ON
← Retour au fil
Le comité du Sénat approuve le candidat du CDC, le choix controversé du HHS
United States🏛️ PolitiqueCentreil y a 5 j

Le comité du Sénat approuve le candidat du CDC, le choix controversé du HHS

La commission de la santé du Sénat a approuvé deux nominations pour le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (HHS): Erica Schwartz pour le directeur du CDC et Sean Kaufman pour le secrétaire adjoint pour la préparation et la réponse. Les deux candidats ont fait face à un examen minutieux en raison de controverses passées.

The Senate health committee approved the nomination of Erica Schwartz for director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Sean Kaufman for assistant secretary for preparedness and response (ASPR) on Thursday. These confirmations represent a critical step in filling key positions within the Trump administration's health infrastructure, which has long struggled with staffing shortages and ideological conflicts. Both nominees now await final approval by the full Senate, although no specific dates have been announced for such votes. The committee's decisions reflect a willingness among Republican members to support the administration despite concerns over the qualifications and past statements of some candidates. The vote on Erica Schwartz passed 12-10, with all Republicans and one Democrat supporting her nomination. For Sean Kaufman, the vote was closer, 12-11, with all Republicans backing him and all Democrats opposing. Committee chairman Bill Cassidy (R-La.) voiced reservations about Kaufman's past anti-vaccine comments but ultimately supported the nomination after receiving assurances from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). According to Cassidy, HHS officials promised unspecified personnel changes and a commitment to keep Kaufman away from vaccine-related policymaking. Cassidy acknowledged that Kaufman had previously made "stupid and irresponsible" remarks about immunizations but emphasized that he had since taken responsibility for those views. The senator stressed that he would monitor future actions to ensure that science, not ideology, guides decision-making. He also warned that the committee might exert influence over future appointments if these commitments are not honored. Erica Schwartz, who served as deputy surgeon general under the first Trump administration, faced scrutiny during her July 15 confirmation hearing. She was questioned about her ability to avoid political interference and her plans for revitalizing the CDC, which has suffered from low morale and staffing issues due to prolonged leadership gaps. Schwartz pledged to prioritize scientific integrity and rebuild public trust in the agency. However, she remained vague about whether she would inform Congress if directed to implement unscientific or harmful policies, stating she believed neither President Trump nor Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would pursue such measures. Schwartz succeeded Susan Monarez, who was removed from her position after just days in office, reportedly for refusing to endorse Kennedy's vaccine policies. Her appointment marks a shift toward a less polarizing figure compared to previous Trump health nominees. Public health experts suggest she faces considerable challenges in restoring stability to the CDC amid ongoing controversies surrounding vaccine safety and misinformation. Sean Kaufman's nomination drew particular controversy due to his history of expressing skepticism about vaccines. His past statements, initially reported by STAT, raised concerns about his suitability for a role responsible for pandemic preparedness. Despite these reservations, Cassidy decided to support Kaufman after negotiations with HHS officials, who reportedly offered assurances about limiting his involvement in vaccine policy. However, the effectiveness of these assurances remains uncertain, especially given previous instances where HHS has deviated from commitments made to Cassidy. The broader context includes ongoing tensions between Cassidy and HHS leadership, particularly Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Earlier agreements between the two have been partially broken, including the removal of a panel of vaccine advisers and the appointment of individuals skeptical of vaccines. Additionally, HHS has proposed reducing the number of recommended pediatric vaccines, a move Cassidy opposes. Changes to the CDC's website, which previously stated vaccines do not cause autism, have also drawn criticism, with Cassidy calling the revisions insufficient. As the full Senate prepares to consider the nominations, the focus remains on ensuring that the confirmed officials adhere to the commitments made during the confirmation process. The outcome of these votes will have implications for the direction of U.S. public health policy, particularly in addressing current health challenges such as measles outbreaks and foodborne illnesses. Meanwhile, the committee continues to evaluate other nominees, including Nicole Saphier for surgeon general, whose stronger support for vaccines has been noted as encouraging.

Aller aux sources primaires (1)

Les sources officielles sur lesquelles repose la couverture. Lisez-les directement pour contourner le cadrage.

2 articles

Axios logoAxiosIndépendantCentreFactualité 86Objectivité 80il y a 5 j
Le comité du Sénat approuve le candidat du CDC, le choix controversé du HHS

La commission de la santé du Sénat a approuvé deux nominations pour le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (HHS): Erica Schwartz pour le directeur du CDC et Sean Kaufman pour le secrétaire adjoint pour la préparation et la réponse. Les deux candidats ont fait face à un examen minutieux en raison de controverses passées.

Lecture du biais (Centre): L'article présente une vision équilibrée des tensions politiques entourant les nominations, mettant en évidence à la fois la controverse et les compromis conclus.

Pourquoi factualité (86): This article provides detailed information on the approval process, including vote counts and quotes from Senator Cassidy. It accurately reflects the situation with both nominees, noting the controversy around Kaufman's past statements and the concessions from HHS. It aligns closely with the cross-s

Pourquoi objectivité (80): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both sides of the issue without overt bias. Phrases like 'not a slam dunk' and 'future leverage points' suggest some strategic framing, but overall the reporting remains objective and focused on the facts.

STAT News logoSTAT NewsIndépendantCentreFactualité 85Objectivité 78il y a 5 j
Un panel clé du Sénat soutient les choix de Trump pour le CDC, la préparation à la pandémie

Le comité sénatorial de la santé a approuvé deux candidats de l'administration Trump pour des rôles critiques en matière de santé: Erica Schwartz en tant que directrice du CDC et Sean Kaufman en tant que secrétaire adjoint pour la préparation et la réponse (ASPR). Les deux nominations ont reçu un soutien bipartite, tous les républicains votant pour et certains démocrates s'y opposant. Le sénateur Bill Cassidy (R-La.) a soutenu les deux candidats malgré des désaccords précédents, citant des défis de santé publique comme les maladies évitables par la vaccination et la préparation aux pandémies. Cassidy avait précédemment soutenu Robert F. Kennedy Jr., s'appuyant sur les promesses des responsables du HHS, bien que ces promesses aient été brisées. L'article met en évidence les tensions en cours concernant les politiques de vaccination, notamment la réduction des vaccins pédiatriques recommandés par le HHS et la modification des sites Web du CDC pour remettre en question les liens entre les vaccins et l'autisme, auxquels Cassidy s'est fermement opposé.

Lecture du biais (Centre): Bien que l'article traite de sujets politiquement chargés tels que la politique des vaccins et les confirmations partisanes, il présente de multiples perspectives. Il critique à la fois l'administration Trump et Robert F. Kennedy Jr., tout en reconnaissant le soutien bipartisan des candidats.

Pourquoi factualité (85): The article accurately reports the approval of both nominees by the Senate health committee, citing specific votes and quotes from Senator Cassidy. It references the controversy around Kaufman's past anti-vaccine comments and mentions the role of HHS officials in influencing Cassidy's decision. Whil

Pourquoi objectivité (78): The tone remains largely neutral, presenting facts about the approvals and the controversies surrounding the nominees. However, phrases like 'some pretty stupid things' and 'irresponsible things' introduce a slight subjective judgment, affecting objectivity.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et toutes les autres fonctions pour les soutiens.

Devenir soutien

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 4 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés