ON
🔍
← Back to feed
United StatesCulture9 days ago

Judge Ross Did Not Even Sign Her First Apology Letter

The article discusses concerns regarding Judge Ross's handwriting on two letters dated May 29 and June 11. The author notes significant differences in the style of the signatures, suggesting that the May 29 signature appears to be written by someone else, possibly a subordinate, who signed it as 'Judge Ross.' The article also references Judge Ross's digital signature from another case and criticizes her professional conduct.

This story keeps getting weirder. @Jimmy_Esq flags the fact that Judge Ross writes like a toddler. The problem is worse.

Here is her signature on the May 29 letter:

That is fourth grade penmanship.

And here is her signature on the June 11 letter:

That is an adult's signature.

And here is Ross's digital signature from the Raffensperger case (an order she certainly didn't read):

The signatures on May 29 and June 11 are totally different. The May 29 signature includes "Judge" as a her first name. Who does that?? In the second letter has initial "E."

The letters from June 11 are far more angular, and match the type of letter in her standard digital signature. I realize I have some expertise in authenticating the provenance of Alexander Hamilton's signatures, but this one wasn't too hard.

I suspect Judge Ross didn't even sign her first, completely unremorseful letter. She couldn't even bring herself to put her name on it. It is clear she asked some subordinate to sign it for her, and that person actually signed it "Judge Ross."

Judge Ross should be ashamed of herself. She materially breached the terms of her private reprimand many times over. Impeach her.

Read the full article at Reason →

1 reports

ReasonIndependentCenter9 days ago
Judge Ross Did Not Even Sign Her First Apology Letter

The article discusses concerns regarding Judge Ross's handwriting on two letters dated May 29 and June 11. The author notes significant differences in the style of the signatures, suggesting that the May 29 signature appears to be written by someone else, possibly a subordinate, who signed it as 'Judge Ross.' The article also references Judge Ross's digital signature from another case and criticizes her professional conduct.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on the stylistic differences in Judge Ross's handwriting without taking a clear political stance. It presents observations about the signatures and raises questions about their authenticity but does not explicitly endorse or criticize any political ideology or policy.