Sud u Milanu je oslobodio Youssefa Sihera, 30-godišnjeg aktivista povezanog s pokretom 17. listopada, nakon što je odbacio optužbe za nasilno podsticanje zločina povezanih s terorizmom. Istražni sudac Tiziana Landoni presudio je da Siherove poruke na internetu nisu zagovarale nasilne akcije, već su promovirale kolektivnu svijest i legitimni ustavni prosvjed protiv trenutne vladine politike. Ova odluka je u direktnoj suprotnosti s prethodnim zahtjevom tužitelja za pritvor, koji je tvrdio da su njegove komunikacije imale za cilj zastrašivanje stanovništva i podršku logističkoj koordinaciji za nemire. Sudac je također utvrdio da Siher nije imao izravnu odgovornost za nasilne poruke drugih korisnika u Telegram razgovorima ili na stranicama pokreta na Instagramu. Odvjetnici obrane su pokazali da bi Siher mogao uskoro nastaviti objavljivati na internetu, dok je tužiteljstvo ranije karakteriziralo njegove aktivnosti kao dio strategije stvaranja kaosa i potkopavanja demokratskog poretka.
The release of Youssef Siher by a Milan judge has ignited a fierce political dispute, culminating in a heated on-air confrontation during a broadcast on La7. The incident involves Simonetta Matone, a Forza Italia deputy and former magistrate, who clashed with Edmondo Bruti Liberati, the former chief prosecutor of Milan. The argument centered on the judicial decision to drop charges against Siher, a thirty-year-old activist associated with the October 17 movement. The exchange escalated until Matone threatened to leave the studio unless the host muted her guest. The legal basis for the release was established by Judge Tiziana Landoni, the investigating magistrate at the Milan court. She ruled that the detention order requested by prosecutors lacked merit. Specifically, she found no evidence of aggravated instigation to commit crimes linked to terrorism. The judge stated that Siher’s messages did not advocate for violent action but instead promoted a collective mobilization of protest against government policies. She characterized his intent as fostering a collective conscience, citing constitutional freedoms. This ruling directly contradicted the position of the public prosecutor’s office, led by Prosecutor Marcello Viola and Deputy Prosecutor Francesca Crupi. They had argued that Siher’s social media strategy aimed to support demonstrators seeking chaos and to strengthen criminal intentions. The prosecution described the Telegram chats and Instagram pages used by Siher as logistical hubs for organizing networks. However, Judge Landoni rejected this view, noting that even violent posts by other users in those groups did not implicate Siher directly. She also dismissed the terror charge, stating there was no conduct capable of causing grave damage to the state or undermining the democratic order. During the television program, Bruti Liberati criticized Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s comments regarding the judge’s decision. He called the prime minister’s remarks an insult to the judiciary. He noted that the reference to terrorism in the initial prosecution file was so unfounded that the judge dismissed it in very few pages. Matone interrupted him repeatedly, leading to a breakdown in protocol. When Bruti Liberati addressed her as "madam," Matone protested that she should be called "honorable" or "doctor," arguing that he would not use such terms for a male colleague. Bruti Liberati insisted that he addresses everyone as madam or sir. Matone retorted that he uses "madam" only for his sister, not for professional peers. The debate shifted to the events of December 17, though Matone initially misstated the date before correcting herself. She accused Bruti Liberati of failing to distance himself from those incidents. Maurizio Acerbo, secretary of the Communist Refoundation party, interjected to suggest that distancing oneself from those events is difficult. Bruti Liberati reacted with frustration, asking what he needed to dissociate from and reminding the audience that he served as chief prosecutor in Milan for a lifetime. He highlighted that he had sent ISIS terrorists to trial, resulting in their convictions. Matone countered that he had done his job poorly. She also challenged his description of the indictment as vulgar, reminding him that the judicial office is not a local greengrocer. As the volume rose, Bruti Liberati attempted to maintain control, telling Matone to listen. Matone exploded, demanding silence from her opponent. She accused certain magistrates of arrogance, pointing to Bruti Liberati as an example. Bruti Liberati laughed and joked that he could dissociate himself from the assassination of King Umberto I if she wished. Matone turned to the host, David Parenzo, issuing an ultimatum. She demanded that they either cut the audio of her guest or she would walk out of the studio. She insisted that he needed to stay quiet. Meanwhile, members of the Council of Magistrates have requested the opening of a protective case for Judge Landoni. This move follows the public statements made by the Prime Minister regarding the non-validation of Siher’s detention. Siher remains under investigation for the alleged offenses. His defense attorneys, Benedetto Ciccarone and Yasmina Abu Sharar, indicated that he might resume posting online soon. They declined to discuss specific plans, stating that time will tell. The prosecution has not excluded the possibility of appealing the judge’s decision to the Review Court. The document titled "Revolution, Instructions for Use," which prosecutors viewed as a manual for clashes, was deemed by the judge to lack content encouraging violence. Instead, the judge interpreted Siher’s call to act like in France as a reference to the persistence of French protest movements.
Idi na primarne izvore (1)
Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.
Oštra verbalna svađa izbila je tijekom emitiranja talijanskog televizijskog programa "L'aria che tira" na La7, u kojem su sudjelovali zamjenik Forze Italije Simonetta Matone i bivši glavni tužitelj u Milanu Edmondo Bruti Liberati. Spor je bio usmjeren na oslobađanje Youssefa Sihera od strane milanske sudije Tiziane Landoni i naknadne kritike premijera Giorgia Melonija o sudskoj odluci. Bruti Liberati je branio presudu suda protiv Melonijevih primjedbi, dok je Matone osporavao njegovo profesionalno ponašanje i njegov stav o prošlim sigurnosnim incidentima. Razmjena je eskalirala u osobne uvrede u pogledu obraćanja i profesionalne kompetencije, što je potaknulo Matone da prijeti da će napustiti studio ako njen suradnik ne intervenira. Incident je istaknuo tekuće napetosti između političkih ličnosti i pravnih stručnjaka u vezi s nedavnim slučajevima povezanim s terorizmom u Italiji.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se izvještava o televizijskoj političkoj raspravi koristeći opisni, ali uglavnom neutralni jezik ("zapaljena", "verbalna svađa"). Ona predstavlja argumente obje strane, bez izričite podrške jedne nad drugom, usredotočavajući se na proceduralnu raspodjelu rasprave, a ne na zauzimanje stava.
Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides specific details regarding the TV show 'L'aria che tira', naming participants (Matone, Bruti Liberati, Parenzo) and quoting specific exchanges. It aligns with the broader context of the Siher case mentioned in other sources. However, as no primary transcript was available, the e
Zašto objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'Scontro al fulmicotone' (flashpoint clash) and describing the scene as having 'involuntary comic interludes.' While it reports the conflict, the framing emphasizes the chaotic and humorous nature of the dispute rather than treating it as a ser
Il GiornaleStranački povezanKonzervativnoČinjenice 80Objektivnost 60
Sud u Milanu je oslobodio Youssefa Sihera, 30-godišnjeg aktivista povezanog s pokretom 17. listopada, nakon što je odbacio optužbe za nasilno podsticanje zločina povezanih s terorizmom. Istražni sudac Tiziana Landoni presudio je da Siherove poruke na internetu nisu zagovarale nasilne akcije, već su promovirale kolektivnu svijest i legitimni ustavni prosvjed protiv trenutne vladine politike. Ova odluka je u direktnoj suprotnosti s prethodnim zahtjevom tužitelja za pritvor, koji je tvrdio da su njegove komunikacije imale za cilj zastrašivanje stanovništva i podršku logističkoj koordinaciji za nemire. Sudac je također utvrdio da Siher nije imao izravnu odgovornost za nasilne poruke drugih korisnika u Telegram razgovorima ili na stranicama pokreta na Instagramu. Odvjetnici obrane su pokazali da bi Siher mogao uskoro nastaviti objavljivati na internetu, dok je tužiteljstvo ranije karakteriziralo njegove aktivnosti kao dio strategije stvaranja kaosa i potkopavanja demokratskog poretka.
Procjena pristranosti (Konzervativno): U članku se oslobađanje pro-palestinskog aktivista prikazuje kao značajan neuspjeh tužiteljstva, koristeći snažan jezik kao što je "potpuno razbija" optužbe. Naglašava sudovo mišljenje da je aktivizam bio "legitimno ostvarivanje ustavnih sloboda"
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reflects the legal outcome described in the consensus (Siher released, judge rejected terrorism charges). It cites specific names (Judge Landoni, Prosecutors Crupi/Viola, Lawyers) and quotes the reasoning used by the court. However, it includes interpretive summaries of the me
Zašto objektivnost (60): The headline uses the label 'pro-Pal extremist,' which is a charged term that frames the subject negatively before the reader engages with the legal details. The body text contrasts the prosecutor's view with the judge's view but leans into the narrative that the prosecution's case was weak ('strazz
la RepubblicaNeovisan🔒SredinaČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 95
Odjel za profesionalne suce Visokog suda pravosuđa (CSM) u Italiji zatražio je pokretanje postupka zaštite Tiziane Landoni, istražne suce na sudu u Milanu. Ovaj potez je uslijedio nakon komentara premijera u vezi Landonijeve odluke da ne potvrdi uhićenje Youssefa Sihera. Zahtjev je usmjeren na zaštitu neovisnosti sudaca s obzirom na političku intervenciju na visokoj razini u određenom pravosudnom pitanju.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se izvještava o formalnoj institucionalnoj reakciji na miješanje političke ličnosti u sudski proces. Koristi neutralni, činjenični jezik ("zahtevan", "u vezi s izjavama") bez objave u uredničkom članku o osnovu uhićenja ili kritiziranja premijera ili sudaca. - Što?
Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument
Zašto objektivnost (95): The text is extremely dry and factual, typical of a wire service summary. It presents the action taken by the CSM without adding adjectives, opinions, or emotional coloring, maintaining high neutrality.
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.
progresivno
sredina
konzervativno
★
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.
Italy
