The article discusses the increasing influence of apocalyptic rhetoric in political discourse, citing figures such as Peter Thiel, Pete Hegseth, and Aleksandr Dugin. It argues that when political opponents are viewed as existential threats, traditional diplomatic tools lose effectiveness.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a general critique of apocalyptic rhetoric without taking a stance on specific political actors or ideologies. It does not favor one side over another but highlights the dangers of extreme polarization.
