ON
← Back to feed
United StatesHealthOverlooked from the left3 days ago

DOJ seeks to block reparations to Black people whose ancestors suffered housing discrimination

The Justice Department is suing Evanston, Illinois, to block a reparations program that has distributed over $5 million to Black residents affected by historical housing discrimination. The program aims to address the legacy of systemic racism and the resulting wealth gap among Black Americans. The DOJ's action marks a shift from the Biden administration's earlier support for studying reparations. The lawsuit was filed in response to a 2024 suit by Judicial Watch, a conservative organization opposing the initiative.

The Justice Department is suing Evanston , Illinois , to stop a first-of-its-kind reparations program that has distributed more than $5 million to Black residents who said they were hurt by housing discrimination.

Evanston , a northern suburb of Chicago , has identified and begun paying roughly 600 Black residents who say they or their ancestors were victims of the city’s discriminatory zoning ordinances from 1919 until 1969.

Proponents of the landmark program hope to extend reparations programs such as the one in Evanston to other cities across the United States, where they say the vestiges of slavery and discrimination have resulted in a “wealth gap” and other residual harm to Black Americans.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit could handicap or even end the national reparations movement, marking a reversal from the Biden administration, which supported studying reparations and focused its Civil Rights Division and other departments on diversity, equity and inclusion.

The Justice Department filed court documents this week seeking to intervene in a 2024 lawsuit filed by the conservative-leaning Judicial Watch on behalf of a group of White plaintiffs. The organization called the payouts “a woke, racist program” forbidden by the Constitution.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said reparations initiatives elsewhere in the country are on hold as proponents of the payouts wait to see whether the court delivers a technical knockout blow to reparations.

“It certainly could be a TKO,” Mr. Fitton said. “I have little doubt this scheme will not be able to continue legally.”

The Justice Department argues that providing the money to residents solely on the basis of race violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment and the Fair Housing Act.

“There are sound ways for a city to remedy past discrimination or direct resources to its most vulnerable citizens and neighborhoods. Simply handing out money based on race, however, is not the answer. It is race discrimination, pure and simple. And it is illegal,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dillon , who heads the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

One of the nation’s leading reparations proponents said the Justice Department’s lawsuit is a fear tactic aimed at stymying the broader reparations movement.

“By attempting to use federal litigation to intimidate one community, the Department of Justice is signaling an attempt to create a chilling effect on the entire national movement for reparative justice,” said Robin Rue Simmons , a former Evanston City Council member.

Evanston made history in March 2021 when it became the first American city to offer reparations to Black residents.

Those who qualified received $25,000 to pay for mortgages, home improvement projects and other costs associated with homeownership.

The program was later amended to provide unrestricted, direct cash payments to qualified individuals.

The money was offered exclusively to current or former Black residents of Evanston who lived there between 1919 and 1969 and to their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

During those years, Evanston city officials said, zoning laws and other policies denying mortgages and insurance to certain neighborhoods limited Black residents to substandard housing conditions.

The Evanston City Council’s reparations resolution called the program “a step towards revitalizing, preserving, and stabilizing Black/African-American owner-occupied homes in Evanston , increasing homeownership and building the wealth of Black/African-American residents, building intergenerational equity amongst Black/African-American residents, and improving the retention rate of Black/African-American homeowners in the City of Evanston .”

Roughly 14% of Evanston’s 76,000 residents are Black. The Black population has shrunk by several percentage points in recent years, which city officials blame on the lack of affordable housing. They also blame decades-old, racist housing and banking policies that prevented Black residents from purchasing homes they could pass to their children and grandchildren.

The reparations money is intended to help Black families remain in Evanston , officials said.

Ms. Simmons, who spearheaded reparations in Evanston , said the city’s program was the start of a nationwide push. She now heads FirstRepair, which seeks to implement reparations nationwide.

Major cities run by Democrats are examining reparations for Black residents, among them Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco, Detroit and Kansas City, Missouri.

“Across the country, local leaders and residents are increasingly clear-eyed about the necessity of this work,” she said.

None has gone as far as Evanston , which, according to the Justice Department , is expected to pay out more than $11 million in reparations to its Black residents over the next decade.

The funding comes from the city’s 3% tax on the sale of recreational marijuana.

Read the full article at The Washington Times
Source document: Justice Department lawsuit against Evanston

2 reports

The Washington TimesIndependentRight3 days ago
DOJ seeks to block reparations to Black people whose ancestors suffered housing discrimination

The Justice Department is suing Evanston, Illinois, to block a reparations program that has distributed over $5 million to Black residents affected by historical housing discrimination. The program aims to address the legacy of systemic racism and the resulting wealth gap among Black Americans. The DOJ's action marks a shift from the Biden administration's earlier support for studying reparations. The lawsuit was filed in response to a 2024 suit by Judicial Watch, a conservative organization opposing the initiative.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the reparations program as controversial and highlights opposition from the Justice Department and Judicial Watch, using terms like 'woke, racist program' and emphasizing legal challenges. It presents the DOJ's intervention as a significant obstacle to the reparations movement,暗示着

The New York Times (US)Independent🔒Right4 days ago
Trump Officials Challenge Reparations Program in Chicago Suburb

The Justice Department has challenged a reparations program in a Chicago suburb, arguing that it is racist and unconstitutional.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the Justice Department's challenge against a reparations program, describing it as 'racist' and 'unconstitutional.' This framing aligns with conservative critiques of reparations initiatives, suggesting a right-leaning perspective by emphasizing legal and constitutional concerns

Official sources cited

  • government Justice Department

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.