ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Po incidentu s poslovnikom je Mahnič Sukičevi na soočenju namenil nepričakovane besede
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativnovčeraj

Po incidentu s poslovnikom je Mahnič Sukičevi na soočenju namenil nepričakovane besede

Mahnič se je odzval s kritiko njenega vedenja, ki ga je označil za neprofesionalno in nespoštljivo, in ga primerjal z obnašanjem drugih opozicijskih poslancev, za katere pravi, da se obnašajo bolj vljudno. Obtožil je Sukiča, da je edini član odbora, ki se sooča z opominom, in poudaril, da med razpravami pogosto prekinja druge. Sukič je svoje dejanje branil kot obliko protesta proti načinu, kako se je potekalo zasedanje, in trdil, da je predsednica kršila postopkovna pravila, ko je vložila predlog za prekinitev zasedanja za glasovanje, ne da bi prej pridobila soglasje poslancev. Mahnič je pojasnil, da ni prekinil postopka zasedanja, ampak je dovolil, da se pravilno glasovanje nadaljuje, kar bi lahko pomenilo tudi metaforično posredovanje in grožnjo, da bi se lahko ta predlog prenesel na njo, kar bi lahko privedlo tudi do uporabe političnih orodij in grožnje z uporabo orožja.

During a parliamentary session, Slovenian MP Nataša Sukič of the Left party hurled a parliamentary rulebook at Žan Mahnič, president of the Committee for Internal Affairs and member of the SDS, sparking a heated exchange. Mahnič responded with unexpected remarks during a confrontation, addressing Sukič's behavior and calling for greater respect and decorum in parliamentary proceedings. The incident occurred amid discussions on the rights of foreign workers. Andrej Kosi, an SDS MP, proposed suspending the session due to the government’s failure to submit planned amendments to legislation on foreigners to parliament. Mahnič put the motion to a vote, which was supported by the committee despite opposition from the opposition. Sukič strongly opposed the move, claiming it violated the rules of procedure and amounted to a form of coup against parliament. She accused Mahnič of orchestrating the suspension and stated that such actions constituted a kind of coup. Sukič emphasized that the suspension required the agreement of the proposer, arguing that the process was not followed correctly. She left the session after hurling the rulebook at Mahnič, stating she would no longer participate in what she called a disgraceful situation. Mahnč responded by issuing two formal warnings to Sukič and maintaining that he had not violated the parliamentary rules. He criticized her conduct, noting that other opposition MPs did not face similar issues and that his approach to leading sessions was respected even by members of the Freedom Movement, another opposition group. Mahnč also addressed Sukič’s remark about using all weapons and tools, interpreting it metaphorically but expressing concern over its potential literal interpretation. He noted that he owned firearms as a hunter but would face legal repercussions if he made such statements in parliament. In response to Sukič’s accusations of seizing control of parliament, Mahnč cited past instances where requests to convene sessions were ignored, including several dates in 2023 and 2024. He argued that previous attempts to hold sessions had been thwarted, suggesting that the current situation was not unique. Mahnč attributed nervousness within the opposition to the results of the recent referendum week, where expectations of a 70:30 victory were not met. Instead, the outcome was evenly split, reflecting approximately 50% support for Prime Minister Janez Janša’s government. Sukič criticized Janša’s response to the referendums and alleged that he was the one showing signs of nervousness. Following the incident, Mahnč posted a video of the event on social media, describing Sukič as having serious difficulties managing anger and becoming increasingly aggressive and volatile. He suggested she seek professional help to manage her temper. After the session, President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović commented on Sukič’s actions, recognizing them as a violation of public order and peace. He noted that the police already had sufficient evidence from the video recording to proceed with further action.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

Nova24TV logoNova24TVStrankarsko povezanKonservativnovčeraj
Po incidentu s poslovnikom je Mahnič Sukičevi na soočenju namenil nepričakovane besede

Mahnič se je odzval s kritiko njenega vedenja, ki ga je označil za neprofesionalno in nespoštljivo, in ga primerjal z obnašanjem drugih opozicijskih poslancev, za katere pravi, da se obnašajo bolj vljudno. Obtožil je Sukiča, da je edini član odbora, ki se sooča z opominom, in poudaril, da med razpravami pogosto prekinja druge. Sukič je svoje dejanje branil kot obliko protesta proti načinu, kako se je potekalo zasedanje, in trdil, da je predsednica kršila postopkovna pravila, ko je vložila predlog za prekinitev zasedanja za glasovanje, ne da bi prej pridobila soglasje poslancev. Mahnič je pojasnil, da ni prekinil postopka zasedanja, ampak je dovolil, da se pravilno glasovanje nadaljuje, kar bi lahko pomenilo tudi metaforično posredovanje in grožnjo, da bi se lahko ta predlog prenesel na njo, kar bi lahko privedlo tudi do uporabe političnih orodij in grožnje z uporabo orožja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se dogodek prikazuje z vidika Žana Mahniča, poslanca SDS-a, ki poudarja svojo kritiko obnašanja Nataše Sukič kot neprofesionalnega in nespoštljivega.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe