ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Večina vprašanih podpira interventni zakon, SDS pred GS
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaBolj progresivno

Večina vprašanih podpira interventni zakon, SDS pred GS

Nedavna anketa javnega mnenja, ki jo je izvedla agencija Utrip pred zakonodajnim referendumom, ki je predviden za 6. december, kaže, da večina slovenskih volivcev podpira intervencijski zakon, namenjen gospodarskemu razvoju. Anketa kaže, da bi približno 56 odstotkov anketirancev glasovalo za zakon, skoraj 30 odstotkov pa bi ga nasprotovalo, več kot 70 odstotkov pa je izražalo namen, da bi glasovalo. Javna podpora je še posebej močna za posebne ukrepe v okviru zakona, kot je znižanje DDV na energijo in osnovne živilske izdelke, ki jih podpira več kot 80 odstotkov anketirancev. Nasprotno pa je predlagana socialna zgornja meja bruto mesečnih plač najbolj nasprotovana med posameznimi določbami, čeprav jo še vedno podpira majhna večina. Poleg tega podatki anket razkrivajo, da Slovenska demokratična stranka (SDS) trenutno vodi Svobodno gibanje za skoraj pet odstotnih točk v hipotetičnih scenarijih parlamentarnih volitev.

Slovenia’s post-hoc legislative referendum on the Law on Intervention Measures for the Development of Slovenia will take place on December 6, with deadlines for necessary procedural steps beginning to run on October 30, just before the holiday season. Public opinion polls released this week indicate that a majority of voters intend to support the legislation, which the ruling coalition describes as a driver for economic growth. The survey data suggests that nearly half of all respondents plan to participate in the vote, while specific provisions regarding tax reductions have garnered significantly higher approval than others within the bill. The primary poll was conducted by the Research Center of the Dr. Janez Evangelist Krek Institute in Ljubljana under its "Utrip druzbe" program. The study surveyed 701 individuals in October. According to these findings, almost 48 percent of participants stated they would definitely attend the referendum, while approximately 23 percent said they probably would. This projected turnout exceeds the participation rate recorded during previous referendums held on October 11, which stood at slightly less than 55 percent. However, institute researchers caution that actual attendance often differs from predicted levels. In terms of voting intent, the data shows a clear preference for keeping the law in force. Specifically, 28.6 percent of respondents said they would certainly vote yes, and another 27.2 percent indicated they probably would. Combined, this amounts to nearly 56 percent support. On the opposing side, 17.8 percent said they would definitely vote against the measure, and 11.5 percent said they probably would, totaling 29.3 percent opposition. Approximately 15 percent of those polled remained undecided. Support varies significantly depending on the specific intervention measures included in the law. The provision lowering value-added tax on electricity and heating energy enjoys the highest backing, supported by roughly 87 percent of respondents. Reduced taxation on renting apartments to young people and families follows closely with nearly 86 percent support. Lowering VAT on basic food items is backed by over 83 percent of the sample. Conversely, the so-called social cap, which applies to gross monthly salaries exceeding 7,500 euros, faces the strongest resistance. More than 30 percent of respondents oppose this clause, although more than 52 percent still support it. Additionally, nearly 68 percent of participants support the proposal that pensioners should no longer be required to pay contributions for long-term care. Another recent survey commissioned by POP TV from the research firm Mediana presents a tighter margin. That poll found that nearly 37 percent of respondents would support the law, while 31 percent would oppose it, leaving about one-third undecided. While both studies show a lead for the government's position, the IJEK poll indicates a wider gap of 26.5 percentage points compared to Mediana's six-point difference. The high number of undecided voters in the Mediana survey suggests the final outcome remains open until the day of voting. Political parties are positioning themselves around the referendum. The Social Democratic Party of Slovenia, known as SDS, currently leads in party popularity polls. In the IJEK survey, SDS received 24.7 percent support, followed by the Freedom Movement at 19.8 percent. The Socialist Party of Slovenia trailed at 10.6 percent. A joint list comprising the New Slovenia party, the Liberal Democrats, and Focus secured 10.3 percent. Left received 8.9 percent, while Resni.ca gained 4.5 percent and Democrats 4.4 percent. The Mediana poll showed similar trends, placing SDS at 21.8 percent and the Freedom Movement at 19.4 percent. Critics of the legislation argue that the proposed tax cuts lack safeguards to ensure benefits reach consumers. Monika Weiss, writing in Mladina, noted that the law does not include legal mechanisms to prevent lower VAT rates from being absorbed by retail margins rather than passed on to shoppers. She cited the example of Croatia, where a VAT reduction on food introduced in April 2022 did not result in lower consumer prices but instead benefited retailers, many of which are foreign-owned. The ruling coalition, supported by business associations, maintains that the law will enhance economic competitiveness, reduce costs for residents, and improve tax treatment, thereby accelerating national development. Labor unions and left-wing political groups are campaigning against the measure. The Confederation of Unions of the Public Sector, led by Branimir Strukelj, argues that implementing the law would tear society apart. Political actors agree that the referendum, falling on St. Michael's Day, will have a substantial impact on the country's future. Both sides view the upcoming vote as far more consequential than the advisory referendums held earlier in October. Those advisory votes saw broad support for proposals such as banning the wearing of burqas in public spaces and reducing VAT on basic foods and energy. The campaign period is characterized by polarization, with each side emphasizing arguments that align with their political stance. Proponents highlight potential economic gains, while opponents focus on perceived inequities in the social cap provisions. As the deadline for completing preparatory tasks approaches on October 30, attention turns to whether the high predicted turnout materializes and how the undecided segment of the electorate casts its ballots on December 6.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 3 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

Radio Ognjišče logoRadio OgnjiščeStrankarsko povezanSredina
Večina vprašanih podpira interventni zakon, SDS pred GS

Nedavna anketa javnega mnenja, ki jo je izvedla agencija Utrip pred zakonodajnim referendumom, ki je predviden za 6. december, kaže, da večina slovenskih volivcev podpira intervencijski zakon, namenjen gospodarskemu razvoju. Anketa kaže, da bi približno 56 odstotkov anketirancev glasovalo za zakon, skoraj 30 odstotkov pa bi ga nasprotovalo, več kot 70 odstotkov pa je izražalo namen, da bi glasovalo. Javna podpora je še posebej močna za posebne ukrepe v okviru zakona, kot je znižanje DDV na energijo in osnovne živilske izdelke, ki jih podpira več kot 80 odstotkov anketirancev. Nasprotno pa je predlagana socialna zgornja meja bruto mesečnih plač najbolj nasprotovana med posameznimi določbami, čeprav jo še vedno podpira majhna večina. Poleg tega podatki anket razkrivajo, da Slovenska demokratična stranka (SDS) trenutno vodi Svobodno gibanje za skoraj pet odstotnih točk v hipotetičnih scenarijih parlamentarnih volitev.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljen preprost poročilo o rezultatih volitev v zvezi z zakonodajnim referendumom in trenutnim volilnim položajem. Ta se močno opira na kvantitativne podatke iz določenega raziskovalnega inštituta in navaja odstotke za različne politične stranke in politične ukrepe, ne da bi uporabljal čustvene

Delo logoDeloNeodvisen🔒Sredina
Realna višina učinkov interventnega (razvojnega?) zakona

Prihodnji referendum o izvajanju slovenskega intervencijskega zakona zahteva oceno, ki temelji na številčnih podatkih in ne na levičarskih političnih perspektivah. Za sedanjo razpravo je značilna skrajna polarizacija, kjer politične odločitve prevladujejo nad bistvenimi argumenti, ki so pogosto politično motivirani. Vladajoča koalicija, ki jo podpirajo gospodarska združenja, opisuje zakonodajo kot razvojni akt, namenjen povečanju konkurenčnosti podjetij, zmanjšanju stroškov za prebivalce in izboljšanju davčne obravnave. Zagovorniki trdijo, da bodo ti ukrepi privedli do hitrejšega nacionalnega razvoja, čeprav je v predloženem besedilu navedeno, preden so podrobno opisani posebni protinargumenti ali končni sklepi.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je izrecno navedeno, da je za to vprašanje potreben nepristranski pristop, ki temelji na podatkih ("ne skozi levo ali desno lečo"). Priznava polarizacijo, vendar trditve vladajoče koalicije predstavlja nevtralno, ne da bi sama zavzela kritično ali podporno stališče. Govoril sem analitično.

Mladina logoMladinaNeodvisenProgresivno
Nižji DDV, višje marže trgovcev

Referendum o slovenskem "intervencijskem zakonu", ki je predviden za 6. december, vključuje določbe o znižanju davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) za določene skupine živil. Člen trdi, da ta ukrep nima pravnih zaščitnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da se znižanja davka pretvorijo v nižje maloprodajne cene za potrošnike, namesto da bi se povečale stopnje dobička za trgovce na drobno, od katerih so mnogi v tuji lasti. Kot dokaz, da takšni ukrepi pogosto ne koristijo neposredno potrošnikom, navaja zmanjšanje DDV za živila, ki ga je Hrvaška uvedla aprila 2022. V članku se kaže, da ima slovenski predlog enako strukturno napako kot hrvaški primer, kjer znižanje davka ni privedlo do cenejše hrane, temveč je koristilo trgovcem.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je vprašanje postavljeno skozi kritično lečo, ki se osredotoča na korporativne interese v primerjavi z blaginjo potrošnikov, in izrecno poudarja, da so trgovci na drobno "večinoma v tuji lasti". Ta poudarek na zaščiti domačih potrošnikov pred večnacionalnim izkoriščanjem dobička je v skladu z levičarsko usmerjeno ekonomsko populacijo, ki se zavzema za to, da bi se

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe