Radojčić: Waste in Bibići new proof that state control over waste is not workingDušica Radojčić, predsjednica saborskog Odbora za zaštitu okoliša i prirode (Možemo!), upozorila je na nastavak ilegalnog odlaganja otpada u Bibićima, što smatra dokazom da sustav državne kontrole nad otpadom ne funkcionira. Prema njoj, inspekcijski nadzor nije utvrdio sve činjenice oko ilegalnog odlagališta, a počinitelji su nakon nadzora nastavili dovoziti otpad. Radojčić podsjetila je da je Odbor 31. srpnja 2026. prijavio Državnom inspektoratu RH o masovnom ilegalnom odlagalištu, ali je odgovor inspektorata bio nedostatan. Na lokaciji je pronađeno oko 100 metara kubičnih otpada, a vlasnici zemljišta su dužni otpad ukloniti. Radojčić naglasila je potrebu za uključivanje Državnog inspektorata kako bi se utvrdilo izvor i počinitelji ilegala.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of state control over waste management, which aligns with progressive environmental concerns. The emphasis on institutional inadequacy and calls for stronger oversight reflect a left-leaning critique of current governance structures. The tone critic
The waste in Gospić will be recycled by the company that illegally buried it in Slovenia!The Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marije Vučković, stated that the government aims to quickly remediate waste in Gospić. The chosen company for covering the waste has been linked to illegal dumping in Slovenia, raising concerns. Vučković clarified that the selection process was market research, not a procurement process, and that neither the ministry nor the Fund had influenced the choice of the contractor. She emphasized the need for speed and efficiency, aiming to complete the cleanup before heavy rains. The situation highlights broader issues with thousands of illegal landfills across Croatia, ranging from construction to hazardous waste.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the minister’s statements and clarifications regarding the selection of a contractor for environmental remediation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects and the ap
Vučković on the disputed waste contractor in Gospić: "We did not interfere".Croatia's Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marija Vučković, stated during a visit to Gospić that the government aims to quickly address waste management issues there. When asked about concerns regarding the selection of a contractor with questionable business practices for covering waste, she clarified that neither her ministry nor the relevant fund had intervened in the proposal process. Vučković emphasized that the process involved researching the market by contacting multiple domestic and international companies, aiming to prepare a comprehensive plan and expedite environmental cleanup while protecting the state budget. She noted that the chosen contractor was selected based on cost and time efficiency, with a three-month deadline set to avoid delays caused by heavy rain. The situation differs from past controversies like those involving Sovjak, where contracts were terminated due to similar issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the minister's statements and does not exhibit clear bias toward any political side. It includes direct quotes from Vučković and provides context about the selection process and previous controversies, without overtly favoring one perspective over another.
The initiative from Gospić sent a message to Plenkovic: nothing for 18 months, and three days before the protest he would have sat at the table...The civil initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' responded to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković after he visited Gospić and announced the current state of illegal waste management. The initiative criticized Plenković's statement that problems are solved at the table, not on the street, calling it inappropriate. They pointed out that 18 months have passed since their initial calls for action, and three days before the largest protest in Croatia, they were ignored. The group emphasized that citizens have been living with these issues for years, facing illegal waste disposal and lack of legal protection. They accused the government of not addressing the real problems and claimed that the system has not improved despite claims of new dynamics. The initiative stressed that the law is being violated and called for accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the government's handling of waste management as a failure to address citizen concerns, using strong language to highlight systemic neglect and injustice. The tone suggests a left-leaning perspective by emphasizing grassroots activism and legal rights over state-c
Net.hrIndependentProgressive9 hr. agoThe article reports that a Croatian branch of a Slovenian waste management company, Kostak, has been selected by the Environmental Protection Fund to cover 33,000 tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. The same company was previously found to have illegally buried municipal waste last year, which required excavation and remediation. The project was estimated at €400,000 before tax, but Kostak offered to complete it for €268,740. The company is led by Miljenko Muha, who was previously accused alongside three others and an environmental inspector for illegal waste burial. Slovenian media reported that Kostak handled all the waste this year. Police have initiated a criminal report and investigation into the case, which is ongoing. Investigators suspect the company gained €8.7 million in profits through illegal waste burial.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a legal and ethical violation by the company, highlighting potential corruption and financial gain through illegal activities. It emphasizes the involvement of local authorities and the ongoing investigation, suggesting systemic issues rather than just individual罪
Waste in Gospić will be covered by the company that illegally buried municipal waste?The environmental protection fund has selected the company Kostak-Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine d.o.o. from Zagreb to cover hazardous buried waste in Gospić, with the task estimated at 400,000 euros excluding VAT, and the company offered to perform the work for 268,740 euros. The chosen company, a subsidiary of Slovenian municipal enterprise Kostak, was previously found to have illegally disposed of communal waste last year, requiring excavation and remediation. The company operates the Kostak Waste Management Center in Spodnji Stari Grad.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the selection of the company as a consequence of its previous illegal waste disposal, implying regulatory oversight and accountability. While the company is presented as having been sanctioned, the emphasis on its past violations suggests a critical stance toward corporate conduct
tportalIndependentProgressive11 hr. agoThe Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund has selected two contractors for waste remediation work at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The Zagreb-based Zaprešić Tabak Group was chosen to remove and manage approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags, while the Croatian branch of Slovenia’s Kostak company was selected to cover the illegally buried waste. The Kostak subsidiary had previously been linked to illegal waste disposal practices in Slovenia, where inspectors found that around 2,900 square meters of mixed municipal waste were unlawfully buried at their facility in Spodnji Stari Grad. Slovenian authorities have launched an ongoing investigation into these activities, suspecting financial gains of up to €8.7 million through illegal dumping. Despite this, the fund proceeded with selecting the Croatian branch of Kostak for the covering task, citing no legal barriers.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights concerns over environmental mismanagement and potential corruption by linking the selected contractor to prior illegal waste disposal activities. It emphasizes the ongoing police investigation and suggests possible conflicts of interest, which frames the situation as a matter
Croatia
