Africa , Aid , Biodiversity , Civil Society , Climate Action , Conferences , Development & Aid , Editors' Choice , Environment , Featured , Food Security and Nutrition , Headlines , Natural Resources , Ocean Health , Sustainable Development Goals , TerraViva United Nations , Women & Climate Change Environment
Jamila Said Hassan, a marine researcher with the Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania, during an interview on the sidelines of the GEF Assembly in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. Credit: Kizito Makoye/IPS
SAMARKAND, Uzbekistan, Jun 5 2026 (IPS) - In the opulent conference halls of Samarkand, far from the drought-hit fields of East Africa, Tanzanian delegates have warned that unless global climate finance is directed to rural communities, environmental destruction will only accelerate, deepening the vulnerability of those least responsible for the crisis.
For generations, farmers and pastoralists across Tanzania have relied on predictable rainfall patterns to decide when to plant, graze or harvest water. Today, that certainty is slipping away.
Rains come too late or fall violently. Rivers that once flowed year-round are running dry. Pastures wither before cattle can graze, while trees vanish into charcoal kilns.
Climate change and environmental destruction have become a daily reality, measured in failed harvests, shrinking forests and increasingly hard choices for survival.
Against this backdrop, Tanzania is calling for stronger international support under the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to cushion vulnerable communities from climate shocks.
Meeting in Samarkand for the GEF-9 replenishment discussions, Tanzanian civil society experts are urging a shift in global climate finance – from high-level pledges to practical investments that directly benefit rural communities.
They argue that without faster and more direct support, countries like Tanzania – where livelihoods depend heavily on forests, land and water – will struggle to withstand recurring droughts, deforestation and food insecurity.
Tumaini Charles Marijani, Regional Focal Point for the GEF Civil Society Organisation Network, gestures during an interview with IPS on the sidelines of the GEF Assembly in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. Credit: Kizito Makoye/IPS
In Tanzania alone, nearly 400,000 hectares of forest are lost each year, and experts say ecosystem survival is now closely tied to whether international funding can effectively reach the communities managing those landscapes.
Africa hosts some of the world’s richest biodiversity, but it is also facing mounting environmental pressures driven by climate change and land degradation.
In Tanzania, where livelihoods remain heavily dependent on natural resources, the challenge is not only environmental but economic – how to sustain food production, energy access and rural incomes under increasing climate stress.
Through three decades of engagement, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) has supported countries, including Tanzania, in addressing climate threats and shaping more sustainable development pathways.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Assembly, Tumaini Charles Marijani, Regional Focal Point for the GEF Civil Society Organisation Network, said climate policy must be grounded in livelihoods.
“Climate change is affecting ordinary people who use firewood and charcoal to survive more than rich people in the western world,” Marijani told IPS.
He said environmental programmes often fail because they overlook daily survival needs, especially food and energy.
“We have been advocating for global partners and environmental donors to reconnect environmental conservation programmes with food production and food security,” he said.
Marijani said one of the most urgent interventions is expanding access to affordable clean cooking energy, including liquefied petroleum gas, solar power and biogas.
“We advise developing-country governments to consider subsidies for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) used in cooking,” he said.
He added that decentralised energy systems could transform rural livelihoods.
“So the good thing is we have this issue of solar energy and biogas,” he said.
“Governments must consider putting more subsidies on renewable energy so that rural communities can access solar power and biogas.”
He pointed to pastoralist communities as potential beneficiaries of biogas technology.
“They own thousands of cattle and have access to plenty of cow dung, but there are no affordable technologies or training available to help them convert it into biogas,” he said.
Beyond energy, he proposed linking conservation to income generation.
“Smallholder farmers will be less likely to cut down trees if they know the trees will bear fruit they can harvest, sell, and rely on for income.”
He warned that tree-planting campaigns fail when communities do not benefit directly.
“If we don’t tell them to plant fruit trees, they will definitely destroy forests,”
He also highlighted adaptation measures suc…
Read the full article at IPS News (Inter Press Service) →
Italy