ON
← Back to feed
ILBusinessOverlooked from the left2 days ago

Editor's Notes: Israel just met the America that comes after Trump - comment

The article discusses Israel's reaction to a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal negotiated under the Biden administration, criticizing it as detrimental to Israeli security. The author highlights frustration among Israeli politicians such as Bezalel Smotrich, Itamar Ben-Gvir, Naftali Bennett, and Ehud Barak, who all expressed concerns about the deal's implications. Public opinion data from the Israel Democracy Institute is cited, showing majority belief that the deal leaves Israel less secure. The article also notes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's reluctance to publicly support the agreement.

By ZVIKA KLEIN JUNE 19, 2026 05:59 I could have written the other column in 20 minutes: The deal is bad for Israel. We were kept out of the room, told to stand down in Lebanon, and lectured by the administration that called us its closest partner – an hour before it signed a deal with the regime that spent four months trying to kill us.

All true. After the spring we had, the air-raid sirens, the nights in the mamad (reinforced safe room), I feel it the way you do. And I was not alone. The fury ran wall to wall.

Bezalel Smotrich said the deal was “bad for Israel and for the entire free world.” Itamar Ben-Gvir said Israel “is not a banana republic.” Naftali Bennett called it “a historic failure.” Ehud Barak said the war left Iran “stronger” and Israel “weaker.” The Israel Democracy Institute found 57.5% of respondents expected the deal to leave us less safe.

Benjamin Netanyahu would not even defend it; he defended himself. When a finance minister and Ehud Barak agree about something, I get suspicious.

So, I asked what the betrayal story misses. Turn it over, and the dumping looks like a promotion we cannot recognize, one that came with no warm words.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a special plenum session in honor of US President Donald Trump at the Knesset, in Jerusalem, October 13, 2025 (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90) For our whole lives, the Arabs and the Turks and the Iranians held a veto over any real partnership between Washington and the Jewish state. That veto is gone. I sat with senior officers this spring who called fighting beside the American military the thing they will tell their grandchildren, and they were not being sentimental; that alliance did not exist 18 months ago.

A man very close to this White House gave me the shorthand: Money in the bank; respect, the kind that outlasts a president.

Be honest about the love we are mourning. The presidents who loved us the loudest were the ones who slow-walked our weapons for years, pressed us to carve a Palestinian state out of our land, and split Jerusalem. We were adored, and we were managed, often in the same sentence.

That style is dying. The old evangelical music that treated our return to Zion as a chapter in somebody else’s Bible is leaving Washington. Donald Trump can still tell a room: “Without me, there would be no Israel.” That is how a patron talks about a dependent.

US-Israel relationship belongs to Vance and Rubio, not Trump

Here is the part almost nobody here will say out loud. Look past this deal, and past Trump himself, because the relationship will not be his to define for much longer. It belongs to the two men he keeps calling his dream team: JD Vance and Marco Rubio, who will shape it for the next decade, probably from the same ticket.

We tell ourselves Rubio loves Israel, and he does. But Rubio is the last of his kind, not the first of a new one. Vance is the template now: respect; none of the old devotion; the register the party is settling into.

The detail that should keep you up is smaller: Rubio’s own counselor at the State Department, Mike Needham, reads as pure Vance – the same flat indifference to whether we are loved. When the warmth has drained even from the pro-Israel camp’s back office, it is not coming back.

The same cold front took the lectures with it. This generation feels nothing for the Palestinian cause either: no plan; no map with our name halved.

The week 99 of our Knesset MKs voted down a Palestinian state , the future of the Republican Party had already lost interest in building one. There is a real fight over whether the wing that slides into open contempt for Jews stays or goes, and the people pushing it out might lose. None of them hate us. They are indifferent with a type of indifference you can work with once you stop expecting to be loved.

The hawks have an answer, and I had it myself. What promotion? Khamenei’s regime is still standing. The uranium is buried, not gone. Hezbollah is hurt and breathing. Iranian state TV is calling it a victory. Some promotion.

It is all true, and it misses the point. We were never going to bring that regime down from the air, and the people who told us we would were selling something. The honest ceiling of this war was a humiliated Iran, its leadership decapitated, its proxies gutted, its program knocked back, with a superpower now treating us as a partner instead of a chore.

We hit that ceiling. The gap between that and what we were promised is a bill addressed to the men who oversold the war, not to Washington.

Iran deal is an American election move from Trump

Understand what the deal was. It was an American election. Trump has a midterm in five months, the Democrats are up, and the Iranians stretched the war out to squeeze the American consumer until a president scared for the House needed it to be over. The Strait of Hormuz opens, oil moves, gasoline prices drop, the incumbent exhales.

When Vance sold it on television, he did not call it a good day…

Read the full article at The Jerusalem Post
Source document: Israel Democracy Institute survey

2 reports

HaaretzIndependent🔒RightFactual 75Objective 756 days ago
Netanyahu Campaign Video Warns Against Moves His Own Coalition Is Promoting

A video released by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's campaign warns against certain moves being promoted by his own coalition.

Bias read (Right): The article highlights a video from Netanyahu's campaign criticizing actions taken by his own coalition, which suggests an internal conflict within the governing alliance. The framing implies criticism of coalition partners while defending Netanyahu's position, indicating a right-leaning perspective

The Jerusalem PostIndependentRight2 days ago
Editor's Notes: Israel just met the America that comes after Trump - comment

The article discusses Israel's reaction to a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal negotiated under the Biden administration, criticizing it as detrimental to Israeli security. The author highlights frustration among Israeli politicians such as Bezalel Smotrich, Itamar Ben-Gvir, Naftali Bennett, and Ehud Barak, who all expressed concerns about the deal's implications. Public opinion data from the Israel Democracy Institute is cited, showing majority belief that the deal leaves Israel less secure. The article also notes Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's reluctance to publicly support the agreement.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal as a betrayal to Israel, using strong negative language ('dumping,' 'betrayal') and emphasizing Israeli political figures' criticisms. It presents the deal as harmful to national security without offering balanced counterarguments or positive aspects ofU

Official sources cited

  • study Israel Democracy Institute survey

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

  • studyIsrael Democracy Institute survey