Švicarci su poveli iz penala, ali su odmah uslijedile optužbe da je akciji prethodio ofsajd, zbog čega su navijači i stručnjaci zasuli FIFA žestokim kritikama.
Svjetska kuća nogometa morala je nekoliko sati kasnije da izda zvanično saopštenje.
Sporna situacija dogodila se nakon duela u kaznenom prostoru, kada je sudija pokazao na bijelu tačku, dok su usporeni snimci izazvali sumnje da je u začetku akcije moglo da bude i ofsajda. Upravo to je otvorilo pitanje - da li je VAR reagovao ispravno i da li je odluka bila potpuno regularna.
FIFA se ubrzo oglasila i saopštila da je VAR procedura sprovedena po pravilima, ali i da je došlo do tehničkih poteškoća u prikazu određenih grafika za televizijski prijenos, što je dodatno podgrijalo sumnje i teorije među navijačima.
"Tokom meča Švicarske i Katara u San Franciscu imali smo tehničke probleme koji su spriječili da pokažemo grafiku prije penala za Švicarsku. Problem je brzo riješen. Ali, to nije imalo nikakav utjecaj na VAR i procedura provjere situacije je odražena odmah. Pokazale su da ni u jednoj od dvije situacije prije gola nije bilo ofsajda prije odluke o penalu", stoji u saopštenju FIFA.
Uprkos objašnjenju iz FIFA, kontroverza se ne smiruje, a ova situacija već se označava kao jedan od najvećih sudijskih momenata dosadašnjeg dijela turnira.
Podsjetimo, Švicarska je povela u 17. minutu golom Embola iz penala, dok je Katar do historijskog boda stigao u nadoknadi vremena.
Read the full article at Klix.ba →📄Source document: VAR Review
4 reports
Klix.baIndependentCenter4 days agoThe article discusses a controversial penalty decision during a match between Croatia and England. The Croatian goalkeeper, Dominik Livaković, initially saved the first penalty but was later shown a replay by the referee, Clement Turpin, after a VAR review. The footage indicated that Livaković had both feet off the goal line before the English striker took the shot. As a result, the penalty was retaken, and Harry Kane scored, giving England the lead. The article includes a screenshot caption stating 'Croatia was not disadvantaged against England.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents the events objectively, citing the referee's decision based on VAR review and the rule regarding the goalkeeper's position during a penalty. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the rule
Klix.baIndependentCenter4 days ago Look at the controversial situation that Croats will surely complain about, the judge "annulled" Livaković's defended penaltyIn a football match, Luka Modrić fouled Noni Madueke inside the penalty area, leading to a penalty kick. Goalkeeper Dominik Livaković attempted to save the shot but was called for leaving the goal line with both feet before the shot, resulting in the penalty being retaken. Harry Kane successfully converted the second attempt, giving England the lead against Croatia.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event without political commentary, framing, or bias. It focuses solely on the sequence of events during a football match and does not take a stance or emphasize any political aspect.
Klix.baIndependentCenter5 days ago The controversial situation has infuriated the French: Did Judge Faghani miss a penalty shoot-out for the Tricolores?A controversial situation during a football match between France and Senegal led to frustration among French players. The referee, Alireza Faghani, initially did not award a penalty after a challenge in the box. After reviewing the incident with the Video Assistant Referee (VAR), Faghani again decided not to award the penalty, surprising the French team who expected a clear opportunity to take the lead.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event without taking a stance on the decision made by the referee. It presents the facts neutrally, describing the sequence of events and the reaction of the French team without biased language or selective emphasis.
Klix.baIndependentCenter7 days ago Is VAR pushing Switzerland against Qatar: About everything, in the end, FIFA had to speak upDuring a match between Switzerland and Qatar in San Francisco, a controversial penalty decision was made after a disputed offside call. The Swiss team scored first with a penalty by Embolo in the 17th minute. However, replays raised doubts about whether an offside had occurred before the goal. FIFA later issued a statement confirming that the VAR process followed the rules but acknowledged technical issues with displaying graphics for television broadcast, which fueled further speculation among fans. FIFA clarified that no offside was present in either situation prior to the penalty decision.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports event without taking a stance on any political issue. It provides factual information about the match outcome, the controversy surrounding the penalty decision, and FIFA's response. There is no evident bias in the language or framing of the events described.
Official sources cited
- organisation FIFA Statement
BA