America Is Policing Foreign Waters, but Gutting Domestic Protections

While the Trump administration systematically unravels marine protections at home, it appears to be enforcing far higher conservation standards abroad.

The State Department imposed visa restrictions on 26 foreign nationals engaged in illegal fishing last month. Among those restricted is a former Argentine official allegedly involved in an illegal Patagonian toothfish harvesting scandal and a senior Mexican cartel member smuggling endangered fish along the U.S. border.

Though American visa bans have historically been levied against alleged human rights abusers , corrupt foreign officials and land-based wildlife traffickers , this is the first time they have been deployed to combat marine poaching, according to the State Department.

The move—which stems from President Donald Trump’s Executive Order to Restore American Seafood Competitiveness —signals a willingness by Washington to weaponize the country’s immigration apparatus to limit activities they claim have “undermined fair market access” for the American fleet. While environmentalists have critiqued the order’s widespread deregulation, the combatting of illegal fishing enjoys widespread support across the political spectrum.

“Protecting the bounty of the world’s oceans from illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing is a US global priority under [President Trump] and [Secretary of State Rubio],” said Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau in a post on X, last month. “Those who illegally deplete the fishing resources available to the US and the world are not welcome in our country.”

While unlikely to meaningfully prevent illegal fishing, visa restrictions are expected to sever and disrupt the arteries that criminal organizations typically rely on, such as access to U.S. safe houses and American financial institutions.

Though cast by the State Department as an “assertive global approach to protecting the U.S. fishing industry and global fish resources,” the policy is at odds with the administration’s dismantling of domestic marine protections.

In Trump’s second term, the government has accelerated destructive deep-sea mining licenses, Congress has proposed amendments to weaken the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and this February, the President rescinded the protective status afforded to thousands of miles of pristine waters off New England’s coastline, allowing the return of plunderous fishing fleets.

Indeed, the visa revocations—implemented in the name of protecting fish resources—come just weeks after the administration proposed a $1.6 billion funding cut to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration—the very organization that oversees fisheries management plans.

“The administration is absolutely decimating protections for marine species within the United States,” said Sarah Uhlemann, the senior attorney and international program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “At the same time, there are a series of laws in the U.S. that say that other countries need to meet our conservation standards or they’re not allowed to export to the United States, a ton of them around seafood.”

The world’s largest seafood importer , the U.S. last August banned fish products from 42 countries that exceeded bycatch limits. Bycatch refers to fish and other marine animals caught unintentionally by fishermen using huge nets or long lines baited with thousands of hooks.

Similarly, the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit focused on the protection of endangered species, recently relied on the U.S. Moratorium Protection Act in a petition demanding possible sanctions on Chinese seafood due to shark finning concerns.

The willingness to choke domestic protections while simultaneously chasing international actors indicates this approach is less about ecology and more about protecting financial interests and carrying out the administration’s broader immigration agenda.

When asked for comment, a spokesperson for the State Department told Inside Climate News that the motivations rested, in part, with stopping “the actions of these individuals who seek to ignore the rules for short-term, selfish gain at the expense of U.S. consumers and producers.”

Operating out of the purview of governing bodies, evading quota restrictions and often taking advantage of forced labor, illegal fisheries flood the U.S. market with cheap seafood, much to the detriment of law-abiding American fishing crews unable to compete on prices.

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

“I think it’s 100 percent driven by economics,” Uhlemann said. “But at the same time, I’m happy for the result,” noting that any action to help marine wildlife in foreign waters is worth embracing, even if it’s driven by financial interests rather than ecological ones.

Though the S…