ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Britanska policija potrjuje, da je leta 2019 prejela obtožbe za otroško pornografijo zoper očeta Meghan Markle
Spain🏛️ PolitikaSredina

Britanska policija potrjuje, da je leta 2019 prejela obtožbe za otroško pornografijo zoper očeta Meghan Markle

Britanska policija je potrdila, da je leta 2019 prejela pismo z več obtožbami zoper Thomasa Markla Sr., očeta Meghan Markle, glede posedovanja otroške pornografije. Ta potrditev sledi ekskluzivnemu poročilu časopisa The Sun, ki razkriva, da je brat Meghan Markle, Thomas Markle Jr., vložil pritožbo zoper njunega očeta. V odgovoru na začetna medijska poročila je vojvodinja Susseška izdala izjavo, v kateri je izrazila globoko zaskrbljenost in opozorila, da je bila leta 2018 obveščena o podobnem opozorilu, poslanem Metropolitanski policiji in Kraljevski specializirani pisarni za zaščito. Policijsko potrdilo potrjuje obstoj predhodne korespondence, ne pa potrjuje, ali so bile pozneje vložene obtožbe ali če je po prejemu pisma potekala nadaljnja preiskava.

London police confirmed on Saturday that they received a letter in January 2019 containing allegations regarding the possession of child sexual abuse material by Thomas Markle Sr., the estranged father of Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex. The Metropolitan Police stated that while the document was forwarded to the couple’s office for their awareness, the specific details of the claims were not shared with other law enforcement agencies. This admission comes days after the publication of new claims by Markle’s half-brother, Thomas Markle Jr., who alleges he discovered hundreds of such images at his father’s former residence in the Philippines. The sequence of events began on Thursday when The Sun newspaper published an exclusive report detailing the accusations brought by Thomas Markle Jr. According to the tabloid, the younger Markle told police that he found "hundreds, if not thousands" of child sex abuse images stored in four large boxes at his father's previous home in the Philippines. The Sun also published a photograph purportedly showing Thomas Markle Jr. signing a sworn statement submitted to authorities. In that statement, he reportedly declared that he would not speak to his father again unless compelled to provide evidence against him. Following the initial report, Meghan released a statement on Friday expressing her reaction to the disclosures. She described herself as "deeply distressed" by the news emerging in the preceding twenty-four hours and directed her thoughts toward any children who might have been harmed. The Duchess revealed that she had been aware of similar allegations since 2018. She explained that a letter had been sent to the Metropolitan Police and the Royalty and Specialist Protection unit during that year. Meghan stated that the letter contained "troubling and disturbing allegations" against her father and that she was subsequently assured by officials that these matters were under investigation. The Metropolitan Police clarified the timeline and handling of the correspondence on Saturday. A spokesperson for the force said that a thorough review of internal systems and records confirmed the receipt of the letter in January 2019. The document was delivered to the Metropolitan Police Service Protection Command to raise concerns specifically related to the security of the Duchess of Sussex. After review, a decision was made to pass the letter to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex so they could take notice of its contents. However, the police emphasized that the detailed allegations within the letter were not communicated to any other law enforcement bodies. This confirmation highlights a discrepancy in dates between the Duchess’s account and the police records. Meghan indicated she learned of the allegations in 2018, whereas the police identified the receipt of the letter as occurring in January 2019. When asked about this difference, a spokesperson for Meghan suggested that she may have been mistaken by a few months. The Metropolitan Police statement did not specify whether an active investigation was launched based on the 2019 letter or if any further operational steps were taken beyond sharing the document with the royal couple. Currently, the Metropolitan Police is reviewing how the matter was handled in 2019. The force is considering whether to make a formal referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct to examine its approach to the case. A source close to the file previously asserted that the Metropolitan Police neither conducted nor is currently conducting an investigation into Thomas Markle Sr. in the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, investigations continue abroad. Authorities in the Philippines confirmed that an inquiry is underway. The Department of Justice Undersecretary Nicholas Ty stated that the matter is being examined by an anti-human trafficking and child sexual exploitation task force. Interior Minister Jonvic Remulla added that national police have seized items from Thomas Markle Sr.’s property. A separate police source noted that the Philippine investigation is distinct from the historical correspondence held by British police. Thomas Markle Sr., an American photographer aged 82, has categorically denied possessing illegal imagery. Speaking to the Daily Mail, he dismissed the accusations as "sick lies." His estrangement from his daughter has been a subject of public interest for several years. Notably, he did not attend Meghan’s wedding to Prince Harry in 2018, an absence that drew significant media attention at the time. In her statement, Meghan addressed the long-standing narrative surrounding her family dynamics. She argued that past media portrayals of her distant relationship with her father should now be viewed in light of the current revelations. She stated that her decision to limit contact with him was motivated solely by the desire to protect her children, Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five. Neither child has met their grandfather. Meghan expressed hope that justice would be fully served and that the primary focus would remain on the safety and protection of innocent victims. The couple, who recently relocated from the United States back to the United Kingdom, have faced intense scrutiny following these developments. The situation has placed renewed pressure on both the royal household and the policing bodies involved in the protection of senior members of the family. As the independent review of police conduct proceeds, attention remains divided between the ongoing legal proceedings in the Philippines and the internal inquiries within the Metropolitan Police.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

El País logoEl PaísNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 90
Britanska policija potrjuje, da je leta 2019 prejela obtožbe za otroško pornografijo zoper očeta Meghan Markle

Britanska policija je potrdila, da je leta 2019 prejela pismo z več obtožbami zoper Thomasa Markla Sr., očeta Meghan Markle, glede posedovanja otroške pornografije. Ta potrditev sledi ekskluzivnemu poročilu časopisa The Sun, ki razkriva, da je brat Meghan Markle, Thomas Markle Jr., vložil pritožbo zoper njunega očeta. V odgovoru na začetna medijska poročila je vojvodinja Susseška izdala izjavo, v kateri je izrazila globoko zaskrbljenost in opozorila, da je bila leta 2018 obveščena o podobnem opozorilu, poslanem Metropolitanski policiji in Kraljevski specializirani pisarni za zaščito. Policijsko potrdilo potrjuje obstoj predhodne korespondence, ne pa potrjuje, ali so bile pozneje vložene obtožbe ali če je po prejemu pisma potekala nadaljnja preiskava.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja nedvoumno dejstvo, ki potrjuje policijske zapise glede kazenske obtožbe, ki vključuje člana britanske kraljeve družine. Oslanja se na neposredne citate policije in prejšnje izjave vojvode in vojvodinje Sussex brez uporabe obremenjenega jezika,

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (90): Maintains a neutral, journalistic tone. Uses direct quotes for Meghan's reaction and precise language for the police action ('recognized that it received'). Avoids editorializing or taking sides, presenting the sequence of events clearly.

El Periódico logoEl PeriódicoNeodvisenSredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 60
V domu Meghan Marklejevega očeta najdejo otroško pornografijo

Na voljo je samo naslov, ki navaja, da so v hiši Meghan Marklejevega očeta odkrili otroško pornografijo. V priloženem odlomku niso vključeni nobeni dodatni podatki, kontekst, navedbi ali ugotovitve preiskave. Članek ne navaja, kdo je odkril, pravni status posameznika ali kakršno koli uradno potrditev glede narave materialov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Vnosno besedilo je omejeno na naslov enega stavka brez vsebine telesa. Ker v predelanem besedilu ni pripovedi, argumentacije, pridevkov ali vira, je nemogoče oceniti okvir, ton ali pristranskost. Zato je privzeto za CENTER zaradi pomanjkanja podatkov bolj

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The headline uses sensationalist phrasing typical of tabloid-style reporting ('pornographic material' vs 'accusations'), creating a high-stakes narrative before establishing facts. It lacks nuance regarding the legal status of the allegations.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe