Prosvjedi po cijeloj Italiji, policijski napadi u Torinu i Bologni. U Veroni su zaustavili klince s noževima i petardama.

Italian police identified and detained a thirty-year-old man suspected of orchestrating recent unrest in Milan, authorities announced this week. The individual, named Youssef Siher, faces charges for aggravated incitement to commit crimes. Investigators linked him to the digital platform known as the October 17 Movement, which had scheduled new rallies across Italy following violent clashes in the Lombard capital earlier in the month. The detention marks a key step in a broader investigation involving more than 150 searches conducted across Milan, Monza, and twenty other cities, primarily within the Lombardy region. Siher, who has Moroccan origins, was described by officials as a geopolitical researcher and freelance journalist with ties to pro-Palestinian groups. His academic background includes a degree in communications and a master’s in political science from the State University of Milan. He previously worked as a research trainee at the Institute for International and Strategic Studies (ISPI), specializing in political Islam. Fluent in Arabic, Italian, English, and Spanish, he also collaborated with the daily newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano for nearly five years, including a period as a staff writer. Defense Minister Guido Crosetto characterized Siher not as a marginalized figure, but as someone deeply embedded in Italy’s intellectual circles, noting that his access to influential networks contributed to the scale of the disturbances. The October 17 Movement utilized social media channels, particularly Instagram and Telegram, to coordinate protests after initial riots erupted in Milan on Saturday and Sunday of the previous week. Following the initial violence, the group announced plans for further gatherings in multiple Italian cities. To evade law enforcement, organizers adopted tactics similar to clandestine rave parties. They canceled scheduled meetings in eight cities and delayed announcements until late afternoon. Group administrators stated they deleted subgroups for specific cities to avoid leaving written evidence for police. Messages circulated in chats included instructions to meet in public squares at specific times, with final locations revealed only thirty minutes prior to the start. One message extracted from a phone belonging to a young suspect in Milan read, "Bro calm down we are all together against the cops." Security forces deployed heavily to prevent a recurrence of the previous weekend's chaos. Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi confirmed that over 1,400 agents and military personnel operated in Milan alone, while fifteen mobile units totaling 5,800 officers were stationed nationwide. Despite these measures, tensions flared during demonstrations on Tuesday. In Milan, several thousand protesters, mostly university students, confronted police near Corso Venezia. Officers used batons to block the march at Via Borghetto, prompting nearby shops to lower their shutters out of fear of disorder. Similar incidents occurred in Bologna, where police charged demonstrators in Piazza dei Martiri after bottles and fireworks were thrown at security forces. Water cannons were deployed to disperse the crowd. In Verona, police detained approximately fifteen young individuals, many of them minors aged twelve to fourteen, during preventive checks. Authorities seized knives, chains, and fireworks hidden in backpacks. These youths, described as second-generation Italians, were brought to the police headquarters for identification. This followed the previous weekend's unrest in the same area, which resulted in six complaints filed against young people and fifteen home searches. National security efforts extended beyond street-level policing. Rome’s Cybersecurity Center intensified monitoring of open-source internet environments, focusing on social media platforms to track real-time changes in protest schedules. This intelligence sharing coordinated with the Digos, the criminal investigations department of the national police, and information offices of other agencies. In Rome, over one hundred young people were identified during checks ahead of planned marches, including forty-three processed directly at the prefecture. Organized groups such as Gioventù Nazionale and Asse Imperialista held separate, notified marches, raising concerns about potential collisions between different factions in crowded streets. The legal proceedings against Siher are ongoing. He was subjected to a search warrant upon his arrival at the Milan police station. Prosecutors are examining all posts and messages shared within the movement’s Telegram groups. While Siher is formally under investigation, his guilt has not been established by a court. Legal experts emphasize that the presumption of innocence applies until a verdict is reached. However, the public nature of the social media profile he administered provides clear evidence of his role in organizing the events. Critics of the government response pointed to Mayor Beppe Sala’s earlier advice to merchants to keep their businesses open despite the threat of further violence. Sala urged residents not to succumb to panic and promised to shop locally himself. Observers compared this approach to previous political missteps regarding public safety, arguing that practical precautions would have been more effective than verbal reassurances. The mayor’s stance contrasted with the strict security protocols implemented by national authorities, which included curfew-like restrictions on movement in central areas. The discovery of Siher’s identity shifted the narrative from viewing the riots as spontaneous youth rebellion to recognizing organized coordination. Former left-wing intellectuals who signed solidarity statements with radical groups in the 1970s are being cited in discussions about the continuity of certain political attitudes. The current situation involves a mix of traditional protest elements and modern digital mobilization strategies. Police continue to monitor online channels for signs of future gatherings, while judicial processes determine the extent of Siher’s liability. The focus remains on preventing further incidents through both physical presence and cyber surveillance capabilities.