It’s the Most Controversial Scene in One of the 2000s’ Most Polarizing Movies. Even the Screenwriter Was Baffled. What if We Got It Wrong?

Movies

In Defense of Munich ’s, Uh, Climax

By

Jeffrey Bloomer

Enter your email to receive alerts for this author.

Sign in or create an account to better manage your email preferences.

Unsubscribe from email alerts

Are you sure you want to unsubscribe from email alerts for Jeffrey Bloomer ?

June 17, 2026 3:43 PM

Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by Universal Studios.

This article is part of Spielberg Week , Slate’s celebration of Steven Spielberg.

If you’ve seen Munich , you probably remember the scene, even if you wish you didn’t. Near the end of Steven Spielberg’s haunted opus about the murders of 11 Israeli athletes and coaches at the 1972 Olympics by members of the Palestinian militant group Black September, and the subsequent Mossad revenge campaign against them, the retribution’s ringleader, Avner (Eric Bana), returns to his wife, Daphna (Ayelet Zurer), clearly frayed by the years of carnage. The couple lies in bed and begins to have sex. We’ve been here before—uncharacteristically for Spielberg, the movie also has an earlier sex scene between Avner and a quite-pregnant Daphna that leaves little to the imagination. But this time is different. Now the camera pushes in on Avner and then suddenly cuts to … the closing moments of the 1972 massacre, on an airfield during a botched West German rescue attempt. With the wailing John Williams score in full force, Avner’s intense thrusting is crosscut with the murders, reaching a literal climax as Avner finishes in slow motion, his sweat soaring through the air, just after we see the few remaining hostages executed by machine gun. The camera lingers on the dead athletes, and on Avner’s long post-coital stare. Daphna covers his eyes. End of sequence.

Imagine being in a movie theater and watching this scene. I don’t have to, because 20 years ago, at 19, I was, and I still remember an audience torn between abject horror and nervous laughter. What did we just watch? Munich was unsurprisingly controversial when it was released in 2005, earning pre-release condemnation for the alleged “sin of equivalence” before it gained solid critical support and five Oscar nominations, including one for Best Picture. If it was not considered an outright success at the time, it has since earned a strong and deserved reappraisal. (“ The Best Movie About Israel and Gaza Now Came Out 18 Years Ago ,” read a New York Times Opinion headline in late 2023.) These days, it’s often ranked among Spielberg’s best movies.

Yet even fans of the film have never been quite sure what to do with its most infamous scene. For years it has been called “stupefying” and “ fundamentally misguided .” It has enjoyed regular placement on lists with titles like “ The 25 Most Laughable Sex Scenes in Movie History ” (“Why is he so sweaty? Why?”) and “ The 11 Most Excruciatingly Bad Sex Scenes in Film .” For my part, as my long-ago audience struggled to keep a straight face, I remember finding the scene effectively unsettling, like the rest of the movie, if also a bit of a mystery. Where exactly did that come from?

Not long ago, I learned the scene was once baffling to someone else, too. It was so out of character for Spielberg that it was often thought to be the brainchild of Tony Kushner, the Angels in America playwright who shared writing credit on the movie with Eric Roth. “Just the sort of thing you’d expect from the imagination of screenwriter Tony Kushner,” one critic wrote at the time. Except, I recently learned, Kushner didn’t write the scene at all—and he wondered why it was there too.

“To be honest, when I first saw it, I was a little weirded out by it,” he told me. “I didn’t quite know what it meant, and I don’t think I even liked it all that much, though I loved the movie a lot when I saw it. I was shocked by seeing it put together.”

He had written a sex scene, but “it was just a scene where they’re having sex,” he said. “It’s at some point when he comes to Brooklyn. I think there’s some indication that he’s sort of partly there and partly not, but he’s lost a certain amount of himself and his soul in the work that he’s been doing. And then Steven did the crosscutting in the editing room with Michael Kahn. So I think I saw the movie right after Thanksgiving of that year. It was right before it was released. And that was the first time I’d seen this cutting back and forth.”

Kushner told me Munich is called Munich because that’s how he titled the first section of a screenplay draft, as a placeholder for adding in the 1972 events, which were always intended to open the film and which he planned to write last. (Spielberg mistook it for a suggested title.) Instead, the film now opens with the first part of the attack, in the Olympic Village, and saves the airfield killings for last. He couldn’t remember if he ultimately split up the attack, which lasted about 20 hours, or if Spielberg did. But the movie’s most controversial scene had little to do with him.

Part of the reason this was so s…