ON
← Retour au fil
Le Dr Miha Juhart sur la manœuvre de Snow White: "C'est une bêtise complète !"
Slovenia🏛️ PolitiqueProgressisteil y a 10 h

Le Dr Miha Juhart sur la manœuvre de Snow White: "C'est une bêtise complète !"

L'article traite d'un différend juridique impliquant l'homme d'affaires Rok Snežič et de ses tentatives de transférer la propriété de sa société Progros à une autre partie. L'expert juridique Miha Juhart critique les manœuvres de Snežič, les qualifiant de "complètement stupides". Selon Juhart, la procédure appropriée pour le recouvrement de la dette implique la vente d'actifs plutôt que le transfert de propriété.

Dr. Miha Juhart, a legal expert specializing in civil and economic law from Ljubljana’s Faculty of Law, has called the maneuver by Roko Snežič and Borisa Mijič a “complete nonsense.” The situation involves a dispute over the management and ownership of the company Progros, which was recently renamed Klukec, a business focused on camel breeding. According to reports, Snežič, who previously worked under the Ministry of Labour, allegedly took over the company free of charge from parliamentarian Borisa Mijič, with plans to transfer control to another figure within days. This move has sparked controversy among legal experts and stakeholders. The incident unfolded after Snežič revealed earlier this week that he had taken over Progros without payment from Mijič, who is reportedly owed 2,489 euros for legal costs. Snežič claimed he would remain the sole owner temporarily before passing control to Luka Mesec, a representative of the Left Party, who holds authority over his assets. However, according to Juhart, such a transfer does not constitute a valid enforcement action. He explained that enforcement requires selling the debtor's assets, not merely transferring them. If Mesec were to initiate enforcement, the shares held by Snežič would need to be sold, allowing Mesec to recover his debt. In response to questions about the implications for the company, Juhart stated that the director must assess the financial condition of the firm based on available information. Given the current state of affairs, it is likely that the director will recommend initiating insolvency proceedings. The owner, Snežič, would then be required to provide additional capital, otherwise the company could face liquidation. Insolvency procedures can be initiated either by the director or by creditors, including unpaid workers, suppliers, and the state. The situation has drawn attention due to the involvement of several parties, including the former director of Progros, who is also a member of parliament. Mijič, who previously served as a parliamentarian, has been accused of misrepresenting his educational background. His son, Miladin Mijič, was replaced by Admir Kamerić, who resides in the village of Dubnica in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kamerić, who assumed the role of permanent resident, has since become the new director of the company. Legal experts warn that if the company fails to meet its obligations, the consequences could extend beyond mere financial loss. Delinquencies include unpaid wages to employees exceeding 10,000 euros, uncollected taxes and contributions to the Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) totaling more than 30,000 euros, and outstanding debts to cooperative partners. These issues have raised concerns about potential legal actions against Mijič, including possible criminal charges. Juhart emphasized that the recent transfer of Progros to Klukec represents a provocative act, not uncommon in Slovenian history. He described the scenario as a serious conflict involving individuals who have not been paid for their work, suggesting that some are exploiting the situation for personal gain. He referred to the case as a tragedy, highlighting the broader implications for affected parties. As the situation develops, the outcome will depend largely on whether the company’s director takes appropriate steps to address the financial crisis. Without intervention, the possibility of insolvency remains high, potentially leading to the dissolution of the enterprise and further legal repercussions for all involved.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Le même événement, regroupé selon l’orientation politique des médias qui le couvrent.

Comment chaque camp l’a couvert

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Couverture dans le monde

Le même événement tel que rapporté dans d’autres pays.

Couverture dans le monde

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

Vérification des affirmations

Les principales affirmations factuelles et combien de sources les confirment ou les contestent.

Vérification des affirmations

Soutenez une information indépendante et consciente des biais, et débloquez le pouls social, le vote communautaire et votre fil Pour vous personnalisé.

Devenir soutien

1 articles

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndépendant🔒ProgressisteFactualité 55Objectivité 30il y a 10 h
Le Dr Miha Juhart sur la manœuvre de Snow White: "C'est une bêtise complète !"

L'article traite d'un différend juridique impliquant l'homme d'affaires Rok Snežič et de ses tentatives de transférer la propriété de sa société Progros à une autre partie. L'expert juridique Miha Juhart critique les manœuvres de Snežič, les qualifiant de "complètement stupides". Selon Juhart, la procédure appropriée pour le recouvrement de la dette implique la vente d'actifs plutôt que le transfert de propriété.

Lecture du biais (Progressiste): L'article présente les manœuvres judiciaires de Rok Snežič et de ses associés d'une manière qui suggère que leurs actions sont politiquement motivées ou inappropriées.

Pourquoi factualité (55): The article reports on a legal dispute involving Rok Snežič and his alleged transfer of ownership of Progros to Klukec, a company focused on camel breeding. It includes statements from lawyer Miha Juhart who criticizes the maneuver as 'complete nonsense.' The article references a debt owed by Snežič

Pourquoi objectivité (30): The article presents a strongly critical view of Rok Snežič's actions, using emotionally charged language such as 'popolna neumnost' ('complete nonsense'). It frames the situation as a 'tragedija te zgodbe' ('tragedy of this story') and emphasizes the legal implications without presenting alternativ

Gardons l’information honnête.

ObjectiveNews est financé par ses lecteurs et sans publicité : nous vous montrons le biais au lieu de le cacher. Soutenez un journalisme indépendant pour 5 €/mois.

Devenir soutien

Sujets liés