La California conta ancora i voti dal 2 giugno.

Donald Trump, former President of the United States, made controversial remarks during an interview with NBC News' *Meet the Press* on June 5, 2026, when he claimed that the pace of ballot counting in California proved the election was "rigged." This statement came amid ongoing discussions about the delayed certification of results following the June 2 primary election, which included high-stakes races for governor and mayor of Los Angeles. Trump's remarks, which were met with skepticism and outright dismissal by the moderator, Kristen Welker, led to a dramatic conclusion to the interview, with Trump walking out shortly after.

The claim that California's ballot-counting process indicates election fraud is rooted in a misunderstanding of the state's electoral procedures. California, home to approximately 23 million registered voters, operates under a unique system that relies heavily on mail-in voting. According to state law, ballots must be postmarked by Election Day and received within seven days afterward to be valid. This extended window, combined with the sheer volume of mail ballots—many of which are submitted at drop boxes or by mail—creates a natural delay in the verification and counting process. For instance, in the 2024 election, roughly 19% of voters cast ballots in person, while the rest opted for mail-in options.

The complexity of verifying each mail ballot contributes significantly to the prolonged counting period. Each ballot requires comparison of the voter's signature against records in the county's database. If discrepancies arise, voters must be notified and given the chance to confirm their identities. These steps, though essential for ensuring election integrity, contribute to the slower pace compared to states with predominantly in-person voting systems.

Experts such as Katharine Campos, a spokesperson for the Yolo County Elections Office, emphasize that the delays are not indicative of fraud but rather a reflection of the rigorous verification protocols necessary to maintain trust in the electoral process. Despite these efforts, public frustration persists, particularly among those who perceive the lengthy process as a sign of systemic issues or manipulation.

In response to Trump's allegations, Governor Gavin Newsom had previously urged election officials to expedite the counting process to counteract unfounded conspiracy theories surrounding election integrity. However, Trump's repeated assertions about election rigging have contributed to a broader narrative of distrust, despite the absence of credible evidence supporting his claims.

As of June 8, 2026, about 72% of votes in the gubernatorial race had been tallied, with Democrat Xavier Becerra leading the field. Meanwhile, in the Los Angeles mayor's race, incumbent Karen Bass had secured enough votes to advance to the general election, although the outcome remained uncertain due to the ongoing count. The situation highlights the challenges faced by election administrators in balancing the need for accuracy with the expectations of timely results.

The controversy surrounding Trump's remarks underscores the importance of clear communication about electoral processes and the potential consequences of misinformation. While the pace of ballot counting in California remains a subject of discussion, it is crucial to distinguish between legitimate concerns about election integrity and baseless accusations of fraud. As the state continues to finalize its results, the focus should remain on reinforcing public confidence in the democratic process through transparency and adherence to established legal frameworks.