governmentIndia’s Ministry of Information Technology