Laburisti će povećati poreze na proračunu, dvije trećine Britanaca predviđaju u novoj anketi uoči "kritičnog testa" za kancelara
Nova anketa Ipsosa pokazuje da gotovo dvije trećine britanskih građana očekuje da će laburisti povećati poreze tijekom prvog proračuna kancelara Johna Healeya u vladi premijera Andyja Burnhama. Istraživanje otkriva široko rasprostranjenu zabrinutost za ekonomiju, s 58% ispitanika koji vjeruju da se zemlja kreće u "pogrešnom smjeru". Očekivanja javnosti uključuju potencijalno povećanje poreza na banke, kapitalne dobitke i kladionice, unatoč tome što su laburisti već podigli porezno opterećenje na poslijeratni vrhunac. U međuvremenu, zasebna anketa koju je naručio sindikat UNISON sugerira snažnu podršku javnosti za oporezivanje bogatih, velikih korporacija i banaka za financiranje javnih usluga.
Chancellor John Healey is preparing to increase taxes on the United Kingdom’s banking sector in his upcoming Budget, senior industry executives have indicated. The move aims to generate additional revenue to repair public finances strained by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and rising government borrowing costs. Healey, who is currently attending International Monetary Fund meetings in Bangkok, stated that he has decisions to make regarding the sector ahead of the Budget scheduled for October 28. While he praised banks as integral to the nation’s economic fabric, he acknowledged that the sector is likely to face higher levies. This potential tax hike follows a period of exceptional profitability for major lenders, driven by elevated interest rates, and responds to sustained pressure from trade unions and think tanks demanding that banks contribute a larger share of tax revenue. The primary mechanism under consideration involves reversing a reduction in the surcharge applied to bank profits. In 2023, the previous Conservative government, led by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, lowered this surcharge from 8 percent to 3 percent. Treasury officials are reportedly leaning toward restoring the surcharge closer to its previous level, as modifying an existing tax is administratively simpler than introducing a new windfall tax. Reversing the 2023 cut entirely would raise approximately £2 billion annually. However, concerns remain that imposing the full 8 percent surcharge on top of the standard 25 percent corporation tax could render UK banks less competitive compared to European and American rivals. Consequently, the final rate may settle somewhere between the current 3 percent and the historical 8 percent. For banks with profits exceeding £100 million, the combined tax burden currently stands at 28 percent; a return to the 8 percent surcharge would raise this combined rate to 33 percent. Market reaction to the anticipated changes began immediately upon the emergence of these reports. Shares in Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest fell by more than 2 percent on Friday, placing them among the worst performers on the UK stock market. In contrast, shares in Barclays dipped only slightly, while HSBC shares actually rose. Analysts noted that Barclays and HSBC maintain substantial international operations, which insulates them partially from a UK-specific tax increase. The banking industry trade body, UK Finance, issued a warning that further tax increases would weaken the sector’s competitiveness, discourage investment, and hinder job creation, arguing such measures run counter to the government’s goal of delivering growth across all regions. Support for the proposed tax hike is evident among labour representatives and certain policy groups. Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, highlighted that the four largest banks are generating roughly £1 billion in profit weekly, with bonuses reaching post-crisis highs. Nowak attributed these profits to high interest rates and the financial strain placed on households through mortgages. He argued that the Treasury has already lost £6 billion in revenue due to the previous administration’s tax cuts and that it is time for banks to pay their fair share. The TUC has previously advocated for an even more aggressive approach, proposing a 16 percent surcharge that could yield £24 billion in revenue over four years. Similarly, the Institute for Public Policy Research recommended a temporary surcharge on commercial banks’ windfall profits as part of a broader package to raise £16 billion to assist struggling households. The think tank noted that the Chancellor’s fiscal buffer has shrunk by up to £15 billion since the spring. Public sentiment appears divided but leans toward acceptance of higher taxes on the wealthy and corporate entities. An Ipsos poll conducted recently found that 65 percent of Britons expect Labour to announce tax rises in the coming Budget, compared to just 5 percent who anticipate tax cuts. The same survey revealed that 58 percent of respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, while only 18 percent feel things are improving. Conversely, a separate YouGov poll commissioned by the trade union UNISON showed stronger support for specific targets, with 69 percent of people backing increased taxes on the wealthiest individuals to fund public services. Additionally, three-quarters of respondents supported larger contributions from large corporations, and 61 percent favored tax rises specifically for banks. UNISON general secretary Andrea Egan described the potential move as encouraging, stating that massive investment to rebuild public services should be funded by taxing the wealthiest. The political context for the Budget is complex. Chancellor Healey operates under constraints imposed by Labour’s 2024 manifesto, which pledged not to raise income tax, value added tax, or national insurance. This limits his options for raising revenue, pushing attention toward sectors like banking, capital gains tax, and potentially family business inheritance rules. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the UK’s high debt levels, with net accumulated public sector debt reaching 93.8 percent of gross domestic product by the end of August. Rising borrowing costs, exacerbated by inflationary pressures linked to the Middle East conflict, have threatened to halve the £24 billion fiscal cushion established in the March spring forecast. A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment on specific proposals, stating that tax decisions are matters for the Chancellor to outline at fiscal events rather than responding to speculation. Industry experts offer mixed views on the feasibility of the hike. Sir Philip Augar, a former banker and author, suggested there is room for a moderate increase that could raise up to £3 billion annually, citing the booming conditions in the lending market. He criticized the notion that banks are simultaneously too big to fail and too big to tax, arguing that taxpayers should not bear the burden during downturns while banks enjoy special treatment during booms. On the other hand, Louise Hellem, chief economist at the Confederation of British Industries, warned that the Budget should avoid measures that undermine competitiveness. She emphasized that the business tax contribution is already at a record share of receipts and that further sector-specific taxation could weaken incentives to invest and deepen UK capital markets. As the October 28 deadline approaches, the focus remains on how Healey balances the need for revenue against the risks of stifling the financial sector’s growth.
Idi na primarne izvore (1)
Službeni izvori na kojima se izvještavanje temelji. Pročitaj ih izravno da zaobiđeš uokvirivanje.
Visoki bankarski rukovodioci su pokazali BBC-u da očekuju povećanje poreza u predstojećem priopćenju o budžetu od strane kancelarke Rachel Reeves. Izjava sugerira da vlada razmatra mjere koje bi mogle utjecati na dobit banke. To dolazi usred tekućih rasprava o fiskalnim politikama i potencijalnim promjenama strukture oporezivanja. Bankarske zabrinutosti odražavaju šire ekonomske razloge i moguće odgovore na propise o financijskom sektoru.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): Članak predstavlja neutralni izvještaj o očekivanjima banaka u pogledu mogućih poreznih promjena u proračunu. Ona ne pokazuje otvoreno pristrasan jezik, jednostrane izvorima, ili editorializing. U središtu je da se prenese očekivanje bankarskog sektora, a ne da se promoviše
Zašto činjenice (85): The article provides detailed information about potential tax changes targeting the banking sector, citing sources such as UK Finance and mentioning specific figures like the £15bn profit of the four major banks. It references the possible reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and mentions the im
Zašto objektivnost (80): The article presents the situation in a relatively neutral manner, discussing both the potential tax increases and the concerns raised by the banking sector. It avoids overtly biased language but does mention the drop in bank shares, which may subtly imply negative consequences.
Britanski kancelar, John Healey, navodno razmatra povećanje poreza na dobit banaka kao dio svojih planova za rješavanje financijskih izazova u zemlji. Ova potencijalna mjera dolazi uoči njegove prve objave proračuna zakazane za 28. listopada. Takva odluka bila bi dio širih fiskalnih strategija usmjerenih na stabilizaciju nacionalne ekonomije.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku se iznosi činjenični izvještaj o potencijalnim poreznim mjerama koje razmatra kancelarka, bez da se otvoreno favorizira neki određeni politički stav. To ne uključuje pristrasan jezik, jednostrane izvore ili izostavke koji bi ukazivali na jasnu ideološku sklonost.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports that Healey is considering increasing taxes on banks, referencing the TUC and polling data. It mentions the reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and the potential £2bn raise. However, it lacks some specifics found in other articles, such as the exact figures for ba
Zašto objektivnost (70): The article leans slightly toward supporting the idea of taxing banks, citing public opinion and union pressure. It includes direct quotes from Healey and the TUC leader, but the overall tone suggests a positive view of the proposed tax measures.
Nova anketa Ipsosa pokazuje da gotovo dvije trećine britanskih građana očekuje da će laburisti povećati poreze tijekom prvog proračuna kancelara Johna Healeya u vladi premijera Andyja Burnhama. Istraživanje otkriva široko rasprostranjenu zabrinutost za ekonomiju, s 58% ispitanika koji vjeruju da se zemlja kreće u "pogrešnom smjeru". Očekivanja javnosti uključuju potencijalno povećanje poreza na banke, kapitalne dobitke i kladionice, unatoč tome što su laburisti već podigli porezno opterećenje na poslijeratni vrhunac. U međuvremenu, zasebna anketa koju je naručio sindikat UNISON sugerira snažnu podršku javnosti za oporezivanje bogatih, velikih korporacija i banaka za financiranje javnih usluga.
Procjena pristranosti (Sredina): U članku su predstavljeni rezultati dvaju anketa s uravnoteženim perspektivama: jedna naglašava zabrinutost javnosti zbog potencijalnog povećanja poreza i ekonomske tjeskobe, a druga pokazuje podršku javnosti za oporezivanje bogatih i korporacija. Nema otvoreno pristrasnog jezika, jednostranog prikupljanja ili izostavljanja.
Zašto činjenice (80): The article accurately reports the Ipsos poll findings regarding public expectations of tax increases and the critical test facing Chancellor John Healey. It references the previous tax hikes by Rachel Reeves and mentions potential areas of focus for the Budget. However, it lacks specific details ab
Zašto objektivnost (65): The article uses emotive language such as 'pain to come' and 'stubbornly subdued by historic standards' which may influence reader perception. While it presents poll data objectively, the phrasing suggests a somewhat negative outlook on the government's economic policies.
Financial TimesNeovisan🔒ProgresivnoČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 85
Britanski kancelar je najavio planove za povećanje poreza na bankarski sektor u predstojećem proračunu, signalizirajući potencijalno novo financijsko opterećenje za industriju. Komisija je zaključila da je u skladu s člankom 107. stavkom 3. Ovaj potez dolazi usred tekućih rasprava o fiskalnim politikama i ulozi bankarskog sektora u gospodarstvu. Najava naglašava fokus vlade na stvaranju dodatnih prihoda kroz ciljane mjere oporezivanja.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da je predloženo povećanje poreza na banke proaktivna mjera vlade za rješavanje fiskalnih potreba, sugerišući progresivni stav o preraspodjeli bogatstva i povećanju državnih prihoda putem oporezivanja financijskih institucija. Naglasak na "pljačke" banaka podrazumijeva kritiku
Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument
Zašto objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral in tone, simply stating that Healey has signaled potential tax changes without expressing approval or criticism. It presents the facts without editorializing or taking a clear stance.
Daily MailNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 75
U članku se raspravlja o mogućim promjenama porezne politike koje utječu na obiteljska poduzeća u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu, posebno se usredotočavajući na mogućnost povećanja poreza povezanih s prijenosom poduzeća sljedećoj generaciji. Prema izvješću, kancelar John Healey mogao bi predložiti takve mjere u predstojećem proračunu kako bi se ostvarili dodatni prihodi. U članku se pozivaju čitatelji da učestvuju u anketi o tome da li smatraju da bi ovaj porez trebao biti povećan. Rezultati ankete će biti objavljeni u novinama Morning Mail sljedećeg dana.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da je predloženo povećanje poreza "radnički porezni napad", što podrazumijeva kritiku fiskalnog pristupa Laburističke stranke. Ova fraza sugerira negativnu perspektivu prema politici, koja se poklapa s lijevo orijentiranom kritikom potencijalnog povećanja oporezivanja obiteljskih poduzeća.
Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument
Zašto objektivnost (75): The article remains neutral in its presentation, inviting reader input without taking a stance on the proposed tax changes. Its interactive nature allows readers to form their own opinions, maintaining a balanced approach.
Daily MailNeovisanProgresivnoČinjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokumentObjektivnost 60
U članku se raspravlja o rastućim nagađanjima da bi britanski kancelar Jeremy Healey mogao uvesti novi porez na dobit banaka u predstojećem proračunu. Ova potencijalna mjera ima za cilj ostvariti dodatne prihode, ali je izazvala zabrinutost da bi mogla dovesti do povećanja troškova poslovanja i viših stopa hipotekarnih kredita. Prijedlogom se predlaže uvođenje dodatnog poreza na postojeći porez na dobit, što bi značajno utjecalo na bankarski sektor. Iako se taj potez smatra načinom da se riješi problem profitabilnosti financijskog sektora, kritičari upozoravaju na moguće negativne ekonomske posljedice.
Procjena pristranosti (Progresivno): U članku se navodi da je predloženi porez potencijalni "proračunski porezni napad" na banke, što sugerira kritički stav prema financijskom sektoru i ukazuje na to da je mjera politički motivirana, a ne ekonomski nužna. Naglasak na "strah da će povećati troškove poslovanja i stope hipoteka
Zašto činjenice: nije otkriven službeni izvor/dokument
Zašto objektivnost (60): The article takes a more critical stance, highlighting the potential negative effects of the tax increase on business costs and mortgage rates. It uses phrases like 'clobber' which suggest a negative view of the proposed tax measures.
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Isti događaj, grupiran prema političkom nagibu medija koji su o njemu izvještavali.
progresivno
sredina
konzervativno
★
Kako je izvijestila svaka strana
Podržite neovisne vijesti svjesne pristranosti i otključajte društveni puls, glasovanje zajednice i sve ostale značajke za podupiratelje.
United Kingdom
