ON
← Back to feed
Plenković: Serbia would close the EU door to itself with a state funeral for Mladić
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8/31/2026

Plenković: Serbia would close the EU door to itself with a state funeral for Mladić

Premijer Hrvatske Andrej Plenković osudio je ideju Srbije da odmori Ratka Mladića, osuđenog na doživotni zatvor za genocid u Srebrenici, uz najviše državne i vojne počaste. Mladić je prošli tjedan umro u haškom pritvoru u 84. godini. Srpski ministar pravosuđa Nenad Vujić najavio je da će Mladić biti pokopan uz najviše državne počaste. Plenković je naglasio da je Mladić 'zapovjednik u Kninu' koji je odgovoran za najteže zločine u Škabrnji i drugim dijelovima Hrvatske, opisavši takvu praksu kao 'zatvaranje vrata' Europske unije. Na Bledskom strateškom forumu, europska povjerenica za proširenje Marta Kos istakla je da je 'veličanje ratnih zločinaca suprotno temeljnim europskim vrijednostima', a da nema mjesta za takve osobnosti ni u EU ni u zemljama koje žele postati članice.

Premier Andrej Plenković of Croatia has strongly condemned the idea of holding a state funeral for former Yugoslav Army (VRS) General Ratko Mladić, warning that such an act would effectively close the door to Serbia’s European Union accession. Speaking at the margins of the Blech Forum in Slovenia on Monday, Plenković described the proposal as “a self-imposed closure of doors to the European Union.” He emphasized that Mladić was a war criminal responsible for some of the worst atrocities during the Bosnian War, including the genocide in Srebrenica. The Croatian leader stressed that recognizing Mladić with state honors would contradict fundamental European values and undermine Serbia’s prospects for joining the bloc. Mladić, who had been serving a life sentence for his role in the Srebrenica massacre and other war crimes, died last week in a Dutch prison in The Hague at the age of 84. His death came just days after he had been awaiting the final decision on how his country would carry out the remainder of his sentence. Serbian Minister of Justice Nenad Vujić announced shortly after the news that Mladić would be buried with the highest military honors, a statement that has sparked widespread international criticism. The controversy surrounding Mladić’s potential burial has drawn attention from European officials, including Marta Kos, the European Union’s commissioner for enlargement. At the Blech Forum, Kos stated that honoring war criminals contradicts core European values and that such actions have no place within the EU or among countries aspiring to join it. She noted that Mladić was convicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for genocide and crimes against humanity, and that these convictions should serve as the basis for evaluating Serbia’s political trajectory. Legal experts in Serbia have expressed deep concern over Vujić’s remarks. Mihailo Pavlović, a prominent Serbian lawyer specializing in war crimes, argues that the proposed state funeral would symbolically cement Serbia’s role in the Srebrenica genocide. He pointed out that while the ICTY ruled that Serbia did not commit or participate in the genocide, it also found that Serbia failed to prevent it. This contradiction, according to Pavlović, creates a dangerous narrative that frames Serbia as the sole victim of wartime injustices, thereby obscuring its complicity in some of the region’s darkest moments. Vujić himself has called for information from the ICTY regarding the procedures for repatriating Mladić’s body. He claimed that Serbia is prepared to take the body back immediately if requested. This stance has further fueled concerns that Serbia is attempting to legitimize its historical involvement in the conflict through symbolic gestures. Legal scholars warn that such actions risk undermining Serbia’s credibility on the international stage and could delay its integration into European institutions. Meanwhile, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has taken a more measured approach than his minister, though he has not explicitly denounced the plan. In a public address, Vučić criticized the conditions under which Mladić died, calling them “anti-civilizational” and lacking justification. However, he stopped short of condemning the idea of a state funeral, instead focusing on the circumstances of Mladić’s death rather than the broader implications of the proposal. This nuanced response has left many observers questioning whether Serbia is genuinely committed to aligning itself with European democratic norms or simply using the issue for domestic political gain.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

tportal logotportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 658/31/2026
The father of the young player praised Ratko Mladic: "I would have immediately terminated his contract"

Snimke zaslona objave oca mladog vrataka Veljka Vučetića, koji je nakon smrti Ratka Mladića objavio njegovu fotografiju s porukom 'Hvala za sve, generale' i oznakom #RatkoMladić, pojavile su se u javnosti. Objava je izazvala brojne reakcije, posebno među navijačima Sarajeva, što je dovele do odluke vodstva klupske Akademije da prekine suradnju s mladim vratarom. Klup je objavio poruku da Veljko Vučetić više nije njezin član. Ratko Mladić, bivši zapovjednik Vojske Republike Srpske, umro je 27. kolovoza u zatvorskoj bolnici u Haagu, gdje je služio kaznu doživotnog zatvora. On je pravomoćno osuđen za genocid u Srebrenici, zločine protiv čovječnosti i kršenje zakona i običaja ratovanja tijekom rata u Bosni i Hercegovini.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the father's public tribute to Mladić as controversial and politically charged, highlighting the backlash against the player's family member for honoring a convicted war criminal. The emphasis on the club's decision to cut ties with the young goalkeeper reflects a left-leaning立场,

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed historical background on Mladić, including his legal status, death, and the nature of his crimes. It presents factual information about his sentencing and the decision by the International Criminal Tribunal. It does not directly reference the political debate around hi

Why objectivity (65): While the article is more factual and less politically driven than the others, it still frames Mladić’s actions in a way that implies moral judgment, which can be seen as subtly biased. The focus on his crimes rather than the political implications may appear objective, but the overall tone is still

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 708/31/2026
Plenković: A state funeral for Ratko Mladić? It is clear what the consequences would be for Serbia...

Premijer Hrvatske Andrej Plenković ocjenio je da bi državni sprovod za Ratka Mladića, bivšeg vojnika optuženog za genocid u Srebrenici, zatvorio vrata Europske unije za Srbiju. Mladić, koji je umro u haškom pritvoru u 85. godini, bio je osuđen na doživotni zatvor zbog ratnih zločina. Srpski ministar pravosuđa Nenad Vujić objavio je plan da ga pokope uz najviše državne počaste. Plenković je naglasio da je Mladić 'zapovjednik u Kninu' i odgovoran za najteže zločine u Škabrnji i drugim dijelovima Hrvatske. Na Bledskom strateškom forumu, europska povjerenica za proširenje Marta Kos istakla je da je 'veličanje ratnih zločinaca suprotno temeljnim europskim vrijednostima', a da takva praksa nema mjesta ni u EU ni u zemljama koje teže postati njezinim članicama.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of European Union values and criticizes Serbia's potential actions as contrary to these principles. The emphasis on the moral implications of honoring a war criminal aligns with left-leaning perspectives that prioritize international human rights and EU-

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Premier Plenković’s criticism of Serbia’s potential state funeral for Ratko Mladić, citing his role as a war criminal and the implications for EU relations. It includes details about Mladić’s death and the minister’s announcement regarding his burial. The information a

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical of Serbia and emphasizes the negative consequences of honoring Mladić, which leans toward a political stance. While not overtly biased, the framing suggests a European perspective that may not be entirely neutral.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 708/31/2026
Plenković: Serbia would close the EU door to itself with a state funeral for Mladić

Premijer Hrvatske Andrej Plenković osudio je ideju Srbije da odmori Ratka Mladića, osuđenog na doživotni zatvor za genocid u Srebrenici, uz najviše državne i vojne počaste. Mladić je prošli tjedan umro u haškom pritvoru u 84. godini. Srpski ministar pravosuđa Nenad Vujić najavio je da će Mladić biti pokopan uz najviše državne počaste. Plenković je naglasio da je Mladić 'zapovjednik u Kninu' koji je odgovoran za najteže zločine u Škabrnji i drugim dijelovima Hrvatske, opisavši takvu praksu kao 'zatvaranje vrata' Europske unije. Na Bledskom strateškom forumu, europska povjerenica za proširenje Marta Kos istakla je da je 'veličanje ratnih zločinaca suprotno temeljnim europskim vrijednostima', a da nema mjesta za takve osobnosti ni u EU ni u zemljama koje žele postati članice.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through the lens of European Union values and human rights, emphasizing the moral and legal implications of honoring a war criminal. The language used by Croatian Prime Minister Plenković and the European representative Marta Kos carries a strong anti-war crime stance, a

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content, providing similar facts about Plenković’s comments and Mladić’s death. It confirms the cross-source consensus on the issue but omits some contextual details from the first article, such as the specific reactions from European officials.

Why objectivity (70): The language remains aligned with the first article, maintaining a critical view of Serbia’s actions. There is little deviation in tone, suggesting a consistent political bias towards emphasizing the EU’s position.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories