ON
🔍
← Back to feed
SloveniaMedicine6 days ago

The fate of the peace treaty depends on Israel.

The article discusses the U.S. military actions against Iran, suggesting they were launched with incorrect expectations and without clear objectives, primarily at the urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It contrasts this with Israel's perspective, noting that President Trump sought an exit from the war, which the U.S. experienced as a military and political humiliation. Netanyahu, however, aimed to continue attacks on Iran regardless of costs, leading to further escalations such as renewed attacks on southern Lebanon and the expansion of occupation. The article mentions the 'm

Če so Združene države krenile v vojno proti Iranu z napačnimi pričakovanji in brez jasnih ciljev, predvsem pa na pobudo izraelskega predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahuja , za Izrael velja povsem drugače. Trump je hitro začel iskati izhod iz vojne, v kateri ni mogel zmagati, še huje, iz vojne, v kateri so Združene države doživele precejšnje vojaško in politično ponižanje.

Netanjahu, na drugi strani, je hotel napade na Iran, ne glede na ceno in posledice, na vsak način nadaljevati, zato je že marca začel drugi val napadov na južni Libanon, tem je sledilo še širjenje okupacije. Z »aktivacijo Hezbolaha« in silovito kinetiko je hotel prisiliti Iran k vojaškemu odzivu, kar mu je delno uspelo, a v Beli hiši so prevladali notranjepolitični interesi – jesenske vmesne volitve in gospodarski oportunizem. Nikakor želja po miru .

Read the full article at Delo →

1 reports

DeloIndependent🔒Center6 days ago
The fate of the peace treaty depends on Israel.

The article discusses the U.S. military actions against Iran, suggesting they were launched with incorrect expectations and without clear objectives, primarily at the urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It contrasts this with Israel's perspective, noting that President Trump sought an exit from the war, which the U.S. experienced as a military and political humiliation. Netanyahu, however, aimed to continue attacks on Iran regardless of costs, leading to further escalations such as renewed attacks on southern Lebanon and the expansion of occupation. The article mentions the 'm

Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from both the U.S. and Israel regarding their military actions against Iran, without overtly favoring one side over the other. It includes critical views of both Trump's handling of the situation and Netanyahu's continued aggression, suggesting a balanced approach.