ON
← Back to feed
ILMedicineOverlooked from the left6 days ago

'Trump's deal does not bind us': Israeli leaders decry Lebanon’s inclusion in US-Iran deal

Israeli leaders, including Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir and Yair Golan, rejected the U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement brokered by former President Donald Trump. They stated that Israel is not bound by the deal and criticized it for failing to secure Israel's security interests, particularly regarding Hezbollah and territorial control. Some officials expressed dissatisfaction with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's role in the agreement.

By JONAH DAVIDOV JUNE 15, 2026 09:49 Updated: JUNE 15, 2026 10:06 Israel is not bound to US President Donald Trump's US-Iran ceasefire agreement, Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir said in an X/Twitter post on Monday morning.

"Trump's agreement does not bind us. Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation," he said.

"We are not partners to this agreement that does not ensure our security, and it does not bind us in any way. We must not compromise on anything less than the dismantling of Hezbollah , we must not withdraw from any territory that our fighters have captured and cleared of terror infrastructure, we must not return to a situation where thousands of terrorists sit on the fences of northern settlements, and certainly we must not remain silent for a moment in the face of fire directed at the State of Israel," Ben-Gvir continued.

Other Israeli officials took to X on Monday morning to state their positions, including Yair Golan, leader of The Democrats, who criticized Netanyahu for capitulating to a deal he deemed unsatisfactory.

Netanyahu "stood on the sidelines" as Israel's "military achievements secured with the courage of our pilots and the blood of our fighters have been erased," Golan said.

Replacing Netanyahu an 'existential' issue, Iran agreement a 'strategic failure'

"Trump signs an agreement that funnels billions to the Ayatollahs' regime, leaves the nuclear infrastructure intact, preserves the ballistic threat as is, and throws a lifeline to the murderous regime in Tehran," he said in harsh criticism of the agreement.

Pinning much of the blame for the agreement he sees as unsatisfactory on Netanyahu, Golan continued, saying, "Netanyahu is good for Hamas. Netanyahu is good for Iran . Netanyahu is good for Hezbollah. Netanyahu is not good for Israel."

Golan ended his post by saying, "Replacing him is not just a political necessity - it is an existential security imperative."

Benny Gantz, leader of the Blue and White party, said "Under no circumstances - it is forbidden to agree to restrict Israel's freedom of action in Lebanon or to a withdrawal that endangers the residents of the north," in his X post.

"The emerging agreement with Iran appears to be a strategic failure that will require Israel to engage in diplomatic, military, and legal struggles in the coming years, which only a broad Zionist government can lead," he said.

'Bond between Trump and Netanyahu' remains strong

MK Miki Zohar, on the other hand, took the opportunity to emphasize the strength of US-Israel relations and, in particular, Trump and Netanyahu.

"The bond between Trump and Netanyahu will only grow stronger. More surprises are expected until the elections, and many people will be eating their hats in the coming period. Trump loves Netanyahu and Israel," he was quoted as saying by KAN.

Defense Minister Israel Katz released a statement on Monday, saying that he and Netanyahu were outlining a "policy dictating that the IDF will remain in the security zones in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza - indefinitely - in order to protect the border and Israeli communities," calling the seizure of territory and establishment of security zones "among the greatest achievements of the IDF."

Katz said that they will not compromise on Israel's security, promising that all terror infrastructure will be destroyed.

'An abyss yawns between the empty promises of 'total victory' and this morning'

Former IDF chief of staff and leader of the Yashar! party, Gadi Eisenkot, lamented what he views to be a major failure of the government in his own X post, saying, "What began as the gravest failure, with historic internal and international legitimacy, is ripening into the bleak outcome of a failed government."

"A government that operated without strategy or diplomatic or leadership courage, and over three years lost the public's trust and that of its allies while abandoning Israel's residents," Eisenkot continued.

"An abyss yawns between the empty promises of 'total victory' and this morning."

Follow us on Google

Read the full article at The Jerusalem Post
Source document: Itamar Ben-Gvir's statement on X/Twitter

3 reports

HaaretzIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 856 days ago
U.S.-Iran Deal Excludes Missiles, Support for Proxies, Iranian Media Reports

Iranian media reports suggest that any potential U.S.-Iran deal would exclude provisions related to Iran's missile program and support for proxies such as Hezbollah.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of reported content without explicit framing, opinion, or emphasis that suggests a particular ideological stance. The focus is on the exclusion of specific issues in a potential deal, which is presented neutrally.

The Jerusalem PostIndependentRightFactual 80Objective 706 days ago
'Trump's deal does not bind us': Israeli leaders decry Lebanon’s inclusion in US-Iran deal

Israeli leaders, including Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir and Yair Golan, rejected the U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement brokered by former President Donald Trump. They stated that Israel is not bound by the deal and criticized it for failing to secure Israel's security interests, particularly regarding Hezbollah and territorial control. Some officials expressed dissatisfaction with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's role in the agreement.

Bias read (Right): The article presents Israeli officials' strong rejection of the U.S.-Iran deal, emphasizing national sovereignty and security concerns. The framing highlights criticism of the agreement as inadequate and portrays Israeli leadership as firm on security issues, aligning with right-leaning perspectives

The Times of IsraelIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 707 days ago
As the missiles fly, then stop - Sponsored Content

The article raises a question about Israeli public perception of safety following military actions against Hamas and Hezbollah, despite claims of having degraded their capabilities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a question without taking a stance or providing analysis that would indicate a particular ideological leaning. It does not include commentary or framing that suggests a political bias.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.