El caso Zapatero dio este miércoles una vuelta de tuerca tras la declaración del expresidente socialista, que no logró cambiar las sospechas del juez sobre los indicios de delito. Según el instructor, esos indicios siguen intactos después de que José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero tuviera la primera oportunidad de aclarar si el relato contenido en el auto de imputación se basaba en meras conjeturas.
El juez José Luis Calama respondió en dos direcciones después de escuchar casi dos horas al exdirigente: por un lado, evitó convertir el acto en un espectáculo, lo que habría ocurrido en caso de imponer medidas cautelares a alguien que tiene imposible fugarse y, por otro, dejó claro que Zapatero no dio una sola explicación razonable que descarte las sospechas previas de que cobró a cambio de mediar en el rescate de Plus Ultra y otras prácticas de tráfico de influencias.
Las tablas perjudican al expresidente. Los informes de la UDEF presentan inferencias de tal magnitud que conducen a la imputación de varios delitos a Zapatero, quien trasladó a través de su entorno que el contenido de los mismos le provocaba indignación. En la Audiencia Nacional tuvo la oportunidad de presentar documentación y ofrecer explicaciones precisas que diluyeran la fe de la Fiscalía Anticorrupción y el juez Calama en las tesis policiales. Pero no lo hizo, según concluye el juez instructor en el auto donde descarta imponerle medidas cautelares y, al tiempo, deja claro que no ha creído sus explicaciones.
Hay dos asuntos capitales de los que Zapatero se marchó de la Audiencia Nacional sin dar explicaciones suficientes, según refieren fuentes de la investigación: qué trabajos hizo que justifiquen el medio millón de euros que le pagó Análisis Relevante –la consultora de su amigo Julio Martínez Martínez– y el papel de sus hijas en la supuesta trama investigada, que cobraron 800.000 euros de empresas vinculadas a sus negocios.
Los dos aspectos resultan clave porque la Audiencia Nacional cree que Zapatero cobraba de Análisis Relevante por unos informes inexistentes que, en ocasiones, se presentaban incluso como “verbales”. De esta forma, él y su pagador, Julio Martínez Martínez, habrían disimulado el verdadero motivo de los desembolsos, la intercesión del expresidente en el rescate de Plus Ultra por medio del tráfico de influencias, así como en otras operaciones de compañías con intereses en obtener ayudas públicas o favores.
Plus Ultra, que opera la línea Madrid-Caracas, tenía contratado a Julio Martínez Martínez como una especie de conseguidor para resolver sus problemas en Venezuela. La aerolínea le pagó de forma directa o indirecta más de 900.000 euros entre 2020 y 2024. En ese mismo período de tiempo, la consultora de este empresario abonó más de 700.000 euros a la familia del expresidente: 490.780 a Zapatero y 239.755 a Whathefav, la agencia de marketing de sus hijas.
Ante el juez, Zapatero defendió que no ejerció ninguna influencia para favorecer que la aerolínea lograra el rescate de 53 millones de euros en plena pandemia. Respecto a los pagos que recibió de Análisis Relevante, dijo que eran a cambio de trabajos de asesoría y que cobraba por ellos a final del año de forma conjunta, si bien no aportó documentación u otro tipo de pruebas que sustentara su relato. También ha entregado un escrito con su “consentimiento expreso” a comprobar que no tiene activos fuera de España.
El segundo aspecto que quedó sin dilucidar y que aboca a una próxima investigación a las hijas de Zapatero –el PP, como acusación popular, ya ha pedido que se las investigue– son precisamente los 239.755 euros que la empresa de ambas recibió de Análisis Relevante. Y también el más de medio millón de euros que su agencia recibió de otra sociedad, Inteligencia Prospectiva, propiedad de dos hermanos venezolanos y que también hizo pagos a Análisis Relevante. Tanto esta última sociedad como Inteligencia Prospectiva son dos empresas fallidas, según la Oficina Antifraude. Nada hacían y nada, por tanto, tenían que subcontratar, sospechan el juez y Anticorrupción.
Las fuentes de la investigación consultadas por elDiario.es trasladan la sensación de que Zapatero llegó a desentenderse durante el interrogatorio de cualquier explicación que tuviera que ver con la facturación de las empresas de sus hijas. Sostienen que el expresidente se habría dedicado, en este tema, a “soltar lastre” y que sean las hermanas quienes ofrezcan explicaciones si son llamadas a declarar.
Las conclusiones provisionales de los investigadores pasan porque Zapatero no realizó servicios reales a la consultora de su amigo y que, por tanto, resulta difícil que pueda explicar la “confusión” entre los pagos por sus supuestos trabajos y los que hacía la agencia de sus hijas, indican las fuentes consultadas por este medio.
Las mismas fuentes consideran “muy significativo” que Zapatero no haya dado explicaciones sobre las joyas halladas en la caja fuerte de su oficina —ha pedido al juez unos días para po…
Read the full article at elDiario.es →📄Source document: Audiencia Nacional→98 reports
ABC (España)IndependentCenter2 days agoSpanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez reiterated his support for former President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, who is currently under investigation. During a statement from Brussels, Sánchez shared an anecdote about receiving gifts during travel, which he described as symbolic gestures of respect and fraternity within legal boundaries.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a political figure's public statement without overtly favoring any side. The content is descriptive and does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
ABC (España)IndependentLeft2 days ago Risto Mejide hears Pedro Sánchez say that all the presidents of the Government have received gifts and is blunt: It is treating people as imbecilesThe article discusses the ongoing national debate surrounding former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, focusing on allegations of corruption involving commissions from Venezuela, expensive gifts, and ties to the defunct airline Plus Ultra. It also explores claims that Zapatero has been acting as a behind-the-scenes mentor to current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, influencing his policies and actions.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Zapatero, a former leftist leader, as a central figure in a corruption scandal while suggesting he exerts influence over current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who is from the same political party. The tone implies skepticism toward Sánchez’s leadership and highlights Zapatero’s un
ABC (España)IndependentCenter2 days ago Carlos Herrera, convinced of what is Zapatero's great concern after the imputation of his daughters: "I know him and he has no sleep"José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has faced another setback after being named an imputado in the Plus Ultra case. The judge ordered an investigation into his two daughters, Alba and Laura Rodríguez Espinosa, and their secretary, Gertrudis Alcázar, as part of the judicial proceeding that names Zapatero as the alleged leader of an illicit influence network. The court found that the communication agency Whathefav, owned by Zapatero’s daughters, played an instrumental role in channeling, hiding, or facilitating operations related to the case. Despite Zapatero’s claim that the company was used for legal
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts from official sources without overtly favoring any side. It reports on judicial actions and allegations against Zapatero and his associates without using loaded language or emphasizing one perspective over another.
Official sources cited
- court Juez José Luis Calama
- government Fiscalía Anticorrupción
El PaísIndependent🔒Center2 days agoThe Public Prosecutor's Office in the 'Plus Ultra' case believes that Laura Rodríguez Zapatero and Alba Rodríguez Zapatero had an obvious role in the opaque business network linked to their father, former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Prosecutor Elena Lorente requested the indictment of both women and the secretary of the former socialist leader ahead of Zapatero's testimony. However, Judge José Luis Calama of the National Court did not rule until hearing Zapatero's statement. The judge not only believes Zapatero did not undermine the rational indicators of criminality against h
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legal proceedings and judicial decisions neutrally, without apparent favoritism toward any side.
Official sources cited
- government Fiscal Elena Lorente
- government Judge José Luis Calama
El MundoIndependent🔒Center2 days agoFormer Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero appeared before a judge investigating the Plus Ultra case. During the interrogation, Zapatero invoked his presumption of innocence when questioned about the society 'Análisis Relevante,' which is alleged to have been used to pay him a 1% commission for facilitating a €53 million rescue for an airline. Zapatero claimed he was not directly involved in the operations of the company and shifted responsibility to Julio Martínez Martínez, who is considered his key associate in the operation. The judge suggested that the company seemed to be設
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Zapatero's legal proceedings without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both Zapatero and the judge, providing a balanced view of their exchange.
El MundoIndependent🔒Right2 days ago The 'miracle' of Zapatero's daughters: their best client, a ruinous company of Venezuelans, pays videos at 10,000 euros per secondThe article discusses the financial relationship between Whathefav SL, an audiovisual agency owned by the daughters of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, and Inteligencia Prospectiva SL, a seemingly underperforming Venezuelan company. According to the report, Inteligencia Prospectiva paid Whathefav €561,440 despite being in financial trouble. The article highlights the discrepancy between the amount paid and the minimal content produced by Whathefav for Inteligencia Prospectiva, which has only a basic website with limited content.
Bias read (Right): The article uses strong, critical language such as 'insólita e inverosímil' (unusual and unbelievable), 'ruina contable' (accounting ruin), and emphasizes the apparent disparity between the payment and the quality of work provided. It frames the situation as suspicious without providing balanced nu
Official sources cited
- government Informe de la Udef
El PaísIndependent🔒Center2 days ago Zapatero acknowledged that he recommended his daughters but defended their work: They work wellThe daughters of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero have become central figures in an investigation by Spain's National Court into Zapatero's alleged role as a shadow leader of a criminal organization involved in selling influence. The judge, José Luis Calama, has indicted them, describing their company, Whathefav, as a 'center for redistribution of financial flows.' According to the investigation, Whathefav received over 800,000 euros from two key companies in this network, referred to as a 'financial boutique.' During his interrogation, Zapatero admitted he had recom
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts from court proceedings without overtly favoring any side. It quotes the judge’s questions and Zapatero’s responses neutrally, avoiding loaded language or selective emphasis.
elDiario.esIndependentCenter3 days agoIn an interrogation at the National Court, former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero denied any involvement in the 53 million euro rescue granted to airline Plus Ultra during the pandemic. He stated he had no contact with anyone regarding the public sector’s handling of the rescue and called this fact 'unquestionable.' The investigation into the rescue has been linked to messages intercepted from other individuals under scrutiny, which include frequent references to what was termed the 'Zapatero route' to bypass bureaucratic hurdles. These messages suggest confidence that Zapá
Bias read (Center): The article presents Zapatero's denial of involvement in the Plus Ultra rescue without overtly favoring either his claims or the implications of the intercepted messages. It includes direct quotes from Zapatero and mentions the content of messages from others under investigation but does not take a
Official sources cited
- court Interrogation of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero by Judge José Luis Calama
- government Intercepted Messages from Investigated Individuals
El MundoIndependent🔒Center3 days ago Sánchez has maintained contact with Zapatero "all these days" after his imputation and justifies his gifts: "Respaldo a José Luis"Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has maintained contact with former President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero since Zapatero was indicted on corruption charges. Sánchez expressed his support for Zapatero and emphasized his belief in his innocence. He did not comment on the jewelry found in Zapatero’s safe, valued at approximately €1.3 million, nor on the details of their conversations.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on political interactions without overtly favoring any side. It presents Sánchez's statements objectively, including his support for Zapatero and his non-comment on the jewelry. There is no clear framing that leans toward either political spectrum.
El MundoIndependent🔒Center3 days ago Judge of 'Plus Ultra case' charges Zapatero's daughters and former president's secretary for participating in laundering of commissionsA judge in Spain has decided to charge the daughters of former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Alba and Laura Rodríguez Espinosa, as well as his former secretary Gertrudis Alcázar, with involvement in money laundering related to commissions in the Plus Ultra case. The decision follows a request by the Anti-Corruption Prosecution and was also supported by the public prosecution. The judge noted that the daughters were formal administrators of Whathefav, a company believed to have been used to channel funds paid to Zapatero for facilitating a 53 million euro rescue for an airline.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legal actions taken by judicial authorities without apparent ideological framing or emphasis on specific political perspectives.
Official sources cited
- government Judge José Luis Calama
- government Fiscalía Anticorrupción
infoLibreIndependentCenter3 days agoA judge in Spain has agreed to investigate the daughters of former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Alba and Laura Rodríguez, and his secretary, Gertrudis Alcázar, as part of the Plus Ultra case. The decision follows Zapatero's denial of having influenced the airline Plus Ultra to secure public funding of €53 million in 2021. The judge cited solid and converging evidence suggesting that Zapatero's company, What the Fav, played an instrumental role in the alleged scheme.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on judicial actions and legal proceedings without apparent ideological framing or emphasis on specific political perspectives.
Official sources cited
- court Auto del Juez José Luis Calama
elDiario.esIndependentCenter3 days ago Judge Calama charged Zapatero's daughters and secretaryJudge José Luis Calama of the National Court has decided to investigate the daughters of former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Alba and Laura Rodríguez Espinosa, as well as their secretary, Gertrudis Alcázar, in connection with the 'Plus Ultra' case. The decision was made at the request of the Anti-Corruption Prosecution, which asked Calama to question them as suspects rather than witnesses. The judge stated this approach aims to protect their constitutional rights and ensure procedural guarantees. There is no set date yet for their questioning. Calama noted there are 'rational'
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on judicial actions and legal proceedings without apparent ideological framing.
Official sources cited
- court Auto del Juez Calama
El PaísIndependent🔒Center3 days ago Judge in the Plus Ultra case names Zapatero's daughters and secretary as defendantsThe national court judge overseeing the 'Plus Ultra' case has decided to investigate the daughters of former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, as well as his secretary, following Zapatero's testimony in the case involving charges of influence peddling and money laundering. The judge also declined to request further information from the United States regarding how the contents of a former airline executive's phone were obtained.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of judicial decisions without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legal actions taken by a judge based on requests from the Public Prosecutor's Office, maintaining neutrality in tone and content.
Official sources cited
- government Audiencia Nacional
- government Fiscalía Anticorrupción
El PeriódicoIndependentCenter3 days agoThe article discusses messages analyzed by the UDEF (Unit for the Defense of Democracy) revealing intermediation in favor of Plus Ultra in Venezuela, with a quote suggesting that Zapatero will intervene directly tomorrow.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information based on messages analyzed by the UDEF without overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It reports on claims of intermediation without taking a clear stance or emphasizing one perspective over another.
El MundoIndependent🔒Right3 days ago The Caracas-Beijing connection of the Zapatero caseThe article discusses former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's alleged involvement with authoritarian regimes in Venezuela and China through the Plus Ultra case. It suggests that Zapatero's actions go beyond mere corruption by highlighting his connections with these regimes. The piece critiques the narrative presented by Zapatero's supporters, which frames him as a legitimate lobbyist rather than someone involved in more serious issues related to foreign influence.
Bias read (Right): The article presents a critical view of Zapatero, emphasizing his alleged ties to authoritarian regimes and suggesting that his actions involve more than just financial misconduct. This framing implies a negative assessment of Zapatero's conduct and aligns with a right-leaning perspective on such an
elDiario.esIndependentCenter3 days ago Zapatero's answers do not clear the judge's suspicions about the charges of the Plus Ultra achieverThe case involving former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has taken a new turn following his declaration, which did not dispel the judge's suspicions regarding potential criminal charges. The judge, José Luis Calama, stated that the indications of wrongdoing remain unchanged after Zapatero had the opportunity to clarify whether the allegations in the indictment were based on mere speculation. The judge avoided making the hearing a spectacle by not imposing precautionary measures on Zapatero, who cannot flee. However, he emphasized that Zapatero provided no reasonable clarif
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings against Zapatero without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the judge's assessment and the lack of clarification from Zapatero, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.
Official sources cited
- court Auto de imputación
- government Informes de la UDEF
elDiario.esIndependentLeft3 days ago Sánchez orders to maintain support for Zapatero even if the judge maintains doubts about his businessThe Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) has reaffirmed its support for former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero despite ongoing judicial doubts regarding his business dealings. Zapatero appeared before the National Court to address allegations involving seven potential crimes, including organized crime, influence peddling, tax fraud, and money laundering. The court did not dismiss these suspicions, and Zapatero publicly declared his innocence and trust in the justice system. In response, PSOE emphasized solidarity with Zapatero, stating it stands by his declaration of innocence.
Bias read (Left): The article focuses on the PSOE's decision to maintain support for Zapatero despite legal scrutiny. The framing emphasizes the party’s unity and defense of Zapatero’s innocence, using language that aligns with leftist values such as solidarity and trust in the justice system. The tone supports Zapat
El MundoIndependent🔒Right3 days ago Three hours of evasions by Zapatero before the judge: silence with the jewels, does not remember a key appointment and does not use Excel or the 'email'Former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero denied involvement in alleged criminal activities related to the Plus Ultra corruption case during a three-hour interrogation with Judge José Luis Calama. Zapatero claimed he had no influence over the rescue of the airline named in the case, did not order the creation of any offshore companies, and did not receive illegal commissions as a leader of a criminal organization. The judge stated that Zapatero's testimony did not disprove the evidence of criminal activity presented in the indictment. Zapatero also did not provide details on a
Bias read (Right): The article presents Zapatero's denials without significant counterbalance, emphasizing his failure to convince the judge and highlighting the judge's conclusion that the evidence remains intact. The framing suggests skepticism toward Zapatero's claims, aligning more with the judicial perspective.
Official sources cited
- court Auto notificado tras el interrogatorio
El PaísIndependent🔒Center4 days ago Zapatero has already stated in the National Audience: what comes next?Former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has already testified before the National Court in the 'Plus Ultra' case. The article discusses possible next steps, including further testimony from Zapatero to clarify the origin of jewelry or the submission of new police reports.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about Zapatero's testimony and outlines potential developments without overtly favoring any side. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing.
Official sources cited
- government National Court (Audiencia Nacional)
elDiario.esIndependentCenter4 days ago Zapatero gives the judge the letter with his "express consent" to verify that he has no companies outside SpainJosé Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, former Spanish prime minister, has submitted a written statement to the court granting explicit consent for investigators to check if he holds any assets abroad. His legal team denied any hidden assets or money overseas and authorized the judge to contact foreign banks or jurisdictions if needed. The investigation involves allegations related to potential financial misconduct during the pandemic and possible undeclared jewelry valued at €1.3 million.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legal proceedings involving a high-profile individual but does not take a clear stance on the allegations or defense. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural steps taken by Zapatero’s legal团队.
Official sources cited
- government Audiencia Nacional
- government José Luis Calama
Spain