Opet je krenulo s dimnim bombama. Ponovljeni proces izbora troje ustavnih sudaca tako već na prvom koraku ne ostavlja previše nade u to da će ovaj put biti učinkovit i rezultirati popunjavanjem i olakšavanjem rada Ustavnog suda. Već sad se stvara gusta dimna zavjesa oko posve efemernih stvari, e kako bi se, izgleda, moglo one druge optužiti za opstrukciju i tako podebljati politički kapital na sve uzburkanijoj i neizvjesnijoj domaćoj političkoj sceni.
Podsjetimo, tek je održana prva sjednica saborskog Odbora za Ustav, poslovnik i politički sustav, ona na kojoj je trebalo ustanoviti koji od 17 kandidata zadovoljavaju zakonske uvjete za kandidaturu, a već se održavaju izvanredne tiskovne konferencije i izmjenjuju optužbe. Pritom se u središte rasprave stavlja ono što je sebi u bradu na račun većine izgovorila Sandra Benčić iz Možemo! (“stoko”), kao da je cijela ekipa prije, evo, tri minute došla s čaja u gentlemen’s clubu u Oxfordu. Dok zapravo rade u instituciji čiji je predsjednik oporbene zastupnike nazivao smećem, a o izmjeni uvreda između premijera i predsjednika države ili o otrovu koji prema opoziciji rutinski prosipaju HDZ-ove društvene mreže da se ne govori.
No, tko je koga kako nazvao posve je sporedno u ovoj priči o Ustavnom sudu. Za razliku od nekih drugih, vrlo znakovitih detalja. Prvo, već drugi put Saša Đujić , kao glavni pregovarač SDP-a, s Ivanom Malenicom (HDZ) dogovara stvari koje su razbjesnile kako ostatak njegove stranke, tako i Možemo!.
Đujić je, naime, Malenici poručio kako nema problema da u kasnim popodnevnim satima ponedjeljka stavi na dnevni red točku o ustavnim sucima, iako se sjednica održavala već u utorak ujutro. Ta neobična hitnost oko najosjetljivijeg političkog pitanja u zemlji posljednjih mjeseci razjarila je Sandru Benčić, ali ju je kritizirao i Arsen Bauk iz SDP-a, podsjećajući na dobru praksu da se materijali za sjednice Odbora dostavljaju tri dana prije njenog održavanja.
Ima li pilota u SDP-ovu avionu?
Podsjetimo, Đujić je prije nekoliko mjeseci s Malenicom na službenom putu u Turskoj razgovarao o imenima sudaca koji bi bili prihvatljivi za izbor i jednom i drugom bloku. Iako su iz SDP-a tvrdili da nikakvih službenih pregovora o sucima nije bilo, HDZ je cijelu priču iskoristio za javnu ucjenu s imenima trojice kandidata koje je na svojoj tiskovnoj konferenciji iznio Andrej Plenković .
S obzirom na slučaj iz Istanbula i ovaj s večernjim upadom u dnevni red Odbora, postavlja se pitanje je li Đujić djelovao na svoju ruku ili u dogovoru s predsjednikom stranke Sinišom Hajdašem Dončićem koji se, pak, naknadno predomislio. Konkretnije, ima li u ovom SDP-ovu avionu uopće pilota i doživljava li ga itko ozbiljno?
Zašto se HDZ-u odjednom mahnito žuri?
No, unutarnji odnosi u SDP-u i koalicija te stranke s Možemo! su u ovoj priči ipak mnogo manje zanimljivi od onoga što radi HDZ. Stranka koja je punih osam mjeseci razvlačila na kraju neuspjeli izbor troje ustavnih sudaca, sad je odjednom do kraja stisnula gas i želi nove suce izabrati već do ljetne stanke u radu Sabora, dakle do 15. srpnja.
Ta mahnita žurba objašnjava zbog čega je Malenica poželio petnaestak sati prije sjednice Odbora odjednom staviti na dnevni red utvrđivanje liste kandidata za ustavne suce. Ali, sve ono što se naknadno dogodilo ide doslovno u suprotnom smjeru od deklarirane želje HDZ-a da se suci ovaj put doista i izaberu.
Preglasavanjem do dogovora?!
Naime, bez obzira na dogovor Malenice i Đujića, kad su na sjednici Odbora vidjeli da su zastupnici opozicije protiv ho-ruk utvrđivanja liste kandidata, postojao je samo jedan jedini put kojim oni kojima je doista stalo da se suci izaberu – nisu smjeli krenuti. Nisu smjeli osorno preglasati opoziciju i silom većine u Odboru utvrditi listu kandidata za Ustavni sud.
A upravo su to napravili. I sad još organiziraju pressice na kojima se nabacuju blatom na Benčić i lijevu opoziciju.
U traganju za neprijateljima Hrvatske
Kako je HDZ mogao naučiti na vlastitoj koži – na krahu Plenkovićeve ideje da nametne svoj prijedlog trojice sudaca za Ustavni sud – osnovni uvjet da se ti ljudi izaberu je da se opoziciju i njihove zahtjeve tretira sa strpljenjem i uvažavanjem. Ne zato jer je to lijepo, nego jer bez toga ni u manje toksičnoj atmosferi od ove u hrvatskoj politici danas, nema šanse za postizanjem dvotrećinske većine. A ako nema dvotrećinske većine, nema ni novih ustavnih sudaca.
Ponašanje zastupnika vladajuće većine, suprotno onome što govore, pokazuje dakle da im izbor troje ustavnih sudaca i nije cilj. Već samo još jedna javna predstava kojom će pokušati prikazati lijevu oporbu kao opasnu političku snagu što želi ugroziti rad važne hrvatske institucije. A tko destabilizira hrvatske institucije, taj sasvim sigurno ne želi ni hrvatsku državu kao takvu. Jeste li ikad čuli originalniju predizbornu parolu?
Read the full article at Telegram.hr →📄Source document: HDZ Facebook Post→13 reports
Telegram.hrIndependentLeft11 days agoThe article discusses the renewed political conflict surrounding the selection of three constitutional court judges in Croatia. It criticizes the process as ineffective and filled with political maneuvering, highlighting tensions between parties such as SDP and HDZ. The piece references Sandra Benčić from 'Možemo!' and mentions the involvement of key figures like Saša Đujić (SDP) and Ivan Malenica (HDZ).
Bias read (Left): The article uses critical and dismissive language toward the ruling party (SDP), referring to their actions as ineffective and politically motivated. It frames the opposition (HDZ) as engaging in obstructive tactics but does not provide balanced counterpoints or neutral analysis of the situation.
Official sources cited
- government First session of the Parliamentary Committee for the Constitution, Statute, and Political System
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicLeft12 days agoSandra Benčić from the Možemo party confirmed that she muttered 'stoko' (livestock) under her breath while leaving a Constitutional Committee meeting, stating the comment was directed at the ruling HDZ party. The ruling coalition has responded critically to the incident.
Bias read (Left): The article reports the incident factually, though the headline emphasizes the ruling party's dismissive characterization without providing context for why the opposition figure was upset.
Večernji listIndependentRight12 days agoHDZ responds to criticism by suggesting that if they are being called derogatory names, the same would apply to SDP member Saša Đujić.
Bias read (Right): The headline uses a standard reporting format (party name followed by statement) without loaded language or editorial framing favoring either side.
Official sources cited
- organisation HDZ Facebook Post
- organisation Sandra Benčić Facebook Post
Telegram.hrIndependentRight12 days ago HDZ continues the countdown with Bencic: "She showed the right face, we didn't expect an apology.The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has responded to comments made by Sandra Benčić, who confirmed she used the word 'stoka' (which translates to 'cattle') referring to HDZ. HDZ stated that this was an insult directed at both them and SDP member Saša Đujić, who agreed to include a discussion on candidates for the Constitutional Court on the agenda. HDZ emphasized that they would not retaliate with insults but noted that Benčić's remarks are typical of her usual discourse.
Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Benčić's remarks using strong language such as 'uvrede i laži njezin su uobičajeni diskurs' ('insults and lies are part of her usual discourse'), which frames Benčić negatively and supports HDZ's position without balanced counterpoints. The framing emphasizes a
Official sources cited
- organisation Facebook post by HDZ
tportalIndependentRight12 days agoSandra Benčić, a member of the Možemo party and parliamentary representative, admitted to saying 'stoka' (which translates to 'scum') during a session of the Constitutional Committee, referring to the HDZ party. In response, HDZ accused her of insulting both their party and SDP representative Saša Đujić, who was involved in the same committee meeting. HDZ stated that if they were considered 'stoka,' then so was Đujić, and criticized Možemo for how they treat their junior partners. HDZ also claimed that Benčić did not apologize for her remarks, calling them typical of her discourse.
Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Benčić's remark with strong language emphasizing insult and criticism towards Možemo, while defending their own position and indirectly criticizing an SDP member. The framing highlights HDZ's perspective without balancing it with Možemo's potential defense or a
Official sources cited
- organisation HDZ's Facebook post
- organisation Sandra Benčić's statement
Jutarnji listIndependentRight12 days agoFollowing Sandra Benčić's comment during a session of the Constitutional Committee, where she used the word 'stoka' (which was recorded), the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) responded by criticizing her remarks. They stated this incident demonstrates how 'možemo' treats its junior partners. HDZ also mentioned that if they are considered 'stoka,' then SDP member Saša Đujić would also fall into that category, as he agreed to include the item about candidates for the Constitutional Court. HDZ emphasized that they would not retaliate with insults but noted that Benčić's behavior was vulgar and one
Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's response to Sandra Benčić's comments using strong language and frames the situation as an example of how 'možemo' treats its junior partners. The tone is critical of Benčić and implies that her actions reflect poorly on 'možemo.' The framing emphasizes HDZ's position and批评
Net.hrIndependentRight12 days agoThe Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) posted a video on Facebook showing Sandra Benčić saying the word 'stoka' (meaning 'donkey') as she walked away from a parliamentary committee session. HDZ claims this was directed at Ivan Malenić, former dean of the University of Split, and other members of the parliamentary majority. Benčić responded by confirming she said the word, stating it referred to HDZ and expressing frustration with what she described as political manipulation and disrespect toward citizens.
Bias read (Right): The article presents HDZ's claim that Benčić used the term 'stoka' to criticize HDZ members, which is framed as an attack on the party. The tone of the article supports HDZ's interpretation of the event, emphasizing their narrative without providing balanced counterpoints or alternative perspectives
Jutarnji listIndependentLeft12 days ago Sandra Bencic: Yes, I said "enough". It was about HDZ.Sandra Benčić has clarified that her use of the word 'stoka' (which translates to 'thieves') during a parliamentary session was directed at the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). She criticized the HDZ for hastily adding a discussion on candidates for judges of the Constitutional Court to the agenda of the parliamentary committee. Benčić expressed frustration with what she viewed as an underhanded procedural move by the ruling party.
Bias read (Left): The article presents Sandra Benčić’s criticism of the HDZ using strong language such as 'drumski razbojnici' ('bandits') and frames the HDZ as acting unethically and manipulatively. The tone supports Benčić’s perspective without significant counterbalance from the HDZ or other viewpoints.
Official sources cited
- statement Sandra Benčić's Facebook post
N1 HrvatskaIndependentRight12 days agoThe Croatian HDZ party posted a video on Facebook showing an incident involving parliamentary representative Sandra Benčić (from the Možemo party), claiming she insulted Minister Ivan Malenić with the word 'stoka' (meaning 'cattle'). Benčić later confirmed saying the word but clarified it was directed at the HDZ party, not individuals. She mentioned this occurred after the HDZ submitted 17 candidate proposals for judges of the Constitutional Court.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the situation in a manner that emphasizes the alleged insult by Benčić and presents the HDZ's response as a justified reaction. The language used by HDZ ('progresivna, kulturna, moderna...') appears to be complimentary toward their own party while subtly criticizing Benčić's party
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenter12 days ago 16 candidates have been nominated for three new constitutional judges.The Croatian Parliament's Committee on the Constitution, Statute, and Political System has confirmed a list of 16 candidates for the selection of three constitutional court judges. One candidate was deemed invalid, leaving 17 applicants. The committee will hold hearings next week before seeking inter-party agreement, which requires a two-thirds parliamentary majority. Among the candidates are three individuals previously discussed by the parliament. A brief but intense political debate preceded the decision, with member Sandra Benčić (Možemo!) protesting the short notice for adding this itemto
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the process of selecting constitutional court judges without overtly favoring any political side. It mentions the involvement of different political actors but does not use biased language or selectively present information.
Official sources cited
- government Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution, Statute, and Political System
Novi listIndependentCenter12 days agoThe article reports that 17 candidates have submitted their applications for positions at the Constitutional Court, more than in the previous failed public call last year. Three candidates—Željko Pajalić, Mladen Sučević, and Goran Selanec—who ran in the previous call have again applied. The new call had an uncertain outcome due to political negotiations and a short submission period. Despite not receiving enough votes in the parliamentary committee, these candidates remain hopeful. The HDZ majority proposed them after unsuccessful talks with the left-liberal opposition. The entire oppositionbo
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information without overtly favoring any side. It mentions the number of candidates, their backgrounds, and the political dynamics but does not use biased language or selectively present information.
Official sources cited
- government Parliamentary Committee for the Constitution
tportalIndependentCenter13 days ago The council is in second attempt to seek a constitutional judge.The Croatian Parliament has received 17 candidate applications for three new constitutional court judges following a second attempt after previous efforts failed due to lack of political consensus between governing and opposition parties. Six candidates who previously applied have re-submitted their names, including those previously proposed by the HDZ party. New applicants include notable legal professionals and academics.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual summary of the process without overtly favoring any political side. It mentions the failure of prior attempts due to political disagreement but does not take a stance on which party is at fault. The inclusion of both HDZ-proposed candidates and others suggests balanced
Official sources cited
- press release Petra Maretić Žonja
Večernji listIndependentCenter13 days ago New round of negotiations begins: 17 candidates have entered the re-election bid for the Constitutional CourtThe article reports that 17 candidates have applied for the Constitutional Court judges' competition, up from 14 in the previous round. Of those, only one candidate failed to meet all requirements last time. The ruling HDZ party previously nominated three candidates—Željko Pajalić, Mladen Sučević, and Goran Selanac—but they did not secure the two-thirds majority needed. The Constitutional Court Committee will determine the final list of candidates at its upcoming meeting.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the number of candidates applying for Constitutional Court positions and mentions past attempts by the HDZ party to nominate specific individuals. It does not use biased language, avoid one-sided sourcing, or omit relevant context. The tone remains even
Official sources cited
- government Constitutional Court Committee
Croatia