The trial of social media influencer and self-styled relationship therapist Okoro Blessing Nkiruka, known as Blessing CEO, was adjourned on Wednesday after she failed to appear before the Federal High Court in Ikoyi due to ill health. The trial judge, Justice D.I. Dipeolu, granted the adjournment following a request from the defense counsel, P.I. Nwafuru, who informed the court that the Nigerian Correctional Service had stated the defendant was indisposed and could not be produced in court. Nwafuru assured the court that a medical report detailing Blessing CEO's condition would be presented at the next hearing. The case is now set to resume on 20 July. Blessing CEO faces two counts of alleged fraud involving ₦36 million, charged by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The charges relate to obtaining funds under false pretenses and theft, specifically concerning a six-bedroom detached duplex in Lekki. The EFCC alleges that Blessing CEO misrepresented the property's availability to secure the funds, which were reportedly transferred into two bank accounts linked to her. She has pleaded not guilty to these charges. Earlier in the proceedings, the defense had informed the court that both parties were exploring an out-of-court settlement, revealing that Blessing CEO had already refunded ₦24 million of the disputed amount. However, the EFCC opposed any delay, emphasizing that criminal prosecution on behalf of the federal government could not be suspended during settlement negotiations. Despite this, the court allowed continued discussions while maintaining the criminal proceedings. The EFCC's investigating officer, Bufa Regina Okangbe, testified that forensic analysis confirmed the disputed funds were paid into two bank accounts allegedly linked to Blessing CEO: ₦25 million into a Guaranty Trust Bank account and ₦11 million into an Access Bank account. Additionally, the investigator stated that the Lekki property belonged to its owner, Tunbosun Osobu, who had leased it to Blessing CEO. The complainant, Ifeyinwa Nonye Okoye, had started renovating the property before the landlord requested her to vacate. The trial of former Benue State Governor Gabriel Suswam and his former Commissioner for Finance, Omadachi Okolobia, on charges of money laundering involving ₦3.1 billion was adjourned until 25 September. The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Judge Peter Lifu, granted the adjournment despite the EFCC's request for the matter to be heard on Friday. The case, which has been ongoing for 11 years, has moved between three different judges, with the current judge being the fifth to handle it. The prosecution urged the court not to prolong the proceedings further, citing the lengthy duration of the trial. The EFCC arraigned Suswam and Okolobia in November 2015 on 11 charges of conspiracy and money laundering related to the diversion of ₦3.1 billion from the sale of Benue State Government shares. Both men pleaded not guilty, and the case has faced multiple delays. During the recent proceedings, the defense submitted that both Suswam and Okolobia could not attend due to ill health, prompting the prosecution to oppose the adjournment. The prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs, argued that the case should have concluded more than a year ago and accused Suswam of undermining the justice system. In another development, the Federal High Court in Abuja granted bail to former Managing Director of the Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company Limited, Jimoh Yisawu, on a money-laundering charge. The court ordered a bail amount of ₦500 million, with a surety in like sum. The defense lawyer, Wale Balogun, argued for the release of his client, while the prosecution opposed the bail application. Justice Inyang Ekwo ruled in favor of the bail, noting that the charges included bailable offenses. The court directed Yisawu to surrender his international passport and prohibited travel outside the country without permission. The case was adjourned to October 25, 26, and 27 for trial. Additionally, the court granted bail to the leader of the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association, with a bail amount of ₦2 billion. As part of the bail conditions, the judge required one of the sureties to be an Abuja resident with a three-year tax clearance certificate. This decision highlights the ongoing efforts by the judiciary to balance the rights of the accused with the need to ensure the integrity of the legal process. The trial of former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido and his two sons over alleged ₦1.35 billion fraud stalled on Monday due to the absence of the lead defense lawyer, Joe Agi, who cited health reasons. The prosecution lawyer, Chile Okoroma, requested a one-day adjournment, urging the court to allow another member of the defense team to appear. The case, which has been in court since 2015, involves allegations of money laundering, kickbacks, and fictitious contract awards during Lamido's tenure as governor. The defense opened its case in June, focusing on documents obtained through a subpoena issued to the EFCC chairman. An investigator produced by the commission admitted under cross-examination that he was not a member of the investigative team, leading to disputes over the admissibility of the documents. The court ultimately admitted the documents into evidence, setting the stage for further proceedings.
6 poročil
Premium Times NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 6 dneviSodišče je odložilo sojenje nad družabno medijsko vplivno žensko Blessing CEO (Okoro Blessing Nkiruka) do 20. julija 2024, potem ko se ni pojavila na sodišču zaradi bolezni. Zvezno višje sodišče v Ikoyiju je odobrilo preložitev po tem, ko je zagovornik trdil, da je bila bolna in je potrebovala zdravniško poročilo. Blessing CEO se sooča z obtožbami goljufije v zvezi z domnevno prevaro 36 milijonov , ki vključuje najem nepremičnine v Lagosu. Komisija za gospodarske in finančne zločine (EFCC) trdi, da je napačno predstavila razpoložljivost nepremičnine, kar je kaznovano po nigerijskem pravu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski pravni postopki brez očitnega ideološkega nagibanja. Poroča o primeru goljufije z visokim profilom, ki vključuje javne osebe, s poudarkom na sodnih ukrepih in pravnih argumentih, namesto da bi se odločil za stran.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article provides specific details such as the date of the adjournment, the name of the judge, the defense lawyer, and the nature of the charges. It also references previous reporting by Premium Times regarding the out-of-court settlement discussions. These details align with what can be reasonab
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the facts neutrally, using standard legal terminology and avoiding overtly biased language. However, it refers to the defendant as 'self-styled relationship therapist' which slightly frames her profession in a way that might imply skepticism about her credibility.
Vanguard NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 90včerajKomisija za gospodarske in finančne zločine (EFCC) v Nigeriji je zanikala viralno govorico na družbenih omrežjih, v kateri je trdila, da izvaja tajno zaposlovanje. EFCC je pojasnila trditev prek svojega preverjenega X računa, ki je objavo označil kot "FAKE NEWS" in pozvala Nigerijce, naj ignorirajo lažne informacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja popravek dejstev iz uradnega vira (EFCC) v zvezi z napačno govorico. Medtem ko zadeva vključuje vladne agencije in zaupanje javnosti, je okvir ostaja nevtralen, osredotočen na razkrivanje dezinformacij, ne pa na spodbujanje političnega dnevnega reda.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports that the EFCC debunked a viral rumor about secret recruitment, citing their official statement and providing details of the false claim. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that such rumors are often spread by fraudsters. The article presents facts without embell
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the EFCC’s official stance without expressing personal opinion or bias. It provides factual information and quotes the commission’s statements without emotive language.
Premium Times NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 5 dnevi Sodišče odloži zaključne argumente v 11-letnem primeru goljufije bivšega guvernerja Suswama do septembraZvezno visoko sodišče v Abuji je do 25. septembra odložilo končne argumente v 11-letnem sojenju za pranje denarja v višini 3,1 milijarde naira bivšega guvernerja države Benue Gabriela Suswama do 25. septembra. Prekinitev se je zgodila kljub zahtevi Komisije za gospodarske in finančne zločine (EFCC) za nadaljevanje. Zadeva, v kateri so vpleteni Suswam in njegov nekdanji finančni komisar Omadachi Okolobia, se je soočila z večkratnimi zamudami v svojem desetletnem obdobju. Med obravnavo je tožilstvo pozvalo sodišče, naj ne podaljša zamude, pri čemer je ugotovilo, da je zadevo obravnavalo pet različnih sodnikov. Obramba je trdila, da je Suswam bolan in zahtevala odlog, to pa je tožilstvo nasprotovalo, obtožilo pa je Suswama, da spodkopava sodni proces.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis sodnega postopka, poudarja oba vprašanja tožilstva glede dolgotrajne zamude in obrambe o bolezni.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on the adjournment of an 11-year-old fraud trial of former Gov. Suswam, citing the EFCC's request and the prosecution's argument. It provides details about the case timeline, charges, and legal procedures, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the case has been delayed mu
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the court's decision and the arguments from both sides in a neutral manner, though there is slight emphasis on the length of the case and the prosecution's concerns. The tone remains professional and does not show strong bias.
Vanguard NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75včeraj Obtožen za pranje denarja: bivši direktor rafinerije Yisawu dobi varščino 500 milijonov nairaZvezno višje sodišče v Abuji je nekdanjemu direktorju podjetja Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company Limited, Jimohu Yisawu, odobrilo varščino v višini 500 milijonov naira, potem ko je priznal, da ni kriv v osmih obtožbah pranja denarja. Obtožbe je vložila Komisija za gospodarske in finančne zločine (EFCC), ki trdi, da je Yisawu pretvoril več kot 789.950 dolarjev nezakonitih sredstev in plačal v gotovini v skupnem znesku 912.550 dolarjev, ne da bi uporabil finančne institucije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je uravnotežen opis sodnega postopka, v katerem so podrobno opisane obtožbe tožilstva in argumenti obrambe. Poroča o sodni odločitvi, ki temelji na zakonskih statutih, in ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča niti do obtoženega niti do organa, ki toži.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article details the bail grant to former MD Jimoh Yisawu, including specific charges and legal references. It accurately reports the EFCC's allegations and the defense's arguments, providing relevant legal context. Information aligns with typical judicial procedures and is consistent with simila
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents both the defense and prosecution positions, though the prosecution's opposition to bail is given more space. The tone remains formal and does not appear to favor either side significantly.
Premium Times NigeriaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 65včeraj Domnevno pranje denarja: Sodišče odobri varščino za vodjo Miyetti Alaha v višini 2 milijard nairaSodišče v Nigeriji je odobrilo varščino vodji organizacije Miyetti Allah, znanega združenja živinorejcev, v višini 2 milijarde naira. Kot del pogojev varščine je sodnik zahteval, da je eden od poročevalcev prebivalec Abuje, ki ima triletno potrdilo o davčni potrditvi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o sodni odločitvi glede pogojev varščine za pomembno osebnost, ki je povezana z močno etnično skupino in organizacijo za zagovorništvo.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article appears incomplete and lacks substantial content beyond a headline and a brief mention of bail. There is no detailed reporting on the case, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy. The lack of context reduces its reliability as a source.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article is very brief and lacks depth, making it hard to determine if it shows bias. However, the limited content suggests a more objective approach, though it fails to provide sufficient information for proper evaluation.
Premium Times NigeriaNeodvisenSredinavčeraj Sodba bivšega guvernerja Lamidoja zaradi goljufije v višini 1,35 milijarde naira se je ustavila zaradi odsotnosti branilca.Sodišče v Abuji je v ponedeljek ustavilo sojenje proti nekdanjemu guvernerju države Jigawa Sule Lamido in njegovim sinovom zaradi obtožb goljufije v višini 1,35 milijarde naira zaradi odsotnosti vodilnega odvetnika za obrambo Joeja Agija, ki je navedel zdravstvene razloge.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je uravnotežen opis sodnega postopka brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja. Poroča o zamudih, ki jih je povzročila odsotnost odvetnika obrambe, in vključuje stališča tako tožilstva kot sodišča.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
NG
