ON
← Back to feed
I don't want to comment on the Prime Minister or the opposition.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 days ago

I don't want to comment on the Prime Minister or the opposition.

The article reports on an upcoming extraordinary session of the Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation Committee in Croatia, set to take place in Gospić. The session has been called to address an environmental scandal involving illegal waste disposal, centered around the Brač couple Josip and Monika Šincek. Investigators suspect a well-organized and profitable system of avoiding proper waste management costs over many years. The session will include ministers Marija Vučković (Environment and Green Transition), Irena Hrstić (Health), and Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić. During the event, Ivan Turudić was asked if he believed there was hysteria surrounding the issue, to which he responded by refusing to comment on either the prime minister or opposition representatives. Meanwhile, Dalija Orešković, a representative of the Civil Initiative, criticized the ruling HDZ party, accusing it of poisoning the country through corruption and calling for extraordinary elections or a government that would restore national pride. She warned that unless there is a turning point, mass protests could follow.

The scandal over illegal waste dumping in Lika has escalated into a major political crisis, with allegations of widespread corruption, environmental devastation, and public outrage threatening the stability of the government led by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. The discovery of nearly 40,000 tons of hazardous waste in the area around Gospić, primarily consisting of mixed industrial and electronic waste, medical refuse, plastics, and construction materials, has triggered a chain reaction of political consequences. The situation, initially dismissed as a local ecological issue, has now become a national concern, with calls for urgent action, legal accountability, and even potential government collapse. The waste, which was illegally dumped over several years, has caused severe contamination of soil and groundwater, with toxic chemicals such as PFAS (perfluoroalkyl substances), known as "forever chemicals", detected in underground water sources downstream of the dump site. These substances are highly persistent and can accumulate in the environment and human bodies, posing long-term health risks. The extent of the damage has been confirmed through recent studies conducted by the Faculty of Geotechnics at the University of Zagreb, which revealed alarming levels of heavy metals, including copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, far exceeding permissible limits. Over 18,000 square meters of land have been rendered permanently uninhabitable due to irreversible degradation. The scandal gained international attention after Europol-led police operations in February 2025 uncovered 13 individuals linked to the illegal waste trade, including Josip and Monika Šincek, owners of the recycling company Tipos Resurs. Their involvement in the illicit disposal of waste, including medical and electronic waste from Croatian hospitals and imported from Slovenia and Italy, has raised serious concerns about organized crime and regulatory failures. The case has since expanded into a broader investigation involving multiple locations across Croatia, including Varaždin, Benkovac, and Senj, suggesting a systemic pattern of illegal waste management practices. In response to growing public pressure, opposition parties, including Most, SDP, and Drita, have demanded an emergency session of parliament, while President Zoran Milanović has called for immediate action. Unofficial reports suggest that the ruling party’s coalition partner, the Homeland Movement (DP), is under increasing scrutiny, adding to the political tension. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition, led by Minister Marija Vučković, faces criticism for its perceived lack of oversight and accountability. While Vučković claims that drinking water in the region remains safe based on regular testing, many activists and citizens argue that this does little to address the deeper ecological and health threats posed by the contaminated groundwater. The situation has also sparked religious condemnation, with Bishop Marko Medo of the Gospić-Senj Diocese issuing a statement emphasizing the moral and ethical responsibility of all institutions to protect human dignity and the environment. He warned that the ongoing pollution threatens both current and future generations, urging collective action against the forces responsible for the ecological disaster. Political analysts agree that the scandal could mark a turning point for the government. The scale of the environmental harm, combined with the criminal elements involved, has forced politicians to confront uncomfortable truths about their role in enabling the illegal waste trade. Opposition leaders, including representatives from the ruling party, have publicly criticized the slow pace of remediation efforts, with some calling for the resignation of officials implicated in the cover-up. The government has announced plans to begin cleaning up the site by autumn 2025, but critics argue that this is too late and that the process will take decades to fully reverse the damage. Meanwhile, residents in nearby areas, such as Poznanovec, continue to suffer from the effects of similar illegal waste dumping. For over a decade, they have reported foul smells, increased cancer rates, and the presence of toxic waste in their homes. Despite repeated complaints to local authorities, nothing has been done until recently, when the issue gained wider attention following the Gospić scandal. Local officials now face mounting pressure to act, though many remain skeptical about whether meaningful change will occur before the next elections. As the political fallout continues, the question remains: will this environmental crisis force a political reckoning, or will it fade into another bureaucratic failure? With public anger rising and investigative agencies expanding their scope, the answer may soon become clear. One thing is certain: the waste scandal in Lika is more than just an ecological disaster, it is a test of governance, ethics, and the ability of the state to protect its citizens from the consequences of unchecked corporate greed.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
I don't want to comment on the Prime Minister or the opposition.

The article reports on an upcoming extraordinary session of the Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation Committee in Croatia, set to take place in Gospić. The session has been called to address an environmental scandal involving illegal waste disposal, centered around the Brač couple Josip and Monika Šincek. Investigators suspect a well-organized and profitable system of avoiding proper waste management costs over many years. The session will include ministers Marija Vučković (Environment and Green Transition), Irena Hrstić (Health), and Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić. During the event, Ivan Turudić was asked if he believed there was hysteria surrounding the issue, to which he responded by refusing to comment on either the prime minister or opposition representatives. Meanwhile, Dalija Orešković, a representative of the Civil Initiative, criticized the ruling HDZ party, accusing it of poisoning the country through corruption and calling for extraordinary elections or a government that would restore national pride. She warned that unless there is a turning point, mass protests could follow.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the environmental scandal as a systemic issue tied to political corruption, particularly targeting the ruling HDZ party. It uses strong language to accuse the government of poisoning the nation and calls for radical change, aligning with left-wing critiques of political elites. It

Why factuality (85): The article accurately summarizes the situation regarding the illegal waste dumping investigation and the upcoming parliamentary meeting. It includes relevant quotes from Ivan Turudić and mentions the involvement of various officials. However, it doesn’t include the full protest details from the pri

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while reporting facts and quoting officials. However, it still leans slightly toward emphasizing the severity of the issue without providing opposing views or broader context beyond the immediate environmental concern.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
"They betrayed Liku"

In Gospić, hundreds of citizens gathered for a protest against dangerous waste dumping in the area of Lika. The demonstration, organized by the 'Lika Club,' was attended by local politicians including Dalija Orešković and Tomislav Jonjić. Protesters displayed signs warning of environmental degradation and claimed that saving Lika would mean saving Croatia. Organizer Mile Ilić warned that the surrounding areas were contaminated and could become uninhabitable. A report commissioned by USKOK confirmed the presence of harmful PFAS chemicals in groundwater near waste disposal sites. Concerns include approximately 37,000 tons of waste arriving from Italy and Slovenia, along with medical waste from Croatian hospitals. While the Ministry of Environmental Protection stated that drinking water is safe, the ministry and the Environmental Protection Fund have taken charge of cleaning the illegal dump site. A new tender has been launched, targeting between 60 and 70 foreign operators.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a serious environmental threat caused by industrial and governmental negligence, emphasizing grassroots activism and criticism of both local and national authorities. It highlights concerns over contamination and health risks, which align with left-leaning priorities.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the protest and the concerns raised by citizens about the waste issue. It references the 37,000 tons of waste and the presence of PFAS chemicals but does not include direct quotes from the RTL interview with Minister Vučković.

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting both citizen concerns and the need for action, avoiding overtly biased language.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 658 days ago
Character intacta or ad acta?

The article discusses the sudden shift in public perception of the region of Lika in Croatia, which was previously portrayed as pristine and untouched natural land ('terra intacta'). This image has been challenged by recent findings of significant pollution caused by toxic industrial and medical waste illegally dumped over years, primarily at the former Poljoprivrednog-prehrambenog kombinata Velebit site. The issue gained national attention after the Chief State Prosecutor, Ivan Turudić, criticized the findings as unsatisfactory during an interview on RTL, and the USKOK military organization released a detailed report confirming environmental damage and irreversible ecosystem destruction. The revelation has sparked panic among residents and led to accusations against local authorities, while Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has promised swift action. Meanwhile, opposition groups accuse the government of exaggerating the crisis and engaging in ecological terrorism.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents a critical view of the government’s handling of the environmental crisis, it does not overtly favor one political side over another. It reports on both the government’s promises and the opposition’s accusations without clear ideological leaning. The framing remains largely

Why factuality (75): The article provides background information on Lika’s natural beauty and tourism branding but does not directly address the specific protest event described in the primary source. It mentions environmental concerns but lacks direct sourcing from the protest organizers or the primary document. The cl

Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'postapocalyptic environment,' 'skoro polumrtva zemlja,' and 'mrtva priroda.' It frames the issue as a betrayal by local authorities and implies blame on political parties without presenting counterarguments or balanced perspectives.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories