In Germany, they advocate a policy of not disclosing cancer survivors to employers, which allows patients a fresh start.

In Germany, there is growing support for introducing a right to forget for individuals who have recovered from cancer, allowing them to start fresh after treatment. The proposal aims to prevent discrimination based on past diagnoses, particularly in employment and other aspects of life. This initiative has sparked discussions about how similar protections might apply in Slovenia. The idea was launched by Klaus Reinhardt, president of the German Medical Association, who highlights that many cancer survivors live normal lives after successful treatment. However, their past diagnosis can still limit their opportunities in the job market and social settings. He argues that after a certain period without recurrence, patients should no longer be required to disclose their medical history unless it directly affects workplace safety or job requirements. Several German politicians have endorsed this proposal, emphasizing the need to protect individuals from long-term stigma. The goal of the proposal is to eliminate discrimination against former cancer patients. Advocates argue that cancer treatments have significantly improved over the last decade, with more people surviving the disease and returning to normal activities. Many of these individuals face no health restrictions after recovery. Despite this progress, they may still encounter challenges due to their past diagnosis, especially in employment and contract negotiations. They believe the law should ensure that individuals who remain cancer-free for a defined number of years are not obligated to reveal their medical history, except in cases involving safety or specific job functions. Most cancer survivors can lead fully normal lives and perform most jobs on the market. The concept of a “right to forget” is gaining traction as part of broader efforts to promote fairness and equality in society. It reflects a shift towards recognizing the importance of personal privacy and the potential for individuals to move forward without being burdened by past medical conditions. In Slovenia, the principle of a right to forget has already been introduced, although it does not cover employment directly. The Slovenian Medical Association explains that the law currently allows individuals who have survived cancer and certain other diseases to access equal opportunities in housing loans and related insurance services. This law came into effect on June 18, 2025, and explicitly states that those who have recovered from cancer or other specified illnesses should not be denied access to housing credits or associated life or credit insurance based on their past diagnosis, provided they meet legal conditions. While the law does not regulate employment, the Slovenian Medical Association clarifies that employers generally do not have access to candidates' medical histories or complete medical records. Access to health data is already quite limited. Employers typically receive evaluations of an individual’s ability to perform a specific job, rather than detailed medical diagnoses. Candidates must inform employers only about circumstances that would prevent or significantly restrict their ability to carry out work, or that could endanger themselves or others. The Slovenian Medical Association adds that questions regarding additional legislative changes in the area of employment are outside their jurisdiction. Any potential amendments to labor laws would fall under the responsibility of the Ministry of Economy, Employment, and Sports. Issues concerning the protection of health data fall under the authority of the Information Commissioner, while matters of possible discrimination are handled by the Equal Opportunities Advocate. As discussions continue in Germany, the focus remains on ensuring fair treatment and reducing the lingering effects of past medical conditions. In Slovenia, existing legislation provides some level of protection, though further measures may be needed to address concerns in the employment sector. The debate underscores the ongoing effort to balance transparency with the rights of individuals to rebuild their lives free from unnecessary stigma.