Il Consiglio europeo di Dublino ha approvato la proposta di risoluzione del Parlamento europeo che prevede l'introduzione di un sistema di controllo delle emissioni di CO2 per le emissioni di CO2 provenienti dai combustibili fossili.

The White House is considering extending the Jones Act waiver, which would allow foreign-flagged ships to transport goods between U.S. ports, amid growing concerns over rising fuel prices and potential supply disruptions due to heightened tensions with Iran. Two sources familiar with the deliberations told Reuters that the Trump administration is evaluating whether to grant a new waiver, potentially with geographic limitations, to ensure greater flexibility in moving critical supplies. The current waiver, issued under the previous administration, expires on August 16, and officials are preparing for a possible decision before the end of July. A White House spokesperson emphasized that President Trump’s prior actions to suspend the Jones Act have contributed to preventing nationwide supply chain issues, and the administration continues to monitor its impact. The Jones Act, officially called the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, mandates that all cargo transported between U.S. ports must be carried on vessels that are American-built, owned by U.S. entities, registered under the U.S. flag, and operated by crews predominantly composed of U.S. citizens or permanent residents. This law aims to sustain the U.S. merchant marine industry by ensuring domestic shipbuilding and employment. However, during times of crisis, such as the recent escalation in hostilities with Iran, the strict requirements of the Jones Act can hinder the rapid movement of essential commodities. With Iranian forces reportedly threatening oil exports through the strategic Strait of Hormuz, the demand for increased shipping capacity has intensified, prompting calls for temporary exemptions. The current situation highlights the tension between economic interests and regulatory constraints. The Jones Act waiver, when active, permits foreign-flagged vessels to operate within U.S. waters, thereby expanding the available fleet for transporting goods. This measure is often invoked to mitigate price surges by enhancing the efficiency of domestic logistics. In early 2022, the Biden administration briefly waived the Jones Act for a single vessel, but such limited measures were deemed insufficient to address broader supply challenges. Now, with the possibility of further conflicts in the region, there is renewed pressure to implement more extensive waivers to maintain stability in energy markets. Officials from the Energy, Transportation, and Interior departments convened earlier this week to explore potential modifications to the existing waiver framework. Discussions centered on balancing the need for increased shipping capacity with the goal of preserving U.S. maritime industries. Some stakeholders, including representatives from the maritime sector and conservative lawmakers, have expressed concern over the long-term implications of prolonged waivers, arguing that they could undermine domestic shipbuilding and workforce development. Conversely, others contend that temporary exemptions are necessary to safeguard national security and economic resilience in times of geopolitical uncertainty. The administration’s stance reflects a pragmatic approach to managing both immediate logistical demands and long-term policy objectives. While the current waiver is set to expire in late August, the administration is assessing whether to extend it, possibly with conditions that restrict its application to specific regions or types of cargo. This strategy would aim to minimize the risk of undermining the U.S. maritime sector while still providing relief during periods of heightened volatility. A senior White House official noted that the administration is committed to maintaining oversight of how these waivers are utilized, ensuring that they serve their intended purpose without compromising broader economic goals. As the situation in the Persian Gulf continues to evolve, the outcome of these deliberations will likely have far-reaching consequences for U.S. energy markets and international trade. The decision to extend or modify the Jones Act waiver will depend on a careful evaluation of current threats, economic impacts, and the effectiveness of past policies. Regardless of the final determination, the ongoing debate underscores the complex interplay between regulation, geopolitics, and market dynamics in shaping global commerce.