ON
← Back to feed
United StatesCulture3 days ago

Jim VandeHei: Writing with AI

The article discusses the author's personal experience using AI for writing, highlighting both the potential benefits and risks. The author argues that while AI can enhance thinking and expression when used persistently and skillfully, it can also lead to lazy thinking and writing if misused. The author shares cautionary insights from his own experience and his wife's perspective on the importance of 'soul writing.' The piece concludes with a commitment by Axios to remain transparent about its use of AI.

Skip to content

Paris Hilton is sounding the alarm about explicit AI-generated images that she says could “ruin someone’s life,” shining a star-powered light on one of the darkest corners of the internet.

“Searching for Mr. Deepfakes,” Hilton’s new true crime docuseries, just debuted  exclusively on her TikTok channel . The series, shared in rapid-fire videos built for a younger-skewing social media audience who “wouldn’t have watched a long-form documentary,” details a years-long investigation launched by tech journalist Laurie Segall to track down the anonymous owner of an AI-generated pornography site called Mr. Deepfakes.

Hilton told ITK in an exclusive interview that, using AI technology, “people can just take a photo — a family photo, a Christmas photo, anything — and literally turn it into an explicit image or video.”

“It could happen to literally anyone who puts their image online,” she warned.

Segall said after getting a tip about the site and taking a look, “There were thousands of videos of women — AI-generated but who didn’t consent — doing sexual, graphic things they had never done.”

Hilton’s image was among the multitude of women featured on the site — but they weren’t all famous faces.

“They said it was ‘public women,’ but ‘public’ was a very loose definition. I just remember looking at this and saying, ‘How on earth does this exist?’” exclaimed Segall.

“There was nothing these women could do, because they would try to contact the owner of the site, and it was anonymous,” added Segall, the CEO of Mostly Human Media.

“Some of these look very realistic,” Hilton said, “so it’s just completely frightening.”

It’s an issue, Hilton said, that’s “deeply personal” for her.

The TV personality has been open about what happened to her in 2003, when an intimate video of her was shared on the internet without her consent. It was an experience that she said has significantly impacted her work today.

“It took me 20 years to be able to speak about it out loud, because when you go through something, it’s so traumatizing that you just don’t even want to think it’s real. You just don’t even want to remember it, speak about it, and there’s also a huge shame behind it,” she said.

“As a 19-year-old teenager when this happened, there was no technology to even describe it. There were no laws to protect me,” Hilton said.

Now, the business and media maven and former reality TV star is aiming to change that. She’s  made multiple high-profile  trips to  Capitol Hill in recent years, uniting typically bitterly divided lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

In January , the 45-year-old mother of two touted the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act. The bipartisan legislation would allow victims of nonconsensual deepfake pornography to sue individuals who produce and distribute the AI-generated content. She also pointed to  the passage  of the Take It Down Act, signed into law last year by President Trump. The bipartisan legislation, championed by first lady Melania Trump, enacts stricter penalties for the distribution of nonconsensual intimate images and AI-generated deepfakes.

“I’ve helped pass three federal bills and 16 state laws to protect children, and I really feel that this is my true purpose in life and my legacy,” Hilton said.

“That’s why I keep coming back to D.C. all the time, because I know when I come there, I really can make a huge difference in people’s lives.”

Proponents urging lawmakers to “catch up” to the explicit deepfake issue with legislation originally faced an uphill battle, Segall said, because there was neither public pressure nor “an acceptance that this was real abuse.”

“People would say, ‘Oh, but the images aren’t real. It doesn’t matter,'” she recalled.

Meantime, many victims Segall spoke with were left devastated.

“I had one woman tell me it ruined her life. She literally walked up to her rooftop and considered ending her life. Another woman said it impacted the way she walked in the world — she didn’t trust anybody anymore,” the investigative reporter said.

“This digital abuse was real abuse, and so I thought, from a cultural standpoint, we need to get folks talking about this, and from a legal standpoint, we need to push the laws to catch up with the technology and the impact,” Segall said.

Hilton has said before that she’s often told when she touches down in Washington that she gets more done than the government. Asked what the secret is to lobbying lawmakers to take action, she replied, “When I go in there, I’m going as myself with someone with lived experience, and I also bring other survivors.”

“I make sure that I let everyone know and I let the whole entire world know, so it’s something that they cannot ignore.”

“That’s why I think that I’ve been able to pass so many bills and so many laws so quickly. When I’ve heard of others trying, and they say, ‘I’ve been going back [to Washington] for 10, 15 years, and I still have not passed this…

Read the full article at The Hill
Source document: Music Industry Reports

8 reports

AxiosIndependentCenter3 days ago
Jim VandeHei: Writing with AI

The article discusses the author's personal experience using AI for writing, highlighting both the potential benefits and risks. The author argues that while AI can enhance thinking and expression when used persistently and skillfully, it can also lead to lazy thinking and writing if misused. The author shares cautionary insights from his own experience and his wife's perspective on the importance of 'soul writing.' The piece concludes with a commitment by Axios to remain transparent about its use of AI.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of AI's role in writing, acknowledging both its potential benefits and risks. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather offers personal reflections and warnings based on the author's experiences. There is no evident bias toward any political or

The AtlanticIndependent🔒Center7 days ago
The Millions of Songs Mashed Into AI-Generated Music

This article explores the rise of AI-generated music, highlighting how millions of songs are being used as training data to create new compositions. It discusses the implications of this technology for creativity, copyright law, and the future of the music industry.

Bias read (Center): The article presents an analytical overview of AI-generated music without overtly favoring any particular perspective. It discusses both opportunities and challenges posed by the technology but does not exhibit clear ideological bias in its framing or sourcing.

Official sources cited

VoxIndependentCenter9 days ago
Trump’s strange flirtation with AI socialism, explained

The article examines former President Donald Trump's recent comments and actions regarding artificial intelligence (AI), exploring how his rhetoric has been interpreted by some as aligning with socialist principles. It provides context on Trump's past positions on technology, regulation, and economic policy, while also analyzing the potential implications of his current stance on AI development and governance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents an analytical overview of Trump's statements without overtly favoring one ideological perspective over another. It explores interpretations of his remarks but does not adopt a biased tone or selectively present information to support a particular viewpoint. The framing remains客观

Official sources cited

Associated PressIndependentCenter10 days ago
The skills people still perform better than AI, according to workplace experts

Workplace experts discuss the skills where humans outperform artificial intelligence.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses workplace trends and human vs. AI capabilities, which is not inherently politically charged. It does not take a stance on political issues, nor does it favor any particular ideological perspective.

The HillIndependentCenter12 days ago
Paris Hilton sounds the alarm on AI-generated exploitation in new TikTok series: 'It could happen to literally anyone'

Paris Hilton discusses concerns about AI-generated explicit content in her new TikTok docuseries, highlighting the risks of non-consensual deepfake imagery. The series follows tech journalist Laurie Segall's investigation into an AI-generated pornography site called Mr. Deepfakes, which features AI-generated images of women without their consent. Hilton warns that anyone who shares their image online could be affected.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about AI-generated content and its potential harms without overtly favoring any political perspective. It includes quotes from Paris Hilton and Laurie Segall, providing multiple viewpoints on the issue. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language.

Official sources cited

  • other Searching for Mr. Deepfakes
VoxIndependentCenter16 days ago
AI children’s books are an insult to kids’ intelligence

The article argues that AI-generated children's books are an insult to children's intelligence, suggesting that these books lack the creativity and quality of human-written stories.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a critical perspective on AI-generated content but does not exhibit strong ideological bias. It focuses on concerns about quality and creativity without explicitly aligning with a particular political viewpoint.

The AtlanticIndependent🔒Left18 days ago
AI Has Ruined the Job Market

The article discusses the impact of artificial intelligence on the job market, suggesting that AI has significantly altered employment opportunities.

Bias read (Left): The framing emphasizes negative consequences of AI on employment without balancing with potential benefits or counterarguments, using strong language like 'ruined' which implies a critical stance towards technological advancement.

The AtlanticIndependent🔒Center19 days ago
How Much of Data-Center Activism Is Really AI Slop?

The article examines the role of artificial intelligence in data-center activism, questioning whether much of the current discourse around data centers is driven by hype or genuine technological advancement.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced examination of AI's influence on data-center activism without overtly favoring any particular perspective. It questions the extent to which AI is driving the conversation but does so in a neutral tone, avoiding loaded language or one-sided sourcing.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.