ON
← Back to feed
CroatiaHealth2 days ago

Haitians are upset with VAR after the loss to Scotland. They say they were denied two penalties

The captain of the Haitian national football team, Johny Placide, expressed frustration with the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) decisions during their World Cup match against Scotland, which ended in a 0-1 defeat. He claimed that two clear penalty opportunities were denied to Haiti when Scottish defender Grant Hanley handled the ball twice in the second half—once after a cross in the 73rd minute and again while blocking a shot by Jean-Ricner Bellegarde five minutes later. The VAR did not intervene in either incident. Bellegarde also commented on social media questioning the VAR's decision. Plac

'Znate li kad se zadnji put na svjetskom prvenstvu u nogometu dogodilo da je zbog prekršaja golmana, koji je prerano izašao s crte, ponovljen penal? Prije mog rođenja, prije 44 godine, 1982. na utakmici Španjolske protiv Jugoslavije', navodi Mojmira Pastorčić u uvodu Direktovog priloga.

Tada se jugoslavenski golman Dragan Pantelić (koji je umro prije 5 godina) prerano pomaknuo s gol crte. To je jedini javno dostupni podatak o takvom slučaju.

"U posljednjih 12 svjetskih prvenstava penal je zbog prekršaja ali igrača koji su prerano utrčali na teren, ponovljen ukupno pet puta, uključujući onaj jugoslavenski i onaj jučer. A zanimljivo, jedan od tih pet puta ponavljao je Davor Šuker . Sjećate se ono kada je 1998. mjerio puls. I tako je statistika na strani ljutih navijača, koji misle da je ponavljanje penala odredilo tijek utakmice Engleska - Hrvatska. Ali danas imamo VAR, danas imamo loptu u kojoj je čip, danas je sve drukčije", zaključuje Mojmira u najavi priloga Petra Panjkote .

Krenulo je furiozno, a onda je stigla 9. minuta

Krenulo je furiozno, izgarali su na terenu, pritiskali Engleze već u obrani, sve do ključnog trenutka u devetoj minuti. Nakon Modrićeva faula, sudac svira penal, Harry Kane uzima zalet, puca, Dominik Livaković brani, navijači luduju.

I onda, sudac svira da se penal ponovi, Kane opet puca u istu stranu, Livaković ide u drugu, Engleska vodi. Tumačenje događaja tražili smo prvo od trenera golmana. "Golman mora u trenutku udarca lopte sa barem jednim stopalom biti na gol liniji. I to se jučer nije, nažalost, dogodilo. Livaković je dva centimetra ili koliko već bio izvan linije sa svojom desnom nogom, a otišao je u desnu stranu", objašnjava Filip Pavelić , trener vratara u NK "Zagreb 041".

Da je Livaković bio par centimetara izvan linije francuski sudac Turpin je teško mogao sam vidjeti. I nije, kako za Direkt objašnjava sudac s bogatim međunarodnim iskustvom, javili su mu iz VAR sobe.

'Iskreno, to nismo nikad vidjeli'

"Iskreno, to nismo nikad vidjeli, osim mislim možda statistički da se jednom dogodilo na Svjetskim prvenstvima. Vrlo neuobičajena pojava, pogotovo zato što je to nešto činjenično na što najčešće VAR sada intervenira. Ja to nisam nikad vidio, nije mi se to nikad dogodilo na utakmicama koje sam sudio, ali evo, ako je to prema regulama i pravilima, moramo se samo s time složiti", kaže Ivica Modrić , dugogodišnji član komisije nogometnih  sudaca HNS-a  i bivši međunarodni nogometni sudac.

Jednako bi se tako valjda morali složiti i s time da je Harry Kane kod izvođenja penala zastao, i to - kako je i sam priznao - namjerno.

"On je golman koji voli rano krenuti i rano skočiti naprijed. Znao sam da postoji velika vjerojatnost da bi, ako budem zastajkivao, on mogao izaći s linije. Nisam bio 100% siguran da jest. Bio sam možda 80% siguran da jest", rekao je Kane nakon utakmice.

Igrač smije zastajkivati, a golman ne smije ništa

Dakle, imamo izvođača penala koji smije zastajkivati i golmana koji ne smije ni centimetar od gol linije.

"Prije svega zato što ljudi žele golove, izvođačima se dopušta to zastajkivanje dokle god se događa nastavak pokreta. Znači ne smije stati u potpunosti, ali dok god je nekakva kretnja, to se dopušta. S druge strane, golmanima se sve više otežava. Ok, uvijek se gledalo da moraju biti na liniji, ali to nije bilo toliko u fokusu", kaže Filip Pavelić.

Na prvenstvu '98. u Francuskoj, Davor Šuker je, recimo, dvaput pucao penal jer je igrač utrčao u kazneni prostor. A prije osam godina u Rusiji, u utakmici osmine finala Hrvatske i Danske gledali smo itekakve izlete s gol linije. "Pet jedanaesteraca tada nije realizirano, ali kako su stajali Schmeichel i Subašić - oni su s pet metara branili lopte! Znači, sve do relativno nedavno nije postojala ta tehnologija za vratara. I oni su značajno izlazili sa svoje gol linije", tumači sportski komentator Ivan Ivković .

'Za mene to nije korektno, ali takvu su pravila'

Dominik Livaković ili bilo koji drugi golman na ovom prvenstvu mogu biti sigurni da im se to neće više tolerirati. "Koliko je pošteno da zbog toga što je vratar izašao koji centimetar vani da se poništi pogodak. Dakle, za mene nije korektno, ali to su takva pravila i svi ih moraju poštivati, nažalost", zaključuje sudac Ivica Modrić.

S druge strane, kod gola Muse Ivan Perišić je za dlaku izbjegao ofsajd, pa se tu može tražiti balans. I općenito je, kaže Ivković, ovo bila jedna od boljih utakmica Hrvatske otkad je Zlatko Dalić izbornik, svakako najzabavnija. "Igralo se da se da gol, a ne da se spriječi protivnika da postigne gol. To je prva stvar. I po prvi put imam dojam da se to radilo protiv reprezentacije koja je nominalno jača od Hrvatske", naglašava Ivković.

Sa ponovljenom sinoćnjom igrom, Hrvatska bi i protiv Gane i Paname mogla i trebala opravdati ulogu favorita. A bez obzira na prijestup, kako sugeriraju i razni filmići s Tiktoka, Livaković je već pokazao da se od njega mogu očekivati čuda.

Read the full article at Net.hr
Source document: Mojmira Pastorčić's commentary

5 reports

Net.hrIndependentCenter2 days ago
How a misdemeanor prosecuted extremely rarely turned the game around: 'We've never seen that'

The article discusses an unusual incident during a World Cup match where a goalkeeper's early exit from the goal line led to a penalty being awarded and later repeated. This situation, which occurred during England vs Croatia, is compared to a similar event from 1982 involving Yugoslavia's Dragan Pantelić. The article notes that such incidents have been rare, with only five instances across the last 12 World Cups, including one by Davor Šuker in 1998. It highlights the role of modern technology like VAR in changing how such decisions are handled today.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related event without taking a political stance or showing bias toward any particular team, ideology, or political group. It provides historical context and compares past and present occurrences objectively.

Official sources cited

  • other Mojmira Pastorčić's commentary
tportalIndependentCenter4 days ago
Judging an unconditional penalty for France: 'Clean penalty, this is not clear to anyone'

In a recent football match between France and Senegal, French player Kylian Mbappé was denied a penalty after a challenge by Senegal's Sadio Mané. The referee, Iranian judge Faghani, reviewed the incident using VAR but decided there was insufficient contact for a penalty, awarding an own goal to France. Former World Cup referee Darren McCann criticized the decision, stating it was a clear penalty.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event with no explicit political commentary, framing, or bias. It presents the facts of the match and includes quotes from a former referee without taking a stance on the decision.

Novi listIndependentCenter7 days ago
Haitians are upset with VAR after the loss to Scotland. They say they were denied two penalties

The captain of the Haitian national football team, Johny Placide, expressed frustration with the VAR (Video Assistant Referee) decisions during their World Cup match against Scotland, which ended in a 0-1 defeat. He claimed that two clear penalty opportunities were denied to Haiti when Scottish defender Grant Hanley handled the ball twice in the second half—once after a cross in the 73rd minute and again while blocking a shot by Jean-Ricner Bellegarde five minutes later. The VAR did not intervene in either incident. Bellegarde also commented on social media questioning the VAR's decision. Plac

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports-related event without taking a stance on any political issue. It focuses on the performance of the VAR system in a football match and includes quotes from players and officials expressing disappointment with the officiating. There is no indication of political bias,倾向

Official sources cited

Jutarnji listIndependentCenter7 days ago
FIFA acknowledged the technical error in Switzerland's penalty, but the decision of the referee stands

FIFA acknowledged a technical error during the display of the VAR footage in the match between Qatar and Switzerland but confirmed that the referee's decision to award a penalty to Switzerland was correct. The match ended in a 1-1 draw. The incident involved a controversial offside call by Honduran referee Said Martinez, which was later upheld after the technical issue was resolved.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event with no overt political framing. It provides factual details about the match outcome, the technical error, and FIFA's confirmation of the referee's decision without showing bias toward any side.

Official sources cited

  • organisation FIFA's public statement
tportalIndependentCenter7 days ago
Why was a penalty awarded to Switzerland? The VAR decision that caused a storm explained

An article discusses a controversial decision made by the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) during a World Cup match between Qatar and Switzerland, which led to a penalty being awarded to Switzerland.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports event and does not present any political bias or ideological framing. It simply reports on a controversial VAR decision without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular perspective.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • otherMojmira Pastorčić's commentary
  • press_releaseDaily Mail
  • organisationFIFA's public statement