On July 24, 2026, representatives of the Civil Initiative Piran (CI Piran) and municipal advisor Davorin Petaros delivered 918 signatures supporting a citizens' initiative aimed at revoking the decision by the Piran Municipal Council to sell seven parcels of land in Fiesa. This follows the earlier delivery of 921 signatures in support of a referendum on the sale of these lands, which were submitted to the municipal office on July 23, 2026. The signatures collected represent approximately 6.1 percent of eligible voters, surpassing the required five-percent threshold for triggering a referendum. The initiative seeks to prevent the sale of the land and instead designate it for public use. The dispute over the land in Fiesa has been ongoing since the municipal council approved the preliminary legal document for the sale of the parcels during its 35th regular session. The land, located near the historic coastal area of Fiesa, has long been a subject of local significance due to its ecological value and historical importance. The Civil Initiative Piran argues that the decision to sell the land contradicts the principles of democratic governance and public participation, particularly given the recent referendum in 2017, in which residents rejected a proposal to restrict development on parts of the site. According to the municipal authorities, the decision to proceed with the sale was based on the need to generate revenue for infrastructure projects, including the construction of garage houses near Piran, the relocation of vehicles from the current parking lot in Fornači, and the greenification of the area along with the renovation of the beach. Mayor Andrej Korenika emphasized that the municipality must adhere to existing spatial planning documents, which classify the land as suitable for residential construction. He stated that the sale would allow private investors to develop the properties, thereby fulfilling the municipality’s responsibility to manage urban space effectively. However, supporters of the citizens' initiative argue that the decision undermines the democratic process and fails to consider alternative uses for the land. They point to the 2017 referendum, in which residents overwhelmingly opposed proposals to limit development on the site, as evidence of public sentiment against the current plan. The initiative's leaders claim that the sale would compromise the environmental and cultural integrity of Fiesa, a protected natural area known for its unique landscape and biodiversity. The campaign to collect signatures for the referendum began shortly after the municipal council's approval of the sale. Within ten days, the group had gathered more than three times the number of signatures needed to trigger the referendum process. According to Davorin Petaros, the municipal advisor and spokesperson for the initiative, the response from the community has been overwhelming, indicating broad public opposition to the decision. He noted that the initiative aims to demonstrate that the public should have a direct say in decisions affecting their environment and heritage. The municipal administration has acknowledged the petition but maintains that the decision to sell the land falls under the category of a specific legal action rather than a general municipal act. Therefore, they argue that a referendum may not be legally permissible under current regulations. Nevertheless, the municipality has committed to consulting relevant state agencies to determine whether the law allows for the organization of such a referendum. If the legal basis exists, the city will initiate the process. Otherwise, the mayor plans to propose the repeal of the decision to the municipal council. In addition to the debate over the land sale, there have been ongoing discussions regarding the broader development of the Fiesa area. In recent months, the municipality has undertaken extensive efforts to restore and enhance the natural environment, including the removal of invasive species, replanting native trees, and improving recreational facilities. These improvements have sparked both praise and controversy among residents, highlighting the complex relationship between urban development and conservation in the region. The situation in Fiesa reflects a growing tension between local governance and civic engagement, with the citizens' initiative representing one of the strongest expressions of public dissent. As the debate continues, the outcome of this referendum could set a precedent for how future decisions involving public spaces are made in Piran. For now, the focus remains on gathering additional signatures and preparing for the formal referendum process, which could take place in the coming weeks.
8 poročil
918 podpisov za ljudsko iniciativo: Fiesa naj ostane javnaČlanek poroča o državljanski pobudi v slovenskem Piranu, ki je namenjena preprečevanju prodaje sedmih zemljišč v Fiesi. Predstavniki občinske pobude Piran in svetnik Davorin Petaros sta v sredo predložili 921 podpisov v podporo referendumu o prodaji zemljišča, danes pa so dodali še 918 podpisov za ljudsko pobudo za razveljavitev občinske odločitve o prodaji zemljišča. Pobuda si prizadeva odstraniti te parcele iz prodaje in jih dodeliti za javno uporabo. Zbrani podpisi - približno 6,1% upravičenih volivcev - presegajo zahtevani petodstotni prag. Pobudniki trdijo, da je to jasno demokratično sporočilo prebivalcev, ki navajajo, da bi morale odločitve glede Fiese sprejeti ljudje, ne lokalna vlada. Poudarjajo, da svet ne more prenesti odgovornosti za odločitev iz referenduma pred devetimi leti ali na državljane.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je situacija predstavljena objektivno, s poudarkom na zbiranju podpisov za ljudsko pobudo in argumentih pobudnikov.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article continues the narrative of the signature collection, providing additional context about the legal mechanism of a citizens’ initiative and the required threshold. It is consistent with other articles and supports the factual claims made.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): There is a subtle emphasis on the democratic aspect and the legitimacy of the initiative, which may influence the reader’s perception. While not overtly biased, the tone slightly favors the initiative’s position.
Bitka za Fieso se šele začenja, civilna iniciativa zbrala podpise za referendum o prodaji zemljišč (FOTO)V članku se razpravlja o tekoči razpravi o prodaji zemljišča v Fiesi, zeleni zalivu v bližini Pirana v Sloveniji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni oba stališča - občinske trditve o nujnem razvoju in zaskrbljenost skupnosti zaradi kulturne dediščine - brez očitne naklonjenosti nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article summarizes the main points of the initiative and the public response, confirming the signature count and the political implications. It aligns with the other articles and provides no contradictory information.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The language used to describe the initiative as a 'bitka' (battle) and the emphasis on public opinion may suggest a slight leaning towards the initiative’s cause, reducing objectivity.
Svet24NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 9 dneviČlanek poroča o sporu na območju Fieso, kjer so prebivalci Pirana zbrali trikrat več podpisov za referendum v primerjavi s svojimi nasprotniki.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek poudarja uspeh peticijskih prizadevanj prebivalcev Pirana, ki bi jih bilo mogoče razlagati kot podporo lokalni avtonomiji ali nasprotovanju zunanjemu nadzoru.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reiterates the key facts about the signature collection and the potential referendum, maintaining consistency with previous reports. It adds context about past referendums and the current political climate, which is supported by the primary source documents indirectly.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the initiative as a significant civic effort, using emotive language such as 'bitka' (battle) which may imply a stronger stance in favor of the initiative, thus affecting objectivity.
Civilna iniciativa Piran Pirano zbrala 921 podpisov podpore pobudi za razpis referenduma o prodaji zemljišč v FiesiObčinski svetnik Piran Pirano v občinski svetnici Davorin Petaros je včeraj predal 921 podpisov za razpis referenduma o prodaji občinskih zemljišč v Fiesi. Podpisovanje je bilo posledica sklepa piranskega občinskega sveta, ki je na zadnjem zasedanju odobril predhodno soglasje za prodajo sedmih parcel v Fiesi. Občinski svetnik je izrazil zadovoljstvo zaradi velike podpore javnosti, kar je pokazalo, da je nasprotovanje proti prodaji zemljišč široko razširjeno. Predstavniki pobude menijo, da bo referendum pokazal javno mnenje o tem sklepu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je pobuda predstavljena kot spodnja prizadevanja, ki predstavljajo javno mnenje proti odločitvi lokalnega sveta, da proda zemljišče v Fiesiju.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article confirms the signature count and quotes the spokesperson, Davorin Petaros, consistently with other articles. It includes additional details about the response from the public and social media reactions, which are supported by the primary source documents indirectly.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): While the reporting is factual, the emphasis on public reaction and the use of emotionally charged terms like 'burno' (wildly) may suggest a slight lean towards the opposition perspective, affecting objectivity.
Se obeta nov referendum o Fiesi?V članku je obravnavana lokalna polemika v Piranu v Sloveniji glede morebitne prodaje sedmih parcel zemljišč na območju Fiesa s strani občinskega sveta. Civilna pobuda Piran Pirano zbira podpisove za začetek referenduma proti prodaji, pri čemer trdi, da ta zemljišča vsebujejo nekaj najboljših vrtov v občini in bi morala ostati v javni lasti. Mestni svet je odobril prodajo kot del širše strategije za prodajo nekritičnih sredstev, medtem ko ohranja bistveno zemljišče za razvoj.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se opozicija proti prodaji zemljišč obravnava kot državljanska dolžnost in poudarja zaskrbljenost zaradi izgube javnih zelenih površin in dediščine skupnosti.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article repeats the key facts about the signature collection and includes additional context about the legal process and the percentage of voters reached. It aligns with the primary source document in terms of data privacy practices, though this is not directly relevant to the content.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the initiative, using language that suggests strong public support. While not overtly biased, the focus on the democratic process and citizen involvement leans slightly towards the initiative’s viewpoint.
DnevnikNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 85pred 8 dneviV članku se razpravlja o morebitnem novem referendumu v Piranu glede usode zemljišč v Fiesi in njihovega razvoja. Civilna pobuda PiranPPirano (CI) je zbrala 921 podpisov, ki podpirajo referendum o izpodbijanju odločitve občinskega sveta o odobritvi osnutka pravnega dokumenta za prodajo teh zemljišč.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni oba stališča: upravičenost občinske uprave za odločitev, ki temelji na pravnih okvirih, in prizadevanje državljanske pobude za demokratični nadzor s referendumom.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article confirms the collection of 921 signatures for the referendum on the sale of land in Fiesa, providing similar details to the others. It includes quotes from the representative of the initiative and highlights the significance of public involvement. The information is consistent with othe
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral, reporting the facts without taking sides. It presents the initiative's goals and outcomes objectively, without emotional language or biased framing.
Siol.netDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 9 dneviPobuda, ki jo zastopa Davorin Petaros, trdi, da bi morala javnost odločati o odločitvah o prostorskem načrtovanju, kritizirajoč sedanji avtokratski vodstveni slog občine in države. Petaros je poudaril, da zakon o prostorskem načrtovanju zahteva sodelovanje javnosti v razvojnih strategijah in upravljanju, trdi pa, da organi zanemarjajo to načelo in trdijo, da državljani niso sposobni sprejemati obveščenih demokratičnih odločitev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je pobuda predstavljena kot legitimno demokratično prizadevanje proti domnevno avtoritarnemu vodenju, s poudarkom na udeležbi javnosti in kritiki lokalnih oblasti.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article continues the discussion on the referendum initiative, confirming the number of signatures and the reasons behind the campaign. It includes quotes from the representative and explains the legal basis for public involvement. The information is consistent with other sources and is reported
Zakaj objektivnost (75): While the article is generally neutral, it includes some emotionally charged language, such as 'avtokratsko vodenje,' which can be seen as subtly biased. This affects the overall objectivity score.
Civilna iniciativa zbrala podpise za razpis referenduma o prodaji občinskih zemljišč v FiesiDržavljanska pobuda v Piranu je zbrala 921 podpisov, ki podpirajo referendum o prodaji občinske zemlje v Fiesiju, ki so ga predložili lokalni občini.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se to vprašanje obravnava kot demokratični primanjkljaj, kritizira izključitev javnega prispevka v lokalno upravljanje in trenutno pristop opisuje kot "avtokratski", poudarja potrebo po vključujoči, participativni demokraciji in postavlja državljansko pobudo kot zagovornik demokratičnih načel.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article discusses the referendum initiative in Piran regarding the sale of land in Fiesa, citing the number of signatures collected and the background of the issue. It references past referendums and the current political context. While factually correct, it contains some subjective commentary f
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone leans toward the activist perspective, using phrases like 'avtokratsko vodenje' which carry a strong ideological charge. While the facts are presented, the language suggests a particular viewpoint, reducing overall objectivity.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
Slovenia
