President Trump’s deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for lifting sanctions on Iran is getting strong pushback from Senate Republicans on Capitol Hill who warn that giving Iran’s theocratic regime access to billions of dollars in economic relief would be a major “blunder.”
Some Republicans are warning that the likely outcome of the more than 100-day conflict is not worth the cost to the nation: the lives of 13 American service members and more than $100 billion spent.
“Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave,” fumed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) in a social media post, calling the war and its outcome the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”
“Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal,” he wrote on social platform X.
“Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped,” he continued.
Most concerning to some Senate GOP critics is that the deal will immediately lift sanctions on Iranian oil exports and may lead to the unfreezing of Iranian assets around the world.
“History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).
The deal leaves open the future of Iran’s nuclear program and does not clearly prohibit Iran from levying tolls on the Strait of Hormuz at some point in the future, according to senators who reviewed the deal.
It also leaves open the future of Iran’s missile program, which remains robust even after weeks of American and Israeli bombardment, according to intelligence estimates.
A classified CIA assessment estimated that Iran still had 70 percent of its prewar missile stockpile and 75 percent of its mobile missile launchers, according to a report by The Washington Post.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the lack of significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program, its weapons arsenal or its longstanding practices of funding militant proxies throughout the Middle East raises serious concerns. He pointed out it doesn’t prevent Iran from continuing to enrich uranium or toll the strait, and “it gives them a lot of money they can use to fund their proxies.”
The agreement would only guarantee that Iran does not impose tolls on the Strait of Hormuz for a period of 60 days. After that time, Iran will negotiate with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration of, and maritime services through, the strait.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said it’s hard to argue that Trump’s decision to order joint missile strikes with Israel against Iran in late February produced an outcome to justify the cost in lives and munitions.
Tillis said the deal appears weak “on its face.”
“You got to do the balance of accounts: A hundred billion roughly, maybe more, spent today, 13 dead, 365 wounded, injured, our partners in the Middle East bombed, they’ve had casualties. There’s got to be a lot of return on that,” Tillis said, summing up the cost of the conflict.
He said that Trump appears to have fallen well short of his objectives at the outstart of the war.
“We set out by saying we were going to drive down to zero their nuclear capability. Now we’re equivocating on that. We said that we were not going to make the mistake that Obama did by sending them a plane full of cash. I got to reconcile the numbers there,” he said.
“There’s a lot of work to be done to convince me that we’re on the right path,” Tillis added.
The Trump administration has conducted briefings with Senate allies such as Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) to highlight the benefits of the deal, such as the reopening of the critical Strait of Hormuz.
Moreno says that while Iran will benefit from the easing of sanctions on its oil exports, U.S. consumers will also benefit from lower fuel and fertilizer prices, which factor heavily into the cost of food and other goods and services.
“That helps us. Yes, of course it helps the Iranians also. It helps us lower energy prices,” he said.
Speaking on the Senate floor Wednesday evening, Moreno expressed his hope that the memorandum of understanding (MOU) would lead to lasting agreement to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
“We’re on the verge of a historic possibility in a world that is not under threat by Iran, where we don’t live in fear of an Iranian regime with a nuclear weapon,” he said.
But Republican critics of the deal aren’t taking much comfort in the prospect of lower oil and gas prices when Trump’s decision to start the conflict caused prices to spike upward in the first place.
West Texas Intermediate crude was priced at $67 a barrel before the conflict and surged up to $120 a barrel. It dropped to $76 a barrel on Wednesday.
“It’s an awful deal. It…
Read the full article at The Hill →📄Source document: Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.)
6 reports
RealClearPoliticsIndependentCenter3 days ago Can Iran Deal Help Republicans in Midterm Elections?The article discusses the potential impact of the Iran deal on Republican performance in the midterm elections, suggesting that resolving a major foreign policy issue could influence domestic political outcomes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral framing of the potential relationship between the Iran deal and Republican electoral prospects without overtly favoring one side. It does not employ loaded language or selectively cite sources to support a particular viewpoint.
RealClearPoliticsIndependentRight3 days ago Can Iran Deal Help Republicans in Midterm Elections?The article discusses whether the Trump administration's Iran deal could benefit Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections, contingent on the deal lasting and not causing division within the party.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the Iran deal as a potential boon for Republicans, implying that the deal's success would be advantageous to the party. This framing aligns with a conservative perspective by suggesting that the deal could serve Republican interests if it remains intact and unifying.
The HillIndependentRight3 days ago Senate Republicans raise alarm over Trump’s deal with IranSenate Republicans are criticizing President Trump's agreement with Iran, which aims to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for lifting sanctions on Iran. Critics argue that the deal could provide Iran with significant financial relief and potentially enable further nuclear development. Some senators expressed concerns about the human and financial costs of the conflict, including the deaths of 13 American service members and over $100 billion in expenses.
Bias read (Right): The article uses strong negative language toward the Trump administration's deal with Iran, such as 'major blunder,' 'theocratic regime,' and 'theocratic lunatics.' It emphasizes Republican criticism and highlights concerns about the potential consequences of the deal without presenting counter-argu
Official sources cited
- government Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.)
SemaforIndependentCenter3 days ago Exclusive / Republicans concerned about Iran dealThe article mentions that Republicans are concerned about the Iran deal, but provides no further details.
Bias read (Center): The article does not provide enough information to determine a clear ideological lean. It only states that Republicans are concerned about the Iran deal without elaborating on their concerns or providing context.
The Washington TimesIndependentRight3 days ago Bill Cassidy unloads on Trump's Iran deal: Reagan is 'rolling over in his grave'Senator Bill Cassidy criticized President Trump's Iran deal, calling it the worst foreign policy blunder in decades and suggesting that former President Ronald Reagan would be 'rolling over in his grave' over the agreement. Cassidy argued that the deal does not curb Iran's nuclear ambitions and allows Iran to strengthen its infrastructure. President Trump defended the deal, stating that Iran will only benefit if it abandons its nuclear weapons program and complies fully with the agreement.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Senator Bill Cassidy's criticism of the Iran deal using strong negative language such as 'worst foreign policy blunder in decades' and frames the deal as a failure to address Iran's nuclear ambitions. It emphasizes Cassidy's alignment with Reagan's legacy and highlights concerns
The Daily WireIndependentCenter6 days ago Obama Makes His Prediction For Trump’s Iran DealFormer President Barack Obama expressed skepticism about any new deal with Iran being an improvement over the nuclear agreement he negotiated, which was abandoned by former President Donald Trump in 2018. Obama stated that he does not believe any future agreement would be significantly better than the previous one and expressed hope for an end to violence affecting civilians.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Obama's statements without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It quotes Obama directly and provides context about the original Iran nuclear deal and Trump's withdrawal from it. There is no clear ideological framing or emphasis that suggests a particular political slm