Godčeva z dejstvi razbila laži o “politični policiji”

VečerNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70včeraj

V članku so obravnavane težave, s katerimi so se srečali zagovorniki referenduma o predlagani spremembi slovenskega zakona o parlamentarnih preiskavah. Po pobudi "Proti politični policiji" so se nekateri državljani soočali z zamudami v lokalnih upravnih enotah, ko so poskušali predložiti podpise za referendum. Nekaterim je bilo sporočeno, da jih zaradi težav s sistemom ni mogoče obdelati. Zbiranje podpisov se je začelo 10. junija in naj bi se končalo 14. julija, skupina pa je zbrala 34.104 podpisov od potrebnih 40.000. Predlagana sprememba, ki jo je maja sprejela narodna skupščina, bi posameznike, ki so predmet preiskave, omejila na izpodbijanje odločitev pred ustavnim sodiščem in preprečila, da bi narodna skupščina po izdaji končnega poročila začela nove preiskave v isti zadevi.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni tako izzivi, s katerimi se soočajo organizatorji referenduma, kot tudi vsebina predlagane zakonodajne spremembe, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): Factual accuracy is high as it reports on the challenges faced during signature collection for the referendum, including technical issues at local offices and the current count of signatures. However, the article presents the issue from the perspective of the campaign against the law change, potenti

DemokracijaStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 60pred 22 urami

The article discusses proposed changes to Slovenia's parliamentary investigation law, which aim to limit blockages during investigations and strengthen oversight by the opposition. The amendments were passed by the National Assembly at the end of May 2026, supported by a coalition including SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Respublika. Critics, including activists from the left-wing parties such as Svoboda and Levica, argue that the new law enables the majority to abuse power and threatens journalists and civil society. Opponents are collecting signatures for a referendum under the misleading campaign title 'Against Political Police,' aiming to challenge the amended law. As of late June 2026, they had gathered around 25,602 verified signatures out of the required 40,000, but the campaign has slowed down recently.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents both perspectives—supporters of the legal changes who claim they improve efficiency and prevent constitutional challenges, and opponents who criticize them as enabling political abuse. It does not favor one side through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 60): This article explains the legal changes and their implications, citing sources and providing context. It mentions both supporters and critics of the law change. While factual content is solid, the tone suggests a leaning toward the opposition's view, reducing objectivity.

Nova24TVStrankarsko povezanDesnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 65predvčerajšnjim

The article discusses the controversy surrounding a proposed amendment to Slovenia’s law on parliamentary investigations, which has sparked a referendum campaign led by figures such as Pavel Gantar, Dušan Keber, and Spomenka Hribar. The campaigners claim the amendment would establish a 'political police' by allowing investigations into individuals’ communications and devices, allegedly violating citizens' rights. However, Jelka Godec, an SDS MP, refutes these claims by citing specific legal provisions, emphasizing that the law targets public officials, politicians, and entities linked to public interests, not ordinary citizens. She criticizes opponents of the amendment for spreading misinformation and failing to provide concrete legal references. Meanwhile, former Prime Minister Robert Golob and other influential figures have actively promoted the referendum, using emotionally charged rhetoric to encourage public support.

Ocena pristranskosti (Desno): The article frames the debate around the proposed law as a defense of legal clarity and parliamentary oversight against exaggerated fears of surveillance. It emphasizes the legal framework provided by the law and critiques opponents for spreading misinformation, aligning more closely with the pro-am

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 65): The article provides factual information about the number of signatures collected and mentions the involvement of political figures like Robert Golob. It includes quotes from politicians but leans towards supporting the anti-political police narrative. Factuality is good, but objectivity is compromi

Žurnal24NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 55pred 22 urami

Televizijska voditeljica Ana Praznik je javno pojasnila, da je podpisala zahtevo za razpis referenduma 'proti politični policiji', saj si želi živeti svobodno in brez strahu pred posledicami zaradi drugačnega mnenja. Po objavi njenega videoposnetka so se pojavili več kot 500 žaljivih in vulgarnih komentarjev na družbenih omrežjih. Praznik je poudarila, da ne želi reagirati na takšne komentarje in da jih ni prijavila, saj ji je duševni mir vreden več. Zavod Center za informiranje, sodelovanje in razvoj nevladnih organizacij (CNVOS) je takšne komentarje obsodil in pozval k strpnejšemu javnemu dialogu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents Ana Praznik's statement supporting a referendum against 'political police' and describes the backlash she received online. It includes her response to the negative comments and a statement from CNVOS condemning online harassment. The article does not exhibit clear bias toward a

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 55): The article focuses heavily on Ana Praznik's personal experience and the backlash she received, which may not represent the broader context of the referendum. The emphasis on emotional reactions reduces objectivity. Factuality is moderate as it reports on her actions and public response.