Objavljene so bile podrobnosti o preiskavi Keruma in njegove ekipe.
Članek poroča o preiskavi, ki jo je državno tožilstvo (USKOK) sprožilo zoper nekdanjega uslužbenca mesta Kastel, Andreja Polića, Želja Keruma in njegovega vnuka Igora Sapunara, v zvezi z domnevno nezakonito legalizacijo stavb v nekdanjem objektu Konoba Pršut, ki je zdaj znan kot Hacijenda Amora. Polić je bil prvi obtoženi, Kerum drugi in Sapunar tretji, ki se soočajo z obtožbami zlorabe položaja in spodbujanja take zlorabe. V preiskavi trdijo, da so po juniju 2011 iskali pravno priznanje nezakonito zgrajenih struktur, kar je kršilo zakonske zahteve. Trdijo, da je Polić kot višji specialist za prostorsko načrtovanje in gradnjo v avgustu 2022 nepravilno izdal poročilo, v katerem je napačno navedel, da na zemljevidu iz leta 2011 obstajajo nezakonite konstrukcije, čeprav na tem zemljevidu niso vidne. Namesto tega je uporabil zemljevid iz leta 2017, kjer so bile vse tri osebe jasno vidne.
Željko Kerum, former mayor of Split and leader of the Croatian Civic Party (HGS), has stepped down from his position as head of the party following his release from custody. The leadership of the HGS has been taken over by Igor Stanišić, who previously served as president of the City Council of Split. This move comes after Kerum was released from prison following an investigation into alleged illegal construction and encouraging a former city official to legalize previously unauthorized buildings on private property. The investigation, initiated by the Office for the Suppression of Organized Crime and Corruption (USKOK), focuses on three individuals, Kerum, Andrija Polić, and Kerum's nephew Igor Sapunar, for suspected abuse of office and incitement to abuse of office. According to police and USKOK reports, Polić, while serving as a senior technical assistant for spatial planning and construction in the City of Kaštela, allegedly illegally facilitated Kerum and his company in the process of legalizing buildings constructed after June 2011. Kerum was the client and project manager for construction work on land registered under his company, which he owned in real terms. From March 2020, he became the legal representative of the company. Sapunar, Kerum’s nephew, was authorized to represent the company in Kerum’s real ownership. Investigators suspect that Kerum and Sapunar requested Polić to issue a decision legalizing buildings and other structures constructed after June 2011, despite knowing there were no legal conditions for issuing such a decision. Some of these buildings were not visible on the digital orthophoto map of the State Geodetic Administration from 2011. Others did not match the size and area shown in the geodetic and architectural documentation submitted with the request. Despite this, Polić prepared a statement in August 2022 claiming he had determined through reviewing the 2011 orthophoto map that unauthorized buildings existed on the parcel. However, instead of attaching the 2011 map, he used one from 2017, on which the buildings were already visible. He then compiled a record stating that the size, degree of completion, and purpose of the buildings and structures matched the state observed during an inspection conducted in September 2022. On January 26, 2023, he issued a decision legalizing five buildings, including three commercial properties, two residential buildings, a pool, and a workshop, totaling a gross floor area of 1,965.65 square meters. USKOK suspects that Polić thereby unlawfully enabled Kerum and his company to construct buildings significantly larger than those existing before June 21, 2011, and to build new, legalized buildings in agricultural zones outside the urban area of the General Urban Plan of Kaštela, where such construction was not permitted. Kerum was arrested following a series of investigative articles published by Telegram journalist Denis Mahmutović. His downfall marked the end of our investigative series on his real estate misdeeds, excluding a previous incident involving a minor traffic accident. In the following sections, we present the Telegram texts that triggered the USKOK investigation. At the beginning of May, we published a story about Pršut, Kerum’s newly opened restaurant in Kaštela. We revealed that the Pršut complex, including a pool, workshop, chapel, and other floors, was built illegally. The Building Inspection had long identified the illegal construction and ordered its removal, but the restaurant was never demolished. Kerum continued expanding on land classified as "particularly valuable arable land," ignoring the inspection. How was this possible? Thanks to a Copernican turn by Kaštela municipal officials who issued a legalization decision, even though the documentation did not match the actual situation on the ground, which can be seen literally from an airplane. Illegal construction and the exploitation of maritime assets Andrija Polić, who composed the disputed document, was at the time pretending to run for the position of chief executive officer in the City of Split, where Kerum held power. Since then, he has not been mentioned in that context. Polić, then a senior technical assistant for spatial planning in Kaštela, legally declared that the buildings visible on official state maps were nonexistent, allowing Kerum to formally convert illegal buildings into legal ones through forged documents. In short, his signature on an official document allowed illegal buildings to become officially legal. The next text focused on Perl, Kerum’s luxurious hotel resort in Rogoznica, near the sea. The complex consists of a hotel, apartments, villas, deluxe rooms, a pool, a restaurant, and related facilities. We revealed how Kerum illegally built a villa and hotel complex spanning maritime assets and then, with the passivity of the State Attorney’s Office, mortgaged the maritime asset for multimillion loans from a bank. He exploited the maritime asset as a private ATM. Such a maneuver was possible because the Republic of Croatia, represented by the State Attorney’s Office, has failed to register the asset on public records for 13 years, which the Kerum family has successfully exploited for years. ‘Telegram ordered an investigation’ We later revealed how Kerum had erected an illegal marina for yachts on maritime assets in Rogoznica, directly opposite the Perl resort, which has been advertised for years as "marina" and "ideal destination for sailors with all necessary amenities." Despite a ruling by the Supreme Administrative Court declaring the concession process illegal, Kerum operated the marina under the nose of the competent authorities. Eventually, after our article, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport, and Infrastructure banned the use of the illegal docking facility, which must now be removed from the maritime asset. Kerum followed our revelations with nervous, paranoid posts on social media, called emergency meetings where he claimed he would seek asylum, and in telephone conversations, he ranted and insulted the signed journalist. In his final appearance on freedom, he seriously stated that Telegram had ordered an investigation against him, mentioning DORH, USKOK, the State Inspectorate, and Carina. Kerum was arrested last night in Velika Luka while relaxing at a concert commemorating Oliver Dragojević. According to RTL Danas, Kerum, his nephew Igor Sapunar, and Andrija Polić, a former senior technical assistant for spatial planning and construction in the City of Kaštela, were arrested for the legalization of the Pršut restaurant. The arrest is linked to the so-called "Pršut Restaurant Affair," concerning a hospitality establishment in Kerum’s ownership in Kaštela. The restaurant found itself at the center of an investigation due to suspicions of unlawful legalization. Construction on agricultural land without permission was confirmed as early as 2019 when a decision to demolish was issued, but it was never carried out, according to Slobodna Dalmacija. The wider public learned about the object at the beginning of 2021 due to a party celebrating the birthday of former football player Ivica Mornar, attended by several Split judges, despite existing epidemiological measures. Although satellite images show that parts of the complex did not exist within the legal timeframe, municipal services issued a decision on the state of affairs in 2023, and the continuation of operations and failure to meet conditions ultimately led to the arrest and initiation of the investigation. The investigation began in May Kerum was arrested last night in Velika Luka while relaxing at a concert commemorating Oliver Dragojević. According to RTL Danas, Kerum, his nephew Igor Sapunar, and Andrija Polić, a former senior technical assistant for spatial planning and construction in the City of Kaštela, were arrested for the legalization of the Pršut restaurant. The arrest is linked to the so-called "Pršut Restaurant Affair," concerning a hospitality establishment in Kerum’s ownership in Kaštela. The restaurant found itself at the center of an investigation due to suspicions of unlawful legalization. Construction on agricultural land without permission was confirmed as early as 2019 when a decision to demolish was issued, but it was never carried out, according to Slobodna Dalmacija. The wider public learned about the object at the beginning of 2021 due to a party celebrating the birthday of former football player Ivica Mornar, attended by several Split judges, despite existing epidemiological measures. Although satellite images show that parts of the complex did not exist within the legal timeframe, municipal services issued a decision on the state of affairs in 2023, and the continuation of operations and failure to meet conditions ultimately led to the arrest and initiation of the investigation. The investigation began in May. Kerum denied all charges, stating that the object was legalized in accordance with the law and that there is evidence that a legal business entity existed on the site before 2011. In public appearances, he asserted that the issue was political.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Željko Kerum, bivši predsednik Hrvaške državljanske stranke (HGS), je odstupil s mesta predsednika stranke po tem, ko je bil izpuščen na svobodo po kazenskem postopku. Preiskava proti njemu je bila uvedena zaradi obtožb za nezakonito gradnjo in poticanje nekadašnjeg gradskega službenika na nezakonito legalizacijo prej nezakonito izgrajenih objektov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljen dejanski opis odstopa Željka Keruma s položaja vodje stranke HGS zaradi pravnih vprašanj, povezanih z nezakonito gradnjo.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports on Kerum's resignation from his party position and the ongoing investigation, aligning with the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains objective in its reporting, focusing on the facts of the investigation and Kerum's actions without showing clear bias.
Novi listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 85včeraj
Hrvaška državna pravosodna uprava (USKOK) je začela preiskavo treh hrvaških državljanov - nekdanjega občinskega uslužbenca Kaštele Andrije Polića, nekdanjega župana Splita in podjetnika Želja Keruma ter Kerumovega nečaka Igorja Sapunarja - zaradi domnevne zlorabe položaja in spodbujanja take zlorabe.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o tekoči preiskavi, ki vključuje javne uslužbence in obtožbe o korupciji.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately represents the primary source, providing detailed information about the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language.
Hrvaška protikorupcijska agencija Uskok je začela preiskavo proti nekdanjemu mestnemu zaposlenemu v Kaštelu Andriji Poliću, nekdanjemu županu Splita in vodji HGS Željku Kerumu ter Kerumovemu nečaku Igorju Sapunarju, domnevno zaradi nezakonite legalizacije stavb, ki jih je zgradilo podjetje Kerumova.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije, ki temeljijo na poročilih policije in Uskoka, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source, detailing the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the specific allegations related to the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is presented in a neutral manner, focusing on the factual aspects of the investigation without injecting personal opinion.
Članek obravnava preiskavo Hrvaške državne pravosodne uprave (USKOK) v zvezi z obtožbami, ki vključujejo nekdanjega župana Splita Željka Keruma, njegovega nečaka Igorja Sapunarja in nekdanjega občinskega uslužbenca Andrije Polića. Trio se sooča z obtožbami, povezanimi z nezakonito legalizacijo gradbenih projektov v kompleksu Pršut v Kašteli Štafiliću. Po preiskavi je Polić, medtem ko je delal kot višji strokovnjak za prostorsko načrtovanje in gradnjo za občino Kaštela, domnevno olajšal legalizacijo stavb, zgrajenih po juniju 2011, kljub temu, da niso izpolnjevali zakonskih zahtev. Kerum in Sapunar zanikajo kakršne koli nepravilnosti in trdijo, da so zgolj delovali v okviru svojih vlog. Preiskava kaže, da nekatere konstrukcije niso bile vidne na ortofotokarti iz leta 2011, ki jo je zagotovil državni geodetski urad, in se niso ujemale z velikostjo in površino, opisanimi v dokumentaciji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o tekoči pravni preiskavi, ki vključuje javne uslužbence in domnevno zlorabo oblasti.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source, detailing the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation into the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is presented in a neutral manner, focusing on the factual aspects of the investigation without injecting personal opinion.
Željko Kerum, znana lokalna osebnost, je padel iz milosti zaradi polemik, ki so obkrožale njegovo restavracijo "Pršut" v Kaštel Štafiliću. Ta ustanova je postala osrednja v velikem političnem in gradbenem škandalu v Dalmaciji, potem ko so mediji postavili vprašanja o njeni zakonitosti in kako je bila legalizirana. Leta 2019 je gradbeni inšpekcijski pregled ugotovil, da je bila struktura zgrajena brez ustreznih dovoljenj na zemljišču, razvrščenem kot "zlasti dragoceno orodno zemljišče", kar je privedlo do naloga za njeno odstranitev, ki ni bila nikoli izvršena. V začetku leta 2021, med pandemijo, je restavracija gostila zasebno slavje, ki so ga obiskali več splitskih sodnikov, kar je privedlo do policijskih preiskav in glob za kršitev zdravstvenih predpisov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o sporu med Željko Kerumom in restavracijo "Pršut", ki podrobno opisuje različne incidente in pravne težave, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article thoroughly covers the background of the case, including the illegal construction of the restaurant and previous scandals, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains objective in presenting the facts and historical context surrounding Kerum's case without showing clear bias.
Željko Kerum, nekdanji župan Splite in politik, je bil aretiran zaradi več gradbenih in finančnih kaznivih dejanj. Med najpomembnejšimi je nezakonita gradnja njegove restavracije "Pršut" v Kaštelimi, kjer je gradbena inšpekcija že prej ugotovila nezakonito gradnjo, Kerum pa še naprej razvija poslovne projekte brez dokumentov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so podrobni dokazi o nezakonitih dejavnostih uglednega politika, ki se osredotočajo na njegovo zlorabo javnih virov in korupcijo.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately describes the reasons behind Kerum's arrest, referencing the primary source document and providing detailed information about the investigation.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains an objective stance, presenting the facts of the investigation and the charges against Kerum without overtly favoring any side.
Željko Kerum, nekdanji gradski gradonačelnik, je bil aretiran skupaj s sinom Igorom Sapunarom in Tomislavom Režićem, lastniki podjetja 'Lazina' d.o.o., zaradi preiskave o znani korupciji 'Pršut' v Kaštelu Štafiliću. Istraživačka akcija povezana z nezakonitim gradjenjem objektov na kmetijski zemlji brez dovoljenja, ki je bila sprožena še leta 2019. Čeprav je bilo izdano odločanje o rušenju, ni bilo dokazano, pa bo v letu 2023 gradske službe izdala odločanje o izvedenem stanju, ki bo prispevalo k nastanku preiskave. Kerum je bil zaprt v zadnjem letu zaradi vožnje pod upravnim nadzorom ZDA. Začelo se je preiskovanje koruptivnih dejanj, od katerih naj bi se po zaslišanju osumljenca vprašali tudi ženske.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski dogodki v zvezi s sodnimi postopki proti Željku Kerumu in njegovim sodelavcem, pri čemer je poudarek na preiskavi nezakonite gradnje gostilne "Pršut".
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article presents facts from the primary source accurately, including the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation into the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language.
Kerum je bil aretiran med koncertom v Veliki Luci s svojo družino, kjer so mu se pridružili tudi njegov nečak Igor Sapunar in Andrija Polić, predsednik Splitske športne zveze. Polić je že prej izdal dovoljenja za Kerumovo nepremičnino, ki niso bila v skladu z zakonskimi pogoji. V članku je poudarjeno pomanjkanje presenečenja med posamezniki v Veliki Luci. Kerumov nečak Igor Sapunar je bil aretiran brez intervjuja RTL-a Rade Županović, ki je opozoril, da je v zvezi z legalizacijo restavracij v Kasteli in z njimi povezanih nepremičnin. Kerum je bil aretiran med koncertom v Veliki Luci s svojo družino, kjer so mu se pridružili tudi njegov nečak Igor Sapunar in Andrija Polić, predsednik Splitske športne zveze.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so aretacije opredeljene kot del širšega vzorca korupcije, v katero so vključeni lokalni uradniki in njihovi sodelavci, kar se ujema z levičarskimi narrativi, ki kritizirajo politične elite in sistemsko korupcijo.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article closely follows the primary source, accurately reporting the arrest of Kerum and the investigation into corruption. It includes direct quotes from the lawyer and official statements, reflecting the core facts without significant deviation.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both the actions of the authorities and the responses from the defense without leaning toward either side.
Članek poroča o preiskavi, ki jo je državno tožilstvo (USKOK) sprožilo zoper nekdanjega uslužbenca mesta Kastel, Andreja Polića, Želja Keruma in njegovega vnuka Igora Sapunara, v zvezi z domnevno nezakonito legalizacijo stavb v nekdanjem objektu Konoba Pršut, ki je zdaj znan kot Hacijenda Amora. Polić je bil prvi obtoženi, Kerum drugi in Sapunar tretji, ki se soočajo z obtožbami zlorabe položaja in spodbujanja take zlorabe. V preiskavi trdijo, da so po juniju 2011 iskali pravno priznanje nezakonito zgrajenih struktur, kar je kršilo zakonske zahteve. Trdijo, da je Polić kot višji specialist za prostorsko načrtovanje in gradnjo v avgustu 2022 nepravilno izdal poročilo, v katerem je napačno navedel, da na zemljevidu iz leta 2011 obstajajo nezakonite konstrukcije, čeprav na tem zemljevidu niso vidne. Namesto tega je uporabil zemljevid iz leta 2017, kjer so bile vse tri osebe jasno vidne.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejstva preiskave, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli posebno politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the details of the investigation into Kerum and his associates, aligning with the primary source document and providing relevant legal information.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, though it does include some commentary from the defense lawyers.
Željko Kerum, nekdanji splitski gradonačelnik in poduzetnik, je bil aretiran v okviru akcije USKOK-a zaradi sumnje v koruptivne kazenske dejanja. Akcija se provodi na območju Splitsko-dalmatinske in Dubrovačko-neretvanske županije in vključuje več oseb. Uskok je potrdil aretacijo po službenem izboru in naveo da će nakon ispitivanja donijeti odluku o daljnem postupanju. Bivši splitski vijećnik Bojan Ivošević je incident komentiral na Facebooku in poudaril pomembnost neovisnoginarstva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Novice so nevtralne, prikazane brez jasnega tujega ali lokalnega vidika. Napominje se, da so kot zakonska mjera, politične reakcije izražene brez očitnega izražanja besed. Čeprav gre za politični subjekt, besedilo ne kaže znane tuje manipulacije.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reflects the arrest of Željko Kerum and the involvement of USKOK, matching the primary source document. It provides relevant details about the investigation and the individuals involved.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the facts of the arrest and the ongoing investigation without overt bias.
Nekdanji župan Splita in podjetnik Željko Kerum je bil v sredo v Veliki Luči aretiran v okviru operacije, povezane s škandalom "Konoba Pršut". Aretacija je sprožila spomine na njegovo sporno kariero, v kateri je iz revščine v Dalmaciji postal simbol prehodnega uspeha, politične moči in spektakularnega poslovnega padca. Njegova življenjska zgodba, ki se je začela v vasi Ogorje in se preselila v Split leta 1974, vključuje delo kot operater rudarske opreme, kasneje je služil v Iraku pod Sadamom Huseinom in sčasoma ustanovil uspešno maloprodajno cesarstvo s podjetji, kot je nakupovalni center Joker. Na vrhuncu svojega bogastva je zaposlil več kot 1.000 ljudi in imel ocenjeno neto vrednost 200 milijonov evrov. Vendar ga poslovni uspeh ni zadovoljil, kar je privedlo do nadaljnjih ambicij, ki so na koncu pripeljale do pravnih težav.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled Kerumovega življenja in kariere, poudarja njegove dosežke in polemike, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal nobeno posebno politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article provides a comprehensive overview of Kerum's life and career, aligning with the primary source document and offering additional context.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the information in a somewhat narrative style, which may slightly affect its perceived neutrality.
V članku so obravnavane politične posledice aretacije Željka Keruma, predsednika Hrvaške državljanske stranke (HGS) in nekdanjega župana Splita, ki je bil pridržan zaradi nezakonite gradnje svoje vile v Kaštel Štafiliću. Kerum, ključni koalicijski partner HDZ v mestnem svetu Splita, je preklical mandat in ne sodeluje v dejavnostih sveta. V članku so poudarjene pomisleki v političnih krogih v Splitu, da Kerum morda ne bi iz zapora izpodbijal sedanje uprave, saj bi to ogrožalo njegov politični vpliv. Medtem pa Tomislav Šuta, župan Splita in vodja HDZ v mestu, trdi, da se sodelovanje s Kerumom nadaljuje, poudarja pa, da pravni postopki obravnavajo oblasti. Vendar nekateri člani HDZ menijo, da ta situacija predstavlja priložnost za nove volitve, saj je Šutajeva avtoriteta v mestnem svetu odvisna od podpore Davorja Matijeviča in vpliva neodvisnih voditeljev Splita, vključno z njegovim bivšim voditeljem SDPP, ter da je Kerum zdaj zagotovil tudi lukrativne položaje in vprašanja o korupciji v lokalnih podjetjih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je navedeno, da je Kerum zaprt, kar bi lahko privedlo do novih volitev in prekinitve njegovega vpliva.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides a clear account of the search at Kerum’s home, including the time frame, actions taken by investigators, and the involvement of media. It aligns closely with the Telegram report and offers specific details about the operation without introducing conflicting information.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article uses descriptive language to convey the atmosphere during the operation, which could be seen as more journalistic style than strictly objective reporting. However, it maintains a neutral tone overall.
Zastopnica Sabora in predsednica stranke Centar Marijana Puljak je komentirala aretacijo Željke Kerume, nekdanjega gradonačelnika Splite in predsednika Hrvaške državljanske stranke (HGS), ki je bila danes v Veliki Luci na Korčuli obsojena zaradi obtožb za kriminal in korupcijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je kritizirana korupcija in kriminalna omrežja v vladajoči stranki (HDZ), ki je povezana z desnico.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides detailed background on how the investigation into Kerum began, including the initial inquiry by the journalist and the subsequent discovery of irregularities. It accurately reflects the timeline and events described in the Telegram report, offering additional context without co
Zakaj objektivnost (75): While informative, the article has a slightly narrative tone, describing the events in a somewhat dramatic manner. This could be seen as leaning toward storytelling rather than purely factual reporting, though it remains largely neutral.
V članku so obravnavani novi dogodki v preiskavi Željka Keruma, Andrije Polića in Igorja Sapunarja, s poudarkom na obtožbah zlorabe položaja in spodbujanju take zlorabe. Po navedbah ministrstva za notranje zadeve (MUP) je Polić kot višji strokovnjak za prostorsko načrtovanje in gradnjo za mesto Kaštela na zahtevo Keruma in Sapunarja med oktobrom 2017 in januarjem 2023 domnevno izdal odločitve o legalizaciji nezakonito zgrajenih objektov. Te odločitve so bile sprejete kljub temu, da je vedel, da pogoji za legalizacijo teh objektov niso bili izpolnjeni. V članku je poudarjeno, da je Polić v uradni opombi uporabil lažne informacije, s sklicevanjem na ortofotokarto iz leta 2017 namesto na zemljevid iz leta 2011, na katerem ni bilo vidnih objektov. To je Kerumu in njegovemu podjetju omogočilo gradnjo znatno večjih objektov zunaj mestnega načrta, kjer je bila taka gradnja prepovedana.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske podrobnosti o tekoči kazenski preiskavi, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and others, but includes some interpretative statements that may not be directly supported by the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the potential for an investigative detention, which might suggest a particular viewpoint.
Preiskava kaže, da je med oktobrom 2017 in januarjem 2023 Polić kot višji tehnični pomočnik za prostorsko načrtovanje in gradnjo v mestu Kaštela nezakonito olajšal Kerum in njegovo podjetje z izdajo odločitev o legalizaciji stavb, ki so bile nezakonito zgrajene po juniju 2011. Polić naj bi med upravnimi postopki posredoval lažne informacije, pri čemer je uporabil zastarele zemljevide, da bi upravičil legalizacijo zgradb, ki niso bile vidne na ortofotografiji iz leta 2011. Odločba, ki je bila izdana januarja 2023, je dovolila legalizacijo petih stavb, ki so presegle velikost 1.655 kvadratnih metrov in so bile zgrajene zunaj urbanističnega načrta Kaštele.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske podrobnosti o tekoči preiskavi, ki vključuje pomembne posameznike in domnevno kršitev lokalne uprave.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and others, but includes some interpretative statements that may not be directly supported by the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the potential for an investigative detention, which might suggest a particular viewpoint.
Članek pripoveduje, kako je novinar Denis Mahmutović odkril korupcijo, povezano z Željkom Kerumom, lokalno osebnostjo, ki je sodelovala v nezakonitih gradbenih dejavnostih. Mahmutović je sprožil preiskavo, s tem ko je vprašal pristojne organe o gradbenih dovoljenjih za restavracijo "Pršut", ki se nahaja na naslovu 1134/1 in 1134/5 v Kaštel Štafiliću. Restavracija je bila odprta le mesec dni prej, Kerum pa jo je agresivno promoviral. Mahmutovićeva preiskava je razkrila, da je bila gradnja nezakonita, saj je bila zgrajena na zaščiteni kmetijski zemlji. Kljub temu je gradnja nadaljevala, vključno z dodajanjem več stavb in objektov. Leta 2023 so mestne oblasti pravno priznale strukture in navedle zastarele zračne karte, ki so nakazale, da so stavbe obstajale od leta 2011.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se zadeva obravnava kot primer korupcije in zlorabe moči, poudarjajo pa se nezakonitost gradnje Keruma in soudeležba lokalnih oblasti.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the situation around Kerum’s arrest, including his role in the coalition and the political implications. It references the primary source document and adds context about the ongoing investigations. No significant discrepancies are noted.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): There is a subtle political undertone, particularly in the suggestion that the arrest might be an opportunity for new elections. While this is a reasonable interpretation, it introduces a potential bias in framing the event.
Željko Kerum, nekdanji župan Splite, je bil aretiran po preiskavi svojega doma v Mejami, ki je trajala dve leti. Preiskovalci so ga odpeljali v službenem vozilu skozi prostor garaže, njegovi tesni sodelavci pa so pomagali organizirati postopek.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o policijski operaciji, ki vključuje nekdanjega župana, povezanega s preiskavo korupcije.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the arrest and the police procedures involved, including the use of handcuffs and the presence of journalists. It matches the details from the Telegram report and provides visual context through photos, which is appropriate for a news story.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat sensational, emphasizing the dramatic elements of the arrest and the use of handcuffs. While not overtly biased, it leans toward a more engaging narrative style.
Željko Kerum, nekadašnji gradonačelnik Splita in predsednik Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), je bil aretiran v Veloj Luci na Korčuli, po neslužbenem izvoru blizu policije. Uhićenje je povezano z incidentom s konobom Pršut v Kaštel Štafiliću, kjer je Kerum brez prava izgradio objekt, v procesu legalizacije tog objekta. Portal je potrdil, da je Kerum aretiran v ranem satima četvrtka, in ni bilo, kar bi lahko špekulili mediji. Policija je stigla na njegovem brodu v šest sati zjutraj, po sinočnem koncertu. Uhićeni so bili njegovi sodelavci, sorodniki in sodelavci Igor Žapunar, kot tudi sodelavci Tomislav Režić.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski dogodki v zvezi z aretacijo Željka Keruma, pomembne politične osebnosti, ne da bi javno podprli ali kritizirali katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article aligns closely with the primary source, mentioning Kerum's arrest, the 'Konoba Pršut' affair, and the involvement of other individuals. It provides accurate contextual information.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, though it includes some commentary on the political implications of the arrest.
Kerum, nekdanji župan in trenutni koalicijski partner vladajoče hrvaške stranke HDZ v Splitu, je bil aretiran med koncertom. Polić, trenutno predsednik Splitske športne zveze in nekdanji kandidat za vodilni položaj v Splitu, je Kerumu pomagal skozi pravno vprašljiv proces, ki je omogočil širitev restavracije "Pršut" in sorodnih stavb. Kljub pregledu leta 2019, ki je ugotovil nezakonito gradnjo, je Kerum nadaljeval z gradnjo, Polić pa je igral vlogo pri legitimizaciji teh struktur prek dokumentov, ki so se sklicevali na nepostoječe stavbe iz leta 2011.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek opisuje dejanja Andrije Polića in Zeljaka Keruma na način, ki nakazuje na sočustvovanje pri korupciji, poudarja pa njihovo vlogo pri omogočanju nezakonitih gradb in morebitni zlorabi javnih služb.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately conveys the charges against Kerum and others, but uses more emotive language such as 'ključni dokaz' (key evidence) which could imply a stronger case than what is stated in the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone is slightly biased towards emphasizing the significance of the evidence against Kerum, potentially influencing reader perception.
Željko Kerum, hrvaški političar, je bil aretiran v Veliki Luci pod obtožbo korupcijskega kazenskega dejanja, povezanega s konobom Pršut, ki je dobil nezakonito državljansko licenco. Njegov odvetnik, Željko Gulišija, je izjavil, da je večino informacij o primeru dobil iz medijev in da je imel samo kratek stik s Kerumom. Gulišija je poudaril, da Kerum načrtuje aktivno braniti svoj sudbinu, dovoliti obtožbe in odgovarjati na vprašanja USKOK-a. Prav tako je izrazil sumnjo, da bi policija lahko poiskala, ker ni bilo ugotovljeno nič kompromitirajoče. Istražalski proces bo nadaljeval v USKOKu, a akcija bo tudi odobravala preiskavo Kerumov ne Igora Sapunova, ki je v podjetju brez dokumentov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja informacije o politični osebnosti, ki je predmet preiskave zaradi obtožb, povezanih s korupcijo, vendar ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča.
Zakaj dejstva (88): This article provides detailed information about the arrest, including the time, location, and the involvement of the USKOK and police. It aligns closely with the primary source document and includes statements from Kerum’s lawyer, who confirms the lack of direct contact and reliance on media for in
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on facts and statements from officials and lawyers. There is minimal editorializing, though there is a slight emphasis on the legal process and the implications of the arrest.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Croatia
