ON
← Back to feed
United StatesEconomyOverlooked from the right5 days ago

Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges

The Trump administration has abandoned its legal challenge against a court ruling that invalidated President Donald Trump's executive order freezing federal permits and leases for wind energy projects. The decision follows a December 8 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris, who deemed the order 'arbitrary and capricious' and beyond the president's authority. A coalition of 17 state attorneys general and Washington, D.C., led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, had challenged the order. Environmental groups have praised the outcome, highlighting the continued growth of clean, 

The Trump administration has abandoned its effort to halt wind energy projects across the United States and dropped its challenge to the court ruling that tossed President Donald Trump’s order freezing federal permitting and leasing for wind projects. States that challenged the order hailed the development as one of the most significant legal victories against the Trump White House’s campaign against the energy transition.

On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed the appeal after the Justice Department filed a motion for its voluntary dismissal on June 10.

The case against Trump’s executive order was filed in May, 2025 by a coalition of attorneys general from 17 states and Washington, D.C., led by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Monday’s decision affirms the Dec. 8 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris, which concluded that Trump’s January 2025 executive order was unlawful, finding the sweeping ban on wind projects was “arbitrary and capricious” and exceeded the president’s authority.

Environmental and wildlife advocacy groups applauded the move. Nancy Pyne, a senior advisor to the Sierra Club, said renewable energy continues to prevail and grow in spite of Trump’s relentless attacks.

“While everyday Americans face soaring bills and unstable prices,” she said, “renewable energy offers an affordable, common sense solution to lower costs and protect our health and our environment.”

This latest victory in a string of legal setbacks for the administration comes at a time when clean energy production continues to surge despite a slew of policy, permitting and procedural hurdles imposed by the White House.

According to a recent report from the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund and Atlas Public Policy, a record 79.7 GW of clean power are projected to come online in the U.S. in 2026, even as roughly 8 GW of clean energy projects were canceled in the first quarter of the year.

The project pipeline remains strong, the report found, with 222 GW of clean energy capacity planned or under construction nationwide as part of 693 GW of power announced through the first quarter. Developers have announced plans to invest an estimated $377 billion in new projects through 2031, the report said in its key findings.

The country already has 471 GW of clean power online, with a record 51.6 GW newly added in 2025, “the equivalent of about 25 Hoover Dams,” the report notes. Solar and battery storage now account for 85 percent of the planned pipeline.

The Monday court ruling arrives roughly a week after a different federal court restored a key tax-credit pathway for wind and solar developers.

On June 6, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia tossed an August 2025 treasury rule that made it difficult for wind and solar projects to qualify for federal tax credits. The change eliminated the longstanding practice whereby developers locked in tax credits by showing that 5 percent or more of a project’s total cost had been spent. Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the administration had not given a sound reason for the change, and sent the rule back to the IRS to reconsider.

“We see a strong correlation between the high rate of cancellation and the anti-renewable policies from the Trump Administration—from aggressive executive orders through attempts to repeal pollution protections,” said David Villagrana, lead counsel for clean energy tax solutions at EDF. In an emailed response, Villagrana said the Trump administration has significantly delayed projects through administrative measures. “Development within any industry likes consistency; for clean energy, the Trump administration has ensured a lack thereof.”

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

He cautiously welcomed the court’s overturning of the revised 5 percent rule, saying the administration could decide to appeal the district court’s decision but “it would have to overcome the district court’s careful and thorough analysis of the many legal deficiencies in the IRS’ notice.”

The EDF report also tracked a sharp uptick in gas projects. “[T]otal planned and under construction natural gas capacity rose from 44.8 GW in Q4 2025 to 65.5 GW by the end of Q1 2026, an increase of 20.7 GW,” its authors wrote, more than four times the combined growth of solar, storage and onshore wind over the same period. Fossil fuels’ share of planned capacity has climbed from 9 percent at the end of 2022 to 27 percent, “a threefold increase that points to an uptick in fossil fuel generation investment,” according to the report.

In an interview with Inside Climate News, Jon Gordon, senior policy director at Advanced Energy United, a clean energy advocacy group, said the gas buildout was “very concerning… particularly…

Read the full article at Inside Climate News
Source document: U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

1 reports

Inside Climate NewsIndependentLeft5 days ago
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges

The Trump administration has abandoned its legal challenge against a court ruling that invalidated President Donald Trump's executive order freezing federal permits and leases for wind energy projects. The decision follows a December 8 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris, who deemed the order 'arbitrary and capricious' and beyond the president's authority. A coalition of 17 state attorneys general and Washington, D.C., led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, had challenged the order. Environmental groups have praised the outcome, highlighting the continued growth of clean, 

Bias read (Left): The article frames the abandonment of the Trump administration's opposition to wind energy as a 'significant legal victory' against the administration's 'campaign against the energy transition.' It emphasizes the success of renewable energy despite 'relentless attacks' by Trump and highlights the 'g

Official sources cited

  • court U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • court U.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris
  • government New York Attorney General Letitia James
  • organisation Sierra Club

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • courtU.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • courtU.S. District Court Judge Patti Saris
  • governmentNew York Attorney General Letitia James
  • organisationSierra Club