Trade unions support the people of Lika and the protest Walk for Lika and for Croatia
Three Croatian trade union federations, Savez samostalnih sindikata Hrvatske (SSSH), Nezavisni hrvatski sindikati (NHS) i Matica hrvatskih sindikata (MHS), have fully supported the citizens of Lika in their protest 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku!' which will take place in Zagreb on September 5th. The unions call for urgent action from the Croatian government and relevant authorities to remove health risks, determine institutional failures, and establish systems to prevent such incidents. They emphasize that trust in institutions is built through action, not by diminishing citizens' justified concerns. The protests highlight serious concerns over illegal waste management practices and lack of timely responses from institutions. The unions stress that the right to clean environment, safe water, healthy soil, and life without fear of pollution is a fundamental human right and a matter of public interest for all of Croatia. They warn against attempts to discredit legitimate citizen demands with labels like 'politicization,' 'undermining authority,' or 'anti-Heritage.' The leaders of the unions urge solidarity with Lika and participation in the protest, emphasizing that the fight for a
A large protest in Zagreb has sparked public outrage over the government's handling of waste management issues in Gospić, with lawmakers and activists accusing officials of failing to address the crisis adequately. The demonstration, organized under the banner "Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku," drew around 30,000 participants, highlighting growing frustration among citizens over the illegal dumping of tens of thousands of tons of waste in the area. Protesters demanded immediate action, including a comprehensive cleanup plan with clear timelines and accountability for institutional failures. The protest was led by the civic initiative "Gospić je naš dom," which highlighted how the issue extends beyond local concerns, affecting the entire country. Participants included students, families, and diaspora members who expressed solidarity with the cause. Lawmaker Zvonimir Troskot of the Most party criticized the government’s response, particularly the statement by Minister Branko Bačić that the cleanup would be expensive. Troskot called this a form of humiliation toward citizens, arguing that the government should take responsibility for the cleanup rather than shifting costs onto residents. Troskot emphasized that the situation reflects a deeper systemic failure, describing the actions taken by authorities as internal aggression against the nation. He accused the government of enabling certain corporations while failing to hold them accountable, leading to environmental harm and health risks for communities. He also pointed out that the government had delayed addressing the issue for nearly two years, citing ongoing investigations by the State Inspectorate for Environmental Protection (USKOK) as a justification for inaction. Meanwhile, the waste management company Tabak Group, which had been contracted to handle 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from Gospić, announced its withdrawal from plans to transport the waste to Zaprešić. This decision came after pressure from local residents, who opposed the potential contamination of their neighborhoods. The company stated it would seek permission for on-site treatment instead, and if denied, it would withdraw from the contract altogether. The move has raised further concerns about transparency and accountability in waste management decisions. In Zaprešić, local authorities have responded to the growing unrest. Mayor Željko Turk confirmed that the city is investigating whether Tabak Group had the necessary permits to operate in the area. He noted that the city had not been involved in the permit issuance process and that the existing spatial planning does not allow for waste processing within residential zones. Turk also mentioned that the company had constructed additional structures on its site, prompting a complaint to the State Inspectorate. Residents in Krapinska Street, near the Tabak Group facility, have set up signs opposing the transportation of waste from Gospić to Zaprešić. Some have even threatened to block trucks attempting to deliver the waste. These tensions reflect broader frustrations with the lack of transparency and public involvement in decisions affecting community health and safety. Separately, the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development has faced criticism for its slow response to the growing crisis. The latest findings from USKOK reveal that microplastics have been detected in groundwater beneath the dumpsite, raising serious concerns about long-term ecological damage. Despite these revelations, Premier Andrej Plenković initially dismissed public concerns, labeling them as hysteria. His comments were later challenged by experts and activists, who argued that the delay in releasing critical information undermined public trust. As the situation continues to escalate, calls for greater transparency, accountability, and citizen participation in governance grow louder. With multiple stakeholders, local governments, environmental organizations, and affected communities, demanding urgent action, the question remains whether the government will finally prioritize public welfare over political convenience.
Go to the primary sources (4)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article reports on the reaction of the Croatian company 'Kostak - Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine' to media claims that they illegally disposed of waste in Slovenia. The company clarifies that their activities in Gospić were related to unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste at their own waste management center, which was later removed at their expense and the area sanitized. They emphasize that they met all legal and technical requirements for the temporary covering work of waste, and that the project does not involve handling, excavation, or disposal of waste but rather construction work to prevent contamination of groundwater. The company stresses that they operate independently under Croatian law and that the allegations against them are inaccurate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the company’s official statement in response to media claims, providing detailed explanations and emphasizing compliance with regulations. While the issue involves environmental concerns and local governance, the framing remains balanced by presenting both the accusations and a驳
Why factuality (100): This article is a direct reproduction of the primary source document from Jutarnji list. It accurately presents Kostak's statements regarding their legal status, denial of illegal dumping in Slovenia, and clarification of the nature of their work in Gospić. All claims align precisely with the origin
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, simply reporting Kostak's official statement without editorializing or taking sides. It presents facts objectively and avoids any biased language or framing.
Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 98Objective 658/30/2026
Pop singer Severina called for participation in the 'March for Lika' protest in Zagreb, organized by the initiative 'Gospic is our home.' She emphasized that the protest is against pollution, illness, and corruption, stating these issues affect everyone regardless of ideology. Severina criticized authorities for suppressing dissent, referencing incidents in Serbia where students and citizens were beaten for demanding accountability. She accused opponents of the march of being either aligned with criminals who dumped waste in Gospic or with the government itself. Severina also urged athletes, religious groups, and pro-life activists to join the march, arguing that Croatia needs prayer and collective action to protect its environment and sovereignty.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a moral and environmental cause, criticizing government actions and aligning with anti-corruption and environmental protection narratives. The emphasis on grassroots activism, religious groups, and opposition to corporate interests suggests a progressive/leftist slp
Why factuality (98): This article provides an accurate summary of Severina's speech and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, making it highly factual.
Why objectivity (65): While more neutral than article 0, this article still contains subjective elements like 'žestoko pozivala' and emphasizes Severina’s support for the protest over opposing views, indicating some bias.
Croatian singer Severina called on citizens to join a protest against dangerous waste in Lika during a concert in Karlovac, later expanding her message on social media. She emphasized that issues like health, pollution, and corruption should not have ideological labels and criticized those who support such problems. Severina drew parallels to events in Serbia, warning against attempts to discredit people seeking accountability. She questioned whether Croatia wants to become a society where people are attacked both online and in the streets. She accused opponents of the planned march for Lika of being either complicit with criminals responsible for the waste, connected to the government, or simply ignorant. She urged medical professionals to check the health status of residents in Gospić, criticizing some politicians for mocking elderly people who claim they fell ill due to the situation. Severina called for prayers for Croatia, urging people to walk for the country and for life, emphasizing the need to prevent further delays in handling hazardous waste.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Severina's statements without overtly favoring any political side. It includes her criticisms of various groups, including politicians and opponents of the protest, but does not take a stance on these claims. The framing remains balanced, focusing on her calls for action and her
Why factuality (96): The article accurately summarizes Severina's message and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, though it omits some details present in other articles.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language and frames opponents of the protest negatively, similar to article 0. This shows a lack of neutrality and balance in presenting the issue.
A company from Zaprešić called Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, and the company has eight months to complete the work. This decision was made by the Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency, which evaluated bids based on cost and expertise. Another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković, emphasized the importance of removing illegal waste and minimizing environmental risks during a meeting on Wednesday.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a government-funded environmental cleanup project, including the selection of a contractor, the amount of funding, and the rejection of another bid. It includes quotes from the Prime Minister but does not exhibit clear ideological framing or biased word
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group as the contractor for removing 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from Gospić, including the contract value of 357,500 euros and the rejection of the second bid. It aligns closely with the primary source document, though it does not mention th
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on facts such as the selection process, contract details, and the timeline for completion. There is no evident bias or emotionally charged language.
The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to handle approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The company will receive €357,500 (excluding VAT) for this task. The decision was based on the highest score according to price and professional expertise criteria, signed off by the Fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for €578,500 was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of €400,000. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to remove illegal waste in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to prevent water contamination and the removal of waste contained in bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize particular political narratives. While the issue involves public帑
Why factuality (95): This article provides an accurate summary of the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, including the financial aspects and the rejection of another bid. However, like the first article, it does not include the clarification from Kostak about the nature of their i
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the facts without any apparent bias or subjective commentary.
The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, based on the highest score according to price and professional experience criteria. The decision was signed by the fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to address illegal waste removal in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to eliminate even the smallest trace and possibility of water contamination, along with transporting part of the waste contained in the bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It includes quotes from the prime minister regarding environmental concerns but does not take a clear ideological stance.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, along with the financial terms and the rejection of the higher-priced bid. It lacks the clarification from Kostak regarding the scope of their work but otherwise matches the primary source d
Why objectivity (95): The article remains objective, delivering the information in a straightforward manner without showing favoritism or using emotive language.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 959/2/2026
The Croatian company Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The decision by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund was announced on Wednesday, stating that Tabak Grupa’s bid received the highest score based on cost and professional experience. The winning bid amounts to 357,500 euros excluding VAT, while another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS worth 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and dissatisfied bidders may file a complaint within ten days to the State Commission for Public Procurement Control. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković emphasized during a meeting on Wednesday that the fund’s decision aims to cover the landfill and eliminate any water runoff risks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a public procurement decision made by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund. It includes quotes from the fund director and mentions the prime minister's comments but does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Tabak Group for the removal of non-hazardous waste in Gospić, including the contract amount and the rejection of the second bid. It does not include the clarification from Kostak about the nature of their involvement being strictly construction-related
Why objectivity (95): The article is presented in a neutral and factual manner, avoiding any biased language or opinionated statements.
Premijer Andrej Plenković, tokom sastanka u Gospiću, reagirao je na zabrinutost stanovnika vezanu uz nezakonito odlaganje otpada. Naglasio je da je Fond za zaštitu okoliša donio odluke o odabiru izvođača za prekrivanje odlagališta i odnošenje otpada u vrećama. Ocjenu je dao da je situacija s rasutim otpadom ozbiljna, s procjenom oko 4.500 tona, dok je zakopani otpad procjenjen na 33 tone i 33.000 tona. Plenković je istaknuo da su nalozi nadležnim tijelima dati, da će se uklanjati otpad u najskorijem roku, i da je voda iz javne vodoopskrbe zdravstveno ispravna. Također je naglasio da se brzo vrši kazneni postupak protiv osoba odgovornih za odlaganje otpada, a Vlada je preuzeo proces sanacije odlagališta.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's actions and responses to public concerns regarding waste management, without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It includes statements from the Prime Minister acknowledging public worries and outlining steps taken by the government, while also提及
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Prime Minister Plenković's address regarding the illegal waste disposal in Gospić and the selection of the contractor. It includes relevant details about the process and the expected actions.
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, reporting on the government's response and the steps being taken without showing bias or personal opinion.
The article reports that a Croatian branch of a Slovenian waste management company, Kostak, has been selected by the Environmental Protection Fund to cover 33,000 tons of hazardous waste in Gospić. The same company was previously found to have illegally buried municipal waste last year, which required excavation and remediation. The project was estimated at €400,000 before tax, but Kostak offered to complete it for €268,740. The company is led by Miljenko Muha, who was previously accused alongside three others and an environmental inspector for illegal waste burial. Slovenian media reported that Kostak handled all the waste this year. Police have initiated a criminal report and investigation into the case, which is ongoing. Investigators suspect the company gained €8.7 million in profits through illegal waste burial.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a legal and ethical violation by the company, highlighting potential corruption and financial gain through illegal activities. It emphasizes the involvement of local authorities and the ongoing investigation, suggesting systemic issues rather than just individual罪
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and references the prior legal issues with the company. It provides precise details about the cost estimates, the involvement of Miljenko Muha, and the ongoing police investigation, aligning closely with the primar
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone, presenting facts without editorializing or showing bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on delivering the information clearly and concisely.
The environmental protection fund has selected the company Kostak-Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine d.o.o. from Zagreb to cover hazardous buried waste in Gospić, with the task estimated at 400,000 euros excluding VAT, and the company offered to perform the work for 268,740 euros. The chosen company, a subsidiary of Slovenian municipal enterprise Kostak, was previously found to have illegally disposed of communal waste last year, requiring excavation and remediation. The company operates the Kostak Waste Management Center in Spodnji Stari Grad.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the selection of the company as a consequence of its previous illegal waste disposal, implying regulatory oversight and accountability. While the company is presented as having been sanctioned, the emphasis on its past violations suggests a critical stance toward corporate conduct
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and references the prior legal issues with the company. It provides precise details about the cost estimates, the involvement of Miljenko Muha, and the ongoing police investigation, aligning closely with the primar
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone, presenting facts without editorializing or showing bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on delivering the information clearly and concisely.
The article reports that cities and municipalities surrounding the city of Split have stopped transporting their waste to Karepovac starting Wednesday. This decision follows previous meetings between Split’s mayor Tomislav Šuta and representatives from nearby areas such as Brela, Baška Voda, Podgore, Tučepa, Kaštela, as well as the Fund for Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition. Šuta confirmed that Omiš and other municipalities associated with the Omiška Komunalna Poduzetnica (Peovici) will no longer send waste to Karepovac. He noted that while some areas like Kaštela have resolved part of their waste issue, others, including the Croatian region, still need solutions. Šuta emphasized the goal of stopping waste transportation from the Croatian side through peaceful dialogue and normal communication, expecting a resolution soon. He also highlighted his efforts to protect Split residents by reducing waste volume, unpleasant smells, and disruptions to daily life for those in the Kamen, Šin, Mejaša area and related regions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual update on municipal waste management decisions without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on administrative actions and discussions among local authorities without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. The tone remains neutral, focusing on
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the closure of Karepovac to surrounding municipalities and includes details about the meeting between mayors and officials. While it doesn't mention the specific issue in Gospić, it provides factual information about the waste management situation in the Split-Dalma
Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely objective, focusing on the practical implications of the closure and the efforts by local authorities to find solutions. It avoids taking sides but uses some descriptive language that could be seen as slightly favoring the affected communities.
Unions in Croatia have expressed full support for citizens of Lika and their protest 'Walk for Lika, Walk for Croatia,' which is scheduled to take place in Zagreb on Saturday, September 5th. The unions, Savez samostalnih sindikata Hrvatske (SSSH), Nezavisni hrvatski sindikati (NHS), and Matica hrvatskih sindikata (MHS), are calling on the Croatian government and relevant authorities to urgently address health risks, assign responsibility for institutional failures, and establish systems to prevent such incidents from recurring. They emphasize that citizens of Lika have a right to demand protection of health, safety, environment, and property, especially when there are serious suspicions of illegal waste management and inadequate responses from institutions. The unions argue that this issue is not limited to Lika but affects the entire country, highlighting the fundamental right to a clean environment and safe living conditions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests as legitimate demands for environmental and institutional accountability, emphasizing the rights of citizens and criticizing government inaction. It uses strong language supporting the protesters' cause and criticizes attempts to discredit their actions as politically
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the support given by trade unions to the citizens of Lika and the planned protest. It provides context about the demands being made and the concerns raised by the unions. The content aligns closely with the information presented in the primary source documents.
Why objectivity (85): The article takes a clear stance in support of the protesters and emphasizes the need for institutional accountability. While it presents factual information, it also includes strong language that reflects the unions' position rather than maintaining strict neutrality.
The waste disposal site at Karepovac near Split will close to surrounding cities and municipalities starting tomorrow, forcing them to find alternative locations for waste management. Most towns and municipalities in the Split-Dalmatia county were allowed to dispose of household waste there until now, but they were supposed to secure alternatives. However, some have yet to find solutions, including Podgora, Tučepi, Baška Voda, and Brela. All contacted waste sites in Croatia have refused to accept their waste, creating a significant challenge during the tourist season, which increases waste volume by up to ten times. The affected municipalities have hired lawyers and are preparing lawsuits against the City of Split, citing an existing agreement that allowed waste disposal at Karepovac until a new regional center in Lećevica is completed. Local officials expressed concerns about finding temporary solutions before the new facility opens.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the challenges faced by local governments and the legal actions being taken, without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from multiple officials expressing concern and seeking resolution, indicating balanced coverage.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the situation around Karepovac and the challenges faced by municipalities in finding alternative waste disposal sites. It provides relevant background about the legal agreements and the current status of the regional waste center.
Why objectivity (85): While the article is mostly factual, it contains some subjective language such as 'velik problem' (big problem) and 'normalno odlažemo otpad' (normally dispose of waste), which could imply a value judgment about the current situation.
Ministrac zaštite okoliša Marija Vučković je u Gospiću objasnila proces izbora firme za prekrivanje otpada u gradu, koji je podignut zbog sumnje u poslovne prakse odabrane tvrtke. Prema njevim rečima, Ministarstvo i Fond nisu bili uključeni u izbor subjekta, već je proces bio temeljen na istraživanju tržišta i potrebama za brzu sanaciju. Odabrana firma je hrvatska podružnica slovenske tvrtke Kostak, kojoj je lani utvrđeno da je ilegalno zakopala komunalni otpad. Vučković je naglasila da je proces bio pregovarački, baziran na izvješću Geotehničkog fakulteta u Zagrebu koje je pokazalo prisutnost PFAS spojeva u vodama. Njezin cilj je brzo obavljati sanaciju prije velikih kiša, uz oslanjanje na cijenu i rok kao ključne kriterije.
Bias read (Center): Čak i ako je tema politički kontroverzna, tekst se ne zadržava na jednoj strani, već objašnjava proces izbora firme i povezanu politiku. Ministrac daje detalje o proceduri, objašnjava motivaciju i opisuje kriterije, bez evidentnog stranih slanja. Iako se radi o političkoj temi, tekst ostaje neutraln
Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports Minister Vučković’s statements regarding the selection process for the waste remediation company in Gospić. It clearly distinguishes between the market research phase and the procurement process, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the ministry did not direct
Why objectivity (87): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting Vučković’s explanations without overt bias. However, it does include some framing that emphasizes the government’s proactive role in preparing for the formal procedure, which may subtly favor the administration’s perspective.
The article discusses the ongoing issue of illegal waste dumping in Gospić, Croatia, which has become one of the country's most pressing environmental problems. President of the Government Andrej Plenković is set to visit Gospić with members of his cabinet to discuss the remediation of illegally disposed waste in the city. The meeting will involve representatives from relevant institutions, local authorities, and civil initiatives that have been advocating for faster cleanup and greater transparency. The situation follows delays in the remediation process at the former PPK Velebit site, where two bids were received for the removal of approximately 4,500 tons of hazardous waste and 650 tons of non-hazardous waste. In the interim, the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund has received four proposals for temporary covering of buried waste to prevent potential contamination of groundwater. Experts from the Faculty of Geotechnics revealed significant quantities of hazardous waste, changes in soil properties, and damage to ecosystems, including the presence of PFAS chemicals in underground water. These findings highlight the urgency of the situation, though there is no证据 of
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the environmental crisis in Gospić, detailing both the government's efforts and the concerns raised by experts and civil initiatives. It does not overtly favor any particular political stance but rather reports on the complexity of the issue and the various
Why factuality (92): The article provides detailed information about Prime Minister Andrej Plenković visiting Gospić to address illegal waste disposal, including specific details such as the amount of hazardous and non-hazardous waste involved, the evaluation of bids, and findings from a geotechnical report. These facts
Why objectivity (88): The article presents the event in a largely neutral manner, focusing on the facts of the visit and the environmental concerns. However, some phrases like 'one of the biggest current ecological problems in Croatia' may carry a slight tone of emphasis, though not overly biased.
Premijer Andrej Plenković, uz pet ministara, planira da dođe u Gospić u Srijedu na sastanak o problemu nelegalnog otpada na tom području. Informacija je potvrđena ličko-senjskim županom Ernestom Petry. Sastanak će uključivati lokalne vlasti, Državni inspektorat, Hrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo i Fudn za zaštitu okoliša. Prosvjed pod nazivom 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' najavljen je za subotu u Zagrebu.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government meeting regarding illegal waste disposal, which is a politically sensitive issue. The framing remains neutral, presenting both the government action and the planned protest without overtly favoring either side. The focus is on the event itself rather than taking a
Why factuality (92): The article closely follows the primary source, providing exact times, locations, and participants. It includes quotes from local officials and contextualizes the meeting within the broader issue of illegal waste disposal. The information is comprehensive and aligned with the primary source.
Why objectivity (82): The tone remains largely neutral, although there is a brief quote from the premier that suggests a stance against protests, which may introduce a subtle bias. However, this is presented as a direct quote rather than an opinionated statement.
The Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marije Vučković, stated that the government aims to quickly remediate waste in Gospić. The chosen company for covering the waste has been linked to illegal dumping in Slovenia, raising concerns. Vučković clarified that the selection process was market research, not a procurement process, and that neither the ministry nor the Fund had influenced the choice of the contractor. She emphasized the need for speed and efficiency, aiming to complete the cleanup before heavy rains. The situation highlights broader issues with thousands of illegal landfills across Croatia, ranging from construction to hazardous waste.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the minister’s statements and clarifications regarding the selection of a contractor for environmental remediation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects and the ap
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and mentions the prior legal issues involving the company. It aligns closely with the primary source regarding the cost estimates and the involvement of Miljenko Muha. However, it lacks some contextual details from
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, quoting the minister directly and avoiding overt bias. It explains the process of market research and procurement without taking sides or using emotive language.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 859/2/2026
Croatia's Minister of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, Marija Vučković, stated during a visit to Gospić that the government aims to quickly address waste management issues there. When asked about concerns regarding the selection of a contractor with questionable business practices for covering waste, she clarified that neither her ministry nor the relevant fund had intervened in the proposal process. Vučković emphasized that the process involved researching the market by contacting multiple domestic and international companies, aiming to prepare a comprehensive plan and expedite environmental cleanup while protecting the state budget. She noted that the chosen contractor was selected based on cost and time efficiency, with a three-month deadline set to avoid delays caused by heavy rain. The situation differs from past controversies like those involving Sovjak, where contracts were terminated due to similar issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the minister's statements and does not exhibit clear bias toward any political side. It includes direct quotes from Vučković and provides context about the selection process and previous controversies, without overtly favoring one perspective over another.
Why factuality (90): This article mirrors the content of article 1, accurately reporting the selection of Kostak for the cleanup work in Gospić and referencing the prior legal issues with the company. It provides similar details about the cost estimates and the role of Miljenko Muha, aligning well with the primary sourc
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral, quoting the minister and explaining the procurement process without showing favoritism or using emotionally charged language. It focuses on the procedural aspects rather than taking a stance on the issue.
A protest known as 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku' took place in Zagreb, organized by the civil initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' due to concerns over illegal waste dumping in Gospić. Around 30,000 people participated, demanding a comprehensive cleanup plan with clear deadlines and the removal of waste. The protest highlighted broader issues of waste management responsibility across Croatia. MP Zvonimir Troskot of the Most party commented on the event, criticizing the statement by Deputy Prime Minister Branko Bačić, who warned citizens about the high cost of sanitation. Troskot argued that Bačić's remarks were disrespectful to citizens and called for the government to take responsibility for the cleanup, suggesting legal action against those responsible.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a significant national issue involving government accountability and criticizes the ruling party's approach. It emphasizes the moral and civic duty of institutions and portrays the government's response as dismissive and disrespectful. The language used suggests a左翼
Why factuality (90): Offers comprehensive coverage of the protest, including support from various organizations and individuals, and details the goals of the initiative. Consistent with other sources and provides additional context.
Why objectivity (80): Maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the collective effort and the shared concern over waste management. Avoids taking sides and presents facts objectively.
Predsjednik vlade Andrija Plenković i ministri posjetit će Gospić u srijedu kako bi razgovarali o rješavanju problema ilegala odloženog otpada. Sastanak će uključivati predstavnike lokalnih institucija, zajednice i građanskih inicijativa. U Zagrebu se priprema veliki prosvjed „Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku!“, koji je podržao zbog odlaganja opasnog otpada u Lici. Dijelovi desnih političkih krugova tvrde da prosvjed ima jugoslavensku lijevu okus, dok inicijativa „Gospić je naš dom“ odbacuje ovu tezu kao spin.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a government meeting regarding illegal waste disposal and mentions a protest, but does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both perspectives, right-wing claims about the protest being influenced by leftist ideas and the counterclaim by a local initiative, that the '
Why factuality (88): This article provides accurate details about the meeting, including the timing, participants, and the context of the protest. It references the primary source document and includes additional context about political tensions surrounding the protest, which is supported by external reporting.
Why objectivity (75): The article has a more critical tone toward right-wing actors who have claimed the protest is influenced by 'Yugoslav leftism.' This introduces a slight bias, even if it is framed as reporting others' views rather than expressing them directly.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
