Trade unions support the people of Lika and the protest Walk for Lika and for Croatia
Three Croatian trade union federations, Savez samostalnih sindikata Hrvatske (SSSH), Nezavisni hrvatski sindikati (NHS) i Matica hrvatskih sindikata (MHS), have fully supported the citizens of Lika in their protest 'Hodaj za Liku, hodaj za Hrvatsku!' which will take place in Zagreb on September 5th. The unions call for urgent action from the Croatian government and relevant authorities to remove health risks, determine institutional failures, and establish systems to prevent such incidents. They emphasize that trust in institutions is built through action, not by diminishing citizens' justified concerns. The protests highlight serious concerns over illegal waste management practices and lack of timely responses from institutions. The unions stress that the right to clean environment, safe water, healthy soil, and life without fear of pollution is a fundamental human right and a matter of public interest for all of Croatia. They warn against attempts to discredit legitimate citizen demands with labels like 'politicization,' 'undermining authority,' or 'anti-Heritage.' The leaders of the unions urge solidarity with Lika and participation in the protest, emphasizing that the fight for a
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Pop singer Severina called for participation in the 'March for Lika' protest in Zagreb, organized by the initiative 'Gospic is our home.' She emphasized that the protest is against pollution, illness, and corruption, stating these issues affect everyone regardless of ideology. Severina criticized authorities for suppressing dissent, referencing incidents in Serbia where students and citizens were beaten for demanding accountability. She accused opponents of the march of being either aligned with criminals who dumped waste in Gospic or with the government itself. Severina also urged athletes, religious groups, and pro-life activists to join the march, arguing that Croatia needs prayer and collective action to protect its environment and sovereignty.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a moral and environmental cause, criticizing government actions and aligning with anti-corruption and environmental protection narratives. The emphasis on grassroots activism, religious groups, and opposition to corporate interests suggests a progressive/leftist slp
Why factuality (98): This article provides an accurate summary of Severina's speech and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, making it highly factual.
Why objectivity (65): While more neutral than article 0, this article still contains subjective elements like 'žestoko pozivala' and emphasizes Severina’s support for the protest over opposing views, indicating some bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 653 days ago
Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports Severina's statements and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, making it very factual.
Why objectivity (65): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone but still leans in favor of the protest by emphasizing the importance of the cause and the need for action, showing mild bias.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 603 days ago
Croatian singer Severina called on citizens to join a protest against dangerous waste in Lika during a concert in Karlovac, later expanding her message on social media. She emphasized that issues like health, pollution, and corruption should not have ideological labels and criticized those who support such problems. Severina drew parallels to events in Serbia, warning against attempts to discredit people seeking accountability. She questioned whether Croatia wants to become a society where people are attacked both online and in the streets. She accused opponents of the planned march for Lika of being either complicit with criminals responsible for the waste, connected to the government, or simply ignorant. She urged medical professionals to check the health status of residents in Gospić, criticizing some politicians for mocking elderly people who claim they fell ill due to the situation. Severina called for prayers for Croatia, urging people to walk for the country and for life, emphasizing the need to prevent further delays in handling hazardous waste.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Severina's statements without overtly favoring any political side. It includes her criticisms of various groups, including politicians and opponents of the protest, but does not take a stance on these claims. The framing remains balanced, focusing on her calls for action and her
Why factuality (96): The article accurately summarizes Severina's message and her call for the protest. It includes direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus, though it omits some details present in other articles.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language and frames opponents of the protest negatively, similar to article 0. This shows a lack of neutrality and balance in presenting the issue.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 603 days ago
Singer Severina Vučković called on citizens to join a large protest for Lika, scheduled for September 5th in Zagreb, during her concert at the Karlovac Pivo Day event. In her speech, she addressed the situation in Gospić, referencing protests in Serbia and criticizing those who oppose the 'Hod za Liku' campaign, labeling them as either aligned with criminals, corrupt authorities, or simply ignorant. She emphasized the need for collective action to protect Croatia from toxic waste and highlighted historical figures who contributed to Croatia’s liberation. Severina urged religious people, activists, and athletes to participate, stressing that Croatia’s future depends on unity and moral strength.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a moral and national duty, using strong anti-corruption rhetoric and aligning with leftist values such as social justice and environmental protection. The language emphasizes solidarity against perceived corruption and authoritarianism, which aligns with left-wing立场
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Severina Vučković's call for the protest and her statements about the situation in Gospić and Serbia. It includes direct quotes from her speech and aligns closely with the cross-source consensus on the event.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'slizani s kriminalcima' and 'glupi,' which frames opponents of the protest negatively. The tone is biased toward supporting the protest and criticizing opposition, showing clear subjectivity.
A site containing illegal hazardous waste in Croatia needs to be covered by a waterproof layer by October 12th or 13th, potentially earlier. The Environmental Protection Fund explains that a 6-millimeter thick waterproof film will be placed over the entire area, including the sides, to prevent rainwater from penetrating the waste. Water will be directed into surrounding channels and collection wells, with additional protection provided by clay soil. However, this is not considered a final cleanup. The work is being carried out by the Croatian branch of the Slovenian waste management company Kostak from Krsk. In Slovenia, the company has been under suspicion of illegally burying municipal waste, but they deny these claims, stating that any improper storage was later remediated. They clarify their role is limited to creating the protective cover, not handling the waste itself. The company is already active in Croatia, working on building a waste management center in Piškornica.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information objectively, quoting the Environmental Protection Fund and the involved company. It includes both the planned measures and the company’s denial of wrongdoing, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. There is no strong ideological framing or
The Croatian company Kostak has responded to media reports regarding its selection to perform temporary waste cover work at a site in Gospić. In their statement, they clarified that they operate as an independent legal entity in Croatia and denied allegations of illegal waste burial in Slovenia. They emphasized that the issue was improper temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was later removed and the area sanitized by the company. The company highlighted that all conditions were met during the public procurement process, confirmed by the Environmental Protection Fund, and explained that their role involves constructing protective covers to prevent water infiltration and contamination, not handling or disposing of waste itself.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the claims against the company and their rebuttal, providing context about the nature of the work and clarifying that the company does not handle waste directly. It includes quotes from the company’s statement and references the Environmental Protection Fund’s confirmation,
Društvo Kostak, koje je odabrano za izvođenje radova privremenog prekrivanja otpada na lokaciji u Gospiću, odbacilo je navode da bi matična tvrtka u Sloveniji ilegalno zakopala tisuće tona otpada. Prema objavljenom priopćenju, radilo se o nepropisnom privremenom skladištenju otpada na prostoru vlastitog Centra za gospodarenje otpadom, koje je uklonjeno na trošak društva, a područje je sanirano. Društvo naglašava da su svi postupci provedeni sukladno Zakonu o javnoj nabavi, uz provjeru dokumentacije i potvrda o nekažnjavanju. Također, objašnjavaju da su radovi vezani uz izradu zaštitne prekrivke, a ne rukovanje otpadom, i da imaju stručnu osobu i iskustvo za izvođenje posla kvalitetno i u roku.
Bias read (Center): Čak i ako se tematično radi o okolišu i lokalnoj politici, tekst se fokusira na objektivno objašnjenje pozicije tvrtke Kostak, bez evidentnog strujanja lijeve ili desne stranke. Upravo zbog toga se odlučuje za CENTRALAN lejn, jer se ne primjećuje jasna tendencija u izboru riječi, izvorima ili kontek
The article is a statement from the company Kostak, which was selected to carry out temporary covering work for waste at a site in Gospić. The company denies allegations from Slovenia that its parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste. Kostak claims the issue involved unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste on their own Waste Management Center premises, which was removed at the company’s expense and the area subsequently cleaned. They assert that they obtained the contract based on professional references and in accordance with the Law on Public Procurement. The company emphasizes that the work does not involve handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste, but rather the construction of a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater. They stress that all procedures were conducted legally and under supervision, and that they are committed to completing the work professionally and on time.
Bias read (Center): While the topic involves environmental regulation and corporate responsibility, which could be considered politically charged, the article presents Kostak's position without overtly promoting a specific ideological stance. It focuses on legal compliance and technical justification rather than taking
The Croatian company Društvo Kostak has been selected to perform temporary waste covering work at a site in Gospić, based on professional references and according to the Public Procurement Act. The company refuted claims that its parent company in Slovenia illegally buried thousands of tons of waste, stating that the situation involved improper temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was later removed and the area sanitized by the company. According to the company’s statement, they possess the necessary technical expertise and experience to carry out the work, and all conditions required for the project were met, confirmed by the Environmental Protection Fund. The work involves constructing a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and contamination of groundwater, but does not include handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste. The company emphasized its awareness of the sensitivity of the situation in Gospić and its commitment to completing the work professionally and safely.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the company's official statements and responses to allegations without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the company and mentions verification by the Environmental Protection Fund, suggesting balanced reporting. There is no clear ideological framing or sl
Two activists, Nikola Grmoja and Marin Miletić, held a press conference calling citizens to protest in Zagreb over environmental concerns in Gospić. They accused Prime Minister Andreja Plenković of attempting to suppress the protest and criticized the left-wing political faction for failing to raise the issue at the national level. Grmoja highlighted the efforts of their representative Zvonimir Troskot, who spent over a year visiting the area. The article notes that a local subsidiary of a Slovenian company, Kostak, has been selected to cover 33,000 tons of waste temporarily until permanent remediation is completed. This company is linked to illegal waste disposal scandals in Slovenia. Readers' comments on a related question expressed skepticism about the government’s plan, with some arguing that the temporary covering of waste is not true remediation and that those who profited from importing waste should now pay for cleanup.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a political struggle against government corruption and corporate interests, emphasizing the role of left-wing representatives and criticizing the ruling party. The focus on holding officials accountable and the portrayal of the government's actions as attempts to 'min
The company 'Kostak - Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine' has responded to recent media reports regarding their involvement in temporarily covering illegal waste in Gospić. The company clarifies that they operate as an independent legal entity in Croatia and denies allegations that their Slovenian parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste. They explain that the issue was about unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste at their own Waste Management Center, which was fully removed at their expense and the area subsequently cleaned. The company emphasizes that their role involves construction work to create protective coverings to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater, and that the work does not include handling, excavation, processing, or disposal of waste. They stress their commitment to completing the task professionally and within agreed timelines.
Bias read (Center): While the topic relates to environmental governance and local waste management, which could be considered politically charged, the article presents the company’s position factually without overtly favoring any political stance. It provides detailed explanations and references legal procedures, but l
The article reports on the reaction of the Croatian company 'Kostak - Graditeljstvo Tehnologija Sirovine' to media claims that they illegally disposed of waste in Slovenia. The company clarifies that their activities in Gospić were related to unauthorized temporary storage of municipal waste at their own waste management center, which was later removed at their expense and the area sanitized. They emphasize that they met all legal and technical requirements for the temporary covering work of waste, and that the project does not involve handling, excavation, or disposal of waste but rather construction work to prevent contamination of groundwater. The company stresses that they operate independently under Croatian law and that the allegations against them are inaccurate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the company’s official statement in response to media claims, providing detailed explanations and emphasizing compliance with regulations. While the issue involves environmental concerns and local governance, the framing remains balanced by presenting both the accusations and a驳
The article reports that the Croatian company Kostak – graditeljstvo tehnologija sirovine has responded to media allegations regarding the selection process for carrying out temporary waste covering work at a site in Gospić. The company asserts that they fulfilled all conditions of the public procurement procedure and possess the necessary references and capacities to carry out the work. They clarify that while they are owner-connected to the Slovenian Kostak, they operate as an independent legal entity under Croatian law. The company denies claims that their Slovenian parent company illegally disposed of thousands of tons of waste, stating that the issue was improper temporary storage of municipal waste on their own Waste Management Center premises, which was removed at the expense of the community and the area subsequently remediated. They emphasize that the work involves construction activities for creating a protective cover to prevent rainwater infiltration and potential contamination of groundwater, and does not include waste handling, excavation, processing, or disposal. The company assures that the work will be carried out quickly, professionally, and safely, with proper监督.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual response from a company defending its involvement in a public works project, emphasizing compliance with regulations and transparency. While the situation involves public concern over environmental issues and waste management, the article does not take a clear partisan
The article discusses reactions to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's recent comments regarding the situation with illegal waste disposal in the Lika-Senj area. Ante Franić from 'Grupa građana za spas Like' stated that the issue is structural and involves security lapses by state institutions, particularly the police. He warned that while the cleanup process could take up to ten years, it might lead to long-term economic challenges for the region due to perceptions of pollution. Meanwhile, Daria Došen from the civic initiative 'Gospić je naš dom' criticized Plenković's remarks as unacceptable, emphasizing their 18 months of efforts to resolve the issue through dialogue and institutional engagement before resorting to protests. She accused the prime minister of suggesting they were not committed to peaceful solutions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Franić's concerns about systemic issues and Došen's criticism of the government's stance, without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both parties involved, providing balanced representation of their arguments and responses.
The Croatian Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund has selected the 'Tabak Grupa' company to handle the removal and disposal of approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, based on the highest score according to price and professional experience criteria. The decision was made by Fund Director Luka Balen. A second bid from the CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS consortium for 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint with the State Procurement Control Commission within ten days. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on environmental waste removal steps that the fund’s decision aims to eliminate even the smallest trace of water contamination and transport part of the waste stored in bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the procurement decision in a factual manner, focusing on the technical evaluation process and legal procedures. While it mentions political figures like the Prime Minister, the framing remains neutral, avoiding overt ideological slant. The emphasis is on procedural fairness and
The Croatian Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund has selected the Zaprošća company Tabak Group to handle approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at €357,500 excluding VAT, based on the highest score according to price and professional experience criteria. The decision was made by Fund Director Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for €578,500 was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of €400,000. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint with the State Procurement Control Commission within ten days. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to remove illegal waste in Gospić that the Fund’s decision aims to 'eliminate even the smallest trace and possibility of water contamination' and the transportation of part of the waste contained in bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It includes quotes from the prime minister regarding environmental concerns but does not take a clear ideological stance.
A company from Zaprešić called Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, and the company has eight months to complete the work. This decision was made by the Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency, which evaluated bids based on cost and expertise. Another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković, emphasized the importance of removing illegal waste and minimizing environmental risks during a meeting on Wednesday.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a government-funded environmental cleanup project, including the selection of a contractor, the amount of funding, and the rejection of another bid. It includes quotes from the Prime Minister but does not exhibit clear ideological framing or biased word
The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to handle approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste stored in large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The company will receive €357,500 (excluding VAT) for this task. The decision was based on the highest score according to price and professional expertise criteria, signed off by the Fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for €578,500 was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of €400,000. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to remove illegal waste in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to prevent water contamination and the removal of waste contained in bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize particular political narratives. While the issue involves public帑
The article reports that the Croatian company Tabak grupa has been selected by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The contract is valued at 357,500 euros excluding VAT, based on the highest score according to price and professional experience criteria. The decision was signed by the fund’s director, Luka Balen. A second bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS for 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated procurement value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and any dissatisfied bidder can file a complaint within ten days with the State Procurement Control Commission. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković highlighted during a meeting on steps to address illegal waste removal in Gospić that the fund’s decision aims to eliminate even the smallest trace and possibility of water contamination, along with transporting part of the waste contained in the bags.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the selection process and outcome of a public procurement decision in an objective manner, citing the evaluation criteria and the rejection of a higher bid. It includes quotes from the prime minister regarding environmental concerns but does not take a clear ideological stance.
The Croatian company Tabak Grupa has been selected to remove approximately 650 tons of non-hazardous waste from large bags at the former PPK Velebit factory site in Gospić. The decision by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund was announced on Wednesday, stating that Tabak Grupa’s bid received the highest score based on cost and professional experience. The winning bid amounts to 357,500 euros excluding VAT, while another bid from CE-ZA-R and Saubermacher-TS worth 578,500 euros was rejected as it exceeded the estimated purchase value of 400,000 euros. The contractor has eight months to complete the work, and dissatisfied bidders may file a complaint within ten days to the State Commission for Public Procurement Control. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković emphasized during a meeting on Wednesday that the fund’s decision aims to cover the landfill and eliminate any water runoff risks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a public procurement decision made by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund. It includes quotes from the fund director and mentions the prime minister's comments but does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
