Zvonko Vrban testified at the trial of Mamić and the sensational judges, revealed what Turudić told himZvonko Vrban, former president of the Osijek County Court, testified at the Zagreb County Court during the trial of former Osijek judges Darko Krušlin, Zvonko Vekić, and Ante Kvešić, who are accused of accepting bribes from fugitive Zdravko Mamić. Vrban detailed how then-president of the Zagreb County Court, now chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić, warned him about suspicious gatherings involving the judges. Vrban later confronted the judges, who largely denied the allegations, though Vekić eventually admitted to attending a private celebration where Krušlin danced with Mamić’s wife. Vrban also mentioned Mamić’s attempts to make Vekić the head of the Osijek court and the return of an expensive watch given to Krušlin by Mamić. The prosecution alleges that Mamić’s brothers paid the judges at least €370,000 in bribes, including luxury gifts, holidays, and foreign trips. Drago Tadić, an Osijek businessman, confessed to passing Mamić’s money to the judges. The case also involves Vekić’s friend Nataša Sekulić, accused of helping hide the money.
Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from a witness and details the legal proceedings against several judges, focusing on factual accounts and evidence presented in court. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The content力求
How did Mamic pay the judges? Turudić warned the chief of the court that the judges were hanging out with the fugitive, and the wife of one even danced with himThe article discusses testimony from former president of the County Court in Osijek, Zvonko Vrban, who appeared before the Zagreb County Court in the ongoing trial of several former Osijek judges, including Darko Krušlin, Zvonko Vekić, and Ante Kvesić, all linked to Zdravko Mamić. During his testimony, Vrban recounted a conversation with current chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić, who warned him that some judges had connections with Mamić, including attending events with him. Vrban later confronted the judges individually, and Vekić reportedly admitted to having met Mamić in Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to the USKOK (Croatian State Judicial Inspection), Mamić allegedly gave Vekić at least €370,000, which he was supposed to share with other judges to secure favorable court decisions. The case has broader implications, as Mamić publicly accused several Osijek judges of accepting bribes after being convicted by a court chaired by Krušlin in 2021.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of judicial proceedings involving high-profile individuals, including allegations of corruption and bribery. It includes direct quotes from witnesses and legal documents without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the evidence, o
The former head of the emotional court at the trial revealed who danced with Mamic's wifeThe former head of the Osijek court, Marko Vrban, testified during a trial revealing that judges had attended private celebrations where Mamić's wife danced with another individual. Vrban detailed how then-president of the Zagreb County Court, now chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić, warned him about questionable gatherings among Osijek judges. The testimony included claims that judges had traveled to Dubai with Mamić, visited him in Medjugorje, and attended a private celebration in Buševc where someone danced with Mamić's wife. Some judges denied these allegations while others admitted to certain aspects. Vrban requested official statements from the judges, which were submitted but contradicted his claims. He initiated disciplinary proceedings against some judges after their denials. Vrban was temporarily removed from duty last year due to charges of abuse of influence by Uskok. The case involves allegations that brothers Zdravko and Zoran Mamić paid judges at least €370,000 in bribes, including expensive gifts, luxury holidays, and foreign travel. A local businessman, Drago Tadić, confessed to delivering Mamić's money to the judges. The case also involves Vrban's friend Nataša Še
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual testimonies and legal proceedings without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple perspectives from witnesses and defendants, providing a balanced account of the allegations and responses.
At the trial, Zvonko Vrban testified: "Turudić asked me if I knew that Krushlin danced with Mamić's wife".Zvonko Vrban, former president of the Osijek County Court, testified at the Zagreb County Court regarding the trial of former Osijek judges Darko Krušlin, Zvonko Vekić, and Anta Kvesić, who are accused of accepting bribes from fugitive Zdravko Mamić. During his testimony, Vrban described how then-president of the Zagreb County Court, now chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić, questioned him about alleged meetings between the judges and Mamić. Turudić asked if Vrban knew that Vekić had spent time with Mamić in Dubai, that Kvesić and Vekić visited Mamić in Medjugorje, and that the judges attended a private celebration in Buševc where Krušlin danced with Mamić’s wife. Vrban stated he did not know these details and was surprised by the questions. The defense later asked whether Vrban had inquired about the source of Turudić’s information, but Vrban said he had not. Krušlin and Kvesić denied all allegations, while Vekić eventually admitted to attending the celebration. Vrban also mentioned prior rumors among legal circles that the judges attended Dinamo football matches during Mamić’s trials in Osijek, though they claimed to attend privately as fans.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the testimony provided by Zvonko Vrban, detailing both the claims made by Turudić and the denials from the accused judges. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The报道
Former president of the Osijek court testified at the trial of Mamic and the Osijek judgesFormer president of the Osijek County Court, Zvonko Vrban, testified at the Zagreb County Court during the trial of former Osijek judges Darko Krušlin, Zvonko Vekić, and Ante Kvesić, who are accused of accepting bribes from fugitive Zdravko Mamić. Vrban detailed how then-president of the Zagreb County Court, now chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić, warned him about questionable gatherings involving the Osijek judges. Vrban later called the implicated judges for a meeting, where Krušlin and Kvesić denied all allegations while Vekić eventually admitted to attending a private celebration with Mamić’s wife. The testimony included claims that the judges attended Dinamo football matches while Mamić was being tried in Osijek over financial misconduct, though they claimed these were personal visits. Following the Supreme Court's 2021 confirmation of Mamić's conviction, Vrban requested formal statements from the judges, which were largely contradictory. Vrban initiated disciplinary proceedings against Krušlin and Vekić. Additionally, Vrban mentioned Mamić's attempts to have Vekić become the head of the Osijek court and the return of an expensive watch given to Krušlin by Mamić. The case has
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals and does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. It reports on judicial testimony and legal arguments without apparent ideological framing.
Turudić asked him if he knew that his judge danced with Mamic's wifeThe article discusses testimony during the trial of Darko Krušlin and others, focusing on the account provided by Vrban. He described an incident where Ivan Turudić, then president of the Zagreb County Court and now the chief state prosecutor, warned him about questionable gatherings involving Osijek judges. The article references a separate piece about Lana Radeljak wearing Jimmy Choo heels at her wedding, which became a fashion trend among young brides.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals in the judiciary, including Ivan Turudić, who holds a significant political position as the chief state prosecutor. However, the framing remains neutral, presenting testimony without overtly biased language or selective ommi
Net.hrIndependentCenter2 hr. agoThe trial of former judge Darko Krušlin at the Zagreb County Court continues in a criminal case involving accepting bribes from fugitive Zdravko Mamić. Former president of the Osijek County Court, Zvonko Vrban, testified that he met Ivan Turudić, then president of the County Court, during a chance walk. Turudić allegedly mentioned that judges were socializing with Mamić. According to Vrban, Turudić told him that Krušlin danced with Mamić’s wife at a celebration in Dubai. Additionally, court clerk Željka Avdić testified that she noticed Krušlin wearing distinctive shoes, which she said were always well-groomed and stylish, suggesting possible connections to Mamić.
Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from multiple witnesses regarding alleged interactions between judges and Zdravko Mamić, a fugitive linked to organized crime. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal proceedings and witness accounts without overtly favoring any side. No clear ideological sl
Turudić asked me this out of pure peace, I was surprised, and then he said that Vekić was Mamić's guest in Dubai...Zvonko Vrban, bivši predsjednik Osječkog Županijskog suda, svjedočio je na Zagrebačkom Županijskom sudu u slučaju 'osječki suci', gdje je opisao događaje vezane uz optužbe protiv Zdravka Mamića. Prema Vrbana, sudac Zvonko Vekić i Darko Krušlin bili su gosti Mamića u Dubaiju i na zatvorenoj zabavi Mamićevog odvjetnika. Vrban je također naveo da su Vekić i Krušlin redovito posjećivali utakmice Dinama u Zagreb, što je izazvalo pitanja o mogućem sukobu interesa. Vrban je dodao da je Mamić aktivno lobirao za izbor Vekića kao predsjednika suda, što je kasnije potvrdio i sam Mamić.
Bias read (Center): The article presents testimony from Zvonko Vrban regarding alleged connections between judges and Zdravko Mamić, including claims of meetings in Dubai and potential conflicts of interest. The framing appears balanced, presenting Vrban’s account without overtly favoring any side, and includes context
Croatia
